A novel metabolic pathway for glucose production mediated by α-glucosidase-catalyzed conversion of 1,5-anhydrofructose

Abed RM, Ning Chai Y, N. Al-Rawahi A, Mohanta TK, Al-Rawahi A, Schachtman DP, Al-Harrasi A. Rhizosphere Microbiome of Arid Land Medicinal Plants and Extra Cellular Enzymes Contribute to Their Abundance

Revealing the unexplored rhizosphere microbiome of plants in arid environments can help in understanding their interactions between microbial communities and plants during harsh growth conditions. Here, we report the first investigation of rhizospheric fungal and bacterial communities of Adenium obesum, Aloe dhufarensis and Cleome austroarabica using next-generation sequencing approaches. A. obesum and A. dhufarensis grows in dry tropical and C. austroarabica in arid conditions of Arabian Peninsula. The results indicated the presence of 121 fungal and 3662 bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) whilst microbial diversity was significantly high in the rhizosphere of A. obesum and A. dhufarensis and low in C. austroarabica. Among fungal phyla, Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were abundantly associated within rhizospheres of all three plants. However, Mucoromycota was only present in the rhizospheres of A. obesum and A. dhufarensis, suggesting a variation in fungal niche on the basis of host and soil types. In case of bacterial communities, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, Acidobacteria, and Verrucomicrobia were predominant microbial phyla. These results demonstrated varying abundances of microbial structure across different hosts and locations in arid environments. Rhizosphere’s extracellular enzymes analysis revealed varying quantities, where, glucosidase, cellulase, esterase, and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase were significantly higher in the rhizosphere of A. dhufarensis, while phosphatase and indole-acetic acid were highest in the rhizosphere of A. obesum. In conclusion, current findings usher for the first time the core microbial communities in the rhizospheric regions of three arid plants that vary greatly with location, host and soil conditions, and suggest the presence of extracellular enzymes could help in maintaining plant growth during the harsh environmental conditions.

α-Glucosidases and α-1,4-glucan lyases: structures, functions, and physiological actions

α-Glucosidases (AGases) and α-1,4-glucan lyases (GLases) catalyze the degradation of α-glucosidic linkages at the non-reducing ends of substrates to release α-glucose and anhydrofructose, respectively. The AGases belong to glycoside hydrolase (GH) families 13 and 31, and the GLases belong to GH31 and share the same structural fold with GH31 AGases. GH13 and GH31 AGases show diverse functions upon the hydrolysis of substrates, having linkage specificities and size preferences, as well as upon transglucosylation, forming specific α-glucosidic linkages. The crystal structures of both enzymes were determined using free and ligand-bound forms, which enabled us to understand the important structural elements responsible for the diverse functions. A series of mutational approaches revealed features of the structural elements. In particular, amino-acid residues in plus subsites are of significance, because they regulate transglucosylation, which is used in the production of industrially valuable oligosaccharides. The recently solved three-dimensional structure of GLase from red seaweed revealed the amino-acid residues essential for lyase activity and the strict recognition of the α-(1 → 4)-glucosidic substrate linkage. The former was introduced to the GH31 AGase, and the resultant mutant displayed GLase activity. GH13 and GH31 AGases hydrate anhydrofructose to produce glucose, suggesting that AGases are involved in the catabolic pathway used to salvage unutilized anhydrofructose.

Production of 1,5-anhydro-d-fructose by an α-glucosidase belonging to glycoside hydrolase family 31

α-1,4-Glucan lyases [glycoside hydrolase family (GH) 31] catalyze an elimination reaction to form 1,5-anhydro-d-fructose (AF), while GH31 α-glucosidases normally catalyze a hydrolytic reaction. We determined that a small amount of AF was produced by GH31 Aspergillus niger α-glucosidase from maltooligosaccharides by elimination reaction, likely via an oxocarbenium ion intermediate.

Unusual enzymatic glycoside cleavage mechanisms

Over the sixty years since Koshland initially formulated the classical mechanisms for retaining and inverting glycosidases, researchers have assembled a large body of supporting evidence and have documented variations of these mechanisms. Recently, however, researchers have uncovered a number of completely distinct mechanisms for enzymatic cleavage of glycosides involving elimination and/or hydration steps. In family GH4 and GH109 glycosidases, the reaction proceeds via transient NAD(+)-mediated oxidation at C3, thereby acidifying the proton at C2 and allowing for elimination across the C1-C2 bond. Subsequent Michael-type addition of water followed by reduction at C3 generates the hydrolyzed product. Enzymes employing this mechanism can hydrolyze thioglycosides as well as both anomers of activated substrates. Sialidases employ a conventional retaining mechanism in which a tyrosine functions as the nucleophile, but in some cases researchers have observed off-path elimination end products. These reactions occur via the normal covalent intermediate, but instead of an attack by water on the anomeric center, the catalytic acid/base residue abstracts an adjacent proton. These enzymes can also catalyze hydration of the enol ether via the reverse pathway. Reactions of α-(1,4)-glucan lyases also proceed through a covalent intermediate with subsequent abstraction of an adjacent proton to give elimination. However, in this case, the departing carboxylate "nucleophile" serves as the base in a concerted but asynchronous syn-elimination process. These enzymes perform only elimination reactions. Polysaccharide lyases, which act on uronic acid-containing substrates, also catalyze only elimination reactions. Substrate binding neutralizes the charge on the carboxylate, which allows for abstraction of the proton on C5 and leads to an elimination reaction via an E1cb mechanism. These enzymes can also cleave thioglycosides, albeit slowly. The unsaturated product of polysaccharide lyases can then serve as a substrate for a hydration reaction carried out by unsaturated glucuronyl hydrolases. This hydration is initiated by protonation at C4 and proceeds in a Markovnikov fashion rather than undergoing a Michael-type addition, giving a hemiketal at C5. This hemiketal then undergoes a rearrangement that results in cleavage of the anomeric bond. These enzymes can also hydrolyze thioglycosides efficiently and slowly turn over substrates with inverted anomeric configuration. The mechanisms discussed in this Account proceed through transition states that involve either positive or negative charges, unlike the exclusively cationic transition states of the classical Koshland retaining and inverting glycosidases. In addition, the distribution of this charge throughout the substrate can vary substantially. The nature of these mechanisms and their transition states means that any inhibitors or inactivators of these unusual enzymes probably differ from those presently used for Koshland retaining or inverting glycosidases.