Activation of D-tyrosine by Bacillus stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase: 2. Cooperative binding of ATP is limited to the initial turnover of the enzyme

The Dual Role of the 2'-OH Group of A76 tRNATyr in the Prevention of d-tyrosine Mistranslation

Aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetases are crucial enzymes for initiation step of translation. Possessing editing activity, they protect living cells from misincorporation of non-cognate and non-proteinogenic amino acids into proteins. Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS) does not have such editing properties, but it shares weak stereospecificity in recognition of d-/l-tyrosine (Tyr). Nevertheless, an additional enzyme, d-aminoacyl-tRNA-deacylase (DTD), exists to overcome these deficiencies. The precise catalytic role of hydroxyl groups of the tRNA^Tyr A76 in the catalysis by TyrRS and DTD remained unknown. To address this issue, [³²P]-labeled tRNA^Tyr substrates have been tested in aminoacylation and deacylation assays. TyrRS demonstrates similar activity in charging the 2' and 3'-OH groups of A76 with l-Tyr. This synthetase can effectively use both OH groups as primary sites for aminoacylation with l-Tyr, but demonstrates severe preference toward 2'-OH, in charging with d-Tyr. In both cases, the catalysis is not substrate-assisted: neither the 2'-OH nor the 3'-OH group assists catalysis. In contrast, DTD catalyzes deacylation of d-Tyr-tRNA^Tyr specifically from the 3'-OH group, while the 2'-OH assists in this hydrolysis.

Probing the stereospecificity of tyrosyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase with molecular dynamics

The stereospecificity of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases helps exclude d-amino acids from protein synthesis and could perhaps be engineered to allow controlled d-amino acylation of tRNA. We use molecular dynamics simulations to probe the stereospecificity of the class I tyrosyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases (TyrRS, GlnRS), including wildtype enzymes and three point mutants suggested by three different protein design methods. l/d binding free energy differences are obtained by alchemically and reversibly transforming the ligand from L to D in simulations of the protein-ligand complex. The D81Q mutation in Escherichia coli TyrRS is homologous to the D81R mutant shown earlier to have inverted stereospecificity. D81Q is predicted to lead to a rotated ligand backbone and an increased, not a decreased l-Tyr preference. The E36Q mutation in Methanococcus jannaschii TyrRS has a predicted l/d binding free energy difference ΔΔG of just 0.5±0.9kcal/mol, compared to 3.1±0.8kcal/mol for the wildtype enzyme (favoring l-Tyr). The ligand ammonium position is preserved in the d-Tyr complex, while the carboxylate is shifted. Wildtype GlnRS has a similar preference for l-glutaminyl adenylate; the R260Q mutant has an increased preference, even though Arg260 makes a large contribution to the wildtype ΔΔG value.

Synthetic and editing mechanisms of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS) ensure the faithful transmission of genetic information in all living cells. The 24 known aaRS families are divided into 2 structurally distinct classes (class I and class II), each featuring a catalytic domain with a common fold that binds ATP, amino acid, and the 3'-terminus of tRNA. In a common two-step reaction, each aaRS first uses the energy stored in ATP to synthesize an activated aminoacyl adenylate intermediate. In the second step, either the 2'- or 3'-hydroxyl oxygen atom of the 3'-A76 tRNA nucleotide functions as a nucleophile in synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA. Ten of the 24 aaRS families are unable to distinguish cognate from noncognate amino acids in the synthetic reactions alone. These enzymes possess additional editing activities for hydrolysis of misactivated amino acids and misacylated tRNAs, with clearance of the latter species accomplished in spatially separate post-transfer editing domains. A distinct class of trans-acting proteins that are homologous to class II editing domains also perform hydrolytic editing of some misacylated tRNAs. Here we review essential themes in catalysis with a view toward integrating the kinetic, stereochemical, and structural mechanisms of the enzymes. Although the aaRS have now been the subject of investigation for many decades, it will be seen that a significant number of questions regarding fundamental catalytic functioning still remain unresolved.

Heat maps for intramolecular communication in an RNP enzyme encoding glutamine

Allosteric signaling within large ribonucleoproteins modulates both catalytic function and biological specificity, but the spatial extent and quantitative magnitudes of long-distance free-energy couplings have yet to be well characterized. Here, we employ pre-steady-state kinetics to generate a comprehensive mapping of intramolecular communication in the glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase:tRNA(Gln) complex. Alanine substitution at 29 positions across the protein-RNA interface reveals distinct coupling amplitudes for glutamine binding and aminoacyl-tRNA formation on the enzyme, respectively, implying the existence of multiple signaling pathways. Structural models suggest that long-range signal propagation from the tRNA anticodon is dynamically driven, whereas shorter pathways are mediated by induced-fit rearrangements. Seven protein contacts with the distal tRNA vertical arm each weaken glutamine binding affinity across distances up to 40 Å, demonstrating that negative allosteric coupling plays a key role in enforcing the selective RNA-amino acid pairing at the heart of the genetic code.

Origin and evolution of the ribosome

The modern ribosome was largely formed at the time of the last common ancestor, LUCA. Hence its earliest origins likely lie in the RNA world. Central to its development were RNAs that spawned the modern tRNAs and a symmetrical region deep within the large ribosomal RNA, (rRNA), where the peptidyl transferase reaction occurs. To understand pre-LUCA developments, it is argued that events that are coupled in time are especially useful if one can infer a likely order in which they occurred. Using such timing events, the relative age of various proteins and individual regions within the large rRNA are inferred. An examination of the properties of modern ribosomes strongly suggests that the initial peptides made by the primitive ribosomes were likely enriched for l-amino acids, but did not completely exclude d-amino acids. This has implications for the nature of peptides made by the first ribosomes. From the perspective of ribosome origins, the immediate question regarding coding is when did it arise rather than how did the assignments evolve. The modern ribosome is very dynamic with tRNAs moving in and out and the mRNA moving relative to the ribosome. These movements may have become possible as a result of the addition of a template to hold the tRNAs. That template would subsequently become the mRNA, thereby allowing the evolution of the code and making an RNA genome useful. Finally, a highly speculative timeline of major events in ribosome history is presented and possible future directions discussed.

Widespread distribution of cell defense against D-aminoacyl-tRNAs

Several l-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases can transfer a d-amino acid onto their cognate tRNA(s). This harmful reaction is counteracted by the enzyme d-aminoacyl-tRNA deacylase. Two distinct deacylases were already identified in bacteria (DTD1) and in archaea (DTD2), respectively. Evidence was given that DTD1 homologs also exist in nearly all eukaryotes, whereas DTD2 homologs occur in plants. On the other hand, several bacteria, including most cyanobacteria, lack genes encoding a DTD1 homolog. Here we show that Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 produces a third type of deacylase (DTD3). Inactivation of the corresponding gene (dtd3) renders the growth of Synechocystis sp. hypersensitive to the presence of d-tyrosine. Based on the available genomes, DTD3-like proteins are predicted to occur in all cyanobacteria. Moreover, one or several dtd3-like genes can be recognized in all cellular types, arguing in favor of the nearubiquity of an enzymatic function involved in the defense of translational systems against invasion by d-amino acids.

Activation of D-tyrosine by Bacillus stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase: 1. Pre-steady-state kinetic analysis reveals the mechanistic basis for the recognition of D-tyrosine

Tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (TyrRS) is able to catalyze the transfer of both l- and d-tyrosine to the 3' end of tRNA(Tyr). Activation of either stereoisomer by ATP results in formation of an enzyme-bound tyrosyl-adenylate intermediate and is accompanied by a blue shift in the intrinsic fluorescence of the protein. Single turnover kinetics for the aminoacylation of tRNA(Tyr) by D-tyrosine were monitored using stopped-flow fluorescence spectroscopy. Bacillus stearothermophilus tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase binds d-tyrosine with an 8.5-fold lower affinity than that of l-tyrosine (K (D-Tyr)(d) = 102 microm) and exhibits a 3-fold decrease in the forward rate constant for the activation reaction (k (D-Tyr)(3) = 13 s(-1)). Furthermore, as is the case for l-tyrosine, tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase exhibits "half-of-the-sites" reactivity with respect to the binding and activation of D-tyrosine. Surprisingly, pyrophosphate binds to the TyrRS.d-Tyr-AMP intermediate with a 14-fold higher affinity than it binds to the TyrRS.l-Tyr-AMP intermediate (K (PPi)(d) = 0.043 for TyrRS.d-Tyr-AMP.PP(i)). tRNA(Tyr) binds with a slightly (2.3-fold) lower affinity to the TyrRS.d-Tyr-AMP intermediate than it does to the TyrRS.l-Tyr-AMP intermediate. The observation that the K (Tyr)(d) and k(3) values are similar for l- and d-tyrosine suggests that their side chains bind to tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase in similar orientations and that at least one of the carboxylate oxygen atoms in d-tyrosine is properly positioned for attack on the alpha-phosphate of ATP.