Pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin during chronomodulated infusion in metastatic gastrointestinal cancer patients: a pilot investigation with preliminary results

Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity in colorectal cancer patients: mechanisms, pharmacokinetics and strategies

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is a standard treatment approach for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (OIPN) is a severe dose-limiting clinical problem that might lead to treatment interruption. This neuropathy may be reversible after treatment discontinuation. Its complicated mechanisms are related to DNA damage, dysfunction of voltage-gated ion channels, neuroinflammation, transporters, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction, etc. Several strategies have been proposed to diminish OIPN without compromising the efficacy of adjuvant therapy, namely, combination with chemoprotectants (such as glutathione, Ca/Mg, ibudilast, duloxetine, etc.), chronomodulated infusion, dose reduction, reintroduction of oxaliplatin and topical administration [hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC), and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC)]. This article provides recent updates related to the potential mechanisms, therapeutic strategies in treatment of OIPN, and pharmacokinetics of several methods of oxaliplatin administration in clinical trials.

Morphologic features and glial activation in rat oxaliplatin-dependent neuropathic pain

Neurotoxicity is the limiting side effect of the anticancer agent oxaliplatin. A tangled panel of symptoms, sensory loss, paresthesia, dysesthesia, and pain may be disabling for patients and adversely affect their quality of life. To elucidate the morphologic and molecular alterations that occur in the nervous system during neuropathy, rats were daily injected with 2.4 mg kg(-1) oxaliplatin intraperitoneally. A progressive decrease in the pain threshold and hypersensitivity to noxious and nonnoxious stimuli were evidenced during the treatment (7, 14, 21 days). On day 21, morphometric alterations were detectable exclusively in the dorsal root ganglia, whereas the activating transcription factor 3 and neurofilament (heavy-chain) expression changed dramatically in both the nerves and ganglia. Inflammatory features were not highlighted. Interestingly, satellite cells exhibited signs of activation. Glial modulation was characterized in the spinal cord and brain areas involved in pain signaling. On the 21st day, spinal astrocytes increased numerically whereas the microglial population was unaltered. The number of glial cells in the brain differed according to the zone and treatment time points. In particular, on day 21, a significant astrocyte increase was measured in the anterior cingulate cortex, somatosensory area 1, neostriatum, ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, and nucleus raphe magnus.

PERSPECTIVES

These data highlight the relevance of glial cells in chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity as part of the investigation of the role that specific brain areas play in neuropathy.

Oxaliplatin-induced oxidative stress in nervous system-derived cellular models: could it correlate with in vivo neuropathy?

Oxaliplatin is a platinum-organic drug with antineoplastic properties used for colorectal cancer. With respect to the other platinum derivates oxaliplatin induces only a mild hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity. Its limiting side effect is its neurotoxicity, which results in a sensory neuropathy. Repeated oxaliplatin treatment in the rat led to a neuropathic pain characterized by a significant oxidative damage throughout the nervous system. The natural antioxidants silibinin and α-tocopherol reduce redox alteration and prevent pain. Starting from the "oxidative hypothesis" as a molecular basis of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity, we decided to explore deep inside the mechanisms of oxaliplatin neurotoxicity and search for a cellular system useful for screening antioxidant compounds that can reduce oxaliplatin neurotoxicity. Focusing on various constituents of the central nervous system, we used the neuronal-derived cell line SH-SY5Y and primary cultures of rat cortical astrocytes. Oxaliplatin significantly increased superoxide anion production and induced lipid peroxidation (malonyldialdehyde levels) and protein (carbonylated proteins) and DNA oxidation (8-OH-dG levels). Silibinin and α-tocopherol (10µM) were able to reduce the oxidative damage in both cell types. These antioxidants fully protected astrocytes from the caspase 3 apoptotic signaling activation induced by oxaliplatin. The damage prevention effects of silibinin and α-tocopherol on nervous system-derived cells did not interfere with the oxaliplatin antineoplastic in vitro mechanism as evaluated on a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line (HT29). Moreover, neither silibinin nor α-tocopherol modified the oxaliplatin-induced apoptosis in HT29 cells, suggesting a different antiapoptotic profile in normal vs tumoral cells for these antioxidant compounds. In conclusion, because data obtained in in vitro cellular models parallel the in vivo study we propose cell models to investigate oxaliplatin neurotoxicity and to screen possible therapeutic adjuvant agents.

New insights into the biotransformation and pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin

Oxaliplatin is used primarily in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. In this minireview, we discuss potentially important biotransformation pathways in light of its short elimination half-life in vivo. We also highlight new information achieved using a selective analytical technique to measure intact oxaliplatin in pharmacokinetic studies (comprising intravenous, intraperitoneal, and intrahepatic administration) and compare to results obtained by measurements of total platinum. The use of selective analytical techniques is strongly recommended giving kinetic parameters of the parent compound and not only to a complex mixture of platinum containing endogenous compounds.

How may anticancer chemotherapy with fluorouracil be individualised?

Fluorouracil is used clinically against various solid tumours. Both fluorouracil toxicity and pharmacokinetics vary highly within and between individuals. The reasons why doses are not individualised routinely are difficulties in defining, predicting and achieving an optimal fluorouracil exposure or dose because of a narrow therapeutic index, nonlinear pharmacokinetics, variabilities in administration rates and metabolism, and in targets like thymidylate synthase. To individualise fluorouracil administration before the first dose, assessment of the individual dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity may be useful, because this genetically highly polymorphic enzyme controls approximately 80% of fluorouracil elimination. A complete or partial loss of DPD activity in 0.1 and 3-5% of Caucasians, respectively, leads to increased fluorouracil exposure and toxicity. Several methods to assess DPD activity in patients have been proposed (genotyping, various phenotyping methods), but each of them has limitations, as has the fluorouracil test dose approach. To adapt exposure towards fluorouracil a priori, a combination of genotyping and phenotyping may yield better prediction of toxicity than one method alone. A prerequisite for dose adaptation is the definition of fluorouracil exposure ranges with sufficient therapeutic activity, but without serious toxicity. While an increased risk of leukopenia, diarrhoea, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome during continuous 5-day infusions was related to fluorouracil exposures above an area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) threshold of 25-30 mg.h/L, tumour response was higher when an AUC of approximately 30 mg.h/L was achieved, illustrating the extremely narrow therapeutic window of fluorouracil. Pharmacokinetic target values are less clear for other regimens, including chronomodulated regimens, which yielded a superior clinically efficacy and tolerability in several trials. However, the monitoring of fluorouracil plasma concentrations seems principally useful for individual a posteriori dose adjustment. Whether an adaptation of the fluorouracil starting dose to the results of two DPD activity tests before fluorouracil administration a priori, and the adaptation of doses to fluorouracil exposure a posteriori is a reasonable approach to better prevent toxicity and increase efficacy, remains to be evaluated in randomised clinical studies comparing these strategies to routine clinical safety monitoring.

Determination of oxaliplatin in human plasma and plasma ultrafiltrate by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrometry

A method for sensitive determination of the anti-cancer agent oxaliplatin in human plasma and human plasma ultrafiltrate (pUF) is presented. The method is based on the quantification of platinum by graphite-furnace atomic-absorption spectrometry, with Zeeman correction and an atomisation temperature of 2,700 degrees C. Sample pretreatment involves dilution of the samples with a solution containing 0.15 mol L(-1) NaCl and 0.20 mol L(-1) HCl in water. Validation was performed in accordance with the most recent FDA guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. All results were within requirements. The validated ranges of quantification were 0.10-400 micromol L(-1) for human pUF and 0.50-400 micromol L(-1) for plasma. The assay is now successfully used to support pharmacokinetic studies of cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin.