Peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking advanced ovarian cancer in a patient treated with methotrexate for chronic rheumatoid arthritis

Risk of tuberculosis reactivation associated with traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and non-anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics in patients with rheumatic disorders and suggestion for clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

Two classes of biologics, anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and non-anti-TNF targeted, are currently available for the treatment of rheumatic diseases.

AREAS COVERED

Discussion on the need for LTBI diagnosis in rheumatic patients treated csDMARDs and non-anti-TNFs through a review of the literature. The literature, updated to 15 April 2019, on tuberculosis (TB) reactivation risk in patients exposed to conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and non-anti-TNF biologics was reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

An increased risk of TB reactivation in patients receiving csDMARDs (except sulphasalazine) resulted, while a review of clinical trials, and Periodic Safety Update Reports from pharmaceutical Companies evidenced a very low or absent risk for non-anti-TNF biologics. Hence, a contradiction emerges considering that latent TB infection (LTBI) screening is recommended for non-anti-TNF candidates but not for csDMARDs. Concerning the low TB incidence countries, several actions could be undertaken, including to screen all patients independently on the treatment, to omit the procedure in non-anti-TNF candidates, or to perform the LTBI investigations only in high-risk patients. According to WHO guidelines, LTBI screening in low TB risk countries seems unnecessary, except in high TB risk subjects.

Tuberculosis and malignancy

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) and malignancy represent global threats claiming millions of lives and inflicting formidable suffering worldwide. Surprisingly, the pathophysiological and practical implications of their co-existence have received little attention.

METHODS

Therefore, we sought to review the available literature on the field and identify data regarding the association between TB and malignancy in order to highlight the neglected aspects of this association and probably derive clinically useful information. We searched PubMed up to June 2008 for case reports, case series, non-comparative and comparative studies that were written in English and reported data on the occurrence of both TB infection and a neoplastic disorder in the same patient(s). The development of mycobacterial infections in patients with immunocompromized conditions is well known and was considered outside the scope of this review.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The synthesis of the available evidence enabled us to establish three different types of association between malignancy and TB: (i) the development of cancer on the background of a previous tuberculous infection; (ii) the concurrent existence of TB and malignancy in the same patient(s) or clinical specimen(s); and (iii) the diagnostic challenges arising from the multi-faceted presentations of these two disorders.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that clinicians need to be aware of the protean manifestations of TB and cancer and maintain a high index of suspicion for simultaneous and/or misleading presentations. In addition, further research is required to determine if a tuberculous infection, being similar to other chronic infections and inflammatory conditions, may facilitate carcinogenesis.