1
|
Stathi A, Withall J, Greaves CJ, Thompson JL, Taylor G, Medina-Lara A, Green C, Snowsill T, Johansen-Berg H, Bilzon J, Gray S, Cross R, Western MJ, Koning JLD, Ladlow P, Bollen JC, Moorlock SJ, Guralnik JM, Rejeski WJ, Hillsdon M, Fox KR. A group-based exercise and behavioural maintenance intervention for adults over 65 years with mobility limitations: the REACT RCT. PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH 2022. [DOI: 10.3310/mqbw6832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Mobility limitation in older age reduces quality of life, generates substantial health- and social-care costs, and increases mortality.
Objective
The REtirement in ACTion (REACT) trial aimed to establish whether or not a community-based active ageing intervention could prevent decline in physical functioning in older adults already at increased risk of mobility limitation.
Design
A multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled trial with parallel process and health economic evaluations.
Setting
Urban and semi-rural locations across three sites in England.
Participants
Physically frail or pre-frail older adults (aged ≥ 65 years; Short Physical Performance Battery score of 4–9). Recruitment was primarily via 35 primary care practices.
Interventions
Participants were randomly assigned to receive brief advice (three healthy ageing education sessions) or a 12-month, group-based, multimodal exercise and behavioural maintenance programme delivered in fitness and community centres. Randomisation was stratified by site and used a minimisation algorithm to balance age, sex and Short Physical Performance Battery score. Data collection and analyses were blinded.
Main outcome measures
The primary outcome was change in lower limb physical function (Short Physical Performance Battery score) at 24 months, analysed using an intention-to-treat analysis. The economic evaluation adopted the NHS and Personal Social Services perspective.
Results
Between June 2016 and October 2017, 777 participants (mean age 77.6 years, standard deviation 6.8 years; 66% female; mean Short Physical Performance Battery score 7.37, standard deviation 1.56) were randomised to the intervention arm (n = 410) or the control arm (n = 367). Data collection was completed in October 2019. Primary outcome data at 24 months were provided by 628 (80.8%) participants. At the 24-month follow-up, the Short Physical Performance Battery score was significantly greater in the intervention arm (mean 8.08, standard deviation 2.87) than in the control arm (mean 7.59, standard deviation 2.61), with an adjusted mean difference of 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.92). The difference in lower limb function between intervention and control participants was clinically meaningful at both 12 and 24 months. Self-reported physical activity significantly increased in the intervention arm compared with the control arm, but this change was not observed in device-based physical activity data collected during the trial. One adverse event was related to the intervention. Attrition rates were low (19% at 24 months) and adherence was high. Engagement with the REACT intervention was associated with positive changes in exercise competence, relatedness and enjoyment and perceived physical, social and mental well-being benefits. The intervention plus usual care was cost-effective compared with care alone over the 2 years of REACT; the price year was 2019. In the base-case scenario, the intervention saved £103 per participant, with a quality-adjusted life-year gain of 0.04 (95% confidence interval 0.006 to 0.074) within the 2-year trial window. Lifetime horizon modelling estimated that further cost savings and quality-adjusted life-year gains were accrued up to 15 years post randomisation.
Conclusion
A relatively low-resource, 1-year multimodal exercise and behavioural maintenance intervention can help older adults to retain physical functioning over a 24-month period. The results indicate that the well-established trajectory of declining physical functioning in older age is modifiable.
Limitations
Participants were not blinded to study arm allocation. However, the primary outcome was independently assessed by blinded data collectors. The secondary outcome analyses were exploratory, with no adjustment for multiple testing, and should be interpreted accordingly.
Future work
Following refinements guided by the process evaluation findings, the REACT intervention is suitable for large-scale implementation. Further research will optimise implementation of REACT at scale.
Trial registration
This trial is registered as ISRCTN45627165.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 10, No. 14. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afroditi Stathi
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Colin J Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Janice L Thompson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Gordon Taylor
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Colin Green
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Tristan Snowsill
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Heidi Johansen-Berg
- Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - James Bilzon
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Selena Gray
- Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Rosina Cross
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Ladlow
- Academic Department of Military Rehabilitation, Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre, Loughborough, UK
| | - Jessica C Bollen
- University of Exeter Medical School, St Luke’s Campus, Exeter, UK
| | - Sarah J Moorlock
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jack M Guralnik
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - W Jack Rejeski
- Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Worrell Professional Centre, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Melvyn Hillsdon
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Kenneth R Fox
- Centre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Houghton C, Dowling M, Meskell P, Hunter A, Gardner H, Conway A, Treweek S, Sutcliffe K, Noyes J, Devane D, Nicholas JR, Biesty LM. Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 10:MR000045. [PMID: 33026107 PMCID: PMC8078544 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.mr000045.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised trials (also referred to as 'randomised controlled trials' or 'trials') are the optimal way to minimise bias in evaluating the effects of competing treatments, therapies and innovations in health care. It is important to achieve the required sample size for a trial, otherwise trialists may not be able to draw conclusive results leading to research waste and raising ethical questions about trial participation. The reasons why potential participants may accept or decline participation are multifaceted. Yet, the evidence of effectiveness of interventions to improve recruitment to trials is not substantial and fails to recognise these individual decision-making processes. It is important to synthesise the experiences and perceptions of those invited to participate in randomised trials to better inform recruitment strategies. OBJECTIVES To explore potential trial participants' views and experiences of the recruitment process for participation. The specific objectives are to describe potential participants' perceptions and experiences of accepting or declining to participate in trials, to explore barriers and facilitators to trial participation, and to explore to what extent barriers and facilitators identified are addressed by strategies to improve recruitment evaluated in previous reviews of the effects of interventions including a Cochrane Methodology Review. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Epistemonikos, LILACS, PsycINFO, ORRCA, and grey literature sources. We ran the most recent set of searches for which the results were incorporated into the review in July 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative and mixed-methods studies (with an identifiable qualitative component) that explored potential trial participants' experiences and perceptions of being invited to participate in a trial. We excluded studies that focused only on recruiters' perspectives, and trials solely involving children under 18 years, or adults who were assessed as having impaired mental capacity. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Five review authors independently assessed the titles, abstracts and full texts identified by the search. We used the CART (completeness, accuracy, relevance, timeliness) criteria to exclude studies that had limited focus on the phenomenon of interest. We used QSR NVivo to extract and manage the data. We assessed methodological limitations using the Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) tool. We used thematic synthesis to analyse and synthesise the evidence. This provided analytical themes and a conceptual model. We used the GRADE-CERQual (Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research) approach to assess our confidence in each finding. Our findings were integrated with two previous intervention effectiveness reviews by juxtaposing the quantitative and qualitative findings in a matrix. MAIN RESULTS We included 29 studies (published in 30 papers) in our synthesis. Twenty-two key findings were produced under three broad themes (with six subthemes) to capture the experience of being invited to participate in a trial and making the decision whether to participate. Most of these findings had moderate to high confidence. We identified factors from the trial itself that influenced participation. These included how trial information was communicated, and elements of the trial such as the time commitment that might be considered burdensome. The second theme related to personal factors such as how other people can influence the individual's decision; and how a personal understanding of potential harms and benefits could impact on the decision. Finally, the potential benefits of participation were found to be key to the decision to participate, namely personal benefits such as access to new treatments, but also the chance to make a difference and help others. The conceptual model we developed presents the decision-making process as a gauge and the factors that influence whether the person will, or will not, take part. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This qualitative evidence synthesis has provided comprehensive insight into the complexity of factors that influence a person's decision whether to participate in a trial. We developed key questions that trialists can ask when developing their recruitment strategy. In addition, our conceptual model emphasises the need for participant-centred approaches to recruitment. We demonstrated moderate to high level confidence in our findings, which in some way can be attributed to the large volume of highly relevant studies in this field. We recommend that these insights be used to direct or influence or underpin future recruitment strategies that are developed in a participant-driven way that ultimately improves trial conduct and reduces research waste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Houghton
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Maura Dowling
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Pauline Meskell
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Andrew Hunter
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Heidi Gardner
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Aislinn Conway
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Katy Sutcliffe
- Department of Social Science, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, London, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- Centre for Health-Related Research, Fron Heulog, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Declan Devane
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Jane R Nicholas
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Linda M Biesty
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Foyster JM, Rebar A, Guy JH, Stanton R. "If they can do it, I can do it": experiences of older women who engage in powerlifting training. J Women Aging 2020; 34:54-64. [PMID: 32567525 DOI: 10.1080/08952841.2020.1782159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Older adults' participation in resistance training is low. Recent research suggests social aspects are important determinants of exercise engagement. In this study, 13 older women (50 years and older) were interviewed to examine their experiences of powerlifting training. Data were thematically analyzed revealing two main themes: Challenging Beliefs and Positive Social Influences. Peer advocates were essential for uptake, with social interactions in group resistance training, and having a skilled trainer, identified as important adherence factors. Strategies to improve resistance training uptake in older women could leverage off the experience of others and powerlifting training culture and practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jillian M Foyster
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Australia
| | - Amanda Rebar
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Australia
| | - Joshua H Guy
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Australia
| | - Robert Stanton
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, CQUniversity, Rockhampton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burton E, Lewin G, Pettigrew S, Hill AM, Bainbridge L, Farrier K, Langdon T, Airey P, Hill KD. Identifying motivators and barriers to older community-dwelling people participating in resistance training: A cross-sectional study. J Sports Sci 2016; 35:1523-1532. [DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1223334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
5
|
Abstract
RÉSUMÉCet article examine les différences potentielles dans la pratique du yoga entre les adultes d’âge moyen et les adultes plus âgés. Un modèle Croyance à Santé/Parcours de Vie encadre cette recherche, et une stratégie analytique de méthodes mixtes est utilisée pour examiner les voies de parcours de vie dans le yoga, et la motivation à la pratique, ainsi que les obstacles perçus et les bénéfices pour la santé. Pour les analyses quantitatives, un échantillon de convenance de 452 participants a été recueilli au moyen d’un questionnaire en ligne. Pour les analyses qualitatives, des entrevues en face-à-face ont été menées auprès d’un sous-ensemble de 20 participants. Des différences uniques se sont manifestées entre les groupes d’âge (à la fois à l’âge actuel et à l’âge du démarrage de yoga), ainsi que par sexe pour certaines voies, les raisons / motivations, et les obstacles à s’engager dans le yoga, ainsi que pour les bénéfices de santé perçues. En outre, les résultats soulignent l’importance des points de repère d’information et des liens sociaux qui affectent la façon dont les individus adoptent et éprouvent le yoga. On discute les implications en ce qui concern les programmes à la promotion de la santé qui ciblent les adultes âgés.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ashe MC, Winters M, Hoppmann CA, Dawes MG, Gardiner PA, Giangregorio LM, Madden KM, McAllister MM, Wong G, Puyat JH, Singer J, Sims-Gould J, McKay HA. "Not just another walking program": Everyday Activity Supports You (EASY) model-a randomized pilot study for a parallel randomized controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2015; 1:4. [PMID: 27175291 PMCID: PMC4862805 DOI: 10.1186/2055-5784-1-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maintaining physical activity is an important goal with positive health benefits, yet many people spend most of their day sitting. Our Everyday Activity Supports You (EASY) model aims to encourage movement through daily activities and utilitarian walking. The primary objective of this phase was to test study feasibility (recruitment and retention rates) for the EASY model. METHODS This 6-month study took place in Vancouver, Canada, from May to December 2013, with data analyses in February 2014. Participants were healthy, inactive, community-dwelling women aged 55-70 years. We recruited through advertisements in local community newspapers and randomized participants using a remote web service. The model included the following: group-based education and social support, individualized physical activity prescription (called Activity 4-1-1), and use of a Fitbit activity monitor. The control group received health-related information only. The main outcome measures were descriptions of study feasibility (recruitment and retention rates). We also collected information on activity patterns (ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers) and health-related outcomes such as body composition (height and weight using standard techniques), blood pressure (automatic blood pressure monitor), and psychosocial variables (questionnaires). RESULTS We advertised in local community newspapers to recruit participants. Over 3 weeks, 82 participants telephoned; following screening, 68% (56/82) met the inclusion criteria and 45% (25/56) were randomized by remote web-based allocation. This included 13 participants in the intervention group and 12 participants in the control group (education). At 6 months, 12/13 (92%) intervention and 8/12 (67%) control participants completed the final assessment. Controlling for baseline values, the intervention group had an average of 2,080 [95% confidence intervals (CIs) 704, 4,918] more steps/day at 6 months compared with the control group. There was an average between group difference in weight loss of -4.3 [95% CI -6.22, -2.40] kg and reduction in diastolic blood pressure of -8.54 [95% CI -16.89, -0.198] mmHg, in favor of EASY. CONCLUSIONS The EASY pilot study was feasible to deliver; there was an increase in physical activity and reduction in weight and blood pressure for intervention participants at 6 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01842061.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maureen C Ashe
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia (UBC), 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Meghan Winters
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada; Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall Rm 11522, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Christiane A Hoppmann
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada; UBC Department of Psychology, 2136 West Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Martin G Dawes
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia (UBC), 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Paul A Gardiner
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Level 3, Public Health Building, Herston Rd, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP) Centre, Mater Research Institute-The University of Queensland, Level 3 Aubigny Place, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia
| | - Lora M Giangregorio
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, Ontario N1H 8 K4, Canada
| | - Kenneth M Madden
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada; UBC Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Room 7185, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Megan M McAllister
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia (UBC), 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Gillian Wong
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia (UBC), 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Joseph H Puyat
- UBC School of Population and Public Health, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, 588-1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Joel Singer
- UBC School of Population and Public Health, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, 588-1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Joanie Sims-Gould
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia (UBC), 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Heather A McKay
- Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, 7F-2635 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia (UBC), 320-5950 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada; UBC Department of Orthopaedics, 3114-910 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1 M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|