1
|
Stockbridge MD, Bunker LD, Hillis AE. Reversing the Ruin: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Restoration After Stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2022; 22:745-755. [PMID: 36181577 PMCID: PMC9525934 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-022-01231-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Stroke is a common cause of disability in aging adults. A given individual's needs after stroke vary as a function of the stroke extent and location. The purpose of this review was to discuss recent clinical investigations addressing rehabilitation of an array of overlapping functional domains. RECENT FINDINGS Research is ongoing in the domains of movement, cognition, attention, speech, language, swallowing, and mental health. To best assist patients' recovery, innovative research has sought to develop and evaluate behavioral approaches, identify and refine synergistic approaches that augment the response to behavioral therapy, and integrate technology where appropriate, particularly to introduce and titrate real-world complexity and improve the overall experience of therapy. Recent and ongoing trials have increasingly adopted a multidisciplinary nature - augmenting refined behavioral therapy approaches with methods for increasing their potency, such as pharmaceutical or electrical interventions. The integration of virtual reality, robotics, and other technological advancements has generated immense excitement, but has not resulted in consistent improvements over more universally accessible, lower technology therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa D Stockbridge
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 4, Suite 446, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Lisa D Bunker
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 4, Suite 446, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Argye E Hillis
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Phipps 4, Suite 446, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vitti E, Hillis AE. Treatment of post-stroke aphasia: A narrative review for stroke neurologists. Int J Stroke 2021; 16:1002-1008. [PMID: 33949274 DOI: 10.1177/17474930211017807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This review is intended to help physicians guide patients to optimal management of post-stroke aphasia. We review literature on post-stroke aphasia treatment, focusing on: (1) when and for whom language therapy is most effective, (2) the variety of approaches that can be effective for different individuals, and (3) the extent to which behavioral therapy might be augmented by non-invasive brain stimulation and/or medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Vitti
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - Argye E Hillis
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fridriksson J, Hillis AE. Current Approaches to the Treatment of Post-Stroke Aphasia. J Stroke 2021; 23:183-201. [PMID: 34102754 PMCID: PMC8189855 DOI: 10.5853/jos.2020.05015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aphasia, impairment of language after stroke or other neurological insult, is a common and often devastating condition that affects nearly every social activity and interaction. Behavioral speech and language therapy is the mainstay of treatment, although other interventions have been introduced to augment the effects of the behavioral therapy. In this narrative review, we discuss advances in aphasia therapy in the last 5 years and focus primarily on properly powered, randomized, controlled trials of both behavioral therapies and interventions to augment therapy for post-stroke aphasia. These trials include evaluation of behavioral therapies and computer-delivered language therapies. We also discuss outcome prediction trials as well as interventional trials that have employed noninvasive brain stimulation, or medications to augment language therapy. Supported by evidence from Phase III trials and large meta-analyses, it is now generally accepted that aphasia therapy can improve language processing for many patients. Not all patients respond similarly to aphasia therapy with the most severe patients being the least likely responders. Nevertheless, it is imperative that all patients, regardless of severity, receive aphasia management focused on direct therapy of language deficits, counseling, or both. Emerging evidence from Phase II trials suggests transcranial brain stimulation is a promising method to boost aphasia therapy outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Fridriksson
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Argye Elizabeth Hillis
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sheppard SM, Sebastian R. Diagnosing and managing post-stroke aphasia. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:221-234. [PMID: 33231117 PMCID: PMC7880889 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2020.1855976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Aphasia is a debilitating language disorder and even mild forms of aphasia can negatively affect functional outcomes, mood, quality of life, social participation, and the ability to return to work. Language deficits after post-stroke aphasia are heterogeneous. Areas covered: The first part of this manuscript reviews the traditional syndrome-based classification approach as well as recent advances in aphasia classification that incorporate automatic speech recognition for aphasia classification. The second part of this manuscript reviews the behavioral approaches to aphasia treatment and recent advances such as noninvasive brain stimulation techniques and pharmacotherapy options to augment the effectiveness of behavioral therapy. Expert opinion: Aphasia diagnosis has largely evolved beyond the traditional approach of classifying patients into specific syndromes and instead focuses on individualized patient profiles. In the future, there is a great need for more large scale randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of behavioral treatments, noninvasive brain stimulation, and medications to boost aphasia recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon M. Sheppard
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorder, Chapman University, Irvine, CA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rajani Sebastian
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harvey S, Carragher M, Dickey MW, Pierce JE, Rose ML. Dose effects in behavioural treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2020; 44:2548-2559. [PMID: 33164590 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1843079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Aphasia is a debilitating chronic acquired language disorder that impacts heavily on a person's life. Behavioural treatments aim to remediate language processing skills or to enhance communication between the person with aphasia and others, and a number of different treatments are efficacious. However, it is unclear how much of a particular treatment a person needs in order to optimise recovery of language and communication skills following stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS Systematic search for and meta-analysis of experimental studies that directly compared different amounts of the same behavioural aphasia treatment, following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS Treatment dose research in aphasia is an emerging area. Just six studies comparing different doses of the same intervention met all criteria for inclusion. Evidence from these studies was synthesised and meta-analysed, where possible. Meta-analyses were inconclusive due to limited data; however, there are indications that suggest increased dose may confer greater improvement on language and communication measures, but with diminishing returns over time. Aphasia severity and chronicity may affect dose-response relationships. CONCLUSIONS There is currently insufficient evidence to determine the effect of dose on treatment response. A dedicated and coordinated research agenda is required to systematically explore dose-response relationships in post-stroke aphasia interventions.A video abstract is available in the Supplementary Material.Implications for rehabilitationThe investigation of the effect of dose on treatment outcomes in post-stroke aphasia is an emerging research area with few studies reporting comparison of different amounts of the same intervention.In the acute phase of recovery following stroke, higher doses of treatment provided over short periods may not be preferable, tolerable, or superior to lower doses of the same treatment.In the chronic phase, providing additional blocks of treatment may confer additional benefit for some people with aphasia but with diminishing returns.People with chronic aphasia can achieve and maintain significant gains in picture naming after a relatively brief period of high-dose treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Harvey
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Marcella Carragher
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Michael Walsh Dickey
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia.,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Communication Science and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John E Pierce
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Miranda L Rose
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Harvey SR, Carragher M, Dickey MW, Pierce JE, Rose ML. Treatment dose in post-stroke aphasia: A systematic scoping review. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2020; 31:1629-1660. [PMID: 32631143 DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1786412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Little is known about how the amount of treatment a person with aphasia receives impacts aphasia recovery following stroke, yet this information is vital to ensure effective treatments are delivered efficiently. Furthermore, there is no standard dose terminology in the stroke rehabilitation or aphasia literature. This scoping review aims to systematically map the evidence regarding dose in treatments for post-stroke aphasia and to explore how treatment dose is conceptualized, measured and reported in the literature. A comprehensive search was undertaken in June 2019. One hundred and twelve intervention studies were reviewed. Treatment dose (amount of treatment) has been conceptualized as both a measure of time and a count of discrete therapeutic elements. Doses ranged from one to 100 hours, while some studies reported session doses of up to 420 therapeutic inputs per session. Studies employ a wide variety of treatment schedules (i.e., session dose, session frequency, and intervention duration) and the interaction of dose parameters may impact the dose-response relationship. High dose interventions delivered over short periods may improve treatment efficiency while maintaining efficacy. Person- and treatment-level factors that mediate tolerance of high dose interventions require further investigation. Systematic exploration of dose-response relationships in post-stroke aphasia treatment is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam R Harvey
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Marcella Carragher
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Michael Walsh Dickey
- Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia.,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.,Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - John E Pierce
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia
| | - Miranda L Rose
- Discipline of Speech Pathology, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.,Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Recovery and Rehabilitation, Bundoora, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Duncan ES, Small SL. Imitation-based aphasia therapy increases narrative content: a case series. Clin Rehabil 2017; 31:1500-1507. [DOI: 10.1177/0269215517703765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To test the generalization of an intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy to an unrelated narrative production task. Design: ABA design study (A= no treatment; B= treatment) comparing imitation therapy to a baseline condition (pre-therapy). Participants produced narratives at two pre-therapy and two post-therapy time points. Narratives were analyzed for correct information units to determine the number and percent of communicative words produced. Setting: A rehabilitation clinic and participants’ homes. Participants: Nineteen people with chronic aphasia following left hemisphere stroke. Interventions: Six weeks of intensive imitation therapy (3 x 30 minutes/day; 6 days/week) of words and phrases delivered via dedicated laptop. Main measures: We performed t-tests to assess post-therapy changes in narrative production, as well as for intervals during which no intervention was provided. We used stepwise regression to examine the predictive value of demographic, behavioral, and neurological variables in determining treatment outcome. Results: Significant gains were made on the narrative production task in both the number (mean = 34.36; p = 0.009) and percent (mean = 3.99; p = 0.023) of correct information units produced. For percent of correct information units, the number of therapy sessions completed was the sole predictor of changes in production following therapy (r= +0.542; p = 0.020). No variables predicted change in number of correct information units produced. There were no significant differences between the two pre-therapy or the two post-therapy time points ( p > 0.294). Conclusions: Intensive imitation-based aphasia therapy may promote generalization to an unrelated narrative production task. Further investigation is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Susan Duncan
- Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
- Departments of Cognitive Sciences & Neurology, University of California, Irvine, USA
| | - Steven L Small
- Departments of Neurology, Neurobiology & Behavior, University of California, Irvine, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wortman-Jutt S, Edwards DJ. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Poststroke Aphasia Recovery. Stroke 2017; 48:820-826. [PMID: 28174328 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.116.015626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Wortman-Jutt
- From the Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, White Plains, NY (S.W.-J.); Neuromodulation and Human Motor Control Laboratory, Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY (D.J.E.); Department of Neurology, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (D.J.E.); School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia (D.J.E.); and Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.J.E.).
| | - Dylan J Edwards
- From the Burke Rehabilitation Hospital, White Plains, NY (S.W.-J.); Neuromodulation and Human Motor Control Laboratory, Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY (D.J.E.); Department of Neurology, Weill-Cornell Medical College, New York, NY (D.J.E.); School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia (D.J.E.); and Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.J.E.)
| |
Collapse
|