Burden of asthma among patients adherent to ICS/LABA: A real-world study

Efficacy of bronchial thermoplasty in a patient panel with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is an approved procedure to manage uncontrolled severe persistent asthma. Many insurance providers are reluctant to pay for BT without proven benefit among their specific patient panel.

OBJECTIVE

Determine if BT is effective in a panel patient panel with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an unblinded prospective study of adult subjects with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma who underwent BT. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and then 3-, 6-, 12-, 18- and 24-months post-BT. The primary metric was an improved Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score. Other metrics included improved Asthma Control Test (ACT), peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), spirometry, fractional excretion of nitric oxide (FeNO), number of unscheduled medical visits, and lost days of work/activity. Respiratory adverse events were assessed during the BT treatment period and at each post-BT visit.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine subjects completed the study; the median interquartile range (IQR) age was 47 (42-61), and the majority were female (69%), white (93%), and non-Hispanic (90%). After BT, mean (±std) AQLQ scores improved by 1.6(±1.1) at 3 months (p < 0.0001), 1.6(±1.2) at 6 months (p < 0.0001), 1.4(±1.0) at 12 months (p < 0.0001), 1.8(±1.1) at 18 months (p < 0.0001), and 1.6 (±1.5) at 24 months (p < 0.0001). There were significant improvements in ACT, PEFR, unscheduled medical visits and lost days of work and activity. Spirometry and FeNO metrics were unchanged. The average cost for subjects completing all 3 BT procedures was approximately $15,000.

CONCLUSION

BT is an effective adjunctive therapeutic modality in subjects with uncontrolled severe persistent asthma.

Development and validation of a claims-based algorithm to identify moderate exacerbations in patients with asthma treated in the US

INTRODUCTION

Definitions of moderate asthma exacerbation have been inconsistent, making their economic burden difficult to assess. An algorithm to accurately identify moderate exacerbations from claims data is needed.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of Reliant Medical Group patients aged ≥18 years, with ≥1 prescription claim for inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist, and ≥1 medical claim with a diagnosis code for asthma was conducted. The objective was to refine current algorithms to identify moderate exacerbations in claims data and assess the refined algorithm's performance. Positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) were assessed via chart review of 150 moderate exacerbations events and 50 patients without exacerbations. Sensitivity analyses assessed alternative algorithms and compared healthcare resource utilization (HRU) between algorithm-identified patients (claims group) and those confirmed by chart review (confirmed group) to have experienced a moderate exacerbation.

RESULTS

Algorithm-identified moderate exacerbations were: visit of ≤1 day with an asthma exacerbation diagnosis OR visit of ≤1 day with selected asthma diagnoses AND ≥1 respiratory pharmacy claim, excluding systemic corticosteroids, within 14 days after the first claim. The algorithm's PPV was 42%; the NPV was 78%. HRU was similar for both groups.

CONCLUSION

This algorithm identified potential moderate exacerbations from claims data; however, the modest PPV underscores its limitations in identifying moderate exacerbations, although performance was partially due to identification of previously unidentified severe exacerbations. Application of this algorithm in future claims-based studies may help quantify the economic burden of moderate and severe exacerbations in asthma when an algorithm identifying severe exacerbations is applied first.

Frequency and economic burden of exacerbations in inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist-treated patients with asthma: A retrospective US claims study

INTRODUCTION

Despite adherence to inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy, many patients with asthma experience moderate exacerbations. Data on the impact of moderate exacerbations on the healthcare system are limited. This study assessed the frequency and economic burden of moderate exacerbations in patients receiving ICS/LABA.

METHODS

Retrospective, longitudinal study analyzed data from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database recorded between October 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. Eligibility criteria included patients ≥18 years of age with ≥1 ICS/LABA claim and ≥1 medical claim for asthma in the 12 months pre-index (first ICS/LABA claim). Primary objectives included describing moderate exacerbation frequency, and associated healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs. A secondary objective was assessing the relationship between moderate exacerbations and subsequent risk of severe exacerbations. Patients were stratified by moderate exacerbation frequency in the 12 months post index. Moderate exacerbations were identified using a newly developed algorithm.

RESULTS

In the first 12 months post index 61.6% of patients experienced ≥1 moderate exacerbation. Mean number of asthma-related visits was 4.1 per person/year and median total asthma-related costs was $3544. HRU and costs increased with increasing exacerbation frequency. Outpatient and inpatient visits accounted for a similar proportion of these costs. Moderate exacerbations were associated with an increased rate and risk of future severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.56; hazard ratio, 1.51 [both p < 0.001]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlighted that a high proportion of patients continue to experience moderate exacerbations despite ICS/LABA therapy and subsequently experience increased economic burden and risk of future severe exacerbations.

Real-World Study of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol on Asthma Control in the US

Purpose

Real-world asthma control data among patients initiating fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) are limited. This study assessed rescue medication use and asthma-related exacerbations in patients with asthma before and after initiating single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI using administrative claims data.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective, pre-post cohort study analyzed data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database (September 18, 2016‒March 31, 2020). Patients aged ≥18 years that had ≥1 dispensing of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg (first dispensing = index date), ≥12 months of continuous health insurance enrollment prior to (pre-treatment) and following (post-treatment) FF/UMEC/VI initiation and ≥1 diagnosis of asthma during the pre-treatment period or on the index date were included. The primary endpoint was the number of oral corticosteroid (OCS) dispensings per patient per year during pre- and post-treatment periods. Secondary endpoints included asthma-related exacerbation rates and short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) use. Comparisons between pre- and post-treatment periods were made using risk and rate ratios.

Results

Overall, 890 patients with asthma initiating treatment with FF/UMEC/VI were included. The most recently dispensed controller medications prior to FF/UMEC/VI initiation were inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (33.5%) and leukotriene modifiers (33.0%). Patients had a 29% reduction in the number of OCS dispensings (rate ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.71 [0.65, 0.77], P < 0.001) during post-treatment versus pre-treatment, with a 23% reduction in the proportion of patients with ≥1 OCS dispensing post-treatment (risk ratio [95% CI]: 0.77 [0.73, 0.82], P < 0.001). Significant reductions in rates (rate ratio [95% CI]) of asthma-related exacerbations (0.59 [0.52, 0.67], P < 0.001) and SABA use (0.80 [0.74, 0.86], P < 0.001) were also observed.

Conclusion

In this real-world study, patients with asthma had significantly lower OCS use, asthma-related exacerbations, and SABA use following treatment initiation with FF/UMEC/VI compared with their pre-treatment period. These results suggest better asthma control following initiation of FF/UMEC/VI in a routine clinical practice setting.

Relationship Between Asthma Control Status and Health-Related Quality of Life in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Mixed-Methods Study

INTRODUCTION

There is limited information regarding multidimensional relationships between asthma control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity, and asthma symptom burden in Japan. Furthermore, systematic qualitative investigations about asthma burden have not been performed.

METHODS

This cross-sectional, mixed-methods study included Japanese patients (≥ 20 years) with asthma adherent to inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β2-agonists (ICS/LABA). The primary endpoint was impact of asthma on HRQoL, measured using the Asthma Health Questionnaire-33 (AHQ-33). Secondary endpoints were cough burden (Japanese-adapted Leicester Cough Questionnaire [J-LCQ]) and impact of asthma on work/activities (asthma-specific Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire [WPAI:Asthma]). Quantitative data were assessed for the overall population and for well-controlled (WC) and not well-controlled (NWC) asthma subgroups. Qualitative verbal interviews further assessed the impact of NWC asthma on patients' HRQoL; emergent themes were extracted using thematic analyses.

RESULTS

Of 454 patients, 45.2% (n = 205) had NWC asthma. Patients with NWC asthma had significantly worse asthma- and cough-related HRQoL across all AHQ-33 and J-LCQ domains and significantly greater work and activity impairment versus patients with WC asthma, across all assessed WPAI:Asthma domains. AHQ-33 total score was highly correlated with J-LCQ total and domain scores (r = - 0.8132 to r = - 0.7407). Nine themes emerged from qualitative interviews and confirmed that patients with NWC asthma had considerable HRQoL impairment due to asthma symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NWC asthma had higher symptom burden and worse HRQoL than patients with WC asthma, despite ICS/LABA adherence. Cough burden correlated with HRQoL, suggesting cough may be one of the key markers to inform treatment strategy for patients with asthma.

Budget Impact Analysis of Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients with Asthma in the Dubai Academic Healthcare Corporation

Purpose

Asthma is a common, chronic respiratory disorder associated with substantial societal and economic burden globally, despite the availability of different treatment modalities. GSK has developed a once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (SITT), comprised of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI); a combination of inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting muscarinic antagonist, and long-acting β₂-agonist for patients with uncontrolled asthma. A budget impact analysis was conducted to determine the financial impact of introducing FF/UMEC/VI SITT from the perspective of the Dubai Academic Healthcare Corporation (DAHC).

Methods

A budget impact model was constructed using an epidemiology-based approach and used to estimate the expected 5-year budget impact of including FF/UMEC/VI for the treatment of eligible patients within the DAHC in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The model included both pharmacy and efficacy-related costs. The perspective of the DAHC healthcare payer was adopted, thus only direct payer costs were included in the analysis. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to test the robustness of the model structure, assumptions, and input parameters.

Results

The total budget impact was estimated to save 1 million United States Dollars (USD) over 5 years, with budget impacts of 0.08 million USD in Year 1; 0.14 million USD in Year 2; 0.22 million USD in Year 3; 0.28 million USD in Year 4; and 0.33 million USD in Year 5. The overall budget impact per patient was estimated to save 12.2 USD over 5 years. In one-way sensitivity analyses, the budget impact was most sensitive to changes in the market uptake of FF/UMEC/VI.

Conclusion

Healthcare payers may consider FF/UMEC/VI in the management of uncontrolled asthma which would save costs and reduce healthcare resource use in the UAE.

Suboptimally controlled asthma in patients treated with inhaled ICS/LABA: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes

This observational claims-linked survey study assessed the prevalence of and risk factors for suboptimal asthma control and healthcare utilization in adults with asthma receiving fixed-dose combination (FDC) inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist (ICS/LABA). Commercially insured adults from the Optum Research Database were invited to complete the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6). Among participants (N = 428), 36.4% (ACT-assessed) and 55.6% (ACQ-6-assessed) had inadequately controlled asthma. Asthma-related quality of life was worse and asthma-related healthcare resource utilization was higher in poorly controlled asthma. Factors associated with ACT-defined suboptimal asthma control in multivariate analysis included: frequent short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) use, asthma-related outpatient visits, lower treatment adherence, and lower education levels. During follow-up, factors associated with asthma exacerbations and/or high SABA use included: inadequately controlled asthma (ACT-assessed), body mass index ≥30 kg/m², and high-dose ICS/LABA. Approximately 35-55% of adults with asthma were inadequately controlled despite FDC ICS/LABA; poor control was associated with worse disease outcomes.

A mechanistic PK/PD model to enable dose selection of the potent anti-tryptase antibody (MTPS9579A) in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma

Tryptase, a protease implicated in asthma pathology, is secreted from mast cells upon activation during an inflammatory allergic response. MTPS9579A is a novel monoclonal antibody that inhibits tryptase activity by irreversibly dissociating the active tetramer into inactive monomers. This study assessed the relationship between MTPS9579A concentrations in healthy subjects and tryptase levels in serum and nasal mucosal lining fluid from healthy subjects and patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. These data were used to develop a mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model that quantitatively inter-relates MTPS9579A exposure and inhibition of active tryptase in the airway of patients with asthma. From initial estimates of airway tryptase levels and drug partitioning, the PK/PD model predicted almost complete neutralization of active tryptase in the airway of patients with asthma with MTPS9579A doses of 900 mg and greater, administered intravenously (i.v.) once every 4 weeks (q4w). Suppression of active tryptase during an asthma exacerbation event was also evaluated using the model by simulating the administration of MTPS9579A during a 100-fold increase in tryptase secretion in the local tissue. The PK/PD model predicted that 1800 mg MTPS9579A i.v. q4w results in 95.7% suppression of active tryptase at the steady-state trough concentration. Understanding how the exposure-response relationship of MTPS9579A in healthy subjects translates to patients with asthma is critical for future clinical studies assessing tryptase inhibition in the airway of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma.

Optimizing asthma management: Role of long-acting muscarinic antagonists

Patients with asthma who are suboptimally responsive to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting β₂-agonists (LABAs) are frequently exposed to oral corticosteroids and high-dose ICS, which can lead to significant side effects. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) have demonstrated efficacy and safety in a subset of these patients. This review summarizes the results of key studies using LAMAs in patients with asthma aged 12 years or older. LAMA as an add-on treatment improved lung function and asthma control in patients with uncontrolled asthma across studies. The efficacy of LAMAs as an add-on to ICS was superior to that of placebo and ICS dose escalation and comparable with that of LABAs. LAMA plus ICS plus LABA provided modest improvements in bronchodilation and increased the time to first severe exacerbation versus ICS plus LABA. Single-inhaler triple therapy was associated with decreased health care resource utilization and improved cost-effectiveness versus multiple inhalers. LAMAs were generally well tolerated; asthma exacerbations, bronchitis, and nasopharyngitis were common adverse events with LAMA in combination with ICS alone or ICS plus LABA. Thus, the overall evidence presented in this review supports the use of add-on LAMA treatment as a reasonable option in patients with asthma uncontrolled with ICS plus LABA or ICS alone.

Can Phosphodiesterase 4 Inhibitor Therapy Be Used in Respiratory Diseases Other Than Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease?

Selective phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors have been extensively studied for the treatment of various respiratory diseases due to their broad anti-inflammatory and/or bronchodilator effects. Roflumilast, an oral selective PDE4 inhibitor, is currently used as a second-line treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with chronic bronchitis. Despite its proven efficacy in other respiratory disorders, including asthma, no other PDE4 inhibitor is approved for respiratory pathologies. This systematic review summarizes the therapeutic action of PDE4 inhibitors, their limitations, recent therapeutic success, and future targets for their use in respiratory diseases other than COPD. An electronic literature search was conducted on four databases, namely, PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, to collect data on related studies done in humans and published in the English language in the last five years. After extensive analysis and quality appraisal, 11 studies were eligible and thus included in this review, consisting of two randomized controlled trials (RCT), one systematic review and meta-analysis, and eight literature reviews. Roflumilast is not approved for the treatment of asthma due to associated adverse effects and comparable efficacy to inhaled corticosteroids, which are considered the mainstay of asthma maintenance therapy. Hence, the importance of balancing the efficacy with minimizing the side effects is highlighted. Tanimilast (CHF6001), an inhalational selective PDE4 inhibitor, and ensifentrine, a combined PDE3/4 inhibitor, demonstrate the recent therapeutic success in asthma and warrant further large-scale clinical studies. Future researchers will focus on the specific endotype than the phenotype in asthma as a meaningful therapeutic approach due to the high heterogeneity noted in asthma. Current evidence suggests the possibility of PDE4 inhibitors as a novel therapeutic option for chronic cough, allergic rhinitis, and cystic fibrosis. Further evidence from new studies is eagerly anticipated to better understand the efficacy and safety of PDE4 inhibitors in these respiratory diseases.

Characteristics and treatment patterns of patients with asthma on multiple-inhaler triple therapy in Spain

The aim of this observational, retrospective study was to describe characteristics, treatment patterns, and adherence among patients with asthma who initiated multiple-inhaler triple therapy (MITT) in Catalonia, Spain. This study used data of patients initiating MITT in 2016 from the SIDIAP (Information System for Research in Primary Care) database, which covers ~80% of the Catalonian population (5.8 million). Of 1,204 patients initiating MITT, 361 (30.0%) stepped down (discontinued ≥ 1 and continued ≥1 MITT component) and 89 (7.4%) stopped all three components of MITT for a period of 60 days during the following 12 months. In the follow-up period, 196 (16.3%) patients were considered adherent to MITT (>0.8 proportion of days covered [PDC]), with a mean (standard deviation) PDC of 0.52 (0.51) days. Given the low adherence and substantial rates of step down/discontinuation among patients initiating MITT, there is an urgent need to implement strategies to improve treatment adherence/persistence.

A systematic literature review of burden of illness in adults with uncontrolled moderate/severe asthma

BACKGROUND

There are limited published data on the burden of moderate/severe uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review to better understand the impact of moderate-to-severe asthma in the US, the UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Canada, Japan, and Australia in terms of prevalence, clinical measures, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and economic burden, for patients whose asthma is uncontrolled despite inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of uncontrolled asthma among patients with moderate/severe disease varied but was as high as 100% in some subgroups. Patients with uncontrolled asthma generally had poor lung function (mean/median pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁]: 1.69-2.45 L; mean/median pre-bronchodilator percent predicted FEV₁: 57.2-79.7). There was also a substantial but variable exacerbation burden associated with uncontrolled asthma, with the annualised rate of exacerbations ranging from 1.30 to 7.30 when considering various patient subgroups. Furthermore, the annualised rate of severe exacerbations ranged from 1.66 to 3.60. The HRQoL burden measured using disease-specific and generic instruments consistently demonstrated substantial impairment of HRQoL for those with uncontrolled asthma; Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores ranged from 3.00 to 5.20, whilst EurQol-5 Dimensions index scores ranged from 0.53 to 0.59. Direct, indirect and total costs together with consumption of other healthcare resources associated with managing uncontrolled asthma were also substantial in the population studied; no caregiver burden was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that significant unmet needs exist for patients with uncontrolled asthma despite the availability of ICS/LABA therapy. Novel treatments are needed to help reduce the burden to patients, healthcare systems and society.

Treatment Patterns and Disease Burden Associated with Multiple-Inhaler Triple-Therapy Use in Asthma

BACKGROUND

Addition of a long-acting muscarinic antagonist is recommended for patients with asthma uncontrolled on inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist therapy. This is the first large-scale, real-world study examining multiple-inhaler triple-therapy (MITT) use in asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To describe real-world prevalence, outcomes, and treatment patterns associated with MITT.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used medical and pharmacy claims from the Optum Research Database. Patients were diagnosed with asthma between January 01, 2013, and July 31, 2018, with evidence of MITT use (≥1 overlapping days' supply of inhaled corticosteroid, long-acting β₂-agonist, and long-acting muscarinic antagonist). Annual MITT prevalence (primary end point) was assessed in the prevalent population; eligible patients were 18 years or older with 2 or more asthma diagnoses during the study period, and continuous enrollment for the entire year. Secondary outcomes (adherence [proportion of days covered], MITT persistence, health care resource utilization, costs) were assessed in the incident MITT population; eligible patients were 18 years or older, with 2 or more asthma diagnoses and continuous enrollment during both the 12-month baseline and 12-month follow-up periods. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cystic fibrosis were excluded.

RESULTS

MITT prevalence was low but increased from 0.35% (95% CI, 0.32-0.37) in 2014/2015 to 1.00% (95% CI, 0.96-1.04) in 2017/2018. Among 1831 incident MITT users, there was a substantial disease burden, demonstrated by high health care resource utilization and exacerbation rates. Adherence and persistence to MITT was low (mean proportion of days covered, 0.31 ± 0.27), and 12% (n = 216) remained on MITT 12 months postinitiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, MITT use among patients with asthma is low. Patients initiating MITT have substantial disease burden and significant unmet needs.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily, single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol in Japanese patients with inadequately controlled asthma: the CAPTAIN study

OBJECTIVE

In CAPTAIN, a double-blind, parallel-group, Phase IIIA study, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) improved lung function, symptoms and asthma control versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma. Here, we report efficacy and safety from a Japanese cohort in CAPTAIN.

METHODS

Adults with inadequately controlled asthma despite inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β₂-agonist (ICS/LABA) were randomized (1:1:1:1:1:1) to once-daily FF/VI (100/25 mcg or 200/25 mcg) or FF/UMEC/VI (100/31.25/25 mcg, 100/62.5/25 mcg, 200/31.25/25 mcg, or 200/62.5/25 mcg) for ≥24 weeks. Endpoints included change from baseline in clinic trough FEV₁ (primary), annualized rate of moderate/severe asthma exacerbations (key secondary), clinic FEV₁ 3 h post-dose, and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) (all Week 24), Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms (E-RS): Asthma total scores (Weeks 21-24) (all secondary). Adverse events and adverse events of special interest were monitored. Clinical trials.gov registry no: NCT02924688.

RESULTS

Overall, 229 of 2436 patients in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population were from Japan. In this cohort, change from baseline in trough FEV₁ for FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25 mcg versus FF/VI 100/25 mcg was 105 mL (95% confidence interval -5, 216) and 69 mL (-42, 179) for 200/62.5/25 mcg versus 200/25 mcg. These observations were supported by clinic FEV₁ at 3 h post-dose. Moderate/severe exacerbation incidence was low and similar across pooled treatment groups (FF/VI, FF/UMEC 31.25 mcg/VI, FF/UMEC 62.5 mcg/VI). All pooled groups demonstrated clinically important improvements from baseline in ACQ-7, SGRQ and E-RS: Asthma total scores. Safety profiles were consistent with the overall ITT population, with no new safety concerns.

CONCLUSION

FF/UMEC/VI is an effective option with a favorable risk-benefit profile in Japanese patients with uncontrolled moderate or severe asthma on ICS/LABA.

Safety of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Japanese Patients with Asthma: A Long-Term (52-Week) Phase III Open-Label Study

PURPOSE

The pivotal CAPTAIN study reported a favorable safety profile with once-daily inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β2-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple combination of fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) in patients with inadequately controlled asthma, some of whom were Japanese. Here, we evaluate the long-term (52 weeks) safety of FF/UMEC/VI in Japanese patients with asthma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a Phase III, 52-week, multicenter, non-comparator, non-randomized, open-label study (NCT03184987) in Japanese adults receiving maintenance therapy with ICS/LABA, with or without LAMA. At enrollment, patients were allocated to either FF/UMEC/VI 100/62.5/25mcg (Group 1) or 200/62.5/25mcg (Group 2). Patients in Group 1 could have their treatment stepped up to 200/62.5/25mcg at Week 24 if their Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7 score was >0.75. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included vital signs, electrocardiogram measurements, and clinical laboratory tests (biochemistry, hematology, urinalysis). Efficacy was assessed as "other" endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 111 Japanese patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Overall, 77 (69%) patients reported ≥1 AE (Group 1: n=30 [64%]; step-up group: n=7 [78%]; Group 2: n=40 [73%]). SAEs were reported for 1 (2.1%) and 2 (3.6%) patients in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. All SAEs were considered unrelated to study treatment. One AE and one SAE led to study withdrawal: oropharyngeal discomfort (Group 1); eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Group 2). No new safety concerns were identified throughout the 52-week treatment period.

CONCLUSION

In this uncontrolled open-label study, no new safety concerns were observed with long-term (52 weeks) treatment with once-daily FF/UMEC/VI among 111 Japanese patients with asthma.

Characteristics of Treated Asthmatics Experiencing Exacerbations in a US Database: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Rationale

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) recommend a stepwise approach to asthma management, with the goals of maintaining asthma control and reducing exacerbations. Although asthma treatments reduce the frequency of exacerbations, they still occur. We aimed to characterize the treated United States of America (US) adult asthma population, including those experiencing exacerbations, in terms of socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU).

Patients and Methods

A retrospective cohort of asthma patients aged ≥18 years on 01 January 2014 with ≥1 ICD-9 asthma code (493.xx) enrolled in a US healthcare claims database during 2013–2014. Patients who had ≥2 asthma medication dispensings during 2013 (baseline), including ≥1 in the 90-day period before index date, were classified according to NHLBI step. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis, or lung cancer diagnoses were excluded. Demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and HRU were described during baseline. Exacerbations and HRU were described during 2014 (follow-up period).

Results

In total, 72,156 patients were included; 10,590 (14.7%) had ≥1 exacerbation during follow-up. Approximately 44% of patients were classified as NHLBI Steps 1–2, 41% as Steps 3–4, and 11% as Steps 5–6. Exacerbation frequency increased with step (Steps 1, 2, and 3: 12–14%; Steps 4, 5, and 6: 16–26%). Compared with the overall population during baseline, patients with an exacerbation had similar demographics, but differences were observed for comorbid allergic rhinitis (46.4% vs 40.1%, respectively), blood eosinophil counts ≥300 cells/μL (45.5% vs 39.6%, respectively), and asthma-related healthcare encounters (62.9% vs 52.4%, respectively). Overall, asthma-related HRU during follow-up increased with NHLBI step.

Conclusion

Exacerbations were observed among patients classified at each NHLBI step and were more frequent with increasing step. Exacerbations and asthma-related HRU highlight the continued unmet need in the treated US asthma population.

The association between control level and self-reported treatment adherence across different treatment types in Japanese asthma patients

BACKGROUND

Poor control of asthma symptoms is associated with a higher asthma disease burden, and asthma medication adherence is a known predictor for a better control status. This study sought to describe the current asthma control status, self-reported treatment adherence, and the association between them, as well as to describe how control level and better adherence impact the health outcomes of asthma patients.

METHODS

This study used cross-sectional data from the 2018 Japan National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS). Asthma control status and adherence were assessed using the Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 (MMAS-8), respectively. Asthma treatment and patients' health outcomes, i.e. health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and work productivity, were self-reported. Asthma control and self-reported treatment adherence were analyzed descriptively, and the association was investigated by comparing mean ACT scores across adherence levels. Health outcomes were compared across control and adherence levels by multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 816 patients had a physician diagnosis of asthma, with 67.0% reporting at least well controlled (ALWC). Of 505 asthma patients receiving prescription medication, half reported low adherence to medication use. Among asthma patients reporting high adherence, 35.6% were not well controlled (NWC). After adjusting for covariates, NWC asthma patients had significantly worse health outcomes than ALWC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of asthma patients in Japan suffer from poorly controlled asthma. Results of the 2018 NHWS show that poor control status negatively affects patients' HRQoL and work productivity, suggesting an unmet need for better treatments to lessen the burden of asthma.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Fluticasone Furoate, Umeclidinium Bromide, and Vilanterol in Patients with Asthma, Using Data from a Phase IIIA Study (CAPTAIN)

BACKGROUND

This analysis aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone furoate (FF), the long-acting muscarinic antagonist umeclidinium (UMEC), and the long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) vilanterol (VI), administered as dual (FF/VI) or triple (FF/UMEC/VI) single-inhaler therapy to patients with asthma, and to identify covariates that may influence the PK of each analyte.

METHODS

Blood samples were obtained from the phase IIIA CAPTAIN study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02924688), which evaluated the efficacy and safety of once-daily FF/UMEC/VI versus FF/VI in patients with uncontrolled asthma taking ICS/LABA. Samples were collected at trough (defined as ≥ 20 h after the last dose) from all subjects randomized to the six treatment groups (FF/UMEC/VI 100/31.25/25 μg, 100/62.5/25 μg, 200/31.25/25 μg, 200/62.5/25 μg; FF/VI 100/25 μg, 200/25 μg) at week 24 or the early withdrawal visit. In a subset of patients, PK samples were obtained predose at week 12, and at 5-30 min, 45-90 min, and 2-3 h postdose. For each analyte, a population PK model was developed using non-linear mixed-effects modeling. The maximum likelihood method was utilized to incorporate data below the quantifiable limit (BQL). Final models were used to derive the area under the plasma concentration-time curve and maximum observed concentration at steady-state for each analyte.

RESULTS

We obtained 4018, 2695, and 4032 samples from 1891, 1258, and 1891 patients, for FF, UMEC, and VI, respectively; 48%, 49%, and 50% of samples were reported as BQL for each analyte, respectively. The PK were adequately described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination for FF, a two-compartment model with intravenous bolus input and first-order elimination for UMEC, and a three-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination for VI. Statistically significant covariates were body weight on apparent inhaled clearance of FF, creatinine clearance on apparent clearance and body weight on apparent inhaled volume of distribution of the central compartment for UMEC, and race (East Asian, Japanese, and South East Asian heritage) on inhaled apparent volume of distribution of the central compartment for VI. However, the overall effects of covariates were marginal and thus do not warrant dose adjustment. Systemic exposures of FF or VI did not differ when administered as a single-inhaler triple (FF/UMEC/VI) or dual combination (FF/VI), and were similar to those reported for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

CONCLUSION

Only marginal covariate effects were observed, and thus no dose adjustments are deemed necessary for FF, UMEC, or VI. There was no difference in FF or VI systemic exposure in patients with asthma when administered as either triple (FF/UMEC/VI) or dual therapy (FF/VI). Together with efficacy findings from the CAPTAIN study, our data support the use of single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy for patients with uncontrolled asthma currently receiving ICS/LABA.

Real-world evidence: Patient views on asthma in respiratory specialist clinics in America

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30% to 50% of patients with moderate/severe asthma have inadequately controlled disease despite adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) therapy. Data on prevalence and burden of uncontrolled asthma in specialty settings are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence and burden of uncontrolled asthma in respiratory specialist clinics in the United States.

METHODS

Adults with physician-diagnosed asthma attending pulmonary and allergy clinics with self-reported ICS use in the previous 4 weeks completed an electronic questionnaire including the Asthma Control Test and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Additional information was collected using an electronic case report form.

RESULTS

Of 774 patients attending 12 pulmonary and 12 allergy clinics, 53% were not well controlled (mean [SD] Asthma Control Test, 14.3 [3.6] vs 22.4 [1.6] in well-controlled patients). Among ICS/LABA users, 56% were not well controlled, which increased with increasing ICS dose (low-dose 45.7%; high-dose 59.7%). The not well-controlled group reported more respiratory illnesses, more comorbidities, and poorer health-related quality of life (mean [SD] St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, 46.1 [18.9] vs 19.8 [12.9] in the well-controlled group). These patients also had more asthma exacerbations (≥1 exacerbation, 68.9% vs 43.1%) and increased health care resource utilization (≥1 asthma-related hospitalization, 10.7% vs 2.7%); 27.3% were also receiving systemic corticosteroids. Approximately 40% of the population were eligible for step-up to ICS/LABA/long-acting muscarinic antagonist triple therapy, and 20% were eligible for biologic therapy.

CONCLUSION

Substantial unmet needs exist among patients with inadequately controlled asthma managed in United States specialist settings, which may be addressed by improved patient and physician education, better guideline implementation, and improved adherence.

Efficacy and safety of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (CAPTAIN): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3A trial

BACKGROUND

Despite inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β₂-agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy, 30-50% of patients with moderate or severe asthma remain inadequately controlled. We investigated the safety and efficacy of single-inhaler fluticasone furoate plus umeclidinium plus vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) compared with FF/VI.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3A study (Clinical Study in Asthma Patients Receiving Triple Therapy in a Single Inhaler [CAPTAIN]), participants were recruited from 416 hospitals and primary care centres across 15 countries. Participants were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, with inadequately controlled asthma (Asthma Control Questionnaire [ACQ]-6 score of ≥1·5) despite ICS/LABA, a documented health-care contact or a documented temporary change in asthma therapy for treatment of acute asthma symptoms in the year before screening, pre-bronchodilator FEV₁ between 30% and less than 85% of predicted normal value, and reversibility (defined as an increase in FEV₁ of ≥12% and ≥200 mL in the 20-60 min after four inhalations of albuterol or salbutamol) at screening. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1:1), via central based randomisation stratified by pre-study ICS dose at study entry, to once-daily FF/VI (100/25 μg or 200/25 μg) or FF/UMEC/VI (100/31·25/25 μg, 100/62·5/25 μg, 200/31·25/25 μg, or 200/62·5/25 μg) administered via Ellipta dry powder inhaler (Glaxo Operations UK, Hertfordshire, UK). Patients, investigators, and the funder were masked to treatment allocation. Endpoints assessed in the intention-to-treat population were change from baseline in clinic trough FEV₁ at week 24 (primary) and annualised moderate and/or severe asthma exacerbation rate (key secondary). Other secondary endpoints were change from baseline in clinic FEV₁ at 3 h post-dose, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score, and ACQ-7 total score, all at week 24. Change from baseline in Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in Asthma total score at weeks 21-24 was also a secondary endpoint but is not reported here. Exploratory analyses of biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation on treatment response were also done. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02924688, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 16, 2016, and Aug 31, 2018, 5185 patients were screened and 2439 were recruited and randomly assigned to FF/VI (100/25 μg n=407; 200/25 μg n=406) or FF/UMEC/VI (100/31·25/25 μg n=405; 100/62·5/25 μg n=406; 200/31·25/25 μg n=404; 200/62·5/25 μg n=408), with three patients randomly assigned in error and not included in analyses. In the intention-to-treat population, 922 (38%) patients were men, the mean age was 53·2 years (SD 13·1) and body-mass index was 29·4 (6·6). Baseline demographics were generally similar across all treatment groups. The least squares mean improvement in FEV₁ change from baseline for FF/UMEC/VI 100/62·5/25 μg versus FF/VI 100/25 μg was 110 mL (95% CI 66-153; p<0·0001) and for 200/62·5/25 μg versus 200/25 μg was 92 mL (49-135; p<0·0001). Adding UMEC 31·25 μg to FF/VI produced similar improvements (FF/UMEC/VI 100/31·25/25 μg vs FF/VI 100/25 μg: 96 mL [52-139; p<0·0001]; and 200/31·25/25 μg vs 200/25 μg: 82 mL [39-125; p=0·0002]). These results were supported by the analysis of clinic FEV₁ at 3 h post-dose. Non-significant reductions in moderate and/or severe exacerbation rates were observed for FF/UMEC 62·5 μg/VI versus FF/VI (pooled analysis), with rates lower in FF 200 μg-containing versus FF 100 μg-containing treatment groups. All pooled treatment groups demonstrated mean improvements (decreases) in SGRQ total score at week 24 compared with baseline in excess of the minimal clinically important difference of 4 points; however, there were no differences between treatment groups. For mean change from baseline to week 24 in asthma control questionnaire-7 score, improvements (decreases) exceeding the minimal clinically important difference of 0·5 points were observed in all pooled treatment groups. Adding UMEC to FF/VI resulted in small, dose-related improvements compared with FF/VI (pooled analysis: FF/UMEC 31·25 μg/VI versus FF/VI, -0·06 (95% CI -0·12 to 0·01; p=0·094) FF/UMEC 62·5 μg/VI versus FF/VI, -0·09 (-0·16 to -0·02, p=0·0084). By contrast with adding UMEC, the effects of higher dose FF on clinic trough FEV₁ and annualised moderate and/or severe exacerbation rate were increased in patients with higher baseline blood eosinophil count and exhaled nitric oxide. Occurrence of adverse events was similar across treatment groups (patients with at least one event ranged from 210 [52%] to 258 [63%]), with the most commonly reported adverse events being nasopharyngitis (51 [13%]-63 [15%]), headache (19 [5%]-36 [9%]), and upper respiratory tract infection (13 [3%]-24 [6%]). The incidence of serious adverse events was similar across all groups (range 18 [4%]-25 [6%)). Three deaths occurred, of which one was considered to be related to study drug (pulmonary embolism in a patient in the FF/UMEC/VI 100/31·25/25 μg group).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with uncontrolled moderate or severe asthma on ICS/LABA, adding UMEC improved lung function but did not lead to a significant reduction in moderate and/or severe exacerbations. For such patients, single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI is an effective treatment option with a favourable risk-benefit profile. Higher dose FF primarily reduced the rate of exacerbations, particularly in patients with raised biomarkers of type 2 airway inflammation. Further confirmatory studies into the differentiating effect of type 2 inflammatory biomarkers on treatment outcomes in asthma are required to build on these exploratory findings and further guide clinical practice.

FUNDING

GSK.

Efficacy and safety of a first-in-class inhaled PDE3/4 inhibitor (ensifentrine) vs salbutamol in asthma

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to investigate the dose-response and pharmacology of a range of single doses of nebulised ensifentrine (RPL554), an inhaled dual phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3/4 inhibitor in patients with asthma.

METHODS

In this randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study, patients received single nebulised doses of ensifentrine 0.4, 1.5, 6 and 24 mg, salbutamol 2.5 and 7.5 mg, and placebo. Eligible patients were adults with asthma, pre-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) 60-90% predicted and ≥1.5 L, with post-salbutamol FEV₁ increase ≥15%. The co-primary objectives were peak and average FEV₁ over 12 h for ensifentrine vs placebo and salbutamol. Secondary endpoints included: peak and average systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate and ECG heart rate; and safety and tolerability (adverse events [AEs], and serum potassium). ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02427165.

RESULTS

A total of 29 patients were randomised, with 25 (89%) completing the study. For the two co-primary endpoints there was a clear ensifentrine dose-response relationship, with all treatments superior to placebo (p < 0.001). There was no relationship between the ensifentrine dose and AE incidence or blood pressure. Ensifentrine 0.4, 1.5 and 6 mg had significantly lower effects than both salbutamol doses on pulse and heart rates. Ensifentrine did not impact potassium, whereas there was a was a dose-related reduction for salbutamol. Inhalation of ensifentrine resulted in a dose-related increase in plasma exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-dose ensifentrine demonstrated dose-dependent bronchodilation, and was as effective as a therapeutic dose of nebulised salbutamol. All ensifentrine doses were similarly well tolerated, and did not show the characteristic β₂-agonist systemic adverse effects.

Costs of Workplace Productivity Loss in Patients With Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease

BACKGROUND

Fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are highly morbid chronic disorders that frequently occur in working age individuals. The goal of this study was to determine workplace productivity loss, its determinants, and its estimated costs in patients with fibrotic ILD.

METHODS

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, or unclassifiable ILD were identified from the six-center Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis (CARE-PF). The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire was used to determine health-related productivity loss. Independent predictors of low workplace productivity were identified by using multivariate regression. Patient data were compared with Canadian population census data. The average productivity loss (hours per week) and the individual's hourly wage were used to estimate the costs of productivity loss.

RESULTS

Of 650 eligible patients, 148 (23%) were employed. Productivity loss was reported by 55% of employed patients with an average productivity loss of 7.8 ± 0.9 h per week (2.3 ± 0.6 h per week related to absenteeism and 5.5 ± 0.6 h per week related to presenteeism). Employment among patients with ILD aged 25 to 54 years was 23% lower than the age- and sex-matched general Canadian population (60% vs 83%; P < .001). Employment among patients with ILD aged ≥ 55 years was 18% lower than in the age- and sex-matched population (20% vs 38%; P < .001). Dyspnea and cough were independent predictors of workplace productivity loss. Estimated annual costs of productivity loss were 11,610 Canadian dollars per employee with ILD.

CONCLUSIONS

Workplace productivity loss is common in fibrotic ILD, strongly correlated with symptom severity, and associated with significant cost.

Adherence to medication in children and adolescents with asthma: methods for monitoring and intervention

INTRODUCTION

Poor adherence in children with asthma is a major cause of asthma attacks and poor control, leads to large health-care costs, and has been identified as a factor in asthma deaths. However, it is difficult to detect and frequently overlooked leading to inappropriate escalation of asthma treatment. There is a need for cost effective ways to monitor adherence in order to intervene to change this modifiable behavior. Areas covered: Several measurement tools have been developed to assess adherence in adults and children with asthma. The current methods for measuring adherence, both subjective and objective, have several flaws and even the current gold standard, electronic monitoring devices (EMDs), has limitations. This review will outline and critique the adherence monitoring tools and highlight ways in which they have been used for the purpose of intervention. Expert commentary: Although advances have been made in adherence monitoring, we still have some way to go in creating the ideal monitoring tool. There are no validated tailored self-monitoring questionnaires for children with asthma and most objective measures, such as prescription refill rate and weighing canisters, overestimate adherence. Current EMDs, although useful, need improved accuracy to ensure that both actuation and inhalation are measured, and the devices need to be affordable for use in routine health-care practice.