1
|
Houstin A, Zitterbart DP, Winterl A, Richter S, Planas-Bielsa V, Chevallier D, Ancel A, Fournier J, Fabry B, Le Bohec C. Biologging of emperor penguins-Attachment techniques and associated deployment performance. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0265849. [PMID: 35925903 PMCID: PMC9352057 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of marine animals are equipped with biologgers, to study their physiology, behaviour and ecology, often for conservation purposes. To minimise the impacts of biologgers on the animals’ welfare, the Refinement principle from the Three Rs framework (Replacement, Reduction, Refinement) urges to continuously test and evaluate new and updated biologging protocols. Here, we propose alternative and promising techniques for emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri) capture and on-site logger deployment that aim to mitigate the potential negative impacts of logger deployment on these birds. We equipped adult emperor penguins for short-term (GPS, Time-Depth Recorder (TDR)) and long-term (i.e. planned for one year) deployments (ARGOS platforms, TDR), as well as juvenile emperor penguins for long-term deployments (ARGOS platforms) in the Weddell Sea area where they had not yet been studied. We describe and qualitatively evaluate our protocols for the attachment of biologgers on-site at the colony, the capture of the animals and the recovery of the devices after deployment. We report unprecedented recaptures of long-term equipped adult emperor penguins (50% of equipped individuals recaptured after 290 days). Our data demonstrate that the traditional technique of long-term attachment by gluing the biologgers directly to the back feathers causes excessive feather breakage and the loss of the devices after a few months. We therefore propose an alternative method of attachment for back-mounted devices. This technique led to successful year-round deployments on 37.5% of the equipped juveniles. Finally, we also disclose the first deployments of leg-bracelet mounted TDRs on emperor penguins. Our findings highlight the importance of monitoring potential impacts of biologger deployments on the animals and the need to continue to improve methods to minimize disturbance and enhance performance and results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aymeric Houstin
- Département de Biologie Polaire, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
- CNRS UMR 7178, IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- * E-mail: (AH); (CLB)
| | - Daniel P. Zitterbart
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Woods Hole, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, United States of America
- International Research Organization for Advanced Science and Technology (IROAST), Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Alexander Winterl
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Woods Hole, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, United States of America
| | - Sebastian Richter
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
- Applied Ocean Physics and Engineering Woods Hole, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, United States of America
| | - Víctor Planas-Bielsa
- Département de Biologie Polaire, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
| | | | - André Ancel
- CNRS UMR 7178, IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jérôme Fournier
- CNRS UMR 7204 CESCO, Station de Biologie Marine, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Concarneau, France
- Centre de Recherches sur la Biologie des Populations d’Oiseaux, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France
| | - Ben Fabry
- Department of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Céline Le Bohec
- Département de Biologie Polaire, Centre Scientifique de Monaco, Monaco, Principality of Monaco
- CNRS UMR 7178, IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- * E-mail: (AH); (CLB)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phillips JA, Fayet AL, Guilford T, Manco F, Warwick-Evans V, Trathan P. Foraging conditions for breeding penguins improve with distance from colony and progression of the breeding season at the South Orkney Islands. MOVEMENT ECOLOGY 2021; 9:22. [PMID: 33947478 PMCID: PMC8094539 DOI: 10.1186/s40462-021-00261-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to central place foraging theory, animals will only increase the distance of their foraging trips if more distant prey patches offer better foraging opportunities. Thus, theory predicts that breeding seabirds in large colonies could create a zone of food depletion around the colony, known as "Ashmole's halo". However, seabirds' decisions to forage at a particular distance are likely also complicated by their breeding stage. After chicks hatch, parents must return frequently to feed their offspring, so may be less likely to visit distant foraging patches, even if their quality is higher. However, the interaction between prey availability, intra-specific competition, and breeding stage on the foraging decisions of seabirds is not well understood. The aim of this study was to address this question in chinstrap penguins Pygoscelis antarcticus breeding at a large colony. In particular, we aimed to investigate how breeding stage affects foraging strategy; whether birds foraging far from the colony visit higher quality patches than available locally; and whether there is evidence for intraspecific competition, indicated by prey depletions near the colony increasing over time, and longer foraging trips. METHODS We used GPS and temperature-depth recorders to track the foraging movements of 221 chinstrap penguins from 4 sites at the South Orkney Islands during incubation and brood. We identified foraging dives and calculated the index of patch quality based on time allocation during the dive to assess the quality of the foraging patch. RESULTS We found that chinstrap penguin foraging distance varied between stages, and that trips became shorter as incubation progressed. Although patch quality was lower near the colony than at more distant foraging patches, patch quality near the colony improved over the breeding season. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest chinstrap penguin foraging strategies are influenced by both breeding stage and prey distribution, and the low patch quality near the colony may be due to a combination of depletion by intraspecific competition but compensated by natural variation in prey. Reduced trip durations towards the end of the incubation period may be due to an increase in food availability, as seabirds time their reproduction so that the period of maximum energy demand in late chick-rearing coincides with maximum resource availability in the environment. This may also explain why patch quality around the colony improved over the breeding season. Overall, our study sheds light on drivers of foraging decisions in colonial seabirds, an important question in foraging ecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ann Phillips
- Department of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK.
| | - Annette L Fayet
- Department of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Tim Guilford
- Department of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Fabrizio Manco
- Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge Campus, East Rd, Cambridge, CB1 1PT, UK
| | | | - Phil Trathan
- British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Rd, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK.
| |
Collapse
|