Combining RAAS and calcium channel blockade: ACCOMPLISH in perspective

Increasing complexity: which drug class to choose for treatment of hypertension in the elderly?

Treatment of hypertension in the elderly is expected to become more complex in the coming decades. Based on the current landscape of clinical trials, guideline recommendations remain inconclusive. The present review discusses the latest evidence derived from studies available in 2013 and investigates optimal blood pressure (BP) and preferred treatment substances. Three common archetypes are discussed that hamper the treatment of hypertension in the very elderly. In addition, this paper presents the current recommendations of the NICE 2011, JNC7 2013-update, ESH/ESC 2013, CHEP 2013, JNC8 and ASH/ISH guidelines for elderly patients. Advantages of the six main substance classes, namely diuretics, beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), and direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) are discussed. Medical and economic implications of drug administration in the very elderly are presented. Avoidance of treatment-related adverse effects has become increasingly relevant. Current substance classes are equally effective, with similar effects on cardiovascular outcomes. Selection of substances should therefore also be based on collateral advantages of drugs that extend beyond BP reduction. The combination of ACEIs and diuretics appears to be favorable in managing systolic/diastolic hypertension. Diuretics are a preferred and cheap combination drug, and the combination with CCBs is recommended for patients with isolated systolic hypertension. ACEIs and CCBs are favorable for patients with dementia, while CCBs and ARBs imply substantial cost savings due to high adherence.

Switching patients with uncontrolled hypertension on amlodipine 10 mg to single-pill combinations of telmisartan and amlodipine: results of the TEAMSTA-10 study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different strengths of single-pill combinations of the angiotensin II receptor blocker telmisartan 40 or 80 mg (T40 or T80) and the calcium channel blocker amlodipine 10 mg (A10) compared with that of A10 monotherapy in a hypertensive patient population whose blood pressure was not controlled by A10.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

An 8-week, randomized, double-blind, controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of single-pill combinations of T40/A10 or T80/A10 versus A10 monotherapy in 947 patients with uncontrolled hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] ≥90 mmHg after 6 weeks' A10).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was change from baseline in seated in-clinic trough cuff DBP after 8 weeks. Secondary efficacy end points included change from baseline in seated in-clinic trough cuff systolic blood pressure (SBP), and the proportion of patients achieving SBP/DBP response (<140/90 mmHg or ≥10/15 mmHg reduction) and SBP/DBP goal (<140/90 mmHg) after 8 weeks' treatment. Adverse events were recorded throughout.

RESULTS

In a patient population who had failed to achieve DBP goal with A10, T40/A10 and T80/A10 resulted in significantly greater (P < 0.0001) reductions in seated trough SBP/DBP versus A10 (-3.7/-2.8 mmHg; -3.9/-2.8 mmHg), significantly higher SBP/DBP goal rates versus A10 (58.8/63.7% and 60.3/66.5% vs. 50.2/51.1%), and significantly higher SBP/DBP response rates with T40-80/A10 versus A10 (64.7/66.0% and 65.8/68.7% vs. 54.1/53.4%). T40-80/A10 were well tolerated. Rates of peripheral edema adverse events were low (6.7-8.5%) and not significantly different between the treatment groups; however, patients were pre-screened for intolerance to A10.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching patients who fail to achieve blood pressure goal with A10 to a single-pill combination of T40/A10 or T80/A10 results in superior SBP/DBP reductions, and SBP/DBP goal and response rates.

Aliskiren and valsartan combination therapy for the management of hypertension

Combination therapy is necessary for most patients with hypertension, and agents that inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) are mainstays in hypertension management, especially for patients at high cardiovascular and renal risk. Single blockade of the RAAS with an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) confers some cardiorenal protection; however, these agents do not extinguish the RAAS as evidenced by a reactive increase in plasma renin activity (PRA), a cardiovascular risk marker, and incomplete cardiorenal protection. Dual blockade with an ACE inhibitor and an ARB offers no additional benefit in patients with hypertension and normal renal and left ventricular function. Indeed, PRA increases synergistically with dual blockade. Aliskiren, the first direct renin inhibitor (DRI) to become available has provided an opportunity to study the merit of DRI/ARB combination treatment. By blocking the first and rate-limiting step in the RAAS, aliskiren reduces PRA by at least 70% and buffers the compensatory increase in PRA observed with ACE inhibitors and ARBs. The combination of a DRI and an ARB or an ACE inhibitor is an effective approach for lowering blood pressure; available data indicate that such combinations favorably affect proteinuria, left ventricular mass index, and brain natriuretic peptide in patients with albuminuria, left ventricular hypertrophy, and heart failure, respectively. Ongoing outcome studies will clarify the role of aliskiren and aliskiren-based combination RAAS blockade in patients with hypertension and those at high cardiorenal risk.