Efficacy and safety of imiquimod 5% cream for basal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Immune Stimulation with Imiquimod to Best Face SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Prevent Long COVID

Through widespread immunization against SARS-CoV-2 prior to or post-infection, a substantial segment of the global population has acquired both humoral and cellular immunity, and there has been a notable reduction in the incidence of severe and fatal cases linked to this virus and accelerated recovery times for those infected. Nonetheless, a significant demographic, comprising around 20% to 30% of the adult population, remains unimmunized due to diverse factors. Furthermore, alongside those recovered from the infection, there is a subset of the population experiencing persistent symptoms referred to as Long COVID. This condition is more prevalent among individuals with underlying health conditions and immune system impairments. Some Long COVID pathologies stem from direct damage inflicted by the viral infection, whereas others arise from inadequate immune system control over the infection or suboptimal immunoregulation. There are differences in the serum cytokines and miRNA profiles between infected individuals who develop severe COVID-19 or Long COVID and those who control adequately the infection. This review delves into the advantages and constraints associated with employing imiquimod in human subjects to enhance the immune response during SARS-CoV-2 immunization. Restoration of the immune system can modify it towards a profile of non-susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2. An adequate immune system has the potential to curb viral propagation, mitigate symptoms, and ameliorate the severe consequences of the infection.

Therapeutic Approaches for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer: Standard of Care and Emerging Modalities

Skin cancer encompasses a range of cutaneous malignancies, with non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) being the most common neoplasm worldwide. Skin exposure is the leading risk factor for initiating NMSC. Ultraviolet (UV) light induces various genomic aberrations in both tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing genes in epidermal cells. In conjunction with interactions with a changed stromal microenvironment and local immune suppression, these aberrations contribute to the occurrence and expansion of cancerous lesions. Surgical excision is still the most common treatment for these lesions; however, locally advanced or metastatic disease significantly increases the chances of morbidity or death. In recent years, numerous pharmacological targets were found through extensive research on the pathogenic mechanisms of NMSCs, leading to the development of novel treatments including Hedgehog pathway inhibitors for advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Despite the efficacy of these new drugs, drug resistance and tolerability issues often arise with long-term treatment. Ongoing studies aim to identify alternative strategies with reduced adverse effects and increased tolerability. This review summarizes the current and emerging therapies used to treat NMSC.

Topical and Intralesional Immunotherapy for the Management of Basal Cell Carcinoma

Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of cancer among the white population. Individuals with fair skin have an average lifetime risk of around 30% for developing BCC, and there is a noticeable upward trend in its incidence rate. The principal treatment objectives for BCC involve achieving the total excision of the tumor while maximizing the preservation of function and cosmesis. Surgery is considered the treatment of choice for BCC for two main reasons: it allows for the highest cure rates and facilitates histological control of resection margins. However, in the subgroup of patients with low-risk recurrence or medical contraindications for surgery, new non-surgical treatment alternatives can provide an excellent oncological and cosmetic outcome. An evident and justified instance of these local therapies occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, a period when surgical interventions carried out in hospital settings were not a viable option.

Photodynamic therapy for skin carcinomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is increasingly used for the treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, it is unknown whether photodynamic therapy is more effective than other commonly used treatment modalities for these cancers.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine the relative efficacy and safety of PDT compared with placebo or other interventions for the treatment of skin carcinomas.

Methods

Searches were performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. We included randomized controlled trials comparing the PDT with other interventions in adults skin BCC or SCC that reported on lesion response, recurrence, cosmetic appearance, or safety outcomes.

Results

Seventeen unique randomized controlled trials, representing 22 study arms from 21 publications were included. The included trials included 2,166 participants, comparing methyl aminolevulinic (MAL) PDT (six studies) or aminolevulinic acid (ALA) PDT (two studies). Comparators included placebo, surgery, hexaminolevulinic (HAL) PDT, erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet ablative factional laser (YAG-AFL) PDT, fluorouracil, and imiquimod. There were few studies available for each comparison. Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects risk ratios were calculated for response, recurrence, cosmetic outcomes, and adverse events. MAL-PDT had similar response rates to surgery, ALA-PDT, fluorouracil and imiquimod at 3- and 12 months post-intervention. The rate of recurrence was similar, showing few differences at 12 months, but at later time points (24-60 months), fewer lesions recurred with surgery and imiquimod than with PDT. PDT also caused more adverse events and pain than other interventions. However, PDT treatment was more likely to receive a "good" or "excellent" rating for cosmetic appearance than surgery or cryotherapy.

Conclusion

This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that the choice of treatment modality for BCC or SCC is best chosen in the context of the location and size of the lesion, the socioeconomic circumstances of the patient, as well as the patient's preferences. We call for more high quality studies to be done, in order to enable more reliable interpretations of the data.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=368626, identifier CRD42022368626.

Advances in Topical Treatments of Cutaneous Malignancies

Surgical excision has been the preferred treatment for cutaneous malignancies, but can be affected by various considerations. Noninvasive, self-administered topical treatments represent an alternative option. The aim of this review was to evaluate and summarize evidence-based recommendations for topical treatments of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC), in situ melanoma (MIS), and extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD). Studies were reviewed on PubMed. Included studies were summarized, assessed for biases, and assigned a level of evidence to develop treatment recommendations. For the treatment of superficial BCC, complete clearance rates ranged from 90 to 93% for 5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 71 to 76% for imiquimod (IMQ). For the treatment of nodular BCC, clearance rates for photodynamic therapy (PDT) were 91% at 3 months, with a sustained lesion clearance response rate of 76% after 5 years of follow-up. Clearance rates were 53 to 76% with IMQ. For squamous cell carcinoma in situ, clearance rates ranged from 52 to 98% for PDT, 67 to 92% for 5-FU, and 75 to 93% for IMQ. For MIS, clearance rates ranged from 53 to 92% for IMQ. For EMPD, 54% of 110 patients in cohort studies and case series had a clinical complete response with IMQ. While surgical intervention remains the standard of care for skin cancer, non-invasive, self-administered topical treatments are highly desirable alternative options. Ultimately, the patient and provider should find a treatment modality that aligns with the patient's expectations and maintenance of quality of life.

In vitro characterization of immune modulating drug-eluting immunobeads towards transarterial embolization in cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive liver cancer with limited effective treatment options. In this study, we selected TLR agonists imiquimod (IMQ), gardiquimod (GARD), GS-9620 and DSR 6434, and a small molecule checkpoint inhibitor, BMS-202, for characterization of drug loading and release from radiopaque embolic beads (DC Bead LUMI) for potential use in image-guided transarterial embolization (TACE) of HCC. The maximum drug loading capacity and amount of drug released over time were determined by high performance liquid chromatography and compared with the commonly used anthracycline, doxorubicin hydrochloride (Dox). Maximum drug loading was 204.54 ± 3.87, 65.28 ± 3.09, 65.95 ± 6.96, 65.97 ± 1.54, and 148.05 ± 2.24 mg of drug per milliliter of DC Bead LUMI for Dox, GARD, DSR 6434, IMQ, and BMS-202, respectively. Fast loading and subsequent rapid release in saline were observed for IMQ, GARD, and DSR 6434. These drugs could also be partially removed from the beads by repeated washing with de-ionized water suggesting weak interaction with the beads. Aggregation of IMQ was observed in water and saline. GS-9620 partially decomposed in the solubilizing solution, so loading and release were not characterized. Compared to TLR agonists, slower loading and release were observed for Dox and BMS-202. Potential factors influencing drug loading into and release from DC Bead LUMI including steric hinderance, hydrophobicity, drug pKa, and the electrostatic nature of the beads are discussed. The maximum loading capacity of BMS-202 and Dox in DC Bead LUMI exceeded the maximum theoretical loading capacity of the beads expected from ionic interaction alone suggesting additional drug-bead or drug-drug interactions may play a role. Slightly more release was observed for BMS-202 at early time points followed by a slower release compared to Dox. Further study of these drug-bead combinations is warranted in search of new tools for locoregional delivery of immune-modulating agents for treatment of HCC via drug-eluting bead chemoembolization.

The mechanisms and cross-protection of trained innate immunity

In recent years, the traditional cognition of immunological memory being specific to adaptive immunity has been challenged. Innate immunity can mount enhanced responsiveness upon secondary stimulation, and a phenomenon is termed trained innate immunity. Trained innate immunity is orchestrated by distinct metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming in both circulating myeloid cells and myeloid progenitor cells in bone marrow, leading to long-term resistance to related and non-related pathogens infections. The induction of trained innate immunity can also polarize innate immune cells towards a hyperresponsive phenotype in the tumor microenvironment to exert antitumor effects. This review will discuss the current understanding of innate immune memory and the mechanisms during the induction of innate immunity, including signaling pathways, metabolic changes, and epigenetic rewriting. We also provide an overview of cross-protection against infectious diseases and cancers based on trained innate immunity.

Clinical cancer immunotherapy: Current progress and prospects

Immune checkpoint therapy via PD-1 antibodies has shown exciting clinical value and robust therapeutic potential in clinical practice. It can significantly improve progression-free survival and overall survival. Following surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, cancer treatment has now entered the age of immunotherapy. Although cancer immunotherapy has shown remarkable efficacy, it also suffers from limitations such as irAEs, cytokine storm, low response rate, etc. In this review, we discuss the basic classification, research progress, and limitations of cancer immunotherapy. Besides, by combining cancer immunotherapy resistance mechanism with analysis of combination therapy, we give our insights into the development of new anticancer immunotherapy strategies.

Basal Cell Carcinoma: Pathology, Current Clinical Treatment, and Potential Use of Lipid Nanoparticles

Skin cancer is the most common type of carcinoma diagnosed worldwide, with significant morbidity and mortality rates among Caucasians, in particular basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The main risk factors of BCC are well-identified, and there are many chemotherapeutic drugs available for its treatment. The effectiveness of therapeutic options is governed by several factors, including the location of the tumor, its size, and the presence of metastases (although rare for BCC). However, available treatments are based on non-targeted approaches, which encounter a significant risk of systemic toxicity in several organs. Site-specific chemotherapy for BCC has been proposed via the loading of anticancer drugs into nanoparticles. Among various types of nanoparticles, in this review, we focus on potential new regimens for the treatment of BCC using classical anticancer drugs loaded into novel lipid nanoparticles. To meet patient aesthetic expectations and enhance the effectiveness of basal cell carcinoma treatment, new therapeutic topical strategies are discussed, despite a limited number of reports available in the literature.

Soluble Factors and Receptors Involved in Skin Innate Immunity-What Do We Know So Far?

The pattern recognition receptors, complement system, inflammasomes, antimicrobial peptides, and cytokines are innate immunity soluble factors. They sense, either directly or indirectly, the potential threats and produce inflammation and cellular death. High interest in their modulation has emerged lately, acknowledging they are involved in many cutaneous inflammatory, infectious, and neoplastic disorders. We extensively reviewed the implication of soluble factors in skin innate immunity. Furthermore, we showed which molecules target these factors, how these molecules work, and how they have been used in dermatological practice. Cytokine inhibitors have paved the way to a new era in treating moderate to severe psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.

Early redox homeostasis disruption contributes to the differential cytotoxicity of imiquimod on transformed and normal endothelial cells

The off-label use of imiquimod (IQ) for hemangioma treatment has shown clinical benefits. We have previously reported a selective direct IQ-cytotoxic effect on transformed (H5V) vs. normal (1G11) endothelial cells (EC). In the present study, we investigated the mechanism underlying this selective cytotoxicity in terms of TLR7/8 receptor expression, NF-κB signalling and time-dependent modifications of oxidative stress parameters (ROS: reactive oxygen species, catalase and superoxide dismutase activities, GSH/GSSG and lipid peroxidation). TLR7/8 level was extremely low in both cell lines, and IQ did not upregulate TLR7/8 expression or activate NF-κB signalling. IQ significantly induced ROS in H5V after 2 h and strongly affected antioxidant defenses. After 12 h, enzyme activities were restored to baseline levels but a robust drop in GSH/GSSG persisted together with increased lipid peroxidation levels and a marked mitochondrial dysfunction. Although in normal IQ-treated EC some oxidative stress parameters were affected after 4 h, mitochondrial health and GSH/GSSG ratio remained notably unaffected after 12 h. Therefore, the early alterations (0-2 h) in transformed EC breached redox homeostasis as strongly as to enhance their susceptibility to IQ. This interesting facet of IQ as redox disruptor could broaden its therapeutic potential for other skin malignancies, alone or in adjuvant schemes.

'Efficacy and safety of imiquimod 5% cream for basal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial': a critical appraisal

AIM

Jia and He aimed 'to compare the efficacy and safety of imiquimod with other treatments in patients with basal cell carcinoma' (BCC).

DESIGN AND INCLUSION CRITERIA

Meta-analysis of studies that included patients with histologically confirmed BCC treated with imiquimod 5% cream compared with all other treatments, including vehicle, excisional surgery, cryosurgery, fluorouracil and methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy.

OUTCOMES

The main outcome measures included histological and composite clearance rates, success rates, complete response rates, tumour-free survival and adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with a total of 4265 patients were included in the review. Pooled analyses comparing imiquimod with all or any of the listed comparators, including vehicle, demonstrated higher histological clearance rates [risk ratio (RR) 9·28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5·56-15·5; P < 0·001], higher composite clearance rates (RR 34·2, 95% CI 21·3, 55·1; P = 0·001), no significant difference in success rates (RR 0·98, 95% CI 0·89-1·08; P = 0·73), higher complete response rates (RR 3·15, 95% CI 1·55-6·38; P = 0·001), no significant difference in tumour-free survival (RR 1·15, 95% CI 0·98-1·35; P = 0·088) and increased incidence of adverse events (RR 2·00, 95% CI 1·39-2·88; P < 0·001).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors state that 'imiquimod significantly exhibited benefit effect in improving the histological/composite clearance rates' compared with other treatments, and they suggest it could be used as the first-choice treatment for patients with BCC.

COMMENT

The main concerns related to the article by Jia and He are that the research question is replicative, it makes little sense to combine all BCC types in a meta-analysis, and it also makes no sense to combine an active treatment against a combination of vehicle and other active treatments. There are also concerns about bias related to the use of the same study data more than once in a meta-analysis. Furthermore, we have identified an example of covert duplicate publication, which further compounds the profusion of misleading systematic reviews.