Neil-Sztramko SE, Smith-Turchyn J, Fong A, Kauffeldt K, Tomasone JR. Community-based exercise programs for cancer survivors: A scoping review of program characteristics using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021;
103:542-558.e10. [PMID:
34375631 DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.026]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To describe the characteristics of exercise programs for cancer survivors conducted outside of a research laboratory (i.e., home-based, or community-based settings).
DATA SOURCES
A systematic search of published literature was conducted using Medline, Pubmed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, SPORTdiscus, and Embase from 1980 to January 2021. Where conference abstracts were identified, authors were contacted for other articles.
STUDY SELECTION
Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, and full texts of potentially relevant studies with discrepancies resolved by discussion. Included studies were reports of exercise programs or interventions in which participants exercise at home, or in a community-based setting, and including individuals diagnosed with cancer either undergoing treatment or who had completed treatment.
DATA EXTRACTION
Data were extracted using the Oxford Implementation Index and coded under the five domains of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Extraction and coding were completed by two independent reviewers, with discrepancies resolved through discussion. Data were synthesized narratively according to CFIR.
DATA SYNTHESIS
A total of 58 publications describing 34 individual programs from around the world were included. Of these, only 14 publications had the specific goal of reporting on program implementation and development. A variety of intervention characteristics and characteristics of individuals involved in the intervention were described. Reporting of factors related to the CFIR domains of inner setting, outer setting and implementation process were minimal.
CONCLUSIONS
This review summarizes the characteristics of existing programs that have been reported in the literature and finds that partnerships and collaboration in the inner and outer setting, and as part of the process of implementation. This review highlights key knowledge gaps to be answered in order to support the development of future community-based interventions.
Collapse