Nurse-led stroke aftercare addressing long-term psychosocial outcome: a comparison to care-as-usual

Healthcare professionals' experience regarding competencies in specialized and primary stroke units: A qualitative study

AIM

To describe healthcare professionals' experience of needed competence in patient stroke care within specialist and primary healthcare.

BACKGROUND

Healthcare professionals who provide stroke care need multifaceted, multi-professional skills; ongoing training is important for competent stroke care.

DESIGN

A descriptive qualitative study.

METHODS

Six focus group interviews with semi-structured interviews were conducted in October and November 2020. Healthcare professionals (n = 25) working in stroke care units in both specialist and primary healthcare settings were interviewed. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and analyzed inductively by content analysis. The study was conducted, and results were reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research.

RESULTS

Five main categories were identified: clinical competence; multiprofessional networking competence; competence in interaction skills; emotional and psychoeducational support competence; and self-management and development competence.

CONCLUSION

Competence in stroke care includes both in-depth and wide-ranging professional competences that require ongoing development. Utilizing various education models and collaborative learning approaches can help meet the requirements for developing competence in stroke care.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

Sustaining telecare consultations in nurse-led clinics: Perceptions of stroke patients and advanced practice nurses: A qualitative study

Objective

The ongoing pandemic has accentuated the use of telecare services; however, only limited progress has been made in understanding the barriers and facilitators to using these services. In order to move towards sustaining such essential services, the present study aimed to ascertain the experiences of stroke survivors and healthcare providers regarding the utilization of a post-stroke telecare service in Hong Kong.

Methods

Interpretive description was employed for this study. Semi-structured discussions and interviews were undertaken with nine stroke survivors and four stroke nurses who delivered the telecare services. The principles of thematic analysis were inductively followed to analyse the data. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used to guide the reporting of the data.

Results

Three themes emerged: (a) pre-existing post-discharge service pathways; (b) push factors/facilitators for telecare usage; and (c) barriers to telecare usage. Overall, the telecare service was considered a significant alternative and one that complements conventional face-to-face follow-ups. Stroke survivors were motivated to use the service because it was convenient and flexible. However, significant barriers exist, including technical issues and a lack of guidelines and training opportunities for healthcare providers.

Conclusions

Although telecare is still evolving, several factors drive stroke survivors to use the service. Attention needs to be paid to the emerging barriers to improve long-term usage of the service. Clear guidelines are needed to underpin the development and implementation of telecare services.

A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of case management intervention for stroke survivors across three countries

PURPOSE

A stroke survivor who is discharged to home care faces many challenges during the transition from the hospital to home, including managing their care at home and engaging in rehabilitation and recovery. Case management was developed to ease the transition from hospital to home and help people with stroke cope with their care management challenges. However, the effects of case management intervention remain inconclusive. Case management was designed to direct care and may represent a novel method for reducing the burden of care. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of case management interventions on mental health outcomes, activities of daily living capacity, physical function, and social function among stroke survivors.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

This study included studies examining the impacts of case management interventions for stroke survivors that were published in English and identified by searching eight databases, from database inception to February 20, 2022. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to pool effect sizes using a random-effects model (in Stata 16.0). The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB-2) was used to assess the methodological quality of each study.

FINDINGS

The inclusion criteria were satisfied by eight studies (including a total of 1119 stroke survivors). Case management had positive effects on mental health (SMD: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.45, p = 0.001) and activities of daily living (SMD: 0.68; 95% CI: 00.37 to 0.99, p < 0.001). However, no significant effects were observed for either physical function or social function.

CONCLUSION

Case management appears to enhance the mental health and activities of daily living among stroke survivors.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Case management interventions hold promise as efficient, cost-effective, and accessible strategies to positively influence care for stroke survivors. This intervention strategy could be applied to the hospital-to-home transition to guide care among this population.

Topics Mentioned by Stroke Patients during Supportive Phone Calls-Implications for Individualized Aftercare Programs

By understanding stroke as a chronic disease, aftercare becomes increasingly important. For developing aftercare programs, the patients' perspective regarding, for example, stroke-related symptoms and interactions with the healthcare system is necessary. Records from a local stroke pilot program were used to extract relevant topics from the patients' perspective, as mentioned during a phone call two months after hospital discharge. Data from 157 patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) were included. "Rehabilitation" was mentioned by 67.5% of patients, followed by "specialist physician", "symptoms", and "medication". Compared with severely disabled patients, those with no relevant disability at hospital discharge mentioned "symptoms" significantly more often. Regarding rehabilitation, "outpatient care" was mentioned more often by patients in an inpatient setting, and 11.8% without rehabilitation mentioned "depression". Patients in single-compared to multi-person households differed, for example, in the frequency of mentioning "specialist physicians" and gradually "outpatient care". A multivariate model yielded associations between the disability at discharge and the probability of mentioning relevant topics afterward. This study provided insights into the patients' perspective and identified topics that need attention while accompanying stroke and TIA patients after discharge. Further, the degree of disability at discharge might be helpful for planning individual aftercare.

Effects of the nurse-led program on disabilities improvement in patients with ischemic stroke

To evaluate whether the nurse-led program can improve disabilities in patients with ischemic stroke for more than 6 months. This is a randomized, open-label study. Participants in the usual-care group received the usual care that included verbal stroke-related education and secondary prevention. Participants in the active group received the usual care plus the nurse-led program intervention. The disability was evaluated using National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). The Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5) was used to assess mental health status (MHS). The median duration since ischemic stroke was 8.4 and 8.6 months, respectively. At baseline, there was no difference in the median NIHSS value and the NIHSS category between these 2 groups. After 6 months' follow-up, the median NIHSS value was lower in the active group (4.1 vs 6.3). The proportion of patients with NIHSS of 1 to 4 was higher (50.0% vs 28.6%) while the proportion of patients with NIHSS of 5 to 12 (24.1% vs 51.8%) was lower in the active group. After multivariate regression analysis, the nurse-led program was negatively associated with increased NIHSS category (odds ratio of 0.70 and 95% confidence interval of 0.62-0.88). In the group with MHI-5 less than median, the nurse-led program was not associated with NIHSS category. While in the group with MHI-5 greater than median, the nurse-led program was associated decreased NIHSS category, with a significant interaction (P value = .03). In ischemic stroke patients for more than 6 months, the nurse-led program improves disabilities, which might be related to MHS improvement.

Interdisciplinary follow-up clinic for people with spinal cord injury: a retrospective study of a carousel model

STUDY DESIGN

Explorative retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Secondary health conditions (SHCs) are common in people with spinal cord injury (SCI). To date, little is known about the effectiveness of long-term follow-up care in preventing SHCs. The objective of this study was to explore the therapeutic content of an interdisciplinary follow-up clinic by retrospective analyses of provided recommendations and collected data concerning SHCs.

SETTING

Rehabilitation center Sint Maartenskliniek, The Netherlands.

METHODS

All people with SCI, who visited one or more outpatient interdisciplinary follow-up clinics between January 2012 and October 2020 were included in this study. Treatment information was retrieved from their medical records.

RESULTS

The 264 participants of the follow-up clinic received, after their first visit, an average of 3.9 recommendations regarding SHCs. Most recommendations were preventive in nature (43%), and were related to physical SHCs (61%). Most recommendations were followed by the participants (34% out of 40% that could be determined) and half of the underlying problems were solved (31% out of 62%). The bodyweight and respiratory function remained stable over time.

CONCLUSION

Participants of the interdisciplinary follow-up clinics received extensive recommendations on a variety of subjects, which most likely, reflects the interdisciplinary approach. Recommendations were followed-up to a large extent, resulting in solving half of the underlying SHCs. This way, worse SHCs were prevented by the recommendations. This findings, together with the stability of respiratory function and bodyweight, suggests the added value of the interdisciplinary follow-up clinic to usual care. More prospective research is necessary to investigate the (cost-)effectiveness.