Healthcare resource utilization in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a population-based study from Ontario, Canada

Health care utilization and costs for frail vs nonfrail patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Half of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving curative-intent treatment are frail. Understanding the differences in health care utilization including costs between frail and nonfrail patients can inform appropriate models of care. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using population-based data in Ontario, Canada. Patients aged ≥66 years with DLBCL who received frontline curative-intent chemoimmunotherapy between 2006 and 2017 were included. Frailty was defined using a cumulative deficit-based frailty index. Health care utilization and costs were grouped into 5 phases: (1) 90 days preceding first treatment; (2) early treatment (0 to +90 days after starting treatment); (3) late treatment (+91 to +180 days); (4) follow-up (+181 to -181 days before death); and (5) end of life (last 180 days before death). Costs were standardized to 30-day intervals (2019 Canadian dollars). A total of 5527 patients were included (median age, 75 years; 48% female). A total of 2699 patients (49%) were classified as frail. The median costs for frail vs nonfrail patients per 30 days based on phase of care were (1) $5683 vs $2586 ; (2) $13 090 vs $11 256; (3) $5734 vs $4883; (4) $1138 vs $686; and (5) $11 413 vs $9089; statistically significant in all phases. In multivariable modeling, frail patients had higher rates of emergency department visits and hospitalizations and increased costs than nonfrail patients through all phases except end-of-life phase. During end-of-life phase, a substantial portion of patients (n = 2569 [84%]) required admission to hospital; 684 (27%) required intensive care unit admission. Future work could assess whether certain hospitalizations are preventable, particularly for patients identified as frail.

Myelofibrosis and anemia: A German claims data analysis to describe epidemiology and current treatment

OBJECTIVES

There is limited data on the incidence, prevalence, and treatments for myelofibrosis (MF) in Germany. This retrospective study examined claims data from 3.3 million insured individuals, spanning from 2010 to 2021.

METHODS

Four sensitivity scenarios were explored to identify cases of MF. Point prevalence and cumulative incidence of MF were determined as of December 31, 2021, and within 2021, respectively. A cross-sectional analysis used the main scenario definition of MF to identify cases and evaluate the period prevalence of patients receiving treatment for symptoms and/or splenomegaly, including first-line (1L) Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi), second-line, or further (2L+) MF-related treatment therapies during 2021. The prevalence of anemia treatment was also reported.

RESULTS

The estimated standardized point prevalence of MF on December 31, 2021, was 9.9-12.4 cases per 100 000 persons, and cumulative incidence in 2021 was 1.2-1.8 cases per 100 000 persons. Standardized period prevalence in 2021 for MF patients receiving 1L JAKi and/or 2L+ MF-related treatment was 4.0 cases per 100 000. Among these patients, 47.1%-53.7% required treatment for anemia, resulting in a period prevalence of 1.9-2.2 cases per 100 000 individuals.

CONCLUSION

The data reveal gaps in MF treatments and the need to improve patient quality of life.

Direct and indirect costs for patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are associated with substantial healthcare resource use and productivity loss. This retrospective cohort analysis used disability leave and medical claims data to measure direct and indirect healthcare costs associated with MPNs. The analysis included 173 patients with myelofibrosis (MF), 4477 with polycythemia vera (PV), 6061 with essential thrombocythemia (ET), and matched controls (n = 519, n = 13,431, and n = 18,183, respectively). Total healthcare costs were significantly higher for cases versus controls in each cohort (mean cost difference: MF, $67,456; PV, $10,970; ET, $22,279). Cases were more likely than controls to take disability leave and incurred higher disability-related costs. Among subgroups with thrombotic events, direct and indirect costs were higher for cases versus controls. Thrombotic events substantially increased direct costs and disability leave for patients with PV or ET compared with the full PV or ET cohorts. These findings demonstrate increased economic burden for patients with MPNs.

Evaluation of Absolute Neutrophil, Lymphocyte and Platelet Count and Their Ratios as Predictors of Thrombotic Risk in Patients with Prefibrotic and Overt Myelofibrosis

AIM

To investigate the prognostic contribution of absolute neutrophil (ANC), lymphocyte (ALC), platelet count and their ratios, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), to thrombotic risk in patients with prefibrotic and overt fibrotic myelofibrosis (MF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 256 patients with prefibrotic (85 patients) and overt fibrotic MF (171 patients) treated in six Croatian hematological centers.

RESULTS

Prefibrotic compared to overt fibrotic MF patients presented with significantly higher ALC, platelet count and PLR, and experienced longer time to thrombosis (TTT). Among prefibrotic patients, ANC > 8.33 × 109/L (HR 13.08, p = 0.036), ALC > 2.58 × 109/L (HR 20.63, p = 0.049) and platelet count > 752 × 109/L (HR 10.5, p = 0.043) remained independently associated with shorter TTT. Among overt fibrotic patients, ANC > 8.8 × 109/L (HR 4.49, p = 0.004), ALC ≤ 1.43 × 109/L (HR 4.15, p = 0.003), platelet count ≤ 385 × 109/L (HR 4.68, p = 0.004) and chronic kidney disease (HR 9.07, p < 0.001) remained independently associated with shorter TTT.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic properties of ANC, ALC and platelet count are mutually independent and exceed those of NLR and PLR regarding thrombotic risk stratification. ALC and platelet count associate in opposite directions with thrombotic risk in prefibrotic and overt fibrotic MF patients.

Labor market affiliation of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: a population-based matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) suffer from substantial symptoms and risk of debilitating complications, yet observational data on their labor market affiliation are scarce.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a descriptive cohort study using data from Danish nationwide registries, including patients diagnosed with MPN in 2010-2016. Each patient was matched with up to ten comparators without MPN on age, sex, level of education, and region of residence. We assessed pre- and post-diagnosis labor market affiliation, defined as working, unemployed, or receiving sickness benefit, disability pension, retirement pension, or other health-related benefits. Labor market affiliation was assessed weekly from two years pre-diagnosis until death, emigration, or 31 December 2018. For patients and comparators, we reported percentage point (pp) changes in labor market affiliation cross-sectionally from week -104 pre-diagnosis to week 104 post-diagnosis.

RESULTS

The study included 3,342 patients with MPN and 32,737 comparators. From two years pre-diagnosis until two years post-diagnosis, a larger reduction in the proportion working was observed among patients than comparators (essential thrombocythemia: 10.2 [95% CI: 6.3-14.1] vs. 6.8 [95% CI: 5.5-8.0] pp; polycythemia vera: 9.6 [95% CI: 5.9-13.2] vs. 7.4 [95% CI: 6.2-8.7] pp; myelofibrosis: 8.1 [95% CI: 3.0-13.2] vs. 5.8 [95% CI: 4.2-7.5] pp; and unclassifiable MPN: 8.0 [95% CI: 3.0-13.0] vs. 7.4 [95% CI: 5.7-9.1] pp). Correspondingly, an increase in the proportion of patients receiving sickness benefits including other health-related benefits was evident around the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Overall, we found that Danish patients with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, myelofibrosis, and unclassifiable MPN had slightly impaired labor market affiliation compared with a population of the same age and sex. From two years pre-diagnosis to two years post-diagnosis, we observed a larger reduction in the proportion of patients with MPN working and a greater proportion receiving sickness benefits compared with matched individuals.

Prevalence of frailty and its association with clinical outcomes in myeloproliferative neoplasms: a population-based study

Clinical implications of frailty in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), including essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF), are unknown. In this population-based study, all incident cases of MPN from the Ontario cancer registry between 2004 and 2019 (N = 10 336; ET = 5108; PV = 3843; MF = 1385) and their matched controls (for age, sex, residence, and income) in a 1:4 ratio were included. Baseline frailty measured using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator and McIsaac frailty index (mFI), categorized as fit, prefrail, or frail if mFI <0.10, 0.11 to 0.20, >0.20), was significantly higher in ET, PV, and MF compared with matched controls (standardized mean difference of 0.27, 0.27, and 0.28). Over 23%, 20%, and 34% of patients with ET, PV, and MF were frail or prefrail despite a younger age (<65 years) or minimal comorbidities. In Cox proportional regression, frailty was independently associated with worse overall survival (OS) after adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities compared with mFI-fit patients. The hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for OS for mFI-prefrail and mFI-frail patients were: 1.6 (1.3-1.9) and 3.6 (2.9-4.4) in ET, 1.3 (1.1-1.5) and 2.7 (2.1-3.4) in PV, and 1.2 (1.0-1.5) and 2.0 (1.5-2.7) in MF. Patients with MPN have a substantially higher prevalence of frailty compared with matched controls, which is associated with reduced OS, independent of age or comorbidities.

Healthcare resource utilization in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: A Danish nationwide matched cohort study

Few studies have assessed healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) using a matched cohort design. Further, no detailed assessment of HRU in the years preceding an MPN diagnosis exists. We conducted a registry-based nationwide Danish cohort study, including patients with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera, myelofibrosis, and unclassifiable MPN diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2016. HRU data were summarized annually from 2 years before MPN diagnosis until emigration, death, or end of study (December 2017). We included 3342 MPN patients and 32 737 comparisons without an MPN diagnosis, matched on sex, age, region of residence, and level of education. During the study period, the difference in HRU (rate ratio) between patients and matched comparisons ranged from 1.0 to 1.5 for general practitioner contacts, 0.9 to 2.2 for hospitalizations, 0.9 to 3.8 for inpatient days, 1.0 to 4.0 for outpatient visits, 1.3 to 2.1 for emergency department visits, and 1.0 to 4.1 for treatments/examinations. In conclusion, MPN patients had overall higher HRU than the matched comparisons throughout the follow-up period (maximum 8 years). Further, MPN patients had substantially increased HRU in both the primary and secondary healthcare sector in the 2 years preceding the diagnosis.

Professional Case Management in Outpatient Settings for Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this discussion is to review the management and symptomatic burden of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Patients with MPNs are at increased risk for thromboembolic events; thus, cardiovascular complications are not uncommon. Professional case managers can coordinate outpatient services with the health care team and assist patients to mitigate cardiovascular complications.

PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING

This discussion is relevant to professional case managers who manage patients with chronic conditions in outpatient settings.

FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS

Professional case managers can intervene for patients with MPNs to improve (a) coordination of scheduled therapeutic phlebotomy procedures, and (b) education about subcutaneous injections and frequent monitoring of laboratory reports. In the outpatient setting, professional case managers can improve health care utilization for patients with MPNs and promote high-quality self-care and symptom management to prevent adverse complications.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

As a member of the outpatient health care team, the professional case manager can serve as a key clinician with comprehensive knowledge of the patient's experience of living with an MPN, their usual state of health and symptoms, and the factors affecting their quality of life. This article explores the role of the professional case manager in the outpatient setting and suggests specific interventions to improve delivery of care and contribute to better self-care management. Professional case managers can assess and validate symptom burden, coordinate and manage routine laboratory testing, support careful medication adjustment, and contribute to improved health outcomes.

Fedratinib: a pharmacotherapeutic option for JAK-inhibitor naïve and exposed patients with myelofibrosis

INTRODUCTION

Ruxolitinib is the most commonly used JAK-inhibitor (JAKi) for the management of symptoms related to splenomegaly and cytokine-mediated inflammation in patients with myelofibrosis (MF), but is limited by variable durability of response with most patients experiencing failure after 2-3 years. Long-term data on other approved JAKi, fedratinib and pacritinib, are not available due to the clinical hold put on pivotal trials for toxicity concerns.

AREAS COVERED

Following the initial hold for concern of Wernicke's encephalopathy, fedratinib was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2019 for MF. We review the data available from early, and late phase critical trials, outline a role for fedratinib in the current treatment landscape of MF, and highlight the knowledge gaps in optimizing use of fedratinib.

EXPERT OPINION

The JAKARTA and JAKARTA2 trials established efficacy in spleen volume response (SVR) and symptom reduction in JAKi-naïve and ruxolitinib-exposed MF patients, respectively. Further trials, FREEDOM and FREEDOM2, are in progress to understand long-term effects of fedratinib; and include strategies to mitigate gastrointestinal toxicity, monitor thiamine levels and surveil for encephalopathy. We use fedratinib for symptomatic MF following ruxolitinib failure in patients without significant cytopenias; with practical strategies for monitoring and managing potential toxicity.

Association of frailty with clinical outcomes in myelofibrosis: a retrospective cohort study

There is limited understanding of the impact of frailty on clinical outcomes in patients with myelofibrosis (MF). In this retrospective cohort study on 439 chronic phase MF patients [mean age: 68·7 ± 12 years; median follow-up: 3·4 years (IQR 0·4-8·6)] from 2004 till 2018, we used a 35-variable frailty index (FI) to categorise patient's frailty status as fit (FI < 0·2, reference), prefrail (FI 0·2-0·29) or frail (FI ≥ 0·3). The association of frailty with overall survival (OS) and cumulative JAK inhibitor (JAKi) therapy failure was measured using hazard ratio (HR, 95% CI). In multivariable analysis, prefrail (HR 1·7, 1·1-2·5) and frail patients (HR 2·9, 1·6-5·5), those with higher DIPSS score (HR 2·5, 1·6-3·9) and transfusion dependency (HR 1·9, 1·3-2·9) had shorter OS. In a subset analysis of patients on JAKi treatment (n = 222), frail patients (HR 2·5, 1·1-5·7), patients with higher DIPSS score (HR 1·7, 1·0-3·1) and transfusion dependence (HR 1·7, 1·1-2·7) had higher cumulative incidence of JAKi failure. Age, comorbidities, ECOG performance status, and MPN driver mutations did not impact outcomes. Thus, higher frailty scores are associated with worse OS and increased JAKi failure in MF, and is a superior indicator of fitness in comparison to age, comorbidities, and performance status.

Comparison of outcomes of HCT in blast phase of BCR-ABL1- MPN with de novo AML and with AML following MDS

Comparative outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for BCR-ABL1- myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) in blast phase (MPN-BP) vs de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and AML with prior myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs; post-MDS AML), are unknown. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we compared HCT outcomes in 177 MPN-BP patients with 4749 patients with de novo AML, and 1104 patients with post-MDS AML, using multivariate regression analysis in 2 separate comparisons. In a multivariate Cox model, no difference in overall survival (OS) or relapse was observed in patients with MPN-BP vs de novo AML with active leukemia at HCT. Patients with MPN-BP in remission had inferior OS in comparison with de novo AML in remission (hazard ratio [HR], 1.40 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.76]) due to higher relapse rate (HR, 2.18 [95% CI, 1.69-2.80]). MPN-BP patients had inferior OS (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.00-1.43]) and increased relapse (HR, 1.60 [95% CI, 1.31-1.96]) compared with post-MDS AML. Poor-risk cytogenetics were associated with increased relapse in both comparisons. Peripheral blood grafts were associated with decreased relapse in MPN-BP and post-MDS AML (HR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57-0.86]). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was similar between MPN-BP vs de novo AML, and MPN-BP vs post-MDS AML. Total-body irradiation-based myeloablative conditioning was associated with higher NRM in both comparisons. Survival of MPN-BP after HCT is inferior to de novo AML in remission and post-MDS AML due to increased relapse. Relapse-prevention strategies are required to optimize HCT outcomes in MPN-BP.