Bone, cartilage and hormone therapy: established concepts and future scenarios

Menopause, estrogens and frailty

The controversy surrounding the results from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) trials published a decade ago caused a significant decline in the use of menopausal hormone replacement therapy. However, these results have been vehemently contested and several lines of evidence suggest that in perimenopausal and non-obese women, estrogen therapy may indeed be of benefit. There is ample proof that menopause causes a loss of musculoskeletal tissue mass and quality, thereby causing a loss of health and quality of life. There is also solid evidence that hormone replacement therapy in itself prevents most of these effects in connective tissue in itself. Besides the independent, direct effects on the musculoskeletal tissues, estrogen deficiency also reduces the ability to adequately respond and adapt to external mechanical and metabolic stressors, e.g. exercise, which are otherwise the main stimuli that should maintain musculoskeletal integrity and metabolic function. Thus, normophysiological estrogen levels appear to exert a permissive effect on musculoskeletal adaptations to loading, thereby likely improving the outcome of rehabilitation following critical illness, musculoskeletal trauma or orthopedic surgical therapy. These effects add to the evidence supporting the use of estrogen therapy, particularly accelerated gain of functional capacity and independence following musculoskeletal disuse.

Estrogens and the intervertebral disc

Intervertebral discs are an integral part of the vertebral column. It has been shown that menopause has a negative effect on bone and on intervertebral discs. Estrogen has a beneficial effect of preserving the health of collagen-containing tissues, including the intervertebral disc. The intervertebral disc allows for mobility of the spine, and maintains a uniform stress distribution of the area of the vertebral endplates. Also, the disc influences spinal height. The disc tissue is adapted for this biomechanical function. The function of the spine is impaired if there is a loss of disc tissue. Narrowing of the disc space due to degeneration of intervertebral discs is associated with a significantly increased risk of vertebral fractures. Estrogen should be seen as the first-choice therapy for bones and other collagen-rich tissues, such as intervertebral discs, because it maintains homeostasis of the bone-remodelling unit. Unlike bisphosphonates, estrogen is unique in its ability to regenerate bone collagen after its disintegration, apart from suppressing osteoclastic activity. Besides, there is insufficient data on deterioration in bone qualities and micro-cracks in patients on long-term bisphosphonates.

Oral bioavailability and bone-sparing effects of estetrol in an osteoporosis model

OBJECTIVES

To measure the oral bioavailability of estetrol (E(4)) in rats relative to its subcutaneous administration and to test the bone-sparing effect of oral E(4) compared to that of ethinylestradiol (EE).

METHODS

In the bioavailability study, E(4) was administered as a single dose of 0.05, 0.5 or 5.0 mg/kg orally or subcutaneously to female rats. Plasma was analyzed using an LC-MS/MS method. The bone study was conducted in 3-month-old female rats assigned to the following seven treatment groups of ten animals each: no treatment; sham-operated + vehicle; bilaterally ovariectomized (OVX) + vehicle; OVX + E(4) 0.1, 0.5, or 2.5 mg/kg/day and OVX + EE 0.1 mg/kg/day. Once-daily treatment by oral gavage was given for 4 weeks and the following measurements were performed: serum osteocalcin, bone mineral density, bone mineral content and bone mineral area of lumbar vertebrae L3-L6, peripheral quantitative computed tomography of the left tibiae and the biomechanical properties of the distal femora.

RESULTS

Oral bioavailability of E(4), relative to that of subcutaneous dosing, was 70% and above at the 0.05 and 0.5 mg/kg doses based on the AUC(0-t last). Subcutaneous dosing provided significantly higher E(4) levels at the 1-h time point only, and was comparable to oral dosing after 0.5, 2, 4 and 8 h. In the bone study, E(4) dose-dependently and significantly (1) inhibited the OVX-related increase in osteocalcin levels, (2) increased bone mineral density and content, and (3) increased bone strength, all attenuated by ovariectomy. In this rat model, the relative potency of the highest dose of E(4) (2.5 mg/kg/day) was comparable to the EE dose, used as positive control.

CONCLUSIONS

Estetrol exhibits high oral bioavailability in the rat, a species considered relevant for pharmacological studies that are predictive for effects on human bone. Oral administration of E(4) conveys dose-dependent bone-sparing effects of high-quality bone in estrogen-depleted OVX rats. Based on its bone-sparing effects, its oral bioavailability and its preclinical safety and efficacy profile, E(4) may be superior to other estrogens and is a potential drug for the prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.