1
|
Yano E, Sayama S, Iriyama T, Ariyoshi Y, Akiba N, Ichinose M, Toshimitsu M, Seyama T, Kumasawa K, Nakayama T, Kobayashi K, Nagamatsu T, Hirota Y, Osuga Y. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in the prolonged second stage using the delta angle of progression. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2024; 6:101403. [PMID: 38880239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is clinically challenging to determine when to intervene in the prolonged second stage. Although individualized prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery is crucial to avoid maternal and neonatal complications associated with operative deliveries, the approach has not been fully established. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the predictability of spontaneous vaginal delivery using the difference in angle of progression between pushing and rest, delta angle of progression, to establish a novel method to predict spontaneous vaginal delivery during the prolonged second stage in nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively analyzed deliveries of nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia between September 2018 and October 2023. Women were included if their delta angle of progression during the second stage was available. Operative deliveries were defined as the cases that required forceps, vacuum, and cesarean deliveries due to labor arrest. Women requiring operative deliveries due to fetal and maternal concerns, or women with fetal occiput posterior presentation were excluded. The second stage was stratified into the prolonged second stage, the period after 3 hours in the second stage, and the normal second stage, the period from the beginning until the third hour of the second stage. The association of the delta angle of the progression measured during each stage with spontaneous vaginal delivery and operative deliveries was investigated. Furthermore, the predictability of spontaneous vaginal delivery was evaluated by combining the delta and rest angle of progression. RESULTS A total of 129 women were eligible for analysis. The delta angle of progression measured during the prolonged second stage and normal second stage were significantly larger in women who achieved spontaneous vaginal delivery compared to operative deliveries (p<.001 and p<.05, respectively). During the prolonged second stage, a cutoff of 18.8 derived from the receiver operative characteristic curves in the context of the delta angle of progression predicted the possibility of spontaneous vaginal delivery (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 60.0%; AUC, 0.76). Combining the rest angle of progression (>140) and delta angle of progression (>18.8) also provided quantitative prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery (sensitivity, 86.7%; specificity, 70.0%; AUC, 0.80). CONCLUSION The delta angle of progression alone or in combination with the rest angle of progression can be used to predict spontaneous vaginal delivery in the second stage in nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia. Quantitative analysis of the effect of pushing using the delta angle of progression provides an objective guide to assist with an assessment of labor dystocia in the prolonged second stage on an individualized basis, which may optimize labor management in the prolonged second stage by reducing neonatal and maternal complications related to unnecessary operative deliveries and prolonged second stage of labor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eriko Yano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Seisuke Sayama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga).
| | - Takayuki Iriyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Yu Ariyoshi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Naoya Akiba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan (Akiba and Nagamatsu)
| | - Mari Ichinose
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Masatake Toshimitsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Takahiro Seyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Keiichi Kumasawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Toshio Nakayama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sanno Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (Nakayama)
| | - Koichi Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (Kobayashi)
| | - Takeshi Nagamatsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, Chiba, Japan (Akiba and Nagamatsu)
| | - Yasushi Hirota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Yutaka Osuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Yano, Sayama, Iriyama, Ariyoshi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jung JE, Lee YJ. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound: angle of progression to evaluate and predict the mode of delivery and labor progression. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2024; 67:1-16. [PMID: 38029738 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.23141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Intrapartum ultrasonography serves as a valuable tool for the objective evaluation of labor progression and effectively identifies underlying factors, such as asynclitism, in cases of abnormal labor progression. Among the various ultrasound measurement techniques, the angle of progression (AOP) demonstrates favorable reproducibility and accuracy in assessing fetal head descent. In the context of abnormal labor, interventions differ across different stages of labor, emphasizing the importance of investigating the utility of AOP according to labor stages in this review article. Pre-labor assessment of AOP can be beneficial in terms of counseling for the timing of induction of labor, while a wider AOP value during the prolonged first stage of labor has demonstrated a positive correlation with successful vaginal delivery and shorter time to delivery. In the second stage of labor, the AOP has exhibited efficacy in predicting the mode of delivery and complicated operative deliveries. Furthermore, it has assisted in predicting the duration of labor, thereby highlighting its potential as a decision-making model for labor progression. However, further research is needed to investigate aspects, such as the determination of cutoff values, of AOP, considering the multifaceted characteristics of labor progression, which are influenced by complex interactions among maternal, fetal, and other contributing factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Eun Jung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Joo Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yano E, Iriyama T, Sayama S, Ariyosi Y, Akiba N, Ichinose M, Toshimitsu M, Seyama T, Sone K, Kumasawa K, Nagamatsu T, Nakayama T, Kobayashi K, Osuga Y. The head direction to the angle of progression ratio: a quantitative parameter for intrapartum evaluation of cephalic malposition. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2023; 5:100755. [PMID: 36155110 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND No previous study has evaluated the transitions of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameters during labor progression in cephalic malposition. OBJECTIVE We aimed to quantitate the characteristic trends of fetal head position and descent in cephalic malposition by analyzing the transitions of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameters and explore an indicator associated with the degree of cephalic malposition. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively analyzed pregnant women who delivered at term from January 2018 to December 2020 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. The fetal occipital position was classified as occiput anterior and nonocciput anterior according to the fetal occipital angle of 0° to 75° and 75° to 180°, respectively. Fetal occipital angle was defined by the midline angle and position of the ocular orbit. The differences in the trends of head direction, head-symphysis distance, and progression distance relative to the angle of progression between occiput anterior and nonocciput anterior cases were evaluated. In addition, the parameters that showed differences were analyzed to evaluate their relationship to the degree of cephalic malposition. RESULTS A total of 502 images (occiput anterior, 319; nonocciput anterior, 183) met the inclusion criteria. The distribution of head direction values relative to the angle of progression was smaller in the nonocciput anterior group than in the occiput anterior group, whereas the head-symphysis distance and progression distance values relative to the angle of progression showed no difference in their distribution between the occiput anterior and nonocciput anterior groups. The ratio of head direction to the angle of progression was significantly smaller in the nonocciput anterior group than in the occiput anterior group (median [interquartile range], 0.03 [-0.02 to 0.10] vs 0.21 [0.12-0.28]; P<.0001). Furthermore, this ratio was negatively correlated with fetal occipital angle (Spearman correlation coefficient, -0.66). CONCLUSION Our results indicated that the head direction to angle of progression ratio reflects the deviation in the fetal head direction toward the maternal dorsal side, and decreases in proportion to the degree of cephalic malposition. This concept of deviation in the head direction as an indicator for evaluating cephalic malposition with intrapartum transperineal ultrasound may contribute to improving labor management in the case of cephalic malposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eriko Yano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Takayuki Iriyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga).
| | - Seisuke Sayama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Yu Ariyosi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Naoya Akiba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Mari Ichinose
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Masatake Toshimitsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Takahiro Seyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Kenbun Sone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Keiichi Kumasawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Takeshi Nagamatsu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| | - Toshio Nakayama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sanno Hospital, Tokyo, Japan (Dr Nakayama)
| | - Koichi Kobayashi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan (Dr Kobayashi)
| | - Yutaka Osuga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (Drs Yano, Iriyama, Sayama, Ariyosi, Akiba, Ichinose, Toshimitsu, Seyama, Sone, Kumasawa, Nagamatsu, and Osuga)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Youssef A, Brunelli E, Fiorentini M, Pilu G, El-Balat A. The correlation between levator ani co-activation and fetal head regression on maternal pushing at term. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35:9654-9660. [PMID: 35282757 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2050363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the correlation between fetal head regression and levator ani muscle (LAM) co-activation under Valsalva maneuver. STUDY DESIGN This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study on the association between the angle of progression (AoP) and labor outcome. We scanned a group of nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor at rest and under maximum Valsalva maneuver. In addition to the previously calculated AoP, in the present study, we measured the anteroposterior diameter of LAM hiatus (APD) on each ultrasound image. LAM co-activation was defined as APD at Valsalva less than that at rest, whereas fetal head regression was defined as AoP at Valsalva less than that at rest. We calculated the correlation between the two phenomena. Finally, we examined various labor outcomes according to the presence, absence, or co-existence of these two phenomena. RESULTS We included 469 women. A total of 129 (27.5%) women presented LAM co-activation while 50 (10.7%) showed head regression. Only 15 (3.2%) women showed simultaneous head regression and LAM co-activation. Women with coexisting LAM co-activation and head regression had the narrowest AoP at Valsalva in comparison with other study groups (p < .001). In addition, they had the highest risk of Cesarean delivery (40%) and longest first, second, and active second stage durations, although none of these reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION In nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor fetal head regression and LAM co-activation at Valsalva are two distinct phenomena that uncommonly coexist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aly Youssef
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Elena Brunelli
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marta Fiorentini
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Pilu
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ahmed El-Balat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Youssef A, Brunelli E, Fiorentini M, Lenzi J, Pilu G, El-Balat A. Breech progression angle: new feasible and reliable transperineal ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal breech descent in birth canal. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2021; 58:609-615. [PMID: 33847431 DOI: 10.1002/uog.23649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility and reliability of transperineal ultrasound in the assessment of fetal breech descent in the birth canal, by measuring the breech progression angle (BPA). METHODS Women with a singleton pregnancy with the fetus in breech presentation between 34 and 41 weeks' gestation were recruited. Transperineal ultrasound images were acquired in the midsagittal view for each woman, twice by one operator and once by another. Each operator measured the BPA after anonymization of the transperineal ultrasound images. BPA was defined as the angle between a line running along the long axis of the pubic symphysis and another line extending from the most inferior portion of the pubic symphysis tangentially to the lowest recognizable fetal part in the maternal pelvis. Each operator was blinded to all other measurements performed for each woman. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility of BPA measurement was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). To investigate the presence of any bias, intra- and interobserver agreement was also analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis. Student's t-test and Levene's W0 test were used to investigate whether a number of different clinical factors had an effect on systematic differences and homogeneity, respectively, between BPA measurements. RESULTS Overall, 44 women were included in the analysis. BPA was measured successfully by both operators on all images. Both intra- and interobserver agreement analyses showed excellent reproducibility in BPA measurement, with ICCs of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.80-0.93) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.90), respectively. The mean difference between measurements was 0.4° (95% CI, -1.4 to 2.2°) for intraobserver repeatability and -0.4° (95% CI, -2.6 to 1.8°) for interobserver repeatability. The upper limits of agreement were 12.0° (95% CI, 8.9-15.1°) and 13.6° (95% CI, 9.9-17.3°) for intra- and interobserver repeatability, respectively. The lower limits of agreement were -11.2° (95% CI, -14.3 to -8.1°) and -14.4° (95% CI, -18.2 to -10.7°) for intra- and interobserver repeatability, respectively. No systematic difference between BPA measurements was found on either intra- or interobserver agreement analysis. None of the clinical factors examined (maternal body mass index, maternal age, gestational age at the ultrasound scan and parity) showed a statistically significant effect on intra- or interobserver reliability. CONCLUSIONS BPA represents a new feasible and highly reproducible measurement for the evaluation of fetal breech descent in the birth canal. Future studies assessing its usefulness in the prediction of successful external cephalic version and breech vaginal delivery are needed. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Youssef
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - E Brunelli
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - M Fiorentini
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - J Lenzi
- Section of Hygiene, Public Health and Medical Statistics, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - G Pilu
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, IRCCS Sant'Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - A El-Balat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kamel R, Garcia FSM, Poon LC, Youssef A. The usefulness of ultrasound before induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021; 3:100423. [PMID: 34129996 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The indications for induction of labor have been consistently on the rise. These indications are mainly medical (maternal or fetal) or social or related to convenience or maternal preferences. With the increase in the prevalence of these indications, the incidence rates of induction of labor are expected to rise continuously. This poses a substantial workload and financial burden on maternity healthcare systems. Failure rates of induction of labor are relatively high, especially when considering the maternal, fetal, and neonatal risks associated with emergency cesarean deliveries in cases of failure. Therefore, it is essential for obstetricians to carefully select women who are eligible for induction of labor, particularly those with no clinical contraindication and who have a reasonable chance of ending up with a successful noncomplicated vaginal delivery. Ultrasound has an established role in the various areas of obstetrical care. It is available, accessible, easy to perform, and acceptable to the patient. In addition, the learning curve for skillful obstetrical ultrasound scanning is rather easy to fulfill. Ultrasound has always had an important role in the assessment of maternal and fetal well-being. Indeed, it has been extensively explored as a reliable, reproducible, and objective tool in the management of labor. In this review, we aimed to provide a comprehensive update on the different applications and uses of ultrasound before induction of labor for the prediction of its success and the potential improvement of its health-related maternal and fetal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha Kamel
- Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt (Dr Kamel).
| | - Francisca S Molina Garcia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico San Cecilio, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria IBS, Granada, Spain (Dr Molina Garcia)
| | - Liona C Poon
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Dr Poon)
| | - Aly Youssef
- Obstetric Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna and IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S.Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy (Dr Youssef)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bulut AN, Ceyhan V. Evaluation of the labour process with serial transperineal ultrasonography and prediction of the type of birth. J Perinat Med 2020; 49:36-42. [PMID: 32892180 DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to follow the birth process with transperineal ultrasonography (TPU) and predict the delivery method using angle of progression (AOP). METHODS The study included 134 patients. The AOP was examined with TPU in the lithotomy position applied at 4-h intervals, not at a time of straining or contractions. The relationship was examined between AOP and those who continued with vaginal delivery, and those who underwent caesarean section delivery. RESULTS A total of 122 (91%) patients had vaginal delivery and 12 (9%) patients had cesarean delivery. In patients giving vaginal delivery, progress in AOP was observed in every 4-h measurement, but not in patients with cesarean section. In the ROC analysis, if 70% sensitivity and 75% specificity with AOP degree >132.5°, the patient was expected to have vaginal delivery with a probability of 77.5% (95% CI 0.62-0.93; p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS Rather than repeating digital examinations, the labour process can be monitored with serial TPU and the type of delivery can be predicted. There is a need for further studies for the measurement of AOP with TPU to become a part of clinical practice in the monitoring of the whole labour process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayca Nazli Bulut
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
| | - Venhar Ceyhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kayseri City Training and Research Hospital, Kayseri, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brunelli E, Del Prete B, Casadio P, Pilu G, Youssef A. The dynamic change of the anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus under Valsalva maneuver at term and labor outcome. Neurourol Urodyn 2020; 39:2353-2360. [PMID: 32865824 DOI: 10.1002/nau.24494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between the proportional change of anteroposterior diameter (APD) of levator hiatus from rest to maximum Valsalva maneuver in nulliparous women at term and labor outcome. METHODS We prospectively recruited nulliparous women at term before the onset of labor. Women underwent a two-dimensional transperineal ultrasound, measuring the APD of the levator hiatus at rest and under maximum Valsalva's maneuver. APD change from rest to maximum Valsalva was described both in terms of absolute figures and proportional change. Correlation of APD change with the mode of delivery and with labor durations was assessed. RESULTS Overall, 486 women were included in the analysis. No significant association between change in APD and the mode of delivery. We found a significant negative correlation between change of APD from rest to Valsalva and the duration of active second stage both in terms of absolute change (Pearson's r = -0.138, P = .009) and in terms of proportional change (Pearson's r = -0.154, P = .004). Survival outcomes based on Cox-regression model showed that APD was independently associated with the duration of active second stage of labor after adjusting for epidural analgesia, maternal age and body mass index (hazard ratio, 1.008; 95% confidence interval, 1.001-1.016; P = .04) CONCLUSION: Women with higher increase of the anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus from rest to Valsalva have a shorter active second stage of labor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Brunelli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Biancamaria Del Prete
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Pilu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Aly Youssef
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sant'Orsola Malpighi University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|