1
|
de Groot NF. A contextual integrity approach to genomic information: what bioethics can learn from big data ethics. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2024; 27:367-379. [PMID: 38865053 PMCID: PMC11310229 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-024-10211-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Genomic data is generated, processed and analysed at an increasingly rapid pace. This data is not limited to the medical context, but plays an important role in other contexts in society, such as commercial DNA testing, the forensic setting, archaeological research, and genetic surveillance. Genomic information also crosses the borders of these domains, e.g. forensic use of medical genetic information, insurance use of medical genomic information, or research use of commercial genomic data. This paper (1) argues that an informed consent approach for genomic information has limitations in many societal contexts, and (2) seeks to broaden the bioethical debate on genomic information by suggesting an approach that is applicable across multiple societal contexts. I argue that the contextual integrity framework, a theory rooted in information technology and big data ethics, is an effective tool to explore ethical challenges that arise from genomic information within a variety of different contexts. Rather than focusing on individual control over information, the contextual integrity approach holds that information should be shared and protected according to the norms that govern certain distinct social contexts. Several advantages of this contextual integrity approach will be discussed. The paper concludes that the contextual integrity framework helps to articulate and address a broad spectrum of ethical, social, and political factors in a variety of different societal contexts, while giving consideration to the interests of individuals, groups, and society at large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina F de Groot
- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Findley MG, Ghosn F, Lowe SJ. Vulnerability in research ethics: A call for assessing vulnerability and implementing protections. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2322821121. [PMID: 39141349 PMCID: PMC11348164 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2322821121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Ethics standards reference the need for special consideration of vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women, incarcerated individuals, and minors. The concept of vulnerability is poorly conceptualized in the medical sciences where it originated, and its application to the social sciences is even more challenging. Social science researchers may unwittingly fail to appreciate preexisting vulnerabilities and indeed may be responsible for inducing new research-related vulnerability. In this paper, we present the first comprehensive coding of country-level vulnerability designations. Specifically, we coded all 355 official documents governing social/behavioral human subjects research for the 107 countries with such regulations and identified 68 distinct vulnerability categories. The data reveal substantial regional variation, overemphasis of categories derived from medical sciences, neglect of critical categories such as displacement, and likely heterogeneity within and across groups. The article provides a conceptual framework that shifts the problem away from static, enumerated categories toward emphasis on research-induced vulnerability. Based on our conceptualization and coding, we present a framework for assessing vulnerability and implementing appropriate protections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael G. Findley
- Department of Government, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX78712
| | - Faten Ghosn
- Department of Government, University of Essex, ColchesterCO4 3SQ, United Kingdom
| | - Sara J. Lowe
- Innovations for Peace and Development, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX78712
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mangal S, Niño de Rivera S, Reading Turchioe M, Myers A, Benda N, Goyal P, Dugdale L, Masterson Creber R. Perceptions of patient-reported outcome data access and sharing among patients with heart failure: ethical implications for research. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2024; 23:145-151. [PMID: 37172035 PMCID: PMC10640657 DOI: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvad046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
AIMS In the face of growing expectations for data transparency and patient engagement in care, we evaluated preferences for patient-reported outcome (PRO) data access and sharing among patients with heart failure (HF) using an ethical framework. METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of patients with HF who participated in a larger 8-week study that involved the collection and return of PROs using a web-based interface. Guided by an ethical framework, patients were asked questions about their preferences for having PRO data returned to them and shared with other groups. Interview transcripts were coded by three study team members using directed content analysis. A total of 22 participants participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants were mostly male (73%), White (68%) with a mean age of 72. Themes were grouped into priorities, benefits, and barriers to data access and sharing. Priorities included ensuring anonymity when data are shared, transparency with intentions of data use, and having access to all collected data. Benefits included: using data as a communication prompt to discuss health with clinicians and using data to support self-management. Barriers included: challenges with interpreting returned results, and potential loss of benefits and anonymity when sharing data. CONCLUSION Our interviews with HF patients highlight opportunities for researchers to return and share data through an ethical lens, by ensuring privacy and transparency with intentions of data use, returning collected data in comprehensible formats, and meeting individual expectations for data sharing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Mangal
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington School of Nursing, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Annie Myers
- Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Natalie Benda
- Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parag Goyal
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lydia Dugdale
- Department of Medicine, Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Potthoff S, Hempeler C, Gather J, Gieselmann A, Vollmann J, Scholten M. Research ethics in practice: An analysis of ethical issues encountered in qualitative health research with mental health service users and relatives. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2023; 26:517-527. [PMID: 37639076 PMCID: PMC10725844 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10169-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
The ethics review of qualitative health research poses various challenges that are due to a mismatch between the current practice of ethics review and the nature of qualitative methodology. The process of obtaining ethics approval for a study by a research ethics committee before the start of a research study has been described as "procedural ethics" and the identification and handling of ethical issues by researchers during the research process as "ethics in practice." While some authors dispute and other authors defend the use of procedural ethics in relation to qualitative health research, there is general agreement that it needs to be supplemented with ethics in practice. This article aims to provide an illustration of research ethics in practice by reflecting on the ways in which we identified and addressed ethical and methodological issues that arose in the context of an interview study with mental health service users and relatives. We describe the challenges we faced and the solutions we found in relation to the potential vulnerability of research participants, the voluntariness of consent, the increase of participant access and the heterogeneity of the sample, the protection of privacy and internal confidentiality, and the consideration of personal and contextual factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Potthoff
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Markstr. 258a, 44799, Bochum, Germany.
| | - Christin Hempeler
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Markstr. 258a, 44799, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jakov Gather
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Markstr. 258a, 44799, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Preventive Medicine, LWL University Hospital, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Astrid Gieselmann
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Markstr. 258a, 44799, Bochum, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jochen Vollmann
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Markstr. 258a, 44799, Bochum, Germany
| | - Matthé Scholten
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Markstr. 258a, 44799, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chapman CR, Quinn GP, Natri HM, Berrios C, Dwyer P, Owens K, Heraty S, Caplan AL. Consideration and Disclosure of Group Risks in Genomics and Other Data-Centric Research: Does the Common Rule Need Revision? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023:1-14. [PMID: 38010648 PMCID: PMC11167719 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2276161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
Harms and risks to groups and third-parties can be significant in the context of research, particularly in data-centric studies involving genomic, artificial intelligence, and/or machine learning technologies. This article explores whether and how United States federal regulations should be adapted to better align with current ethical thinking and protect group interests. Three aspects of the Common Rule deserve attention and reconsideration with respect to group interests: institutional review board (IRB) assessment of the risks/benefits of research; disclosure requirements in the informed consent process; and criteria for waivers of informed consent. In accordance with respect for persons and communities, investigators and IRBs should systematically consider potential group harm when designing and reviewing protocols, respectively. Research participants should be informed about any potential group harm in the consent process. We call for additional public discussion, empirical research, and normative analysis on these issues to determine the right regulatory and policy path forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Courtney Berrios
- Children's Mercy Kansas City
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reddy J, Black K, Bazemore K, Jordan K, Jackson JB, Knittel AK. Ethical inclusion: Risks and benefits of research from the perspective of perinatal people with opioid use disorders who have experienced incarceration. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0294604. [PMID: 37992010 PMCID: PMC10664874 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research ethics guidelines and emphasis on representation in research guide the inclusion of marginalized groups, including people with perinatal opioid use disorders (OUD) and people experiencing incarceration in the United States. However, insights from participants regarding the risks and benefits of participation are not adequately considered. The aim of this study was to examine the risks and benefits of research participation from the perspective of pregnant/postpartum people with OUD who have experienced incarceration. DESIGN We recruited people who had experience with perinatal incarceration and were either currently pregnant or postpartum, and at least 18 years old. All participants met the clinical criteria for OUD. Our study did not have exclusion criteria based on gender, race, or ethnicity. SETTING Participants were either currently incarcerated at the North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women in Raleigh, North Carolina, United States or had previously experienced perinatal incarceration and were recruited from a perinatal substance use disorder treatment program located in North Carolina. PARTICIPANTS Between 9/2021-4/2022, we completed 12 interviews with pregnant/postpartum people with OUD, approximately half who were currently incarcerated and half with a recent history of perinatal incarceration. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENT Interviews were conducted via Webex phone or video. The interviews followed a scripted interview guide and lasted one hour on average. Interview transcripts were analyzed using the Rigorous and Accelerated Data Reduction technique to produce an overarching thematic framework. FINDINGS Our analysis identified benefits, including the personal advantage of self-expression, helping others and contributing to change, and financial incentives. Risks included stigma and breach of confidentiality, misunderstanding of the distinction between research and advocacy, and limited ability to share their whole experience. CONCLUSIONS Participant-identified benefits of research mirrored those from other marginalized populations, though participant-identified risks were novel and nuanced. Recruitment and consent should move beyond normative research ethics committees protocol language to consider the perspectives of participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Reddy
- Department of Maternal Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Kristel Black
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Keia Bazemore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Kiva Jordan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Jamie B. Jackson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Andrea K. Knittel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Idnay B, Fang Y, Butler A, Moran J, Li Z, Lee J, Ta C, Liu C, Yuan C, Chen H, Stanley E, Hripcsak G, Larson E, Marder K, Chung W, Ruotolo B, Weng C. Uncovering key clinical trial features influencing recruitment. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e199. [PMID: 37830010 PMCID: PMC10565197 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Randomized clinical trials (RCT) are the foundation for medical advances, but participant recruitment remains a persistent barrier to their success. This retrospective data analysis aims to (1) identify clinical trial features associated with successful participant recruitment measured by accrual percentage and (2) compare the characteristics of the RCTs by assessing the most and least successful recruitment, which are indicated by varying thresholds of accrual percentage such as ≥ 90% vs ≤ 10%, ≥ 80% vs ≤ 20%, and ≥ 70% vs ≤ 30%. Methods Data from the internal research registry at Columbia University Irving Medical Center and Aggregated Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov were collected for 393 randomized interventional treatment studies closed to further enrollment. We compared two regularized linear regression and six tree-based machine learning models for accrual percentage (i.e., reported accrual to date divided by the target accrual) prediction. The outperforming model and Tree SHapley Additive exPlanations were used for feature importance analysis for participant recruitment. The identified features were compared between the two subgroups. Results CatBoost regressor outperformed the others. Key features positively associated with recruitment success, as measured by accrual percentage, include government funding and compensation. Meanwhile, cancer research and non-conventional recruitment methods (e.g., websites) are negatively associated with recruitment success. Statistically significant subgroup differences (corrected p-value < .05) were found in 15 of the top 30 most important features. Conclusion This multi-source retrospective study highlighted key features influencing RCT participant recruitment, offering actionable steps for improvement, including flexible recruitment infrastructure and appropriate participant compensation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betina Idnay
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yilu Fang
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alex Butler
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joyce Moran
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NY Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ziran Li
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Junghwan Lee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Casey Ta
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cong Liu
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chi Yuan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Huanyao Chen
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edward Stanley
- Compliance Applications, Information Technology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - George Hripcsak
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elaine Larson
- School of Nursing, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- New York Academy of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karen Marder
- Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NY Research, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wendy Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brenda Ruotolo
- Institutional Review Board for Human Subjects Research, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Chunhua Weng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Samuel G, Richie C. Reimagining research ethics to include environmental sustainability: a principled approach, including a case study of data-driven health research. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023; 49:428-433. [PMID: 35922120 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2022-108489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
In this paper we argue the need to reimagine research ethics frameworks to include notions of environmental sustainability. While there have long been calls for healthcare ethics frameworks and decision-making to include aspects of sustainability, less attention has focused on how research ethics frameworks could address this. To do this, we first describe the traditional approach to research ethics, which often relies on individualised notions of risk. We argue that we need to broaden this notion of individual risk to consider issues associated with environmental sustainability. This is because research is associated with carbon emissions and other environmental impacts, both of which cause climate change health hazards. We introduce how bioethics frameworks have considered notions of environmental sustainability and draw on these to help develop a framework suitable for researchers. We provide a case study of data-driven health research to apply our framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Samuel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Cristina Richie
- Philosophy and Ethics of Technology Department, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Friesen P, Gelinas L, Kirby A, Strauss DH, Bierer BE. IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023; 23:75-88. [PMID: 35482887 PMCID: PMC9926358 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2063434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Institutional review boards, tasked with facilitating ethical research, are often pulled in competing directions. In what we call the protection-inclusion dilemma, we acknowledge the tensions IRBs face in aiming to both protect potential research participants from harm and include under-represented populations in research. In this manuscript, we examine the history of protectionism that has dominated research ethics oversight in the United States, as well as two responses to such protectionism: inclusion initiatives and critiques of the term vulnerability. We look at what we know about IRB decision-making in relation to protecting and including "vulnerable" groups in research and examine the lack of regulatory guidance related to this dilemma, which encourages protection over inclusion within IRB practice. Finally, we offer recommendations related to how IRBs might strike a better balance between inclusion and protection in research ethics oversight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - David H Strauss
- Columbia University Medical Center
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard
| | - Barbara E Bierer
- Harvard Medical School
- Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard
- Brigham and Women's Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang Y, Wu S, He L, Li L, Wang Z. Social work research ethics in China: A scoping review of research involving human subjects during COVID-19. INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK 2023; 66:233-253. [PMID: 36650895 PMCID: PMC9837027 DOI: 10.1177/00208728221108004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
As the first review to systematically explore the scope and application of Chinese social work research ethics, this study incorporated web-crawling technology in the scoping review process and identified 18 eligible studies from 1168 publications from January 2020 to July 2021. Findings suggest that social work scholars are aware of research ethics when conducting human subjects research in the Chinese population. Yet, many failed to fully demonstrate practical considerations of internationally accepted ethical principles (e.g. respect for persons). We discuss education on research ethics, new challenges of the digital age, and considerations of Chinese culture in developing ethical protocols for social work research in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yixuan Wang
- Yixuan Wang, Department of Social Work,
China Youth University of Political Studies, Beijing 100089, China.
| | | | - Longtao He
- Southwestern University of Finance and
Economics, China
| | - Linjing Li
- China Youth University of Political Studies,
China
| | - Zijiao Wang
- China Youth University of Political Studies,
China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nagai H, Nakazawa E, Akabayashi A. The creation of the Belmont Report and its effect on ethical principles: a historical study. Monash Bioeth Rev 2022; 40:157-170. [PMID: 36357708 PMCID: PMC9700634 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-022-00165-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The Belmont Report continues to be held in high regard, and most bioethical analyses conducted in recent years have presumed that it affects United States federal regulations. However, the assessments of the report's creators are sharply divided. Understanding the historic reputation of this monumental report is thus crucial. We first recount the historical context surrounding the creation of this report. Subsequently, we review the process involved in developing ethical guidelines and describe the report's features. Additionally, we analyze the effect of unfolding events on the subsequent creation of federal regulations, especially on gene therapy clinical trials. Moreover, throughout this paper we evaluate the ethical principles outlined in this report and describe how they overlap with the issue of protecting socially vulnerable groups. Based on the analysis, we conclude that the features of the Belmont Report cannot be considered as having affected the basic sections of the federal regulations for ethical reviews that were made uniform in 1981. Nevertheless, regarding the regulations on gene therapy clinical trials-which were at first expected to be applicable to research involving children-in addition to implementing policies regarding the public review of protocols that passed ethical review, this report's principles are clearly reflected in the key notes that should have been referred to when the report was created.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Nagai
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
- Center for Technology Research and Innovation, BIPROGY Inc, 1-1-1 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8650, Japan
| | - Eisuke Nakazawa
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan
| | - Akira Akabayashi
- Department of Biomedical Ethics, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.
- Division of Medical Ethics, New York University School of Medicine, 227 East 30th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Doorn N. Wastewater research and surveillance: an ethical exploration. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE : WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY 2022; 8:2431-2438. [PMID: 36353217 PMCID: PMC9609648 DOI: 10.1039/d2ew00127f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The current COVID-19 pandemic has given wastewater research a huge impetus. While wastewater research has some promising applications, there are as yet no well-developed ethical guidelines on how and under what conditions to use wastewater research. The current perspective paper aims to explore the different ethical questions pertaining to wastewater research and surveillance and to provide some tentative guidelines on the desirability of different types of applications. This paper shows that wastewater research offers interesting possibilities, but that legal regulation and ethical guidelines are still lacking, while there are ethical risks involved. The perspective indicates that it is important to look beyond the regulation of data collection and to shift the focus to the question how the analysis and use of wastewater data can be supervised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Doorn
- Department of Technology, Policy and Management - Values, Technology and Innovation, Delft University of Technology PO Box 5015 2600 GA Delft The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Filmalter CJ, Rossouw S, De Kock J, Coetzee I, Heyns T. A process to gain access for research in the clinical setting. Appl Nurs Res 2022; 64:151569. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
14
|
Siddiqui W, Sharp RR. Beyond the Belmont Report. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:1-4. [PMID: 34554060 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1972649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
|
15
|
Friesen P, Doerksen E, Gunay A. Solidarity without Sovereignty: Extending the Belmont Principles Further? THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:25-27. [PMID: 34554062 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1965250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
|
16
|
Ferretti A, Ienca M, Sheehan M, Blasimme A, Dove ES, Farsides B, Friesen P, Kahn J, Karlen W, Kleist P, Liao SM, Nebeker C, Samuel G, Shabani M, Rivas Velarde M, Vayena E. Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed? BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:51. [PMID: 33931049 PMCID: PMC8085804 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00616-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ethics review is the process of assessing the ethics of research involving humans. The Ethics Review Committee (ERC) is the key oversight mechanism designated to ensure ethics review. Whether or not this governance mechanism is still fit for purpose in the data-driven research context remains a debated issue among research ethics experts. MAIN TEXT In this article, we seek to address this issue in a twofold manner. First, we review the strengths and weaknesses of ERCs in ensuring ethical oversight. Second, we map these strengths and weaknesses onto specific challenges raised by big data research. We distinguish two categories of potential weakness. The first category concerns persistent weaknesses, i.e., those which are not specific to big data research, but may be exacerbated by it. The second category concerns novel weaknesses, i.e., those which are created by and inherent to big data projects. Within this second category, we further distinguish between purview weaknesses related to the ERC's scope (e.g., how big data projects may evade ERC review) and functional weaknesses, related to the ERC's way of operating. Based on this analysis, we propose reforms aimed at improving the oversight capacity of ERCs in the era of big data science. CONCLUSIONS We believe the oversight mechanism could benefit from these reforms because they will help to overcome data-intensive research challenges and consequently benefit research at large.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agata Ferretti
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Hottingerstrasse 10 (HOA), 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
| | - Marcello Ienca
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Hottingerstrasse 10 (HOA), 8092, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Mark Sheehan
- The Ethox Centre, Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Hottingerstrasse 10 (HOA), 8092, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Edward S Dove
- School of Law, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Phoebe Friesen
- Biomedical Ethics Unit, Department of Social Studies of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jeff Kahn
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, USA
| | - Walter Karlen
- Mobile Health Systems Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Kleist
- Cantonal Ethics Committee Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - S Matthew Liao
- Center for Bioethics, Department of Philosophy, New York University, New York, USA
| | - Camille Nebeker
- Research Center for Optimal Digital Ethics in Health (ReCODE Health), Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, USA
| | - Gabrielle Samuel
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mahsa Shabani
- Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Minerva Rivas Velarde
- Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Effy Vayena
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, Hottingerstrasse 10 (HOA), 8092, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kratzer K, Getz LJ, Peterlini T, Masson JY, Dellaire G. Addressing the dark matter of gene therapy: technical and ethical barriers to clinical application. Hum Genet 2021; 141:1175-1193. [PMID: 33834266 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02272-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gene therapies for genetic diseases have been sought for decades, and the relatively recent development of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system has encouraged a new wave of interest in the field. There have nonetheless been significant setbacks to gene therapy, including unintended biological consequences, ethical scandals, and death. The major focus of research has been on technological problems such as delivery, potential immune responses, and both on and off-target effects in an effort to avoid negative clinical outcomes. While the field has concentrated on how we can better achieve gene therapies and gene editing techniques, there has been less focus on when and why we should use such technology. Here we combine discussion of both the technical and ethical barriers to the widespread clinical application of gene therapy and gene editing, providing a resource for gene therapy experts and novices alike. We discuss ethical problems and solutions, using cystic fibrosis and beta-thalassemia as case studies where gene therapy might be suitable, and provide examples of situations where human germline gene editing may be ethically permissible. Using such examples, we propose criteria to guide researchers and clinicians in deciding whether or not to pursue gene therapy as a treatment. Finally, we summarize how current progress in the field adheres to principles of biomedical ethics and highlight how this approach might fall short of ethical rigour using examples in the bioethics literature. Ultimately by addressing both the technical and ethical aspects of gene therapy and editing, new frameworks can be developed for the fair application of these potentially life-saving treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kateryna Kratzer
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Landon J Getz
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada
| | - Thibaut Peterlini
- Genome Stability Laboratory, Oncology Division, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada.,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Laval University Cancer Research Center, 9 McMahon, Quebec, G1R 3S3, Canada
| | - Jean-Yves Masson
- Genome Stability Laboratory, Oncology Division, CHU de Québec Research Centre, Quebec, Canada. .,Department of Molecular Biology, Medical Biochemistry and Pathology, Laval University Cancer Research Center, 9 McMahon, Quebec, G1R 3S3, Canada.
| | - Graham Dellaire
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. .,Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, PO BOX 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. .,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Santana FN, Hammond Wagner C, Berlin Rubin N, Bloomfield LSP, Bower ER, Fischer SL, Santos BS, Smith GE, Muraida CT, Wong-Parodi G. A path forward for qualitative research on sustainability in the COVID-19 pandemic. SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE 2021; 16:1061-1067. [PMID: 33495701 PMCID: PMC7816056 DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00894-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
The unique strengths of qualitative research, through in-depth inquiry and identification of unexpected themes and linkages, is essential to our growing understanding of COVID-19's impacts on the social world and its intersection with sustainability science. However, many challenges-physical, psychological, and ethical in nature-face qualitative researchers during the pandemic, as social distancing and travel restrictions prevent in-person field work. In this paper, we outline the essential contributions of qualitative study to sustainability science, discuss current challenges, and in turn, provide recommendations for researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisca N. Santana
- Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Suite 226, Stanford, CA 94305-4210 USA
| | - Courtney Hammond Wagner
- Water in the West, Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
- Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305-4216 USA
| | - Nina Berlin Rubin
- Earth Systems Science, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Rm. 140, Stanford, CA 94305-4216 USA
| | - Laura S. P. Bloomfield
- Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Suite 226, Stanford, CA 94305-4210 USA
| | - Erica R. Bower
- Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Suite 226, Stanford, CA 94305-4210 USA
| | - Stephanie L. Fischer
- Earth Systems Science, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Rm. 140, Stanford, CA 94305-4216 USA
| | - Bianca S. Santos
- Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Suite 226, Stanford, CA 94305-4210 USA
| | - Gemma E. Smith
- Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Suite 226, Stanford, CA 94305-4210 USA
| | - Caroline T. Muraida
- Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Suite 226, Stanford, CA 94305-4210 USA
| | - Gabrielle Wong-Parodi
- Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Stanford, CA 94305-4216 USA
- Earth Systems Science, Stanford University, 473 Via Ortega, Rm. 140, Stanford, CA 94305-4216 USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ferguson K. The Health Reframing of Climate Change and the Poverty of Narrow Bioethics. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2020; 48:705-717. [PMID: 33404344 DOI: 10.1177/1073110520979381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
We must resist thoroughly reframing climate change as a health issue. For human health-centric ethical frameworks omit dimensions of value that we must duly consider. We need a new, an environmental, research ethic, one that we can use to more completely and impartially evaluate proposed research on mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Ferguson
- Kyle Ferguson, Ph.D., is a postdoctoral fellow in the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU Grossman School of Medicine and an adjunct professor in the Department of Environmental Studies at NYU
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fortier J, Stewart-Tufescu A, Salmon S, Garces Davila I, MacMillan HL, Gonzalez A, Mathews B, Struck S, Taillieu T, Afifi TO. What type of survey research questions are identified by adults as upsetting? A focus on child maltreatment. CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT 2020; 109:104764. [PMID: 33038722 DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research on child maltreatment is imperative to inform evidence-based prevention and intervention efforts. Nonetheless, researchers continue to face barriers due to the perceived sensitivity and possibility of harm when asking about these experiences. While studies have started to explore reactions to participating in research on sensitive topics, there are notable limitations and fewer have focused on child maltreatment. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to better understand adult respondents' identification of, and reactions to, potentially upsetting questions in the context of a well-being and experiences survey, with a focus on child maltreatment. METHODS Data were from the first wave of the Well-Being and Experiences Study in Manitoba, Canada: a computerized self-reported community-based survey of adolescents and their parents/caregivers administered individually at a research facility. The current study focused on parents/caregivers' responses (N = 1000). The study utilized a mixed methods approach with descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analyses of open-ended responses of their perceptions of upsetting questions. RESULTS Overall, few respondents (15.1 %) identified any questions as upsetting. Ten themes emerged in respondents' recall of upsetting questions, including maltreatment and other themes often perceived as less sensitive. Only 4% identified maltreatment-related questions as upsetting. Among those who identified any questions or maltreatment-specific questions as upsetting, most felt they were important to ask and should not be removed (92.7 %-97.5 %). These findings suggest that retrospective survey questions about experiences of child maltreatment involving adult samples are not associated with major upset and should be included in future health and social surveys.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janique Fortier
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Samantha Salmon
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Harriet L MacMillan
- Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, and of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Andrea Gonzalez
- Department of Psychiatry & Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Canada
| | - Ben Mathews
- Faculty of Law, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
| | - Shannon Struck
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada
| | - Tamara Taillieu
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Canada
| | - Tracie O Afifi
- Departments of Community Health Sciences and Psychiatry, University of Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Friesen P, Yusof ANM, Sheehan M. Should the Decisions of Institutional Review Boards Be Consistent? Ethics Hum Res 2020; 41:2-14. [PMID: 31336039 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
In response to increasing concerns regarding inconsistency in the decision-making of institutional review boards (IRBs), we introduce the decision-maker's dilemma, which arises when complex, normative decisions must be made regularly. Those faced with such decisions can either develop a process of algorithmic decision-making, in which consistency is ensured but many morally relevant factors are excluded from the process, or embrace discretionary decision-making, which makes space for morally relevant factors to shape decisions but leads to decisions that are inconsistent. Based on an exploration of similarities between systems of criminal sentencing and of research ethics review, we argue for a discretionary system of decision-making, even though it leads to more inconsistency than does an algorithmic system. We conclude with a discussion of some safeguards that could improve consistency while still making space for discretion to enter IRBs' decision-making processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe Friesen
- Postdoctoral fellow at the Ethox Centre at the University of Oxford
| | | | - Mark Sheehan
- Oxford Biomedical Research Centre ethics fellow at the Ethox Centre at the University of Oxford
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hoffman L, Oppenheim L. Three Identical Strangers and The Twinning Reaction-Clarifying History and Lessons for Today From Peter Neubauer's Twins Study. JAMA 2019; 322:10-12. [PMID: 31265078 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.8152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Hoffman
- Pacella Research Center, New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, New York, New York
| | - Lois Oppenheim
- Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey
- New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sacks HS, Rhodes R. Innovation in a Learning Healthcare System. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2019; 19:19-21. [PMID: 31135317 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1602426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
|
24
|
|
25
|
Brothers KB, Rivera SM, Cadigan RJ, Sharp RR, Goldenberg AJ. A Belmont Reboot: Building a Normative Foundation for Human Research in the 21st Century. THE JOURNAL OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS : A JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LAW, MEDICINE & ETHICS 2019; 47:165-172. [PMID: 30994072 PMCID: PMC6587582 DOI: 10.1177/1073110519840497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle B. Brothers
- University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, Division of Pediatric Clinical and Translational Research, 231 East Chestnut Street, N-97, Louisville, KY 40202
- University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, Institute for Bioethics, Health Policy, and Law, 501 E. Broadway, Ste 310, Louisville, KY 40202
| | - Suzanne M. Rivera
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, School of Medicine, TA200, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland OH 44106-4976
| | - R. Jean Cadigan
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, Department of Social Medicine, CB #7240, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240
| | - Richard R. Sharp
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Biomedical Ethics Research Program, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Aaron J. Goldenberg
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, School of Medicine, TA200, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland OH 44106-4976
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Willison DJ, Richards DP, Orth A, Harris H, Marlin S. Survey of Awareness and Perceptions of Canadians on the Benefits and Risks of Clinical Trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2018; 53:669-677. [PMID: 30373453 PMCID: PMC6710611 DOI: 10.1177/2168479018805433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the Canadian public’s perspective regarding clinical trials. Methods: We surveyed 1602 Ontario and British Columbia residents to ascertain their understanding of and willingness to participate in clinical trials. Results: Clinical trials are regarded positively with overall perceptions that they provide societal and personal benefits. Most respondents were somewhat (49%) or very willing (19%) to participate in a clinical trial. This increased with age and level of education. It was also greater among those with poor or very poor health, those with multiple chronic conditions, and those who had previously been invited into a clinical trial, all of which were correlated with age. Still, there was room for improvement in awareness and understanding of clinical trials. Forty-three percent of those surveyed felt not very informed or not at all informed and 37% had no opinion regarding clinical trials. Respondents would most often turn to their treating physician if considering participating in a clinical trial and least often to social media. Conclusion: While Canadians’ views about clinical trials are generally positive, they are somewhat muted and a significant minority feels poorly or not at all informed. They are less willing to participate in clinical research than Americans and are roughly equivalent to Europeans. While clinicians are the top choice for learning about clinical trials, they have little or no training and little time for this role. As we move toward integrating clinical trials into the practice setting, these issues of time, training, and resources must be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donald J Willison
- 1 Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Alison Orth
- 3 Clinical Trials BC, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Heather Harris
- 4 Can-SOLVE CKD Network, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Susan Marlin
- 2 Clinical Trials Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lieber SR, Schiano TD, Rhodes R. Promoting Research with Organ Transplant Patients. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/eahr.405001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R. Lieber
- University of North Carolina Hospital; Department of Medicine in the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology; Chapel Hill
| | - Thomas D. Schiano
- Icahn School of Medicine; Recanati/Miller Liver Transplantation Institute
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Adashi EY, Walters LB, Menikoff JA. The Belmont Report at 40: Reckoning With Time. Am J Public Health 2018; 108:1345-1348. [PMID: 30138058 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2018.304580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
It was the summer of 1972 when a stunned nation first learned of the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study, during which hundreds of poor, disease-stricken black men from Macon County Alabama, had been deliberately left untreated for 40 years. Coming on the heels of multiple, earlier examples of unethical human experimentation, the Tuskegee Syphilis Study made it plain that the moral foundation of human subject research was in desperate need of repair. Blind reliance on the Nuremberg Code and the Declaration of Helsinki was no longer going to suffice. It was against this backdrop that Congress resolved to act. Numerous hearings and multiple spirited discussions later, an agreement was struck to constitute the "Commission." The outgrowth of a retreat held at the Smithsonian Institution's Belmont Conference Center, the Belmont Report lays out a principled analytical framework to "guide the resolution of ethical problems arising from research involving human subjects." Durable and ever-present, the Belmont Report, which is the foundational document that reset the ethics of human subject research, must now reckon with all-important novel issues of the day that could not have been foreseen by its drafters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eli Y Adashi
- Eli Y. Adashi is with the Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, RI. LeRoy B. Walters is with the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Jerry A. Menikoff is with the Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD
| | - LeRoy B Walters
- Eli Y. Adashi is with the Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, RI. LeRoy B. Walters is with the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Jerry A. Menikoff is with the Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD
| | - Jerry A Menikoff
- Eli Y. Adashi is with the Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, RI. LeRoy B. Walters is with the Kennedy Institute of Ethics and Department of Philosophy, Georgetown University, Washington, DC. Jerry A. Menikoff is with the Office for Human Research Protections, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Cascio MA, Racine E. Person-oriented research ethics: integrating relational and everyday ethics in research. Account Res 2018; 25:170-197. [PMID: 29451025 DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1442218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Research ethics is often understood by researchers primarily through the regulatory framework reflected in the research ethics review process. This regulatory understanding does not encompass the range of ethical considerations in research, notably those associated with the relational and everyday aspects of human subject research. In order to support researchers in their effort to adopt a broader lens, this article presents a "person-oriented research ethics" approach. Five practical guideposts of person-oriented research ethics are identified, as follows: (1) respect for holistic personhood; (2) acknowledgement of lived world; (3) individualization; (4) focus on researcher-participant relationships; and (5) empowerment in decision-making. These guideposts are defined and illustrated with respect to different aspects of the research process (e.g., research design, recruitment, data collection). The person-oriented research ethics approach provides a toolkit to individual researchers, research groups, and research institutions in both biomedical and social science research wishing to expand their commitment to ethics in research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ariel Cascio
- a Neuroethics Research Unit , Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM) , Montréal , Québec , Canada.,b Neurology and Neurosurgery and Division of Experimental Medicine (Biomedical Ethics Unit) , McGill University, Montréal, Québec , Canada
| | - Eric Racine
- a Neuroethics Research Unit , Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM) , Montréal , Québec , Canada.,b Neurology and Neurosurgery and Division of Experimental Medicine (Biomedical Ethics Unit) , McGill University, Montréal, Québec , Canada.,c Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine , Université de Montréal, Montréal , Québec , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hull SC, Wilson Diné DR. Beyond Belmont: Ensuring Respect for AI/AN Communities Through Tribal IRBs, Laws, and Policies. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2017; 17:60-62. [PMID: 28661757 PMCID: PMC6097707 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1328531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
|