1
|
Pamungkas DR, O'Sullivan B, McGrail M, Chater B. Tools, frameworks and resources to guide global action on strengthening rural health systems: a mapping review. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:129. [PMID: 38049824 PMCID: PMC10694960 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-01078-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inequities of health outcomes persist in rural populations globally. This is strongly associated with there being less health coverage in rural and underserviced areas. Increasing health care coverage in rural area requires rural health system strengthening, which subsequently necessitates having tools to guide action. OBJECTIVE This mapping review aimed to describe the range of tools, frameworks and resources (hereafter called tools) available globally for rural health system capacity building. METHODS This study collected peer-reviewed materials published in 15-year period (2005-2020). A systematic mapping review process identified 149 articles for inclusion, related to 144 tools that had been developed, implemented, and/or evaluated (some tools reported over multiple articles) which were mapped against the World Health Organization's (WHO's) six health system building blocks (agreed as the elements that need to be addressed to strengthen health systems). RESULTS The majority of tools were from high- and middle-income countries (n = 85, 59% and n = 43, 29%, respectively), and only 17 tools (12%) from low-income countries. Most tools related to the health service building block (n = 57, 39%), or workforce (n = 33, 23%). There were a few tools related to information and leadership and governance (n = 8, 5% each). Very few tools related to infrastructure (n = 3, 2%) and financing (n = 4, 3%). This mapping review also provided broad quality appraisal, showing that the majority of the tools had been evaluated or validated, or both (n = 106, 74%). CONCLUSION This mapping review provides evidence that there is a breadth of tools available for health system strengthening globally along with some gaps where no tools were identified for specific health system building blocks. Furthermore, most tools were developed and applied in HIC/MIC and it is important to consider factors that influence their utility in LMIC settings. It may be important to develop new tools related to infrastructure and financing. Tools that have been positively evaluated should be made available to all rural communities, to ensure comprehensive global action on rural health system strengthening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dewi Retno Pamungkas
- Mayne Academy of Rural and Remote Medicine, Rural and Remote Medicine Clinical Unit, Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Theodore, QLD, Australia.
| | - Belinda O'Sullivan
- Toowoomba Regional Clinical Unit, Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.
- Murray Primary Health Network, Bendigo, VIC, Australia.
| | - Matthew McGrail
- Rockhampton Regional Clinical Unit, Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Rockhampton, QLD, Australia
| | - Bruce Chater
- Mayne Academy of Rural and Remote Medicine, Rural and Remote Medicine Clinical Unit, Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Theodore, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baumann AA, Hooley C, Goss CW, Mutabazi V, Brown AL, Schechtman KB, Twagirumukiza M, de Las Fuentes L, Reeds D, Williams M, Mutimura E, Bergström A, Nishimwe A, Ingabire C, Davila-Roman VG. Exploring contextual factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based care for hypertension in Rwanda: a cross-sectional study using the COACH questionnaire. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048425. [PMID: 34548353 PMCID: PMC8458329 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Hypertension is the largest contributor to the Global Burden of Disease. In Rwanda, as in most low-income and middle-income countries, an increasing prevalence of hypertension and its associated morbidity and mortality is causing major healthcare and economic impact. Understanding healthcare systems context in hypertension care is necessary. OBJECTIVE To study the hypertension healthcare context as perceived by healthcare providers using the Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) tool. DESIGN A cross-sectional cohort responded to the COACH questionnaire and a survey about hypertension training. SETTING Three tertiary care hospitals in Rwanda. PARTICIPANTS Healthcare professionals (n=223). PRIMARY OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The COACH tool consists of 49 items with eight subscales: resources, community engagement, commitment to work, informal payment, leadership, work culture, monitoring services for action (5-point Likert Scale) and sources of knowledge (on a 0-1 scale). Four questions surveyed training on hypertension. RESULTS Responders (n=223, 75% women; 56% aged 20-35 years) included nurses (n=142, 64%, midwives (n=42, 19%), primary care physicians (n=28, 13%) and physician specialists (n=11, 5%)). The subscales commitment to work, leadership, work culture and informal payment scored between 4.7 and 4.1 and the community engagement, monitoring services for action and organizational resources scored between 3.1 and 3.5. Sources of knowledge had a mean score of 0.6±0.3. While 73% reported having attended a didactic hypertension seminar in the past year, only 28% had received long-term training and 51% had <3-year experience working with hypertension care delivery. The majority (99%) indicated a need for additional training in hypertension care. CONCLUSIONS There is a need for increased and continuous training in Rwanda. Healthcare responders stated a commitment to work and reported supportive leadership, while acknowledging limited resources and no monitoring systems. The COACH tool provides contextual guidance to develop training strategies prior to the implementation of a sustainable hypertension care programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana A Baumann
- Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Cole Hooley
- School of Social Work, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA
| | - Charles W Goss
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | | | - Angela L Brown
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Kenneth B Schechtman
- Division of Biostatistics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marc Twagirumukiza
- Regional Alliance for Sustainable Development, Kigali, Rwanda
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Lisa de Las Fuentes
- Washington University in St. Louis, Division of Biostatistics, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Dominic Reeds
- Center for Human Nutrition, Division of Geriatrics and Nutritional Science, Department of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Makeda Williams
- National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Eugene Mutimura
- Regional Alliance for Sustainable Development, Kigali, Rwanda
- National Council for Science and Technology, Kigali, Rwanda and to Regional Alliance for Sustainable Development, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Anna Bergström
- Uppsala Global Health Research on Implementation and Sustainability (UGHRIS), Dept of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala Universitet, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Aurore Nishimwe
- Regional Alliance for Sustainable Development, Kigali, Rwanda
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Cecile Ingabire
- Regional Alliance for Sustainable Development, Kigali, Rwanda
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Victor G Davila-Roman
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gengiah S, Connolly C, Yende-Zuma N, Barker PM, Nunn AJ, Padayatchi N, Taylor M, Loveday M, Naidoo K. Organizational contextual factors that predict success of a quality improvement collaborative approach to enhance integrated HIV-tuberculosis services: a sub-study of the Scaling up TB/HIV Integration trial. Implement Sci 2021; 16:88. [PMID: 34535170 PMCID: PMC8447673 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01155-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A quality improvement (QI) collaborative approach to enhancing integrated HIV-Tuberculosis (TB) services may be effective in scaling up and improving the quality of service delivery. Little is known of the role of organizational contextual factors (OCFs) in influencing the success of QI collaboratives. This study aims to determine which OCFs were associated with improvement in a QI collaborative intervention to enhance integrated HIV-TB services delivery. Methods This is a nested sub-study embedded in a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Sixteen nurse supervisors (clusters) overseeing 40 clinics were randomized (1:1) to receive QI training and mentorship, or standard of care support (SOC). In the QI arm, eight nurse supervisors and 20 clinics formed a “collaborative” which aimed to improve HIV-TB process indicators, namely HIV testing, TB screening, isoniazid preventive therapy (IPT) initiations, viral load testing, and antiretroviral therapy for TB patients. OCFs measured at baseline were physical infrastructure, key staff, flexibility of clinic hours, monitoring data for improvement (MDI), and leadership support. Surveys were administered to clinic staff at baseline and month 12 to assess perceptions of supportiveness of contexts for change, and clinic organization for delivering integrated HIV-TB services. Linear mixed modelling was used to test for associations between OCFs and HIV-TB process indicators. Results A total of 209 clinic staff participated in the study; 97 (46.4%) and 112 (53.6%) from QI and SOC arms, respectively. There were no differences between the QI and SOC arms scores achieved for physical infrastructure (78.9% vs 64.7%; p = 0.058), key staff (95.8 vs 92; p = 0.270), clinic hours (66.9 vs 65.5; p = 0.900), MDI (63.3 vs 65; p = 0.875, leadership support (46.0 vs 57.4; p = 0.265), and perceptions of supportiveness of contexts for change (76.2 vs 79.7; p = 0.128 and clinic organization for delivering integrated HIV-TB services (74.1 vs 80.1; p = 0.916). IPT initiation was the only indicator that was significantly improved in the parent study. MDI was a significantly associated with increasing IPT initiation rates [beta coefficient (β) = 0.004; p = 0.004]. Discussion MDI is a practice that should be fostered in public health facilities to increase the likelihood of success of future QI collaboratives to improve HIV-TB service delivery. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02654613. Registered 01 June 2015. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-021-01155-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santhanalakshmi Gengiah
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X7 Congella, Durban, 4013, South Africa.
| | - Catherine Connolly
- School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X7 Congella, Durban, 4013, South Africa.,CAPRISA-MRC TB-HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, Durban, South Africa
| | - Pierre M Barker
- Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, MA, USA.,Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina (UNC),Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Andrew J Nunn
- Medical Research Council, Clinical Trials Unit at University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Nesri Padayatchi
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X7 Congella, Durban, 4013, South Africa.,CAPRISA-MRC TB-HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, Durban, South Africa
| | - Myra Taylor
- School of Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Marian Loveday
- CAPRISA-MRC TB-HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, Durban, South Africa.,HIV Prevention Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa
| | - Kogieleum Naidoo
- Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag X7 Congella, Durban, 4013, South Africa.,CAPRISA-MRC TB-HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment Research Unit, Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Getachew T, Abebe SM, Yitayal M, Bergström A, Persson LA, Berhanu D. Health extension workers' perceived health system context and health post preparedness to provide services: a cross-sectional study in four Ethiopian regions. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e048517. [PMID: 34108171 PMCID: PMC8191611 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The health system context influences the implementation of evidence-based practices and quality of healthcare services. Ethiopia aims at reaching universal health coverage but faces low primary care utilisation and substandard quality of care. We assessed the health extension workers' perceived context and the preparedness of health posts to provide services. SETTING This study was part of evaluating a complex intervention in 52 districts of four regions of Ethiopia. This paper used the endline data collected from December 2018 to February 2019. PARTICIPANTS A total of 152 health posts and health extension workers serving selected enumeration areas were included. OUTCOME MEASURES We used the Context Assessment for Community Health (COACH) tool and the Service Availability and Readiness Assessment tool. RESULTS Internal reliability of COACH was satisfactory. The dimensions community engagement, work culture, commitment to work and leadership all scored high (mean 3.75-4.01 on a 1-5 scale), while organisational resources, sources of knowledge and informal payments scored low (1.78-2.71). The general service readiness index was 59%. On average, 67% of the health posts had basic amenities to provide services, 81% had basic equipment, 42% had standard precautions for infection prevention, 47% had test capacity for malaria and 58% had essential medicines. CONCLUSION The health extension workers had a good relationship with the local community, used data for planning, were highly committed to their work with positive perceptions of their work culture, a relatively positive attitude regarding their leaders, and reported no corruption or informal payments. In contrast, they had insufficient sources of information and a severe lack of resources. The health post preparedness confirmed the low level of resources and preparedness for services. These findings suggest a significant potential contribution by health extension workers to Ethiopia's primary healthcare, provided that they receive improved support, including new information and essential resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodros Getachew
- Health System and Reproductive Health Research Directtorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Solomon Mekonnen Abebe
- Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | - Mezgebu Yitayal
- Institute of Public Health, University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | | | - Lars-Ake Persson
- Health System and Reproductive Health Research Directtorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Della Berhanu
- Health System and Reproductive Health Research Directtorate, Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bergström A, Ehrenberg A, Eldh AC, Graham ID, Gustafsson K, Harvey G, Hunter S, Kitson A, Rycroft-Malone J, Wallin L. The use of the PARIHS framework in implementation research and practice-a citation analysis of the literature. Implement Sci 2020; 15:68. [PMID: 32854718 PMCID: PMC7450685 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01003-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework was developed two decades ago and conceptualizes successful implementation (SI) as a function (f) of the evidence (E) nature and type, context (C) quality, and the facilitation (F), [SI = f (E,C,F)]. Despite a growing number of citations of theoretical frameworks including PARIHS, details of how theoretical frameworks are used remains largely unknown. This review aimed to enhance the understanding of the breadth and depth of the use of the PARIHS framework. METHODS This citation analysis commenced from four core articles representing the key stages of the framework's development. The citation search was performed in Web of Science and Scopus. After exclusion, we undertook an initial assessment aimed to identify articles using PARIHS and not only referencing any of the core articles. To assess this, all articles were read in full. Further data extraction included capturing information about where (country/countries and setting/s) PARIHS had been used, as well as categorizing how the framework was applied. Also, strengths and weaknesses, as well as efforts to validate the framework, were explored in detail. RESULTS The citation search yielded 1613 articles. After applying exclusion criteria, 1475 articles were read in full, and the initial assessment yielded a total of 367 articles reported to have used the PARIHS framework. These articles were included for data extraction. The framework had been used in a variety of settings and in both high-, middle-, and low-income countries. With regard to types of use, 32% used PARIHS in planning and delivering an intervention, 50% in data analysis, 55% in the evaluation of study findings, and/or 37% in any other way. Further analysis showed that its actual application was frequently partial and generally not well elaborated. CONCLUSIONS In line with previous citation analysis of the use of theoretical frameworks in implementation science, we also found a rather superficial description of the use of PARIHS. Thus, we propose the development and adoption of reporting guidelines on how framework(s) are used in implementation studies, with the expectation that this will enhance the maturity of implementation science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bergström
- Department of Women’s and Children’s health, Uppsala Global Health Research on Implementation and Sustainability (UGHRIS), Uppsala, Sweden
- Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Anna Ehrenberg
- School of Education, Health, and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Ann Catrine Eldh
- Department of Medicine and Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Public Health and Caring Science, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ian D. Graham
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Kazuko Gustafsson
- School of Education, Health, and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- University Library, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Gillian Harvey
- Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sarah Hunter
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Alison Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
- Green Templeton College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jo Rycroft-Malone
- Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancashire, UK
| | - Lars Wallin
- School of Education, Health, and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|