A new decade awaits sticky platelet syndrome: where are we now, how do we manage and what are the complications?

Classic Light Transmission Platelet Aggregometry: Do We Still Need it?

For more than 50 years, light transmission aggregometry has been accepted as the gold standard test for diagnosing inherited platelet disorders in platelet-rich plasma, although there are other functional approaches performed in whole blood. In this article, several advantages and disadvantages of this technique over other laboratory approaches are discussed in the view of recent guidelines, and the necessity of functional assays, such as light transmission aggregometry in the era of molecular genetic testing, is highlighted.

Endothelial dysfunction, platelet hyperactivity, hypertension, and the metabolic syndrome: molecular insights and combating strategies

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a multifaceted condition that increases the possibility of developing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. MetS includes obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, endothelial dysfunction, and platelet hyperactivity. There is a concerning rise in the occurrence and frequency of MetS globally. The rising incidence and severity of MetS need a proactive, multipronged strategy for identifying and treating those affected. For many MetS patients, achieving recommended goals for healthy fat intake, blood pressure control, and blood glucose management may require a combination of medicine therapy, lifestyles, nutraceuticals, and others. However, it is essential to note that lifestyle modification should be the first-line therapy for MetS. In addition, MetS requires pharmacological, nutraceutical, or other interventions. This review aimed to bring together the etiology, molecular mechanisms, and dietary strategies to combat hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and platelet dysfunction in individuals with MetS.

Association of Genetic Variability in Selected Genes with Platelet Hyperaggregability and Arterial Thrombosis

Introduction: Inherited platelet hyperaggregability, so called “Sticky platelet syndrome” (SPS), is a prothrombotic platelet disorder. The syndrome contributes more often to arterial than venous thrombosis. The most common localization of arterial occlusion involves cerebral or coronary arteries. However, SPS may also lead to thrombosis in the atypical sites of the circulation. This qualitative platelet alteration causes platelet hyperaggregability after a very low concentration of platelet inducers – adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and/or epinephrine (EPI). The precise genetic background of the syndrome has not been defined. In the present study we aimed to determine the association between selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within genes for platelet endothelial aggregation receptor 1 (PEAR1) and murine retrovirus integration site 1 (MRVI1) and the risk for arterial thrombosis in patients with SPS. The products of these selected genes play an important role in platelet aggregation.

Patients and methods: We examined 69 patients with SPS and a history of arterial thrombosis and 69 healthy blood donors who served as controls. SPS was confirmed by a light transmission aggregometry (LTA) according to the method and criteria described by Mammen and Bick. We assessed two SNPs within PEAR1 gene (rs12041331, rs1256888) and two SNPs within MRVI1 gene (rs1874445, rs7940646).

Results: Selected PEAR1 and MRVI1 polymorphisms seem not to be a risk factor for the development of SPS as the syndrome with an arterial thrombosis phenotype. However, in the subgroup of SPS1 patients there was found a decreased frequency of the minor A allele of SNP rs12041331 in PEAR1 gene (borderline p value, p=0.061) that can be hypothesized as protective against arterial thrombosis. In the same SPS1 subgroup the haplotype TA in PEAR1 gene also showed a decreased frequency with a borderline insignificance (p=0.056). We can theorize also about its protective role in SPS1 patients. We did not confirm the protective effect of polymorphism (T/T of rs 12566888) in PEAR1 against arterial thrombosis in SPS patients and SPS subgroups.

Conclusion: Our results support the idea that examined genetic variability of the selected SNPs in PEAR1 and MRVI1 genes is not associated with platelet hyperaggregability manifested as arterial thrombosis. The possible protective role of the minor A allele of SNP rs12041331 as well as a role of haplotype TA in PEAR1 gene related to the arterial thrombosis found in the subgroup of SPS1 patients needs to be verified in further research.