Dendritic cell-based vaccines in treating recurrent herpes labialis: Results of pilot clinical study

Safety and efficacy of dendritic cell vaccine for COVID-19 prevention after 1-Year follow-up: phase I and II clinical trial final result

Introduction

Interim analysis of phase I and phase II clinical trials of personalized vaccines made from autologous monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) incubated with S-protein of SARS-CoV-2 show that this vaccine is safe and well tolerated. Our previous report also indicates that this vaccine can induce specific T-cell and B cell responses against SARS-CoV-2. Herein, we report the final analysis after 1 year of follow-up regarding its safety and efficacy in subjects of phase I and phase II clinical trials.

Methods

Adult subjects (>18 years old) were given autologous DCs derived from peripheral blood monocytes, which were incubated with the S-protein of SARS-CoV-2. The primary outcome is safety in phase I clinical trials. Meanwhile, optimal antigen dosage is determined in phase II clinical trials. Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Non-COVID-19 adverse events (AEs) were observed for 1 year.

Results

A total of 28 subjects in the phase I clinical trial were randomly assigned to nine groups based on antigen and Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) dosage. In the phase II clinical trial, 145 subjects were randomly grouped into three groups based on antigen dosage. During the 1-year follow-up period, 35.71% of subjects in phase I and 16.54% in phase II had non-COVID AEs. No subjects in phase I experienced moderate-severe COVID-19. Meanwhile, 4.31% of subjects in phase II had moderate-severe COVID-19. There is no difference in both COVID and non-COVID-19 AEs between groups.

Conclusions

After 1 year of follow-up, this vaccine is proven safe and effective for preventing COVID-19. A phase III clinical trial involving more subjects should be conducted to establish its efficacy and see other possible side effects.

A Comprehensive Overview of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis and the Management of Herpes Labialis

Herpes labialis remains exceedingly prevalent and is one of the most common human viral infections throughout the world. Recurrent herpes labialis evolves from the initial viral infection by herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) which subsequently presents with or without symptoms. Reactivation of this virus is triggered by psychosocial factors such as stress, febrile environment, ultraviolet light susceptibility, or specific dietary inadequacy. This virus infection is also characterized by uninterrupted transitions between chronic-latent and acute-recurrent phases, allowing the virus to opportunistically avoid immunity and warrant the transmission to other vulnerable hosts simultaneously. This review comprehensively evaluates the current evidence on epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission modes, clinical manifestations, and current management options of herpes labialis infections.

Refining the DC-targeting vaccination for preventing emerging infectious diseases

The development of safe, long-term, effective vaccines is still a challenge for many infectious diseases. Thus, the search of new vaccine strategies and production platforms that allow rapidly and effectively responding against emerging or reemerging pathogens has become a priority in the last years. Targeting the antigens directly to dendritic cells (DCs) has emerged as a new approach to enhance the immune response after vaccination. This strategy is based on the fusion of the antigens of choice to monoclonal antibodies directed against specific DC surface receptors such as CD40. Since time is essential, in silico approaches are of high interest to select the most immunogenic and conserved epitopes to improve the T- and B-cells responses. The purpose of this review is to present the advances in DC vaccination, with special focus on DC targeting vaccines and epitope mapping strategies and provide a new framework for improving vaccine responses against infectious diseases.

From the Cochrane Library: Interventions for the Prevention of Herpes Simplex Labialis (Cold Sores on the Lips)

Collapse

Dendritic cell vaccine as a potential strategy to end the COVID-19 pandemic. Why should it be Ex Vivo?

INTRODUCTION

Developing a safe and efficacious vaccine that can induce broad and long-term immunity for SARS-CoV-2 infection is the most critical research to date. As the most potent APCs, dendritic cells (DCs) can induce a robust T cell immunity. In addition, DCs also play an essential role in COVID-19 pathogenesis, making them a potential vaccination target. However, the DCs-based vaccine with ex vivo loading has not yet been explored for COVID-19.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to provide the rationale for developing a DCs-based vaccine with ex vivo loading of SARS-CoV-2 antigen. Here, we discuss the role of DCs in immunity and the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on DCs. Then, we propose the mechanism of the DCs-based vaccine in inducing immunity and highlight the benefits of ex vivo loading of antigen.

EXPERT OPINION

We make the case that an ex vivo loaded DC-based vaccination is appropriate for COVID-19 prevention.

A Randomized Exploratory Study to Investigate the Inflammatory Response During an Ultraviolet-Radiation-Induced Cold Sore Episode

Introduction

Antivirals and occlusive lip patches are key treatments for cold sores. Additional therapeutic options, and validated methods to evaluate these, are needed.

Methods

This exploratory, double-blind, single-center study aimed to evaluate a novel lip patch containing the antiviral aciclovir (ACV) using noninvasive methods for measuring cold sore-associated inflammation. Healthy subjects with ultraviolet radiation (UVR)-induced cold sores were randomized to 10 days’ treatment with a lip patch containing ACV (N = 12) or without ACV (N = 13). Outcome measures included blood flux (field laser perfusion imaging, FLPI), skin temperature (thermography), and skin redness (high-resolution color photography, HRCP).

Results

Mean blood flux (in perfusion units) and skin temperature (in °C/pixel) were higher for cold sores versus intrasubject control regions. For ACV versus placebo patches, skin temperature was higher for ACV with total day 1–5 mean values of 2.6 versus 0.5 (p = 0.036) and day 1–10 mean values of 3.2 versus 0.8 (p = 0.049). Conversely, mean total episode blood flux values over days 1–5 were lower for ACV versus placebo patch (flux 2227 versus 2939, p = 0.340) and remained lower over days 1–10 (flux ACV 810 versus placebo 961, p = 0.404). HRCP failed to discriminate cold sores from control regions or between treatments. Subject-reported pain/soreness, itching, and burning were generally lower with ACV patch.

Conclusions

FLPI reliably measures cold sore-related inflammation and thermography heat radiating from the skin. HRCP was of little value.

Trial Registration

NCT01653509.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00531-x.

Immunotherapy with interferon-α-induced dendritic cells for chronic HCV infection (the results of pilot clinical trial)

The key role of T cells in hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination and the ability of dendritic cells (DCs) to induce antiviral T cell responses suggest that DC vaccines could be a promising approach in the treatment of chronic HCV infection. The aim of our study was to evaluate, whether immunotherapy with DCs is safe and elicits anti-HCV T cell responses. Ten patients with HCV (genotype 1) were vaccinated with monocyte-derived DCs, generated in the presence of IFN-α (IFN-DCs) and pulsed with recombinant HCV Core and NS3 proteins. Treatment schedule included four subcutaneous vaccinations with 1 week interval and six vaccinations with month interval. No serious adverse events or an increase in hepatitis C biochemical activity were registered after vaccination. Using ex vivo assays for the detection of proliferative responses, IFN-γ production and CD8⁺ degranulation have shown that immunotherapy elicited antigen-specific responses in all patients although individual heterogeneity existed within their types, magnitude, and timing. Core/NS3-specific proliferative response and CD8⁺ T cell degranulation have already been registered after the first course of vaccination. Of note, Core-specific responses had higher magnitude. The appearance of antigen-specific IFN-γ responses was registered after the second vaccination course. Vaccination did not cause Th2 response and expansion of the CD4⁺CD25⁺CD127^- regulatory T cells. Generated immune responses failed to provide virus elimination. Nevertheless, there were inverse correlations between viral load and NS3-specific proliferation (R _S = 0.62; p = 0.05) and IFN-γ secretion (R _S = - 0.82; p = 0.001) at 6-month post-treatment period. Immunotherapy with IFN-DCs was safe and elicited HCV-specific T cell responses which were insufficient to eliminate viruses but could be implicated in the restriction of viral replication.

The alpha-herpesviridae in dermatology : Herpes simplex virus types I and II

This review on herpes simplex virus type I and type II (HSV‑I, HSV‑II) summarizes recent developments in clinical manifestations and treatment interventions for primary and recurrent orolabial and genital herpes, as well as those regarding vaccination issues. Among the clinical presentations, the relationship between pyogenic granuloma and chronic HSV‑I infection; HSV-related folliculitis; verrucous HSV‑I and HSV‑II lesions; the role of recurrent HSV‑I infection in burning mouth syndrome; HSV‑I and HSV‑II infection of the periareolar area; zosteriform HSV; the "knife-cut sign"; and the preferential colonization and infection of preexisting dermatoses by HSV‑I or HSV‑II are discussed. The usual antiviral treatment regimens for primary and recurrent orolabial and genital herpes are compared to short-term and one-day treatment options. New anti-HSV‑I and anti-HSV‑II agents include amenavir, pritelivir, brincidofovir, valomaciclovir, and FV-100. Therapeutic or preventive vaccination against HSV‑I and HSV‑II infections still remains a highly desirable treatment aim, which, unfortunately, has no clinically relevant applications to date.

[The alpha-herpesviridae in dermatology : Herpes simplex virus types I and II. German version]

This review on herpes simplex virus type I and type II (HSV-I, HSV-II) summarizes recent developments in clinical manifestations and treatment interventions for primary and recurrent orolabial and genital herpes, as well as those regarding vaccination issues. Among the clinical presentations, the relationship between pyogenic granuloma and chronic HSV-I infection; HSV-related folliculitis; verrucous HSV-I and HSV-II lesions; the role of recurrent HSV-I infection in burning mouth syndrome; HSV-I and HSV-II infection of the periareolar area; zosteriform HSV; the "knife-cut sign"; and the preferential colonization and infection of preexisting dermatoses by HSV-I or HSV-II are discussed. The usual antiviral treatment regimens for primary and recurrent orolabial and genital herpes are compared to short-term and one-day treatment options. New anti-HSV-I and anti-HSV-II agents include amenavir, pritelivir, brincidofovir, valomaciclovir, and FV-100. Therapeutic or preventive vaccination against HSV-I and HSV-II infections still remains a highly desirable treatment aim, which, unfortunately, has no clinically relevant applications to date.