1
|
MacKenzie NE, Marbil MG, Soltani S, Lorenzetti DL, Birnie KA. A systematic review of in-person versus remotely delivered interventions for youth with chronic pain. PAEDIATRIC & NEONATAL PAIN 2024; 6:35-43. [PMID: 38863459 PMCID: PMC11163229 DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic prompted a rapid shift from in-person to virtually-delivered care. Many youth with chronic pain have the ability to access care virtually; however, little is known about the efficacy of pain care for youth with chronic pain delivered virtually when compared to in-person. Such evidence is essential to guide youth in making decisions about their care, but also to inform what options health professionals present to youth. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy of interventions that are delivered in-person versus virtually for youth with chronic pain. Five databases (i.e., CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, and Web of Science) were searched in October 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials that compare single/multimodal interventions for pediatric chronic pain delivered in-person versus virtually. A total 3638 unique studies were identified through database and other searching, two of which satisfied established criteria for inclusion in this review. Both studies compared psychological interventions delivered virtually versus in-person for youth with chronic pain and showed comparable efficacy across modalities. The planned meta-analyses could not be conducted due to different outcomes within each study that could not be combined. This systematic review highlights a critical gap in the evidence regarding the efficacy of virtually delivered interventions for youth with chronic pain. This evidence is necessary to inform treatment decisions for youth, and further research is required to develop the evidence to inform clinical interventions, especially as virtual treatments continue to be offered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole E. MacKenzie
- Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
- Centre for Pediatric Pain ResearchIWK HealthHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | | | - Sabine Soltani
- Department of PsychologyUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Diane L. Lorenzetti
- Health Sciences Library and Department of Community Health SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| | - Kathryn A. Birnie
- Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, and Community Health SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Healy P, Verrest L, Felisi M, Ceci A, Della Pasqua O. Dose rationale for gabapentin and tramadol in pediatric patients with chronic pain. Pharmacol Res Perspect 2023; 11:e01138. [PMID: 37803937 PMCID: PMC10558965 DOI: 10.1002/prp2.1138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite off-label use, the efficacy and safety of gabapentin and tramadol in pediatric patients (3 months to <18 years old) diagnosed with chronic pain has not been characterized. However, generating evidence based on randomized clinical trials in this population has been extremely challenging. The current investigation illustrates the use of clinical trial simulations (CTSs) as a tool for optimizing doses and protocol design for a prospective investigation in pediatric patients with chronic pain. Pharmacokinetic (PK) modeling and CTSs were used to describe the PKs of gabapentin and tramadol in the target population. In the absence of biomarkers of analgesia, systemic exposure (AUC, Css) was used to guide dose selection under the assumption of a comparable exposure-response (PKPD) relationship for either compound between adults and children. Two weight bands were identified for gabapentin, with doses titrated from 5 to 63 mg/kg. This yields gabapentin exposures (AUC0-8 ) of approximately 35 mg/L*h (1200 mg/day adult dose equivalent). For tramadol, median steady state concentrations between 200 and 300 ng/mL were achieved after doses of 2-5 mg/kg, but concentrations showed high interindividual variability. Simulation scenarios showed that titration steps are required to explore therapeutically relevant dose ranges taking into account the safety profile of both drugs. Gabapentin can be used t.i.d. at doses between 7-63 and 5-45 mg/kg for patients receiving gabapentin weighing <15 and ≥15 kg, respectively, whereas a t.i.d. regimen with doses between 1 and 5 mg/kg can be used for tramadol in patients who are not fast metabolisers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Healy
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Group, School of PharmacyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Luka Verrest
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Group, School of PharmacyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | | | - Adriana Ceci
- Fondazione per la Ricerca Farmacologica Gianni Benzi onlusValenzanoItaly
| | - Oscar Della Pasqua
- Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Group, School of PharmacyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Conroy KE, Islam MF, Jason LA. Pediatric pain rehabilitation during the COVID-19 pandemic: exploring the effectiveness of a hybrid intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment model. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:3079-3086. [PMID: 36129253 PMCID: PMC9437146 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2125083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to (1) examine improvements in rehabilitation outcomes after participation in a pediatric hybrid intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment model (50% in-person and 50% video-based telehealth) and (2) compare magnitude of hybrid model improvements to patients treated in a traditional, 100% in-person model prior to the pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS Rehabilitation outcomes for 33 youth with chronic pain from the model were compared to 33 youth with chronic pain who completed a traditional, in-person model. Improvements between admission and discharge in both models were examined using paired student t-tests. Independent samples t-tests compared change scores for the hybrid and traditional models. RESULTS Participants in both models experienced significant improvements on all rehabilitation outcomes, including cardiovascular endurance, pain interference, functional disability, and occupational performance (p < 0.001), except for pain intensity (p = 0.15). Change scores for rehabilitation outcomes did not significantly differ between models. CONCLUSIONS Quantitatively, hybrid model rehabilitation outcomes appeared clinically equivalent to the traditional, in-person model. Qualitative and psychosocial outcome comparisons of each model are warranted to better understand challenges and barriers associated with hybrid pain treatment models. The feasibility and impact of tools to enhance telehealth, such as actigraphy or virtual reality, should also be explored.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThis study supports the efficacy of video-based telehealth interventions for children and adolescents with chronic pain syndromes.Disability outcomes for a hybrid (50% in-person, 50% video-based telehealth) intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment program appear to be equivalent to patients treated within a fully in-person program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl E. Conroy
- Center for Community Research, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mohammed F. Islam
- Department of Psychology, Chicago State University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leonard A. Jason
- Center for Community Research, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyng KD, Djurtoft C, Bruun MK, Christensen MN, Lauritsen RE, Larsen JB, Birnie KA, Stinson J, Hoegh MS, Palsson TS, Olesen AE, Arendt-Nielsen L, Ehlers LH, Fonager K, Jensen MB, Würtzen H, Poulin PA, Handberg G, Ziegler C, Moeller LB, Olsen J, Heise L, Rathleff MS. What is known and what is still unknown within chronic musculoskeletal pain? A systematic evidence and gap map. Pain 2023; 164:1406-1415. [PMID: 36602421 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Evidence and gap maps (EGMs) can be used to identify gaps within specific research areas and help guide future research agendas and directions. Currently, there are no EGMs within the broad domain of chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain in adults. The aim of this study was to create a contemporary EGM of interventions and outcomes used for research investigating chronic MSK pain. This EGM was based on systematic reviews of interventions published in scientific journals within the past 20 years. Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were used to retrieve studies for inclusion. The quality of the included reviews was assessed using AMSTAR-II. Interventions were categorised as either physical, psychological, pharmacological, education/advice, interdisciplinary, or others. Outcomes were categorised using the Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (IMMPACT) recommendations. Of 4299 systematic reviews, 457 were included. Of these, 50% were rated critically low quality, 25% low quality, 10% moderate quality, and 15% rated high quality. Physical interventions (eg, exercise therapy) and education were the most common interventions reported in 80% and 20% of the studies, respectively. Pain (97%) and physical functioning (87%) were the most reported outcomes in the systematic reviews. Few systematic reviews used interdisciplinary interventions (3%) and economic-related outcomes (2%). This contemporary EGM revealed a low proportion of high-quality evidence within chronic MSK pain. This EGM clearly outlines the lack of high-quality research and the need for increased focus on interventions encompassing the entire biopsychosocial perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian D Lyng
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Chris Djurtoft
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Malene K Bruun
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Mads N Christensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Rikke E Lauritsen
- Interdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jesper B Larsen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Kathryn A Birnie
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine and
- Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stinson
- Child Health Evaluation Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Morten S Hoegh
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Thorvaldur S Palsson
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anne E Olesen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars Arendt-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars H Ehlers
- Denmark & Nordic Institute of Health Economics, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Fonager
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Martin B Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Hanne Würtzen
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, The Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patricia A Poulin
- Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Gitte Handberg
- Pain Research Group, Pain Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Pain Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Connie Ziegler
- Gigtforeningen/Danish Rheumatism Association, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars B Moeller
- Foreningen af Kroniske Smerteramte og Pårørende (FAKS)/The Association for Chronic Pain Patients and Relatives, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Judi Olsen
- Fibromyalgi & Smerteforeningen/the Danish Fibromyalgia & Pain Association, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lotte Heise
- Danish Broadcasting Corporation, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael S Rathleff
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Chronic pain in children is a relatively prevalent cause of functional disability. Contributing factors to this pain are best viewed through the biopsychosocial model. Although evidence is lacking for individual aspects of treatment, interdisciplinary care is considered the best treatment approach for children with chronic pain. Interdisciplinary care can include medication management with daily and as-needed medications, physical and occupational therapy focusing on function and movement, and psychological treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy and acceptance focused treatment. In children with severe pain and disability, intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment may be needed to improve pain and function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew B Collins
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine; Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue MLC 4009, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA; Division of Pediatric Pain Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue MLC 2001, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hauber SD, Robinson K, Kirby E, Kamper S, Lennox NN, O'Sullivan K. Describing the nonsurgical, nonpharmacological interventions offered to adolescents with persistent back pain in randomized trials: A scoping review. Eur J Pain 2023; 27:459-475. [PMID: 36587243 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 12/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Persistent nonspecific back pain is now established as a biopsychosocial phenomenon that can be meaningfully affected by individuals' cognitions, emotions, lifestyle factors and family and social relationships. Recent guidelines for the treatment of adolescents with persistent nonspecific back pain, as well as those for youth with mixed chronic pain, strongly recommend interdisciplinary care in which adolescents receive treatment for both mind and body. The objective of this scoping review was to examine the interventions evaluated in randomized trials for adolescents with persistent back pain to determine whether they correspond to these guidelines and to reveal future research priorities. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT The review protocol was registered in March 2022. We followed the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews. Twelve electronic databases were searched for relevant study reports. Data were charted on study characteristics, participant characteristics and intervention details using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. RESULTS The search yielded 1952 records, of which eight reports representing seven randomized trials were eligible. The most common interventions were exercise therapy (n = 6) and back education (n = 4). Five studies employed multiple intervention components, but none was multidisciplinary. Studies primarily targeted posture or biomechanical factors. One study included an intervention addressing participants' fears and beliefs about pain. CONCLUSIONS Randomized trials for adolescents with persistent back pain have primarily relied upon an outdated, biomechanical explanation of persisting pain. Future randomized trials should align with current treatment recommendations and measure outcomes across multiple biopsychosocial domains. SIGNIFICANCE This scoping review describes in detail the interventions included in randomized trials for adolescents with persistent, nonspecific back pain. The review is important because it reveals discrepancies between those interventions and the interventions recommended for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara D Hauber
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Katie Robinson
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Edward Kirby
- Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Runwell, UK
| | - Steven Kamper
- School of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Noirin Nealon Lennox
- Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Belfast, UK
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Kieran O'Sullivan
- School of Allied Health, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
- Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schemer L, Hess CW, Van Orden AR, Birnie KA, Harrison LE, Glombiewski JA, Simons LE. Enhancing Exposure Treatment for Youths With Chronic Pain: Co-design and Qualitative Approach. J Particip Med 2023; 15:e41292. [PMID: 36892929 PMCID: PMC10037174 DOI: 10.2196/41292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing the access to and improving the impact of pain treatments is of utmost importance, especially among youths with chronic pain. The engagement of patients as research partners (in contrast to research participants) provides valuable expertise to collaboratively improve treatment delivery. OBJECTIVE This study looked at a multidisciplinary exposure treatment for youths with chronic pain through the lens of patients and caregivers with the aim to explore and validate treatment change processes, prioritize and develop ideas for improvement, and identify particularly helpful treatment elements. METHODS Qualitative exit interviews were conducted with patients and caregivers at their discharge from 2 clinical trials (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01974791 and NCT03699007). Six independent co-design meetings were held with patients and caregivers as research partners to establish a consensus within and between groups. The results were validated in a wrap-up meeting. RESULTS Patients and caregivers described that exposure treatment helped them better process pain-related emotions, feel empowered, and improve their relationship with each other. The research partners developed and agreed upon 12 ideas for improvement. Major recommendations include that pain exposure treatment should be disseminated more not only among patients and caregivers but also among primary care providers and the general public to facilitate an early referral for treatment. Exposure treatment should allow flexibility in terms of duration, frequency, and delivery mode. The research partners prioritized 13 helpful treatment elements. Most of the research partners agreed that future exposure treatments should continue to empower patients to choose meaningful exposure activities, break long-term goals into smaller steps, and discuss realistic expectations at discharge. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study have the potential to contribute to the refinement of pain treatments more broadly. At their core, they suggest that pain treatments should be disseminated more, flexible, and transparent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Schemer
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany
| | - Courtney W Hess
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Amanda R Van Orden
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Kathryn A Birnie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Lauren E Harrison
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Julia A Glombiewski
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau, Landau, Germany
| | - Laura E Simons
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hurtubise K, Brousselle A, Noel M, Caldwell K, Rayner L, Dawson M, Rasic N, Camden C. The effect domains, measures, and methods reported in pediatric-specialized multidisciplinary outpatient rehabilitation programs: An integrated review. Pain Pract 2023; 23:185-203. [PMID: 36251412 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 09/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Specialized pain rehabilitation is recognized as the treatment of choice for youth with pain-related disability. Appropriate outcomes for program evaluation are critical. This study aimed to summarize the effect domains and methods used to evaluate pediatric-specialized outpatient pain rehabilition programs, map them to the PedIMMPACT statement, and highlight future directions. METHODS An integrated review framework, incorporating stakeholders, was used. Academic Search Complete, CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar were searched for studies published in 1999-2021 featuring the treatment effects of specialized outpatient pain rehabilitation on youth with pain-related disability and their parents. Selected studies were critically appraised using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies of Diverse Design, organized by study characteristics, and analyzed using constant comparison. RESULTS From the 1951 potentially relevant titles, 37 studies were selected. Twenty-five effects targeted youth and 24 focused on parents, with a maximum of 15 youth and 11 parent effect domains (median = 5 domains per study). Although most studies measured a combination of effect domains and were inclusive of some recommended in the PedIMMPACT statement, no effect was measured consistently across studies. Youth physical functioning and parent emotional functioning were measured most often. Eighty-five instruments were used to assess youth outcomes and 59 for parents, with self-report questionnaires dominating. DISCUSSION A lack of standardization exists associated with the domains and methods used to evaluate the effects of pediatric-specialized outpatient pain rehabilitation programs, hindering comparisons. Future program evaluations should be founded on their theory, aim, and anticipated outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Hurtubise
- Faculté de Médecine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Québec, Canada.,Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Astrid Brousselle
- School of Public Administration, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Melanie Noel
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Heritage Medical Research Building, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Health Research Innovation Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kathleen Caldwell
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Laura Rayner
- Vi Riddell Children's Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Matthew Dawson
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nivez Rasic
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Heritage Medical Research Building, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Vi Riddell Children's Pain and Rehabilitation Centre, Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Chantal Camden
- Faculté de Médecine et Sciences de la Santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shulman J, Cybulski A, Randall E, Greco KF, Bryant G, Jervis K, Weller E, Sethna NF. Clinical Assessment of Mechanical Allodynia in Youth With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Development and Preliminary Validation of the Pediatric Tactile Sensitivity Test of Allodynia (Pedi-Sense). THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 24:706-715. [PMID: 36592646 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Youth with complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) commonly experience mechanical allodynia and disability. Assessment of mechanical allodynia is typically binary (present or absent), making it difficult to assess the quality and degree of mechanical allodynia before and after treatment. This study developed and validated the Pediatric Tactile Sensitivity Test of Allodynia (Pedi-Sense) to provide an easy way for rehabilitation clinicians to evaluate mechanical allodynia before and after intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment. The 6 Pedi-Sense items demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability (CR) at admission (CR = .956) and discharge (CR = .973), reasonably fit the hypothesized linear model of stimulus intensity (P < .0001), and significantly loaded onto a single latent factor, mechanical allodynia (P < .0001), at admission and discharge. Pedi-Sense scores significantly correlated with disability (rs = .40; P = .004) and pain catastrophizing (rs = .33; P = .017) at admission. The Pedi-Sense appeared responsive to intervention as participants' total scores improved by 1.44 points (95% CI: .72, 2.15) after IIPT interventions that included daily tactile desensitization. However, test-retest and interrater reliability and the specific contribution of desensitization treatment to the overall success of multi-modal pain rehabilitation still needs to be evaluated. PERSPECTIVE: This article presents the development and preliminary validation of a novel clinical assessment of static and dynamic mechanical allodynia. The Pediatric Tactile Sensitivity Test of Allodynia (Pedi-Sense) allows rehabilitation clinicians to easily evaluate mechanical allodynia at the bedside with minimal training and simple equipment to guide desensitization treatment in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Shulman
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Waltham, Massachusetts.
| | - Anna Cybulski
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - Edin Randall
- Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimberly F Greco
- Boston Children's Hospital, Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Gabrielle Bryant
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Waltham, Massachusetts
| | - Kelsey Jervis
- Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Edie Weller
- Boston Children's Hospital, Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Navil F Sethna
- Mayo Family Pediatric Pain Rehabilitation Center, Boston Children's Hospital, Waltham, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lyng KD, Larsen JB, Birnie KA, Stinson J, Hoegh MS, Palsson TS, Olesen AE, Arendt-Nielsen L, Ehlers LH, Fonager K, Jensen MB, Würtzen H, Poulin PA, Handberg G, Ziegler C, Møller LB, Olsen J, Heise L, Rathleff MS. Participatory research: a Priority Setting Partnership for chronic musculoskeletal pain in Denmark. Scand J Pain 2022; 23:402-415. [PMID: 35918804 DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patient and stakeholder engagements in research have increasingly gained attention in healthcare and healthcare-related research. A common and rigorous approach to establish research priorities based on input from people and stakeholders is the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership (JLA-PSP). The aim of this study was to establish research priorities for chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain by engaging with people living with chronic MSK pain, relatives to people living with chronic MSK pain, healthcare professionals (HCP), and researchers working with chronic MSK pain. METHODS This JLA-PSP included a nation-wide survey in Denmark, an interim prioritisation, and an online consensus building workshop. The information gained from this was the basis for developing the final list of specific research priorities within chronic MSK pain. RESULTS In the initial survey, 1010 respondents (91% people living with chronic MSK pain/relatives, 9% HCPs/researchers) submitted 3121 potential questions. These were summarised into 19 main themes and 36 sub-themes. In the interim prioritisation exercise, 51% people living with pain/relatives and 49% HCPs/researchers reduced the list to 33 research questions prior to the final priority setting workshop. 23 participants attended the online workshop (12 people/relatives, 10 HCPs, and 1 researcher) who reached consensus for the most important research priorities after two rounds of discussion of each question. CONCLUSIONS This study identified several specific research questions generated by people living with chronic MSK pain, relatives, HCPs, and researchers. The stakeholders proposed prioritization of the healthcare system's ability to support patients, focus on developing coherent pathways between sectors and education for both patients and HCP. These research questions can form the basis for future studies, funders, and be used to align research with end-users' priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian D Lyng
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark.,Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University
| | - Jesper B Larsen
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Kathryn A Birnie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.,Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stinson
- Child Health Evaluation Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Morten S Hoegh
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Thorvaldur S Palsson
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark.,Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aalborg University hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anne E Olesen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars Arendt-Nielsen
- Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lars H Ehlers
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research (DACS), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg.,Denmark & Nordic Institute of Health Economics, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kirsten Fonager
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.,Department of Social Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Martin B Jensen
- Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University
| | - Hanne Würtzen
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology, The Multidisciplinary Pain Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patricia A Poulin
- Department of Psychology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gitte Handberg
- Pain Research Group, Pain Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Pain Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Lars B Møller
- The Association for Chronic Pain Patients and Relatives, Denmark
| | - Judi Olsen
- The Danish Fibromyalgia & Pain Association, Denmark
| | | | - Michael S Rathleff
- Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark.,Center for General Practice at Aalborg University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Andias R, Sa-Couto P, Silva AG. Blended-Learning Pain Neuroscience Education and Exercise in High School Students With Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther 2022; 102:6575293. [PMID: 35485186 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzac048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and exercise have emerged as potential interventions in adolescents with chronic pain; however, very few studies have explored their effectiveness. Blended-learning approaches combining face-to-face and online educational sessions have also emerged as facilitating methods of health education. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of exercises and PNE versus exercise alone in adolescents with chronic neck pain (NP). METHODS A randomized controlled trial with 6-month follow-up was conducted in 2 high schools. Over 8 weeks, a total of 127 adolescents with chronic NP were randomly allocated to either (1) perform functional and region-specific exercises, including generalized neuromuscular control, endurance, and strength exercises, as well as exercises targeting the deep neck flexor and extensor muscles and scapular stabilizer muscles; or (2) perform the same exercise-based intervention plus PNE. Pain intensity (primary outcome), disability, sleep, catastrophizing, fear of movement, self-efficacy, and knowledge of pain neuroscience were assessed at baseline, postintervention, and 6-month follow-up. Neck and scapular muscle endurance and pressure pain thresholds were assessed at baseline and postintervention. Patient's Global Impression of Change was assessed postintervention and at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS There was a significant decrease in pain intensity from baseline to postintervention and from baseline to follow-up in both groups, but there were no between-group differences or interactions between time and groups. These results were similar for the secondary outcomes, except for knowledge of pain neuroscience, for which a significant group and time interaction was found. CONCLUSION Exercise and exercise plus PNE were similarly effective in treating adolescents with chronic NP, and the results were maintained for up to 6 months. Further studies are needed to explore the effect of these interventions for longer follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Andias
- School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.,Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS), Piso 2, Edifício nascente, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Sa-Couto
- CINTESIS@RISE, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Anabela G Silva
- School of Health Sciences (ESSUA), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal.,Center for Research and Development in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA), Department of Mathematics (DMAT), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sieberg CB, Karunakaran KD, Kussman B, Borsook D. Preventing pediatric chronic postsurgical pain: Time for increased rigor. Can J Pain 2022; 6:73-84. [PMID: 35528039 PMCID: PMC9067470 DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2021.2019576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 11/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) results from a cascade of events in the peripheral and central nervous systems following surgery. Several clinical predictors, including the prior pain state, premorbid psychological state (e.g., anxiety, catastrophizing), intraoperative surgical load (establishment of peripheral and central sensitization), and acute postoperative pain management, may contribute to the patient's risk of developing CPSP. However, research on the neurobiological and biobehavioral mechanisms contributing to pediatric CPSP and effective preemptive/treatment strategies are still lacking. Here we evaluate the perisurgical process by identifying key problems and propose potential solutions for the pre-, intra-, and postoperative pain states to both prevent and manage the transition of acute to chronic pain. We propose an eight-step process involving preemptive and preventative analgesia, behavioral interventions, and the use of biomarkers (brain-based, inflammatory, or genetic) to facilitate timely evaluation and treatment of premorbid psychological factors, ongoing surgical pain, and postoperative pain to provide an overall improved outcome. By achieving this, we can begin to establish personalized precision medicine for children and adolescents presenting to surgery and subsequent treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine B. Sieberg
- Biobehavioral Pediatric Pain Lab, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Keerthana Deepti Karunakaran
- Biobehavioral Pediatric Pain Lab, Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Pain and Affective Neuroscience Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Barry Kussman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, & Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - David Borsook
- Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bhandari RP, Harrison LE, Richardson PA, Goya Arce AB, You DS, Rajagopalan A, Birnie KA, Sil S. Clinical Utility of CAT Administered PROMIS Measures to Track Change for Pediatric Chronic Pain. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:55-64. [PMID: 34229073 PMCID: PMC11160558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) are utilized in clinical registries and trials, necessitating development of benchmarks to enhance interpretability. This study aimed to 1) examine if PROMIS measures administered via computer adaptive testing (CAT) were responsive to change, and 2) highlight one method of assessing clinically significant change for youth seen in a tertiary pain clinic. Clinically significant change was achieved if patients had significantly reliable pre-to-post-changes greater than Reliable Change Index (RCI) value and reported decreased symptoms by at least one severity level (e.g., moderate to mild). Participants were 328 youth (8-17 years old) seen in a tertiary pediatric pain management clinic. Small to moderate effect sizes were noted across PROMIS measures (except Peer Relations). Reliable magnitudes of change were estimated for this sample as approximately 6 point reduction for Pain Interference and Mobility, 9 for Fatigue, and 11 for Anxiety and Depression. Depending on the measure, 10 to 24% were categorized as improved, 3 to 6% as deteriorated, and 68 to 81% were either not clinically elevated at baseline or remained unchanged at 3 months. Overall, PROMIS CAT measures demonstrated responsiveness to change over time. Estimation of clinically significant change offers preliminary yet rigorous benchmarks for evaluating treatment response and sets the stage for understanding treatment effects. PERSPECTIVE: This study assesses responsiveness of CAT administered PROMIS measures and highlights one methodological approach of presenting clinical significance for assessing treatment outcomes in pediatric chronic pain. These benchmarks will allow clinicians and researchers to evaluate treatment response utilizing PROs while allowing for a deeper understanding of treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashmi P Bhandari
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - Lauren E Harrison
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Patricia A Richardson
- Departments of Pediatric Psychology and Pediatric Pain and Palliative Medicine, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Grand Rapids, Michigan; Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan
| | - Ana B Goya Arce
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Dokyoung S You
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Adithi Rajagopalan
- Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
| | - Kathryn A Birnie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Soumitri Sil
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reda A, Ragy H, Saeed K, Alhussaini MA. A semi-systematic review on hypertension and dyslipidemia care in Egypt-highlighting evidence gaps and recommendations for better patient outcomes. JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION 2021; 96:32. [PMID: 34851468 PMCID: PMC8634749 DOI: 10.1186/s42506-021-00096-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Both hypertension and dyslipidemia are considered as major modifiable risk factors of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and their prevalence in Egypt has increased in recent years. Evidence-based systematic evaluation of data on hypertension and dyslipidemia is critical for effective patient-centric management to reduce the overall risk of CVDs in Egypt. This semi-systematic review aimed to quantify and identify data gaps in the prevalence and distribution of patient journey touchpoints including awareness, screening, diagnosis, treatment, adherence, and control of hypertension and dyslipidemia to provide the basis for research prioritization, practice guidance, and health care reforms in Egypt. Main body Structured search was conducted on MEDLINE and Embase to identify articles published in English between January 2010 and December 2019 that reported key patient journey touchpoints in hypertension and dyslipidemia management. Unstructured search was conducted on public or government websites with no date restriction. Data from all sources were extracted and presented descriptively. In total, 22 studies published between 1995 and 2020 on hypertension and dyslipidemia were included in the final analyses. The prevalence of hypertension in Egypt ranged from 12.1 to 59%. Studies reported awareness (37.5% and 43.9%), diagnosis (42% and 64.7%), treatment (24% and 54.1%), and adherence to antihypertensive medication (51.9%) to be low. Furthermore, the percentage of patients who had their blood pressure controlled ranged from 8 to 53.2%. The prevalence of dyslipidemia varied in the general population (range 19.2–36.8%) but was higher in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (50.9% and 52.5%) and coronary artery disease (58.7%). A national report indicated that 8.6% of the general population was screened for dyslipidemia; however, no data was available on the diagnosis and treatment rates. Among ACS patients, 73.9% were treated for dyslipidemia. Data indicated low levels of medication adherence (59%) among dyslipidemia patients, with overall low control rates ranging from 5.1 to 34.4% depending on CVD risk in populations including ACS patients. Conclusion Data on patient journey touchpoints of hypertension and dyslipidemia are limited in Egypt, indicating the need for more systematic and high-quality evidence-based studies covering different aspects of patient-centric management for better management of CVD and its risk factors. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42506-021-00096-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashraf Reda
- Department of Cardiology, Menoufia University, Shebin El Kom, Egypt.
| | - Hany Ragy
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Institute, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Kanwal Saeed
- Legacy employee, Research, Development and Medical, Pfizer Upjohn, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Birnie KA, Pavlova M, Neville A, Noel M, Jordan I, Jordan E, Marianayagam J, Stinson J, Lorenzetti DL, Faulkner V, Killackey T, Campbell F, Lalloo C. Rapid Evidence and Gap Map of virtual care solutions across a stepped care continuum for youth with chronic pain and their families in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Pain 2021; 162:2658-2668. [PMID: 34050111 PMCID: PMC8516804 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Poor access to pediatric chronic pain care is a longstanding concern. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated virtual care delivery at an unprecedented pace and scale. We conducted a scoping review to create an interactive Evidence and Gap Map of virtual care solutions across a stepped care continuum (ie, from self-directed to specialist care) for youth with chronic pain and their families. Review methodology was codesigned with 8 youth with chronic pain and 7 parents/caregivers. Data sources included peer-reviewed scientific literature, gray literature (app stores and web sites), and a call for innovations. Records were independently coded and assessed for quality. Overall, 185 records were included (105 scientific records, 56 apps, 16 web sites, and 8 innovations). Most virtual care solutions were applicable across pediatric chronic pain diagnoses, with the greatest proportion at lower levels of stepped care (ie, >100 self-guided apps and web sites). Virtual delivery of psychological strategies was common. Evidence gaps were noted at higher levels of stepped care (ie, requiring more resource and health professional involvement), integration with health records, communication with health professionals, web accessibility, and content addressing social/family support, medications, school, substance use, sleep, diet, and acute pain flares or crises. Evidence and Gap Maps are a novel visual knowledge synthesis tool, which enable rapid evidence-informed decision-making by patients and families, health professionals, and policymakers. This evidence and gap map identified high-quality virtual care solutions for immediate scale and spread and areas with no evidence in need of prioritization. Virtual care should address priorities identified by youth with chronic pain and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn A. Birnie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP), Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Maria Pavlova
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Alexandra Neville
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Melanie Noel
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Isabel Jordan
- Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP), Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Evie Jordan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP), Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Health Sciences Library, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Justina Marianayagam
- Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP), Halifax, NS, Canada
- Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Stinson
- Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP), Halifax, NS, Canada
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Diane L. Lorenzetti
- Health Sciences Library, Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Violeta Faulkner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Tieghan Killackey
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fiona Campbell
- Solutions for Kids in Pain (SKIP), Halifax, NS, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chitra Lalloo
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Palermo TM, Walco GA, Paladhi UR, Birnie KA, Crombez G, de la Vega R, Eccleston C, Kashikar-Zuck S, Stone AL. Core outcome set for pediatric chronic pain clinical trials: results from a Delphi poll and consensus meeting. Pain 2021; 162:2539-2547. [PMID: 33625074 PMCID: PMC8442740 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Appropriate outcome measures and high-quality intervention trials are critical to advancing care for children with chronic pain. Our aim was to update a core outcome set for pediatric chronic pain interventions. The first phase involved collecting providers', patients', and parents' perspectives about treatment of pediatric chronic pain to understand clinically meaningful outcomes to be routinely measured. The second phase was to reach consensus of mandatory and optional outcome domains following the OMERACT framework. A modified Delphi study with 2 rounds was conducted including 3 stakeholder groups: children with chronic pain (n = 93), their parents (n = 90), and health care providers who treat youth with chronic pain (n = 52). Quantitative and qualitative data from round 1 of the Delphi study were summarized to identify important outcomes, which were condensed to a list of 10 outcome domains. Round 2 surveys were analyzed to determine the importance of the 10 domains and their relative ranking in each stakeholder group. A virtual consensus conference was held with the steering committee to reach consensus on a set of recommended outcome domains for pediatric chronic pain clinical trials. It was determined, by unanimous vote, that pain severity, pain interference with daily living, overall well-being, and adverse events, including death, would be considered mandatory domains to be assessed in all trials of any type of intervention. Emotional functioning, physical functioning, and sleep were important but optional domains. Last, the research agenda identifies several important emerging areas, including biomarkers. Future work includes selecting appropriate validated measures to assess each outcome domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tonya M. Palermo
- Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Gary A. Walco
- Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Unmesha Roy Paladhi
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Kathryn A. Birnie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Geert Crombez
- Department of Experimental Clinical Psychology and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Christopher Eccleston
- Department of Experimental Clinical Psychology and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Centre for Pain Research, the University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | - Susmita Kashikar-Zuck
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Amanda L. Stone
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Best practices for virtual care to support youth with chronic pain and their families: a rapid systematic review to inform health care and policy during COVID-19 and beyond. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e935. [PMID: 34104841 PMCID: PMC8177877 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Evidence-informed guidance to better leverage, implement, and select virtual care platforms for pediatric chronic pain, and identified knowledge gaps are in need of additional research. The COVID-19 pandemic has acutely challenged health systems and catalyzed the need for widescale virtual care and digital solutions across all areas of health, including pediatric chronic pain. The objective of this rapid systematic review was to identify recommendations, guidelines, and/or best practices for using virtual care to support youth with chronic pain and their families (CRD42020184498). MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, APA PsychINFO, and Web of Science were searched the week of May 25, 2020, for English language peer-reviewed articles published since 2010 that (1) discussed children and adolescents aged <18 years reporting any type of chronic pain (ie, pain lasting >3 months); (2) focused on any type of virtual care (eg, telephone, telehealth, telemedicine, mHealth, eHealth, online, or digital); and (3) reported on guidelines, best practices, considerations, or recommendations for virtual care. Abstract and full text screening and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Meta-ethnography was used to synthesize concepts across articles. Of 4161 unique records screened, 16 were included addressing diverse virtual care and pediatric chronic pain conditions. Four key themes were identified: (1) opportunities to better leverage virtual care, (2) direct effective implementation of virtual care, (3) selection of virtual care platforms, and (4) gaps in need of further consideration when using virtual care to support youth with chronic pain and their families. No existing guidelines for virtual care for pediatric chronic pain were identified; however, best practices for virtual care were identified and should be used by health professionals, decision makers, and policymakers in implementing virtual care.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ives LT, Stein K, Rivera-Cancel AM, Nicholas JK, Caldwell K, Datta N, Mauro C, Egger H, Puffer E, Zucker NL. Children's Beliefs about Pain: An Exploratory Analysis. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2021; 8:452. [PMID: 34071866 PMCID: PMC8228747 DOI: 10.3390/children8060452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Functional abdominal pain (FAP) is one of the most common childhood medical complaints, associated with significant distress and impairment. Little is known about how children understand their pain. Do they attribute it to personal weakness? Do they perceive pain as having global impact, affecting a variety of activities? How do they cope with pain? We explored the pain beliefs of 5- to 9-year-old children with FAP using a novel Teddy Bear Interview task in which children answered questions about a Teddy bear's pain. Responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Results indicate that the majority of young children with FAP are optimistic about pain outcomes. Children generated many types of coping strategies for Teddy's pain and adjusted their calibration of Teddy's pain tolerance dependent on the activity being performed. Early warning signs also emerged: a subset of children were pessimistic about Teddy's pain, and several children identified coping strategies that, while developmentally appropriate, could lead to excessive help seeking if not intervened upon (e.g., physician consultation and shot). The Teddy Bear Interview allows children to externalize their pain, making it a useful tool to access cognitive pain constructs in younger children. Thus, these findings highlight the importance of early intervention for childhood FAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay T. Ives
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; (L.T.I.); (E.P.)
| | - Kate Stein
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK;
| | - Alannah M. Rivera-Cancel
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (A.M.R.-C.); (J.K.N.); (K.C.); (C.M.)
| | - Julia K. Nicholas
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (A.M.R.-C.); (J.K.N.); (K.C.); (C.M.)
| | - Kristen Caldwell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (A.M.R.-C.); (J.K.N.); (K.C.); (C.M.)
| | - Nandini Datta
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Christian Mauro
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (A.M.R.-C.); (J.K.N.); (K.C.); (C.M.)
| | - Helen Egger
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA;
| | - Eve Puffer
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; (L.T.I.); (E.P.)
| | - Nancy L. Zucker
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; (L.T.I.); (E.P.)
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA; (A.M.R.-C.); (J.K.N.); (K.C.); (C.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Eccleston C, Fisher E, Howard RF, Slater R, Forgeron P, Palermo TM, Birnie KA, Anderson BJ, Chambers CT, Crombez G, Ljungman G, Jordan I, Jordan Z, Roberts C, Schechter N, Sieberg CB, Tibboel D, Walker SM, Wilkinson D, Wood C. Delivering transformative action in paediatric pain: a Lancet Child & Adolescent Health Commission. THE LANCET. CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2021; 5:47-87. [PMID: 33064998 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30277-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Eccleston
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK; Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK; Department of Clinical-Experimental and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK; Cochrane Pain, Palliative, and Supportive Care Review Groups, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard F Howard
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Rebeccah Slater
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paula Forgeron
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Tonya M Palermo
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kathryn A Birnie
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Brian J Anderson
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Christine T Chambers
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, and Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada; Centre for Pediatric Pain Research, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Geert Crombez
- Department of Clinical-Experimental and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gustaf Ljungman
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Neil Schechter
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christine B Sieberg
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dick Tibboel
- Intensive Care and Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Suellen M Walker
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | - Dominic Wilkinson
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Chantal Wood
- Department of Spine Surgery and Neuromodulation, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|