The many faces of hypertension in individuals with type 1 diabetes

Several disturbed blood pressure (BP) patterns, including disparities between office and out-of-office BP measurements (such as white-coat and masked hypertension), disturbed circadian BP variability (such as abnormal dipping patterns and nocturnal hypertension) and treatment-resistant hypertension, are common in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Consequently, office or home BP measurements alone may not reflect real BP variation and may lead to inadequate diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. The early detection of these disturbed BP patterns is especially crucial in individuals with type 1 diabetes, as these patterns may indicate future development of adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. In this review we will describe these disturbed BP patterns and discuss recent findings on their prevalence and outcomes. We will also address critical areas for future research to determine the true prevalence and prognosis of disturbed BP patterns, and to optimize and improve the knowledge and management of high-risk individuals with type 1 diabetes and disturbed BP patterns.

Diagnosis Patterns of CKD and Anemia in the Japanese Population

INTRODUCTION

Although early intervention for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal anemia are desirable, these conditions are often asymptomatic during their early stages and may be underdiagnosed.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed Japanese administrative claims data for general and hospital populations. The data period for the general and hospital data ranged from January 2011 to December 2016 and from April 2008 to July 2017, respectively. CKD stage was determined by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Anemia was defined per Japanese guidelines using hemoglobin (Hb) values. The proportion of patients who had eGFR-defined stages G3-G5 CKD without a CKD diagnosis, and Hb-defined anemia without an anemia diagnosis or treatment records, was estimated.

RESULTS

Among 16,779 (general) and 68,161 (hospital) patients, a high proportion of G3 CKD patients did not have a CKD-related diagnosis (general: G3a, 95.0%; G3b, 68.4%; hospital: G3a, 89.2%; G3b, 67.9%); however, some patients were treated with antihypertensives. Among anemic patients, 75.7% (G3a) and 66.7% (G3b) of the general population, and 56.2% (G3a) and 47.5% (G3b) of the hospital population, did not have an anemia-related diagnosis or treatment. CKD and anemia were more likely to be diagnosed in patients with G4 and G5 CKD.

CONCLUSION

A high proportion of G3 CKD patients did not have a CKD-related diagnosis. Likewise, many anemic patients with G3 CKD did not have an anemia-related diagnosis. Despite the lack of a CKD-related diagnosis, some patients received appropriate treatment (e.g., antihypertensives). Further outreach to CKD and anemia patients at earlier stages may be warranted.

Aliskiren reduces morning blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy on hemodialysis

Our previous study indicated that the exchange from an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) to aliskiren reduced morning blood pressure and albuminuria in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy. We extended the above study and assessed the effects of exchanging from an ARB to aliskiren on home blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy on chronic hemodialysis. The patients who were persistently hypertensive despite antihypertensive therapy, including ARB, were considered as candidates for the exchange from the ARB to aliskiren. Patients' age and durations of diabetes and hemodialysis were averaged as 62 ± 9 years old, 15 ± 8 and 7 ± 3 years, respectively. Aliskiren decreased morning systolic blood pressure (149 ± 14 to 144 ± 13 mm Hg, n = 30, P < .01) and plasma renin activity (3.5 ± 1.1 to 1.2 ± 0.6 ng/mL/h, P < .01) without changes in serum potassium. Aliskiren also reduced interdialytic weight gain (2.7 ± 0.6 to 2.5 ± 0.5 kg/interval, P < .05) and attenuated the magnitude of intradialytic declines in systolic (-20 ± 11 to -17 ± 10 mm Hg, P < .05) and diastolic blood pressure (-9 ± 6 to -5 ± 5 mm Hg, P < .01). The exchange from an ARB to aliskiren is safe and useful to control home blood pressure in hypertensive hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy. Aliskiren reduced both intradialytic blood pressure drops and interdialytic weight gain in patients with DN.

Home versus ambulatory and office blood pressure in predicting target organ damage in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Studies have shown that ambulatory blood pressure (BP) is more closely related to preclinical target organ damage than office measurements. A review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the association of home BP measurements with target organ damage was performed.

METHODS

A PubMed and Cochrane Library search (1950-2011) revealed 23 studies reporting comparative data of home BP versus ambulatory and/or office measurements in terms of their association with several indices of target organ damage. Correlation coefficients were pooled by random-effects model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (n = 2485) assessing echocardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI) showed similar correlations with home (coefficients r = 0.46/0.28, systolic/diastolic) as with ambulatory BP (0.37/0.26, P = NS for difference versus home BP), and superior to office measurements (r = 0.23/0.19, P < 0.001/0.009 for difference versus home BP). Four methodologically heterogeneous studies assessing the glomerular filtration rate (n = 609) could not be pooled or lead to a concrete result. Four studies assessing carotid intima-media thickness (n = 1222), three assessing pulse wave velocity (n = 720) and two assessing urinary protein excretion (n = 156) showed no difference in pooled correlation coefficients with home versus office BP measurements. With all the measurement methods SBP was more closely associated with target organ damage than DBP.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that home BP is as good as ambulatory monitoring and superior to office measurements in regard to their association with preclinical organ damage assessed by echocardiographic LVMI. More research is required to evaluate the relationship of home BP with other indices of target organ damage.

Aliskiren reduces morning blood pressure in hypertensive patients with diabetic nephropathy

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a leading disease that requires renal replacement therapy. The progression of renal dysfunction in DN is faster than the other renal diseases. While antihypertensive therapy reduces albuminuria, a good indicator for the progression, hypertension in DN is treatment resistant. Among patients with DN who took angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), 27 patients who exhibited poor control of albuminuria were enrolled into the study. Angiotensin receptor blocker was exchanged to aliskiren (150-300 mg/d) and clinical parameters were followed for 6 months. Exchange to aliskiren decreased albuminuria (1.57 ± 0.68 to 0.89 ± 0.45 g/gCr, P < .01) without changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate and office blood pressure (BP). Body weight and hemoglobin A1c were not altered. Aliskiren also reduced plasma renin activity (2.0 ± 0.9 to 1.2 ± 0.6 ng/mL/h, P < .01). While evening BP was unchanged, morning systolic BP (139 ± 8 to 132 ± 7 mm Hg, P < .01) and diastolic BP (81 ± 7 to 76 ± 6 mm Hg, P < .05) were decreased significantly after 6 months. Our results indicated that aliskiren decreased BP, especially morning BP in hypertensive patients with DN. The present data suggest that aliskiren exerts renoprotective actions including reduction in albumin excretion for patients with DN.

Antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan vs ramipril over the 24-h dosing period, including the critical early morning hours: a pooled analysis of the PRISMA I and II randomized trials

Cardiovascular risk is subject to circadian variation, with peak morning incidence of myocardial infarction and stroke correlating with the early morning blood pressure (BP) surge (EMBPS). Ideally, antihypertensive therapy should maintain control of BP throughout the 24-h dosing cycle. In two sister studies, Prospective, Randomized Investigation of the Safety and efficacy of Micardis vs Ramipril Using ABPM (ambulatory BP monitoring) (PRISMA) I and II, BP control was compared in patients with essential hypertension (24-h mean baseline ambulatory BP approximately 148/93 mm Hg) randomized to the angiotensin receptor blocker, telmisartan (80 mg; n=802), or the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril (5 or 10 mg; n=811), both dosed in the morning. The primary end point was the change from baseline in mean ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) during the final 6 h of the 24-h dosing cycle. The adjusted mean treatment differences in the last 6-h mean ambulatory SBP/DBP were -5.8/-4.2 mm Hg after 8 weeks and -4.1/-3.0 mm Hg after 14 weeks, in favour of telmisartan (P<0.0001 for all four comparisons). Secondary end point results, including the mean 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, day- and night-time BP and 24-h BP load, also significantly favoured telmisartan (P<0.0001). Both treatments were well tolerated; adverse events, including cough, were less common with telmisartan. These findings suggest that telmisartan is more effective than ramipril throughout the 24-h period and during the EMBPS; this may be attributable to telmisartan's long duration of effect, which is sustained throughout the 24-h dosing period.

Advances in genetic hypertension

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mendelian forms of hypertension are rare genetic disorders that cause severe hypertension. This review will explore the recently identified molecular mechanisms and pathogenesis of genetic disorders that cause hypertension in children.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypertension is now believed to be a polygenic disorder resulting from the interaction of multiple genes and the environment. A few forms of severe hypertension have been linked to single genes. The genes responsible for these disorders have all been cloned and all participate in pathways involved in heightened renal sodium reabsorption. The increased sodium reabsorption arises in the distal nephron and leads to volume expansion and hypertension.

SUMMARY

Investigating forms of monogenic hypertension has advanced the understanding of sodium transport and volume control by the kidney. Future studies will identify novel genes, pathways and treatment targets important in the fight against primary hypertension.