BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing: weighing the demand against the benefits

Identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations from Korean breast cancer patients using denaturing HPLC

In order to investigate the presence and function of BRCA mutations in Korean breast cancer patients, mutational analyses using denaturing HPLC (DHPLC) were performed for 1020 breast cancer patients and 167 normal females. We identified 14 deleterious mutations that included 10 frameshift mutations and 4 nonsense mutations. Among these 14 mutations, we found 3 novel BRCA1 and 3 novel BRCA2 mutations. We found that BRCA deleterious mutations were present in 19 of the 1020 patients (1.8%). Three of the 14 deleterious mutations were detected in 7 of these 19 patients. The three mutations were also identified in other studies for BRCA mutations in the Korean population, suggesting that they are possible founder mutations of BRCA for the Korean population. We plan to provide fundamental data for larger population-based studies to establish the frequency and significance of BRCA mutations in Korean breast cancer patients.

CDH1 associated gastric cancer: a report of a family and review of the literature

AIMS

Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is an autosomal-dominant inherited form of gastric cancer associated with inactivating germline mutations in the CDH1 gene. We set out to outline the role of CDH1 in HDGC. Investigation of a family suspected as having HDGC is discussed. The role of surgery in the management of affected individuals is then examined.

METHODS

A search was conducted of Medline and the National Library of Medicine to identify key articles concerning CDH1 gene mutations, familial gastric cancer and gastrectomy. Further, relevant articles were obtained by manual scanning of the reference lists of identified papers. Mutation-specific CDH1 genetic testing was performed on six living family members and on gastric tissue obtained from two deceased members.

RESULTS

CDH1 mutations cause inactivation of the cell adhesion protein E-cadherin. Carriers of the CDH1 germline gene mutation develop an aggressive, diffuse, submucosal gastric cancer at an early age. Current endoscopic screening is ineffective at detecting HDGC. The presence of a CDH1 germline gene mutation was confirmed in both deceased family members and also in four of the six living members tested.

CONCLUSION

Genetic counselling and CDH1 gene mutation testing is indicated in families with suspected HDGC. In the absence of a satisfactory surveillance mechanism, prophylactic total gastrectomy would appear to be an appropriate therapeutic option in mutation carriers.

Fertility Intentions Following Testing for a BRCA1 Gene Mutation

Objective: To test whether fertility intentions differed among persons who tested positive, tested negative, or did not know their genetic status for a mutation of the BRCA1 gene. Method: Participants were members of a large Utah-based kindred with an identified mutation at the BRCA1 locus. Participants received genetic counseling prior to testing and were interviewed at baseline before testing and at three points after receiving test results from a genetic counselor. The sample included men and women who completed all interviews, were between ages 18 and 45, and were fertile, resulting in a sample of 101 respondents. The primary dependent variable measured whether a subject indicated that they were moderately or very sure at all three post-testing interviews that they intended to have additional children. Effects of BRCA1 mutation status on fertility intentions were estimated using multivariate logistic regressions where we controlled for gender, age, marital status, and baseline fertility intentions. Results: Female carriers were less likely to want additional children in relation to female noncarriers (odds ratio 0.12, 95% confidence interval 0.01–1.23; P = 0.074). No differences were found among men. There was a significant difference in the effect of mutation status on fertility intentions between males and females (Gender × Carrier status interaction; P = 0.009). Persons who did not know their mutation status were less likely to want more children than noncarriers (odds ratio 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.01–0.75; P = 0.027). Conclusion: Predictive genetic testing for late-onset cancer susceptibility affects family planning decision-making. Persons contemplating predictive testing should be informed about possible effects such testing may have on their plans for future fertility.

Incidence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutations in Young Korean Breast Cancer Patients

Purpose

The prevalence of BRCA-associated breast carcinoma in the Korean population has not been evaluated extensively.

Methods

Sixty Korean women who developed breast cancer by age 40 years were studied. Lymphocyte specimens from peripheral blood were processed for BRCA1 and BRCA2 by complete sequencing. Family history through three generations was obtained. Available paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were processed for immunohistochemical staining.

Results

In the cohort of 60 patients, nine patients with 11 deleterious mutations (six in BRCA1 and five in BRCA2) and seven missense mutations of unknown significance were found. Two patients had deleterious mutations in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 (double mutant). One half of the mutations were novel, and no founder mutations were observed in this cohort. Most of the BRCA-associated patients had no family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. The expression of HER-2/neu, cyclin D1, and hormone receptors was less common, and p53 overexpression was more common in BRCA-associated tumors.

Conclusion

The prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Korean women with breast cancer at a young age was high. However, the penetrance, as evidenced by the low frequency of breast and ovarian cancers in family members, appears to be low. These data suggest that there may be different genetic and etiologic factors affecting transmission and penetrance of the BRCA genes in Korean patients with breast cancer diagnosed at a young age.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Korean breast cancer patients

The incidence of breast cancer in Korea has been increasing in recent years, such that it is now the most common female cancer. Breast cancer in Korea is characterized by an earlier age of onset than in Western countries, suggesting that it would be related with genetic background. We assayed germline mutations in the BRCA genes to evaluate their genetic pathology in Korean breast cancer patients. The study subjects consisted of 173 patients at clinically higher risk and 109 unselected patients. Germline mutations in the entire coding sequences of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes were analyzed by Conformation-Sensitive Gel Electrophoresis (CSGE), and any aberrantly-sized band was sequenced. BRCA mutations were present in 12.7% of the high risk patients, compared with 2.8% of the unselected patients. Among high risk patients, mutations were most prevalent in patients with a family history of breast or first-degree ovarian cancer (22.1%), followed by those with male breast cancer (20%), bilateral breast cancer (20%), multiple organ cancer including breast (13%) and younger breast cancer patients (aged<35 yr) (8.1%). Moreover, BRCA mutations were detected in 34.8% of patients having two high risk factors. These findings suggest that BRCA gene mutation analysis should be performed on Korean patients with high-risk factors for breast cancer.

Pathogenesis and clinical management of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an inherited genetic condition associated with microsatellite instability; it accounts for around 5 per cent of all cases of colorectal cancer. This review examines recent data on management strategies for this condition.

METHODS

A Medline-based literature search was performed using the keywords 'HNPCC' and 'microsatellite instability'. Additional original papers were obtained from citations in articles identified by the initial search.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The Amsterdam criteria identify patients in whom the presence of an inherited mutation should be investigated. Those with a mutation should be offered counselling and screening. The role of prophylactic surgery has been superseded by regular colonoscopy, which dramatically reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Screening for extracolonic malignancy is also advocated, but the benefits are uncertain. Chemoprevention may be of value in lowering the incidence of bowel cancer in affected patients, but further studies are required.

Common hereditary cancers and implications for primary care

The identification of genes that place individuals at high risk of breast, ovarian, and colorectal cancer has greatly advanced our understanding of cancer predisposition over the past decade. This knowledge has received much attention from the media, and referrals to geneticists and surgeons, and requests for genetic testing, have risen. We review the published evidence for the management of people at increased risk of hereditary cancers, to draw attention to areas of uncertainty and to discuss implications for primary care. We focus on common inherited cancers, since they will have the greatest effect on clinical practice over the next decade. Cancer genetics offers a model of how information on the genetics of other common diseases could affect primary care in the future. Strategies to support the integration of genetic medicine in primary care are needed to enable primary-care practitioners to identify individuals at raised genetic risk and to reassure patients for whom genetic testing and increased surveillance offer little benefit.

Germ line mutations associated with breast cancer susceptibility

Laboratory-based research in germ line mutations associated with breast cancer susceptibility is rapidly being integrated into clinical practice with profound implications. A Medline search was performed for all relevant articles published since 1990. Where appropriate, historical articles referenced in those identified were also reviewed. The results suggested that while mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are the most clinically relevant, much of the data on which clinical decisions are based must be interpreted with wide confidence intervals. Between 1 in 152 and 1 in 833 individuals carry such mutations. They account for less than 5% of all breast cancer, but up to 10% of cancers in those under the age of 40 years. Founder mutations are responsible for a larger proportion of breast cancer cases within certain inbred communities. Phenotypic expression and penetrance of different mutations is not currently predictable and estimates of penetrance are largely based on highly selected populations. BRCA1 mutations are more commonly associated with ovarian cancer than BRCA2 mutations. BRCA1 cancers tend to have more distinct pathological features and are usually oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative. To conclude, the evidence in this review suggests that caution should be exercised when translating scientific progress in breast cancer germ line genetics into clinical practice. Most of the available data are derived from studies on highly selected populations. The importance of other less penetrant, but more prevalent, germ line mutations may be realised in the future.

Prevalence of BRCA1 in a hospital-based population of Dutch breast cancer patients

The prevalence of disease-related BRCA1 mutations was investigated in 642 Dutch breast cancer patients not selected for family history or age at diagnosis. They were tested for germline mutations in the BRCA1 gene using an assay which detects small deletions and insertions (DSDI), as well as the two major genomic founder deletions present in the Dutch population. Data on family history and bilateral breast cancer were obtained retrospectively. Ten protein truncating mutations were detected and one in-frame deletion with an unknown relation to disease risk. Four patients carried the Dutch founder deletion of exon 22. Based on these results the estimated prevalence of breast cancer in the general population in the Netherlands attributable to BRCA1 mutations is 2.1%. Under 40 years-of-age and under 50 years-of-age this prevalence is 9.5% and 6. 4%, respectively. All mutation carriers were under 50 years-of-age at diagnosis of the first breast cancer, and five did not have any relative with breast cancer. The proportions of bilateral breast cancer in the mutation carriers and non-carriers did not differ from each other. These data indicate that in the general Dutch breast cancer population the great majority of BRCA1 mutations will be found in women diagnosed under 50 years-of-age.

What would you do? Specialists' perspectives on cancer genetic testing, prophylactic surgery, and insurance discrimination

PURPOSE

To examine what cancer genetics specialists predict they would do personally if they were at 50% risk of carrying a mutation that predisposes to hereditary breast/ovarian cancer (BRCA1/BRCA2) and hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC).

METHODS

Questionnaire survey of the membership of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) Special Interest Group (SIG) in Cancer.

RESULTS

Of the 296 active members of the NSGC Cancer-SIG surveyed, 163 (55%) responded. Eighty-five percent predicted that if they had a 50% risk of carrying a BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation, they would pursue genetic testing. If they tested positive for a mutation at age 35, 25% predicted they would pursue prophylactic bilateral mastectomies and 68%, prophylactic oophorectomy. Ninety-one percent of respondents believe they would pursue genetic testing for HNPCC, and 17% would elect prophylactic colectomy; 54%, prophylactic hysterectomy; and 52%, prophylactic oophorectomy if they tested positive for a mutation. The majority (68%) would not bill their insurance companies for genetic testing because of fear of discrimination, and 26% would use an alias when undergoing testing. Fifty-seven percent of counselors would seek professional psychologic support to help them cope with the results of testing.

CONCLUSION

A large percentage of cancer genetic counseling providers predicted they would opt for prophylactic surgery at a young age if they carried a BRCA or HNPCC mutation, and most would seek professional psychologic assistance when undergoing testing. More than half of respondents would not bill their insurance companies for genetic testing, largely because of fear of genetic discrimination. The vast majority of those providers most familiar with cancer genetic testing and its associated medical, psychologic, and legal implications would still pursue genetic testing.