Apparent Failure of Moxifloxacin to Prevent Ciprofloxacin‐ and Levofloxacin‐SusceptiblePseudomonas aeruginosaBacteremia in Neutropenic Patients Undergoing Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiotic resistance in patients who have received Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation; A globally Systematic Review

Gram-negative bacteria are infectious and life-threatening agents after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). So, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and its antibiotic resistance in patients who have received Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation through a systematic review. The systematic search was done with key words; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from 2000 to the end of July 2023 in Google Scholar and PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science. Twelve studies were able to include our study. Quality assessment of studies was done by Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. The most of the included studies were conducted as allo-HSCT. Infections such as respiratory infection, urinary infection and bacteremia have occurred. The rate of prevalence with P. aeruginosa has varied between 3 and 100%. The average age of the participants was between 1 and 74 years. The rate of prevalence of P. aeruginosa resistant to several drugs has been reported to be variable, ranging from 20 to 100%. The highest antibiotic resistance was reported against cefotetan (100%), and the lowest was related to tobramycin (1.8%) followed by amikacin, levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin with the prevalence of 16.6%. Our findings showed a high prevalence and antibiotic resistance rate of P. aeruginosa in Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Therefore, more serious health measures should be taken in patients after transplantation.

Moxifloxacin does not alter ciclosporin pharmacokinetics in transplant patients: a multiple-dose, uncontrolled, single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Moxifloxacin has a broad antibacterial spectrum and rapid bactericidal activity, and is thus a good option for the treatment of bacterial infections in patients who have undergone organ or bone marrow transplantation. Transplant patients also receive immunosuppressant therapy such as ciclosporin.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin with and without concomitant treatment with moxifloxacin in transplant recipients. A secondary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of the combined treatment.

METHODS

Patients (n = 9) with stable graft function after bone marrow or renal transplantation and who were already receiving ciclosporin therapy were enrolled into the study. The patients were given ciclosporin (Sandimmun Optoral) capsules twice daily (total daily dosage 150-380 mg/day) throughout the study period. Moxifloxacin (Avolox) tablets 400 mg once daily were given on days 2-8 inclusive. The primary outcome measure was the change in ciclosporin pharmacokinetics on coadministration with moxifloxacin. Secondary outcomes were the steady-state pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and ciclosporin plus its metabolites in patients receiving moxifloxacin and ciclosporin concomitantly. Moxifloxacin pharmacokinetic parameters in the presence of ciclosporin were compared with previously published pharmacokinetic data for moxifloxacin in healthy individuals.

RESULTS

No significant changes occurred in the concentration-time curves of ciclosporin and its metabolites following combination therapy with moxifloxacin. The geometric means of whole blood concentrations of ciclosporin and ciclosporin plus its metabolites on day 1 were similar to those on day 8 following combined administration of ciclosporin and moxifloxacin for 7 days. The ratio of combination treatment to monotherapy for ciclosporin was 1.01 (90% CI 0.91, 1.11) for the area under the blood concentration-time curve from time zero to 12 hours at steady state (AUC(12,ss)) and 0.96 (90% CI 0.88, 1.04) for the maximum steady-state blood drug concentration (C(max,ss)). For ciclosporin plus its metabolites the ratio was 1.07 (90% CI 0.99, 1.17) for AUC(12,ss) and 1.03 (90% CI 0.98, 1.09) for C(max,ss). The pharmacokinetic parameters for moxifloxacin were unaffected by the presence of ciclosporin.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant administration of moxifloxacin does not alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of ciclosporin or ciclosporin plus its metabolites in immunosuppressed patients. Therefore, no dose adjustments or additional drug monitoring are required when ciclosporin is coadministered with moxifloxacin.

Estudio de la actividad comparada de varias fluoroquinolonas frente a Pseudomonas aeruginosa mediante la determinación de la concentración preventiva de mutantes

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to compare the activity of ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin and ofloxacin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by determining the mutant prevention concentration (MPC).

METHODS

Thirty-four clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing nosocomial infection were studied. MPC values were determined using an inoculum of 10(10) cfu/mL on Mueller-Hinton plates with serial dilutions of the antibiotics. The microorganisms were classified according to whether the patients had been previously treated with fluoroquinolones or not.

RESULTS

The fluoroquinolone with the lowest MPC values was ciprofloxacin, followed by levofloxacin. Analysis of strains from patients previously treated with fluoroquinolones showed persistent susceptibility according to the CLSI criteria, but with lower activity of all the drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the microorganism remained susceptible to fluoroquinolones according to classical methods, the suitability of using these drugs in patients with severe infection and a history of fluoroquinolone use should be evaluated.

Stable Antimicrobial Susceptibility Rates for Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the 2001–2003 Tracking Resistance in the United States Today Surveillance Studies

From 2001 to 2003, rates of susceptibility to piperacillin-tazobactam (86%), ceftazidime (80%), ciprofloxacin (68%), and levofloxacin (67%) did not decrease or decreased by <1.5%, whereas the rate of susceptibility to gentamicin decreased by 3.2% (from 75.5% to 72.3%) and the rate of susceptibility to imipenem decreased by 5.6% (from 84.4% to 78.8%), for 2394 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in the Tracking Resistance in the United States Today surveillance studies. Rates of multidrug resistance (i.e., resistance to > or =3 antimicrobial agents) increased from 7.2% in 2001 to 9.9% in 2003 and were significantly higher for isolates from the East North Central and Mid-Atlantic regions of the United States than for isolates from other regions. Analysis of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) suggested that combining an antipseudomonal beta -lactam with ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin would yield a 3.4%-7.1% increase in the percentage of isolates susceptible to the combination, compared with the beta -lactam alone. Ratios of the area under the serum concentration-time curve values for free drug to modal MICs for ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin were similar and were >125 (target ratio), whereas those ratios for gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin were significantly lower. Ongoing surveillance of P. aeruginosa is essential.