Impact of an antimicrobial utilization program on antimicrobial use at a large teaching hospital: a randomized controlled trial

Hospitalised patients as stewards of their own antibiotic therapy: a qualitative analysis informing the strategic design of interventions to encourage shared decision-making in tertiary hospital settings in Singapore

Background

Shared decision-making (SDM) on antibiotic therapy may improve antibiotic use in tertiary hospitals, but hospitalised patients are apprehensive about being involved in it. Understanding the facilitators and barriers to SDM can inform the design and implementation of interventions to empower these patients to engage in SDM on their antibiotic therapies.

Methods

We conducted qualitative interviews with 23 adult patients purposively sampled with maximum variation from the three largest tertiary-care hospitals in Singapore (April 2019─October 2020). Thematic analysis was conducted using the Theoretical Domains Framework and Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model to identify areas for intervention.

Results

Hospitalised patients lacked comprehensive knowledge of their antibiotic therapies and the majority did not have the skills to actively query their doctors about them. There was a lack of opportunities to meet and interact with doctors, and patients were less motivated to engage in SDM if they had a self-perceived paternalistic relationship with doctors, trusted their doctors to provide the best treatment, and had self-perceived poor knowledge to engage in SDM. To empower these patients, they should first be educated with antibiotic knowledge. Highlighting potential side effects of antibiotics could motivate them to ask questions about their antibiotic therapies. Environment restructuring, as facilitated by nurses and visual cues to nudge conversations, could create opportunities for interactions and motivating patients into SDM on their antibiotic therapies.

Conclusion

Education and environmental restructuring should be explored to empower hospitalised patients to engage in SDM on their antibiotic therapies.

Empowered hospitalized patients are involved in shared decision making on antibiotic therapy: a quantitative analysis

BACKGROUND

Half of hospitalized patients receive antibiotics, but they are rarely involved in shared decision making (SDM) on antibiotic therapy. We sought to understand the association between patient empowerment and their involvement in SDM on antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

From March 2021 to April 2022, we conducted a cross-sectional survey on hospitalized patients receiving antibiotic therapy for ≥1 day in a 1600-bed adult general hospital in Singapore. The questionnaire included seven items (five-point Likert scale) on involvement in SDM from SDM-Q-9 and 10 items (four-point Likert scale) on patient empowerment from HCEQ-10. A multi-variable logistic regression model was constructed to assess for independent associations between the three constructs of patient empowerment and involvement in SDM on antibiotic therapy.

RESULTS

Of 636 hospitalized patients, mean age was 57.6 (SD 15.5) years, 61% were males and 37% had tertiary-level education. The majority (90%) were aware that they were on antibiotic therapy, but only 11% of them knew the name of the antibiotic given. After adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, educational level, and duration of hospital stay, patients with a high-level of involvement in decisions (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-6.01), interactions with healthcare professionals (AOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.03-3.02), and degree of control over their hospital care (AOR 1.90, 95% CI 1.15-3.12) were more likely to have a high-level of involvement in SDM on antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Empowering hospitalized patients with involvement in decisions, interactions with healthcare professionals, and control of their hospital care can increase their participation in SDM on antibiotic therapy in hospitals.

Pharmacist insights into antimicrobial stewardship: A social marketing approach

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial resistance is a worldwide public health problem. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) optimize antimicrobial use within hospitals. The social marketing framework has been used in analyzing systems and devising best practices.

OBJECTIVE

(s): To use the social marketing framework to explore pharmacist experiences and perceptions of structural, behavioral and interventional strategies that support ASPs.

METHODS

A qualitative approach utilizing semi-structured individual interviews was utilized. A purposive sample of hospital pharmacists was invited to participate. An interview guide was constructed to describe participant experience and perceptions regarding ASPs in their institutions based on elements of social marketing: Behavioral goals; Customer Insight; Segmentation and Targeting; Competition; Exchange; and Marketing and Interventional mix. Interviews were recorded digitally and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was conducted using deductive methods. A combination of case-based and code-based approaches allowed individual and holistic analyses respectively. Codes were collated into themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

Saturation of themes occurred with 25 interviews from 17 hospitals. ASP metrics included: consumption of antibiotics using days of therapy and defined daily dose, rates of C. difficile and multidrug resistant organisms, resistance patterns, and provider adherence to the ASP. Active stewardship tools such as preauthorization, and prospective feedback/audit were preferred over passive tools such as order sets and automatic stop orders. A physician champion and a clinical pharmacist with infectious disease training were core elements in the multidisciplinary team. Despite certain areas being considered key for stewardship, participants emphasized a hospital-wide approach including outpatient departments; discharge stewardship emerged as a primary theme. Leadership supported ASPs with finances, rapid and novel diagnostics, Clinical Decision Support Systems, mobile technology, and continuous staff training.

CONCLUSIONS

The social marketing framework has been used to explore pharmacist perceptions that inform successful qualities including metrics, restriction methods, personnel, benefits, barriers, training needs/modes, and promotional avenues that support ASPs in hospitals.

The use of telehealth-supported stewardship activities in acute-care and long-term care settings: An implementation effectiveness trial

BACKGROUND

We assessed the implementation of telehealth-supported stewardship activities in acute-care units and long-term care (LTC) units in Veterans' Administration medical centers (VAMCs).

DESIGN

Before-and-after, quasi-experimental implementation effectiveness study with a baseline period (2019-2020) and an intervention period (2021).

SETTING

The study was conducted in 3 VAMCs without onsite infectious disease (ID) support.

PARTICIPANTS

The study included inpatient providers at participating sites who prescribe antibiotics.

INTERVENTION

During 2021, an ID physician met virtually 3 times per week with the stewardship pharmacist at each participating VAMC to review patients on antibiotics in acute-care units and LTC units. Real-time feedback on prescribing antibiotics was given to providers. Additional implementation strategies included stakeholder engagement, education, and quality monitoring.

METHODS

The reach-effectiveness-adoption-implementation-maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used for program evaluation. The primary outcome of effectiveness was antibiotic days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 days present aggregated across all 3 sites. An interrupted time-series analysis was performed to compare this rate during the intervention and baseline periods. Electronic surveys, periodic reflections, and semistructured interviews were used to assess other RE-AIM outcomes.

RESULTS

The telehealth program reviewed 502 unique patients and made 681 recommendations to 24 providers; 77% of recommendations were accepted. After program initiation, antibiotic DOT immediately decreased in the LTC units (-30%; P < .01) without a significant immediate change in the acute-care units (+16%; P = .22); thereafter DOT remained stable in both settings. Providers generally appreciated feedback and collaborative discussions.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of our telehealth program was associated with reductions in antibiotic use in the LTC units but not in the smaller acute-care units. Overall, providers perceived the intervention as acceptable. Wider implementation of telehealth-supported stewardship activities may achieve reductions in antibiotic use.

Efficacy of telemedicine-based antimicrobial stewardship program to combat antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major public health threat. Improving antimicrobial use is the main strategy against AMR, but it is challenging to implement especially in low-resource settings. Thus, this review aims to explore the efficacy of telehealth-based antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP), which is more accessible.

METHODS

Registered to PROSPERO and following PRISMA guidelines, literature search was performed in databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Science Direct, EBSCOhost, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, searching for studies implementing telehealth ASP. Critical appraisal of studies was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cohort Studies (NOS), Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool (RoB) 2.0, and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I). We utilized inverse variance, random effects model to obtain the pooled odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) estimates, as well as sensitivity and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The search yielded 14 studies. Telehealth-based ASP was associated with better adherence to guidelines (pooled OR: 2.78 [95%CI:1.29-5.99], p = 0.009; I2 = 93%), within which streamlining yielded better odds (pooled OR: 30.54 [95%CI:10.42-89.52], p < 0.001) more than the compliance with policy subgroup (pooled OR: 1.60 [95%CI:1.02-2.51], p = 0.04). The odds of antimicrobial prescription rate reduced significantly (pooled OR: 0.60 [95%CI:0.42-0.85], p = 0.005; I2 = 94%), especially for the lower respiratory infection subgroup (pooled OR: 0.37 [95%CI:0.28-0.49], p < 0.001). Days of therapy decreased (pooled MD: -47.12 [95%CI: -85.78- -8.46], p = 0.02; I2 = 100%), with the greatest effect in acute care settings (pooled MD: -97.73 [95%CI:-147.48-47.97], p = 0.0001). Mortality did not change significantly (pooled OR: 1.20 [95%CI:0.69-2.10], p = 0.52; I2 = 63%).

CONCLUSION

Telehealth-based ASP was proven beneficial to increase adherence to guideline and reduce prescription rates, without significantly affecting patient clinical outcome. After further studies, we recommend more widespread use of telemedicine to combat AMR.

Effectiveness of a low trough serum concentration of vancomycin on acute kidney injury in infants and toddlers in the paediatric intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a low trough serum concentration of vancomycin on acute kidney injury in infants and toddlers in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of 126 infants and toddlers (aged between 29 days and 3 years) from the PICU of a tertiary care hospital who were administered intravenous vancomycin between January 2019 and December 2022. Information about their demographic factors, duration of PICU stay, time of administration and trough levels of vancomycin were retrieved. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic factors and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the determining factors.

RESULTS

Based on the trough concentration of vancomycin, the participants were divided into three groups as follows: 4-5 mg/L, 5-15 mg/L and >15 mg/L. The serum vancomycin concentration was significantly related to body weight, albumin, cystatin C, urea nitrogen in serum, serum creatinine and creatinine clearance (p<0.05) in these patients. Multivariate analysis showed that body weight, albumin, cystatin C, urea nitrogen in serum and creatinine clearance were independent contributors to the trough vancomycin concentration. There was no difference in the effectiveness of different trough concentrations on patients (p=0.241). The cumulative incidence of acute kidney injury was highest in the group with a trough concentration of vancomycin >15 mg/L (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a vancomycin trough concentration of 4-5 mg/L in the PICU had a high cure rate (79.4%) and a low incidence of acute kidney injury (HR 18.3, 95% CI 5.135 to 87.621; p<0.001). Therefore, the serum trough concentration should be considered but it should also be combined with the treatment effect to achieve individualised administration for the clinical application of vancomycin.

WHO/INRUD prescribing indicators among tertiary regional referral hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: a call to strengthen antibiotic stewardship programmes

Background

Antibiotic prescribing should be guided by national essential medicines lists (NEMLs) and treatment guidelines; however, there are inadequate data on antibiotic utilization patterns in tertiary hospitals in Tanzania. This study aimed to determine antibiotic prescribing patterns in tertiary hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in three regional referral hospitals. About 200 prescription records from 2020 to 2022 were analysed at each hospital for prescribing patterns using WHO/ International Network of Rational Use of Drugs (INRUD) indicators (1993) and the AWaRe 2021 classification. Factors associated with receiving an antibiotic prescription were assessed using a logistic regression model. Facilities were ranked on prescribing practices using the index of rational drug prescribing (IRDP).

Results

A total of 2239 drugs were prescribed, of which 920 (41.1%) were antibiotics. An average of 3.7 ± 1.5 (optimal: 1.6-1.8) total medicines and 1.53 ± 0.78 antibiotics were prescribed per patient. About 88.0% (528) of the prescriptions contained antibiotics (optimal: 20.0%-26.8%), while 78.2% (413) of all antibiotic prescriptions contained injections (optimal: 13.4%-24.1%). Furthermore, 87.5% (462) of the antibiotics were prescribed in generic names (optimal: 100%), while 98.7% (521) conformed to the NEML (optimal: 100%). Metronidazole was the most frequently prescribed antibiotic (39.2%; n = 134), followed by ceftriaxone (37.1%, n = 127) and amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (8.5%, n = 29).

Conclusions

We found substantial empirical prescribing and overuse of antibiotics exceeding WHO recommendations. Antibiotic overuse varied across the hospitals. Being male, having underlying conditions such as diabetes mellitus, and/or being treated at Temeke hospital were associated with receiving an antibiotic prescription. We recommend strengthening antibiotic stewardship programmes in the studied facilities.

An Implementation Roadmap for Establishing Remote Infectious Disease Specialist Support for Consultation and Antibiotic Stewardship in Resource-Limited Settings

Infectious Disease (ID)-trained specialists, defined as ID pharmacists and ID physicians, improve hospital care by providing consultations to patients with complicated infections and by leading programs that monitor and improve antibiotic prescribing. However, many hospitals and nursing homes lack access to ID specialists. Telehealth is an effective tool to deliver ID specialist expertise to resource-limited settings. Telehealth services are most useful when they are adapted to meet the needs and resources of the local setting. In this step-by-step guide, we describe how a tailored telehealth program can be implemented to provide remote ID specialist support for direct patient consultation and to support local antibiotic stewardship activities. We outline 3 major phases of putting a telehealth program into effect: pre-implementation, implementation, and sustainment. To increase the likelihood of success, we recommend actively involving local leadership and other stakeholders in all aspects of developing, implementing, measuring, and refining programmatic activities.

Improving antibiotic use for sinusitis and upper respiratory tract infections: A virtual-visit antibiotic stewardship initiative

BACKGROUND

Asynchronous virtual patient care is increasingly used; however, the effectiveness of virtually delivering guideline-concordant care in conjunction with antibiotic stewardship initiatives remains uncertain. We developed a bundled stewardship intervention to improve antibiotic use in E-visits for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs).

METHODS

In this before-and-after study, adult patients who completed E-visits for "cough," "flu," or "sinus symptoms" at Michigan Medicine between January 1, 2018, and September 30, 2020, were included. Patient demographics, diagnoses, and antibiotic details were collected. The multifaceted intervention occurred over 6 months. Segmented linear regression was performed to estimate the effect of the intervention on appropriate antibiotic use for URTI diagnoses (defined as no antibiotic prescribed) and sinusitis (defined as guideline-concordant antibiotic selection and duration). Regression lines were fit to data before the bundled intervention (January 2019) and after the bundled intervention (May 2019).

RESULTS

In total, 5,151 E-visits were included. The intervention decreased the number of visits for flu, cough, or sinus symptoms prescribed antibiotics from 43.2% to 28.9% (P < .001). Guideline concordance of antibiotic prescriptions improved following the intervention: first-line amoxicillin-clavulanate rose from 37.9% of prescriptions to 66.1% of prescriptions (P < .001), second-line doxycycline rose from 13.8% to 22.7% (P < .001); and median duration of antibiotics decreased from 10 days to 5 days (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A multifaceted stewardship bundle for E-visits involving both changes in the EMR and audit and feedback improved guideline-concordant antibiotic use for URTIs. This approach can aid stewardship efforts in the ambulatory care setting with regard to telemedicine.

Second-year Outcomes of Implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship Program in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital

Background: The increasing use of antimicrobial agents and resistance is becoming a serious problem in pediatric patients. Hence, antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is implemented to lessen the consequences. Objectives: This report aimed to demonstrate the impact of ASP on antimicrobials utilization in a referral and tertiary pediatric hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Methods: We launched an ASP for inpatients in March 2018 at the Imam Hussain Hospital, which is a 186-bed pediatrics hospital. Data was collected by ASP multidisciplinary team and using hospital records during February 2017-January 2018 (pre-intervention) and February 2019-January 2020 (post-intervention) periods. Consumption data were expressed as defined daily doses (DDDs) per 100 patient-days (PD). Independent sample t-test and paired t-test were used to assess the significance of differences. The rates of antimicrobials resistance for the most common hospital pathogens were also tracked. Results: Utilization of total antimicrobials decreased meaningfully by 12.41% (from 62.11 DDDs/100 PD in February 2017-January 2018 to 54.40 DDDs/100 PD in February 2019-January 2020; P = 0.024). The results showed that the reduction in non-restricted antimicrobials was less (5.43%) than restricted antimicrobials (27.6%). Conclusions: According to our results, the use of antimicrobials, especially the broad-spectrum ones, and the health burden costs significantly decreased after implementing ASP. Thus, continuous monitoring and educational programs are recommended to reduce the negative effects of using antimicrobials.

Guidelines on Implementing Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Korea

These guidelines were developed as a part of the 2021 Academic R&D Service Project of the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency in response to requests from healthcare professionals in clinical practice for guidance on developing antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). These guidelines were developed by means of a systematic literature review and a summary of recent literature, in which evidence-based intervention methods were used to address key questions about the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents and ASP expansion. These guidelines also provide evidence of the effectiveness of ASPs and describe intervention methods applicable in Korea.

Core Elements for Successful Implementation of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs

Antimicrobial resistance has emerged as a serious global public health threat. One of the countermeasures to increased antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections is the use of an integrative intervention strategy for the selection and administration of appropriate antibiotics and for the monitoring of antibiotic use, collectively known as "Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs" (ASPs). However, since the medical environment and policies vary by country and medical facilities, ASPs also need to be applied to each facility and condition accordingly. The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention announced the core elements for hospital ASPs, which outlines the specific structural and procedural components required to implement ASPs in 2014. As multidrug-resistant bacterial infections and use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in Korea are on the rise, ASPs must be urgently applied to medical facilities for appropriate management of antibiotic use. However, there is an ongoing limitation to the immediate adoption and application of ASPs in Korean medical facilities due to the lack of medical workforce and related financial resources. To address this issue, efforts of medical professionals and government are required, and core elements that match the characteristics and circumstances of Korean medical facilities must be urgently developed.

Compliance with the 4Ds of antimicrobial stewardship practice in a tertiary care centre

Background

Antimicrobial stewardship describes the practice of promoting the selection of the right drug, dosage, delivery and duration of antimicrobial therapy (the 4Ds) in order to curtail the emergence of resistant organisms. It is important to quantify the inappropriate use of antimicrobials in terms of percentage adherence to each of the 4Ds mentioned.

Methods

We undertook a prospective review of medical records of patients admitted to the medical wards of a tertiary care centre in North India. All patients on antimicrobials were included and their records reviewed for indication, drug, dose, delivery and duration (or by asking the treating physician if not documented). Adherence to the 4Ds was determined by referring to updated literature-based standard treatment guidelines (STGs) for each specific disease.

Results

Of 304 patients, drugs were appropriate and matched STGs in 218 (72%) patients, with adherence to the right dose in 210 (69%), route of delivery in 216 (71%) and duration in 197 (65%). Full adherence to the 4Ds was observed in 196 (64.5%). Maximum adherence was observed in treating skin and soft tissue infections (100%), while minimum adherence was observed in administering medical prophylaxis (40%). WHO Access, Watch and Reserve categories comprised 29%, 63% and 8.5% of all prescribed antibiotics, respectively.

Conclusions

The right drug, dose, delivery and duration of therapy are prescribed in 72%, 69%, 71%, and 65% of patients, respectively. In order to increase the adherence to 100%, bedside stewardship practices in the form of prospective audits and feedback must be improved. There is a need to integrate WHO AWaRe classification of antibiotics into treatment guidelines.

Antibiotic Stewardship Implementation and Antibiotic Use at Hospitals With and Without On-site Infectious Disease Specialists

BACKGROUND

Many US hospitals lack infectious disease (ID) specialists, which may hinder antibiotic stewardship efforts. We sought to compare patient-level antibiotic exposure at Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals with and without an on-site ID specialist, defined as an ID physician and/or ID pharmacist.

METHODS

This retrospective VHA cohort included all acute-care patient admissions during 2016. A mandatory survey was used to identify hospitals' antibiotic stewardship processes and their access to an on-site ID specialist. Antibiotic use was quantified as days of therapy per days present and categorized based on National Healthcare Safety Network definitions. A negative binomial regression model with risk adjustment was used to determine the association between presence of an on-site ID specialist and antibiotic use at the level of patient admissions.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 122 (14.8%) hospitals lacked an on-site ID specialist; there were 525 451 (95.8%) admissions at ID hospitals and 23 007 (4.2%) at non-ID sites. In the adjusted analysis, presence of an ID specialist was associated with lower total inpatient antibacterial use (odds ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, .85-.99). Presence of an ID specialist was also associated with lower use of broad-spectrum antibacterials (0.61; .54-.70) and higher narrow-spectrum β-lactam use (1.43; 1.22-1.67). Total antibacterial exposure (inpatient plus postdischarge) was lower among patients at ID versus non-ID sites (0.92; .86-.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients at hospitals with an ID specialist received antibiotics in a way more consistent with stewardship principles. The presence of an ID specialist may be important to effective antibiotic stewardship.

WHO/INRUD core prescribing indicators and antibiotic utilization patterns among primary health care facilities in Ilala district, Tanzania

Background

Antibiotic use requires regular monitoring to prevent emergence of antibiotic resistance.

Objectives

To assess antibiotic prescribing patterns at health care facilities (HCF) in Ilala district, Tanzania.

Methods

A 1 year retrospective study was conducted in four HCFs using WHO/International Network of Rational Use of Drugs (INRUD) core prescribing indicators. Factors associated with antibiotic prescription were analysed using logistic regression model.

Results

A total of 604 prescriptions were reviewed. Patients had median age (IQR) of 15 (4–31) years with majority having upper respiratory tract infection 33.3% (n = 201), urinary tract infection 31.1% (n = 188) or diarrhoea 21.2% (n = 128). Out of 624 prescribed antibiotics, amoxicillin was the most common (22.7%), followed by ciprofloxacin (13.6%) and metronidazole (11.6%). The studied HCFs had an average of 1.99 medicines prescribed per consultation (reference: 1.6–1.8). Of 1203 medicines prescribed, 51.9% (n = 624) were antibiotics (reference: 20.0%–26.8%). Additionally, 97.6% (n = 609) of the antibiotics appeared on the national essential medicines list, whereby 84.4% (n = 510) were prescribed by generic names (reference: 100%). Patients with peptic ulcers had a 4.4-fold higher chance of receiving antibiotics [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.918–10.13, P = 0.0001] while patients with diarrhoea had a 2.6-fold higher chance of receiving at least one antibiotic (aOR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.206–5.491, P = 0.015).

Conclusions

We found inappropriate use of antibiotics in the studied primary HCFs. Antibiotic stewardship programmes should be extended to primary HCFs found in Ilala district.

Antibiotic stewardship implementation at hospitals without on-site infectious disease specialists: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Hospitals are required to have antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs), but there are few models for implementing ASPs without the support of an infectious disease (ID) specialist, defined as an ID physician and/or ID pharmacist.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we sought to understand ASP implementation at hospitals that lack on-site ID support within the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA).

METHODS

Using a mandatory VHA survey, we identified acute-care hospitals that lacked an on-site ID specialist. We conducted semistructured interviews with personnel involved in ASP activities.

SETTING

The study was conducted across 7 VHA hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 42 hospital personnel were enrolled in the study.

RESULTS

The primary responsibility for ASPs fell on the pharmacist champions, who were typically assigned multiple other non-ASP responsibilities. The pharmacist champions were more successful at gaining buy-in when they had established rapport with clinicians, but at some sites, the use of contract physicians and frequent staff turnover were potential barriers. Some sites felt that having access to an off-site ID specialist was important for overcoming institutional barriers and improving the acceptance of their stewardship recommendations. In general, stewardship champions struggled to mobilize institutional resources, which made it difficult to advance their programmatic goals.

CONCLUSION

In this study of 7 hospitals without on-site ID support, we found that ASPs are largely a pharmacy-driven process. Remote ID support, if available, was seen as helpful for implementing stewardship interventions. These findings may inform the future implementation of ASPs in settings lacking local ID expertise.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs in adult intensive care units in Latin America: Implementation, assessments, and impact on outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) in adult medical-surgical intensive care units (MS-ICUs) in Latin America.

DESIGN

Quasi-experimental prospective with continuous time series.

SETTING

The study included 77 MS-ICUs in 9 Latin American countries.

PATIENTS

Adult patients admitted to an MS-ICU for at least 24 hours were included in the study.

METHODS

This multicenter study was conducted over 12 months. To evaluate the ASPs, representatives from all MS-ICUs performed a self-assessment survey (0-100 scale) at the beginning and end of the study. The impact of each ASP was evaluated monthly using the following measures: antimicrobial consumption, appropriateness of antimicrobial treatments, crude mortality, and multidrug-resistant microorganisms in healthcare-associated infections (MDRO-HAIs). Using final stewardship program quality self-assessment scores, MS-ICUs were stratified and compared among 3 groups: ≤25th percentile, >25th to <75th percentile, and ≥75th percentile.

RESULTS

In total, 77 MS-ICU from 9 Latin American countries completed the study. Twenty MS-ICUs reached at least the 75th percentile at the end of the study in comparison with the same number who remain within the 25th percentile (score, 76.1 ± 7.5 vs 28.0 ± 7.3; P < .0001). Several indicators performed better in the MS-ICUs in the 75th versus 25th percentiles: antimicrobial consumption (143.4 vs 159.4 DDD per 100 patient days; P < .0001), adherence to clinical guidelines (92.5% vs 59.3%; P < .0001), validation of prescription by pharmacist (72.0% vs 58.0%; P < .0001), crude mortality (15.9% vs 17.7%; P < .0001), and MDRO-HAIs (9.45 vs 10.96 cases per 1,000 patient days; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

MS-ICUs with more comprehensive ASPs showed significant improvement in antimicrobial utilization.

Optimal Duration of Antibiotics Following Appendectomy for Patients With Complicated Appendicitis

BACKGROUND

Complicated appendicitis patients typically undergo appendectomy followed by antibiotics. The optimal course of antibiotics for complicated appendicitis is poorly defined.

METHODS

Data were collected from patients presenting with acute appendicitis and underwent appendectomy at the index hospitalization (2015-2017). Primary outcomes were readmission rate, superficial surgical site infection (SSI), deep space infection (DSI), which includes abscess. Length of post-operative antibiotic use was recorded and an average intent-to-treat (ITT) by operative grade was calculated.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-two patients (23%) were diagnosed with complicated appendicitis. SSI occurred in 4% of patients (n = 11); SSI rates ranged from 0% to 14.6% by ITT group with 3-4 days being the lowest (0%) and <3 days the highest (14.6%) (P = .008). DSI including abscesses occurred in 27 (9.9%) patients; least frequently in the 5-6 day ITT group (7.4%). Length of stay (LOS) was significantly related to longer antibiotic use (P < .001) and increasing operative grade (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the lower incidence of postoperative complications between 3 and 6 days and no added benefit for ITT >6 days, we recommend limiting antibiotic treatment to 3-6 days for all complicated appendicitis cases with additional workup warranted if infectious symptoms persist.

Predictive modeling of bacterial infections and antibiotic therapy needs in critically ill adults

Unnecessary antibiotic regimens in the intensive care unit (ICU) are associated with adverse patient outcomes and antimicrobial resistance. Bacterial infections (BI) are both common and deadly in ICUs, and as a result, patients with a suspected BI are routinely started on broad-spectrum antibiotics prior to having confirmatory microbiologic culture results or when an occult BI is suspected, a practice known as empiric antibiotic therapy (EAT). However, EAT guidelines lack consensus and existing methods to quantify patient-level BI risk rely largely on clinical judgement and inaccurate biomarkers or expensive diagnostic tests. As a consequence, patients with low risk of BI often are continued on EAT, exposing them to unnecessary side effects. Augmenting current intuition-based practices with data-driven predictions of BI risk could help inform clinical decisions to shorten the duration of unnecessary EAT and improve patient outcomes. We propose a novel framework to identify ICU patients with low risk of BI as candidates for earlier EAT discontinuation. For this study, patients suspected of having a community-acquired BI were identified in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) dataset and categorized based on microbiologic culture results and EAT duration. Using structured longitudinal data collected up to 24-, 48-, and 72-hours after starting EAT, our best models identified patients at low risk of BI with AUROCs up to 0.8 and negative predictive values >93%. Overall, these results demonstrate the feasibility of forecasting BI risk in a critical care setting using patient features found in the electronic health record and call for more extensive research in this promising, yet relatively understudied, area.

Nudge strategies to improve healthcare providers' implementation of evidence-based guidelines, policies and practices: a systematic review of trials included within Cochrane systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Nudge interventions are those that seek to modify the social and physical environment to enhance capacity for subconscious behaviours that align with the intrinsic values of an individual, without actively restricting options. This study sought to describe the application and effects of nudge strategies on clinician implementation of health-related guidelines, policies and practices within studies included in relevant Cochrane systematic reviews.

METHODS

As there is varied terminology used to describe nudge, this study examined studies within relevant systematic reviews. A two-stage screening process was undertaken where, firstly, all systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library between 2016 and 2018 were screened to identify reviews that included quantitative studies to improve implementation of guidelines among healthcare providers. Secondly, individual studies within relevant systematic reviews were included if they were (i) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), (ii) included a nudge strategy in at least one intervention arm, and (iii) explicitly aimed to improve clinician implementation behaviour. We categorised nudge strategies into priming, salience and affect, default, incentives, commitment and ego, and norms and messenger based on the Mindspace framework.

SYNTHESIS

The number and percentage of trials using each nudge strategy was calculated. Due to substantial heterogeneity, we did not undertake a meta-analysis. Instead, we calculated within-study point estimates and 95% confidence intervals, and used a vote-counting approach to explore effects.

RESULTS

Seven reviews including 42 trials reporting on 57 outcomes were included. The most common nudge strategy was priming (69%), then norms and messenger (40%). Of the 57 outcomes, 86% had an effect on clinician behaviour in the hypothesised direction, and 53% of those were statistically significant. For continuous outcomes, the median effect size was 0.39 (0.22, 0.45), while for dichotomous outcomes the median Odds Ratio was 1.62 (1.13, 2.76).

CONCLUSIONS

This review of 42 RCTs included in Cochrane systematic reviews found that the impact of nudge strategies on clinician behaviour was at least comparable to other interventions targeting implementation of evidence-based guidelines. While uncertainty remains, the review provides justification for ongoing investigation of the evaluation and application of nudge interventions to support provider behaviour change.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This review was not prospectively registered.

Improved antibiotic prescribing using indication-based clinical decision support in the emergency department

BACKGROUND

Evaluate an indication-based clinical decision support tool to improve antibiotic prescribing in the emergency department.

METHODS

Encounters where an antibiotic was prescribed between January 2015 and October 2017 were analyzed before and after the introduction of a clinical decision support tool to improve clinicians' selection of a guideline-approved antibiotic based on clinical indication. Evaluation was conducted on a pre-defined subset of conditions that included skin and soft tissue infections, respiratory infections, and urinary infections. The primary outcome was ordering of a guideline-approved antibiotic prescription at the drug and duration of therapy level. A mixed model following a binomial distribution with a logit link was used to model the difference in proportions of guideline-approved prescriptions before and after the intervention.

RESULTS

For conditions evaluated, selection rate of a guideline-approved antibiotic for a given indication improved from 67.1% to 72.2% (P < 0.001). When duration of therapy is included as a criterion, selection of a guideline-approved antibiotic was lower and improved from 24.7% to 31.4% (P < 0.001), highlighting that duration of therapy is often missing at the time of prescribing. The most substantial improvements were seen for pneumonia and pyelonephritis with an increase from 87.9% to 97.5% and 62.8% to 82.6%, respectively. Other significant improvements were seen for abscess, cellulitis, and urinary tract infections.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic prescribing can be improved both at the drug and duration of therapy level using a non-interruptive and indication based-clinical decision support approach. Future research and quality improvement efforts are needed to incorporate duration of therapy guidelines into the antibiotic prescribing process.

Discontinuation of Antibiotics in Patients with Neurological Conditions - A Study on the Impact of an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) in a Tertiary Institution

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of antibiotics are prescribed either unnecessarily or inappropriately in most hospitals worldwide. In the largest tertiary hospital in Singapore, patients with neurological conditions were often initiated on antibiotics for change in mental state or isolated fevers. We hypothesize that Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) interventions to discontinue empirical antibiotics in neurological patients with no clinical evidence of bacterial infection are safe. The aim of this study was to compare clinical impact and safety outcomes of ASP interventions between accepted and rejected groups.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the ASP database was conducted for all patients admitted to the neurology department in Singapore General Hospital between January 2014 and December 2017. Interventions were followed up and patients were classified into two intervention groups, the accepted and rejected groups. Demographic data, age-adjusted Charlson co-morbidity index, duration of antibiotic therapy, length of hospital stay post-ASP intervention (PLOS), infection-related readmissions and mortality were compared between the two groups. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables, and unpaired Student's t-test was performed to determine intergroup differences between mean values.

RESULTS

The ASP team recommended 184 interventions, with an overall acceptance rate of 82.6% (152/184). There was no significant difference in demographics and age-adjusted Charlson co-morbidity index between the two groups. The accepted group had a shorter duration of therapy by 1.67 days (4.99±2.50 days vs. 6.66±2.34 days; P<0.01) and a shorter PLOS by 2 days, although this was not statistically significant (22.5±22.2 days vs. 24.5±51.4 days; P=0.83). There were no significant differences between the two groups in 14-day mortality and readmission rates.

CONCLUSION

In neurological patients with no clinical evidence of bacterial infections, ASP interventions to discontinue empirical antibiotics were not associated with increased mortality and readmissions but were associated with significant reduction in duration of therapy.

Considerable variability in antibiotic use among US children's hospitals in 2017-2018

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the prevalence of and seasonal and regional variation in inpatient antibiotic use among hospitalized US children in 2017-2018.

DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional examination of hospitalized children. The assessments were conducted on a single day in spring (May 3, 2017), summer (August 2, 2017), fall (October 25, 2017), and winter (January 31, 2018). The main outcome of interest was receipt of an antibiotic on the study day.

SETTING

The study included 51 freestanding US children's hospitals that participate in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS).

PATIENTS

This study included all patients <18 years old who were admitted to a participating PHIS hospital, excluding patients who were admitted solely for research purposes.

RESULTS

Of 52,769 total hospitalized children, 19,174 (36.3%) received antibiotics on the study day and 6,575 of these (12.5%) received broad-spectrum antibiotics. The overall prevalence of antibiotic use varied across hospitals from 22.3% to 51.9%. Antibiotic use prevalence was 29.2% among medical patients and 47.7% among surgical patients. Although there was no significant seasonal variation in antibiotic use prevalence, regional prevalence varied, ranging from 32.7% in the Midwest to 40.2% in the West (P < .001). Among units, pediatric intensive care unit patients had the highest prevalence of both overall and broad-spectrum antibiotic use at 58.3% and 26.6%, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

On any given day in a national network of children's hospitals, more than one-third of hospitalized children received an antibiotic, and 1 in 8 received a broad-spectrum antibiotic. Variation across hospitals, setting and regions identifies potential opportunities for enhanced antibiotic stewardship activities.

Evidence-Based Strategies in Using Persuasive Interventions to Optimize Antimicrobial Use in Healthcare: a Narrative Review

A rise in antimicrobial resistance, seen especially since 2000, is in part caused by indiscriminate antimicrobial use. Varied types of persuasive interventions aimed to optimize antimicrobial use have been tried with varying success. Our review seeks to identify and assess factors associated with the successful implementation of persuasive interventions. We searched five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and ERIC) to identify critical studies published between 2000 and December 2018 of interventions employing audit and feedback, education through meetings, academic detailing, reminders, and patient, family, or public education. Outcome measures of interest were any means to measure antimicrobial use. We included 26 articles in our analysis. Seventeen examined multimodal interventions and the most common was audit and feedback and meeting (four studies). Nine examined single interventions and the most common was audit and feedback (five studies). Our findings inform four evidence-based strategies to enable healthcare administrators, clinicians, and researchers to make informed choices when planning and designing an antimicrobial stewardship program: (1) implement a combination of persuasive interventions from both groups: audit and feedback, academic detailing, or patient, family, or provider education; and meeting or reminders, (2) design interventions that last one year or longer; post-intervention, assess the intervention's long-term effects for at least another one year, (3) conduct quality improvement projects examining persuasive interventions if the prescribing database provides adequate diagnosis information, and most importantly, (4) make patient, family, or provider education an integral component of multimodal intervention.

Inclining Trend of the Researchers Interest in Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Systematic Review

Introduction:

The implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs) can improve the treatment of infections and can decrease the adverse events that result from antibiotics use. In the last decades, there is an increasing interest of the researchers in the implementation of ASPs.

Materials and Methods:

The articles published in different journals were retrieved by searching many research databases such as Cochrane library, Europe PMC, PubMed, and Web of Science; we searched these databases for all published articles till November 2018.

Results and Discussion:

The searching results using Cochrane library showed an increase in the number of randomized clinical trials that related to the keyword of “antimicrobial stewardship” specially in the last 5 years. Using Europe PMC, we found 6178 results. From these results, there are 3874 free full texts. In addition, there are 2132 original articles in PubMed and by searching Web of Science database till November 8 there are 3085 results. These results show that the number of trusted published articles was increased continuously; this shows the increasing interest of the researchers in ASPs. These researches will help health-care providers to use antibiotics appropriately and to overcome the barriers of implementing ASPs.

Conclusion:

The results of this study show that the researchers had high levels of interest in participating in research activities related to the appropriate use on antibiotics and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Example of antimicrobial stewardship program in a community hospital in Italy

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate use of antibiotics has caused the emergence of resistant strains of bacteria. The hospital of Alessandria, Italy, implemented an antimicrobial stewardship (AS) pilot program between 2013 and 2015 in the intensive care units (ICUs) and internal medicine departments of Casale Monferrato and Tortona. We aimed to describe the project, results at the end of the intervention, and its strengths and weaknesses.

METHODS

The protocol, designed by the local infection control committee, included three consecutive steps: local guidelines for empirical antibiotic therapy and list of prescription antibiotics with justification, monitoring of antibiotic consumption and antimicrobial resistance trend, and peer-to-peer audit sessions in the wards.

RESULTS

One thousand and eighty-five observations were made, corresponding to 850 patients admitted to the ICUs (16.7%) and internal medicine departments (83.3%). Appropriate antibiotic prescriptions increased by 6.4% between 2013 and 2015. The greatest improvement in appropriate prescriptions was observed for glycopeptides and fluoroquinolones (+17.4% and +16.2%, respectively). We reported 305 inappropriate prescriptions, with the most frequent errors being absence of an infectious process (33.3%), inadequate combination therapy (12.8%), and absence of microbiological investigations (8.5%). A reduced incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusaureus (MRSA) was also observed (p<0.0037).

CONCLUSIONS

Antimicrobial stewardship programs contribute to improving antibiotic prescription and can be implemented in small community hospitals. Narrower interventions, focused on a single disease or single antibiotic should be encouraged.

A usability study to improve a clinical decision support system for the prescription of antibiotic drugs

OBJECTIVE

A clinical decision support system (CDSS) for empirical antibiotic treatment has the potential to increase appropriate antibiotic use. Before using such a system on a broad scale, it needs to be tailored to the users preferred way of working. We have developed a CDSS for empirical antibiotic treatment in hospitalized adult patients. Here we determined in a usability study if the developed CDSS needed changes.

METHODS

Four prespecified patient cases, based on real life clinical scenarios, were evaluated by 8 medical residents in the study. The "think-aloud" method was used, and sessions were recorded and analyzed afterwards. Usability was assessed by 3 evaluators using an augmented classification scheme, which combines the User Action Framework with severity rating of the usability problems and the assessment of the potential impact of these problems on the final task outcomes.

RESULTS

In total 51 usability problems were identified, which could be grouped into 29 different categories. Most (n = 17/29) of the usability problems were cosmetic problems or minor problems. Eighteen (out of 29) of the usability categories could have an ordering error as a result. Classification of the problems showed that some of the problems would get a low priority based on their severity rating, but got a high priority for their impact on the task outcome. This effectively provided information to prioritize system redesign efforts.

CONCLUSION

Usability studies improve lay-out and functionality of a CDSS for empirical antibiotic treatment, even after development by a multidisciplinary system.

Antimicrobial resistance surveillance and prediction of Gram-negative bacteria based on antimicrobial consumption in a hospital setting: A 15-year retrospective study

Antimicrobial resistance, a major threat to human health, is mainly driven by the overuse of antimicrobials. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the relationship between antimicrobial use and resistance with a 15-year record in Southwest hospital, one of the largest hospitals in Southwest China and a university affiliated hospital, thus to further predict the antimicrobial resistance in an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) manner. Kirby-Bauer tests were carried out to figure out the drug sensitivity of Gram-negative bacterial. Antimicrobials (β-lactamase inhibitor complex, aminoglycosides, quinolones, third and fourth-generation cephalosporins, carbapenems, cephamycins, oxacephems, and sulfonamides) consumption were calculated according to World Health Organization (WHO) anatomical therapeutic chemical classification index and expressed as annual defined daily dose (DDD) or DDD per 1000 out patients. Resistance rates of levofloxacin-resistant Escherichia coli, ceftazidime-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, amikacin-resistant Bacterium levans, imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa is positively correlated with the usage of aminoglycosides and quinolones; resistance rates of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii is positively correlated with the usage of carbapenemes (P-value between the drug resistance of levofloxacin-resistant E. coli, ceftazidime-resistant K. pneumoniae and the usage of aminoglycosides is under .05, the other P-value are under .01); resistance rates of the drug resistance of levofloxacin-resistant E. coli is positively correlated with the usage of oxacephems (P < .01); resistance rates of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa is positively correlated with the usage of oxacephems and sulfonamides (P < .01).The present study presents one of the largest and longest retrospective analyses in China between antimicrobial consumption and antimicrobial resistance. Change of the usage of several antibacterial drugs has great influence on the drug resistance of Gram-negative bacterial. Of particular, ARIMA forecasting revealed that carbapenem related bacterial resistance should be closely watched.

Vancomycin Use in a Paediatric Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Care Hospital

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is one of the commonly used anti-microbial drugs in intensive care units (ICUs). Guidelines recommend maintaining therapeutic trough levels of vancomycin (10-20 mg/L). The success of achieving the recommended therapeutic concentration of vancomycin is influenced by several factors, and this is even more complex in children, particularly those admitted in the ICU. Hence, we carried out the present study in children admitted in the ICU who were administered vancomycin.

METHODS

We carried out a chart review of children admitted in the paediatric ICU unit of a tertiary care hospital over a period of 3 years. Information on their demographic factors, diagnoses, duration of hospital stay, vancomycin treatment (dose, frequency and time of administration) and concomitant drugs, and vancomycin trough levels were retrieved. Descriptive statistics were used for representing the demographic factors, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to assess the determining factors.

RESULTS

One-hundred and two children were identified, of whom 13 had renal dysfunction. Two-hundred and fifty-two vancomycin trough levels were available, of which only 25% were observed in the recommended range (10-20 mg/L) amongst patients without any renal dysfunction and 22% amongst patients with renal dysfunction. Vancomycin was administered intravenously at an average [standard deviation (SD)] dose (mg/dose) of 13 (3.9) mostly either thrice or four times daily. Even in patients receiving vancomycin as a definitive therapy, only 40.9% achieved the recommended trough levels. Lower trough levels were associated with an increased risk of mortality. Nearly 4% of the levels were above 20 mg/L (toxic range). Seven children were suspected to have acute kidney injury (AKI) during the course of therapy where the cumulative vancomycin dose and mortality rate was higher. Only one serum vancomycin level during augmented renal clearance was observed in the recommended range. All the patients received at least one concomitant drug that either had nephrotoxic potential or predominant renal elimination, and use of a greater number of such drugs was associated with an increased risk of AKI.

CONCLUSION

The current vancomycin dosing strategy is ineffective in achieving therapeutic trough levels in children admitted to the ICU. Sub-therapeutic vancomycin trough levels significantly increase the risk of mortality.

Prior antibiotic use and acquisition of multidrug-resistant organisms in hospitalized children: A systematic review

Objective:

Multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) cause ~5%–10% of infections in hospitalized children, leading to an increased risk of death, prolonged hospitalization, and additional costs. Antibiotic exposure is considered a driving factor of MDRO acquisition; however, consensus regarding the impact of antibiotic factors, especially in children, is lacking. We conducted a systematic review to examine the relationship between antibiotic use and subsequent healthcare-associated infection or colonization with an MDRO in children.

Design:

Systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline.

Methods:

We searched PubMed and Embase for all English, peer-reviewed original research studies published before September 2018. Included studies evaluated hospitalized children, antibiotic use as an exposure, and bacterial MDRO as an outcome.

Results:

Of the 535 studies initially identified, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Overall, a positive association was identified in most studies evaluating a specific antibiotic exposure (17 of 21, 81%), duration of antibiotics (9 of 12, 75%), and number of antibiotics received (2 of 3, 67%). Those studies that evaluated any antibiotic exposure had mixed results (5 of 10, 50%). Study sites, populations, and definitions of antibiotic use and MDROs varied widely.

Conclusions:

Published studies evaluating this relationship are limited and are of mixed quality. Limitations include observation bias in recall of antibiotic exposure, variations in case definitions, and lack of evaluation of antibiotic dosing and appropriateness. Additional studies exploring the impact of antibiotic use and MDRO acquisition may be needed to develop effective antibiotic stewardship programs for hospitalized children.

Clinical Decision Support Systems and Their Role in Antibiotic Stewardship: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to perform a systematic review over the past 5 years on the role and effectiveness of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) on antibiotic stewardship.

RECENT FINDINGS

CDDS interventions found a significant impact on multiple outcomes relevant to antibiotic stewardship. There are various types of CDSS implementations, both active and passive (provider initiated). Passive interventions were associated with more significant outcomes; however, both interventions appeared effective. In the reviewed literature, CDSSs were consistently associated with decreasing antibiotic consumption and narrowing the spectrum of antibiotic usage. Generally, guideline adherence was improved with CDSS, although this was not universal. The effect on other outcomes, such as mortality, Clostridiodes difficile infections, length of stay, and cost, inconsistently showed a significant difference. Overall, CDDS implementation has effectively decreased antibiotic consumption and improved guideline adherence across the various types of CDSS. Other positive outcomes were noted in certain settings, but were not universal. When creating a new intervention, it is important to identify the optimal structure and deployment of a CDSS for a specific setting.

Clinical outcomes in patients admitted to a hospitalist service exposed to an antimicrobial stewardship program - a retrospective matched cohort study

Background

Given global issues with antimicrobial resistance and a need to optimize antimicrobial usage, antimicrobial stewardship (AS) programs are becoming a necessary component of hospitals and are increasingly mandated worldwide. It is important to evaluate these programs with respect to relevant clinical outcomes.

Methods

An AS program with a prospective audit and feedback service (PAF) of antimicrobial usage was initiated May 11, 2015 at our tertiary care center, for patients admitted under the hospitalist service. We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study. Patients assessed during the first year of this PAF were considered to be the exposed cohort and were compared to unexposed controls matched on gender, age and infectious diagnosis selected from patients who had been admitted under the hospitalist service prior to initiation of the PAF. Descriptive analysis was completed and a multivariate conditional logistic regression was performed to analyze differences between the exposed and control groups in terms of a composite endpoint of 30 day mortality, 30 day post hospital discharge mortality and hospital re-admission.

Results

A total of 348 patients were assessed and received PAF suggestions during the first year were compared to 827 matched control patients who did not receive PAF suggestions. Of 707 PAF suggestions made, the most common was to stop an antimicrobial (23%). A significantly lower (20.7% vs 28.8%, p = 0.008) composite endpoint was found in the group exposed to the PAF (OR 0.71 95%CI 0.52–0.97). This difference persisted when only patients with PAF suggestions that were completely or partially accepted were considered (18.6% vs 28.5%, p = 0.001) but was no longer significant when patients who had their ASP suggestions declined were analyzed (30.2% vs 26.7%, p = 0.610).

Conclusions

In this retrospective cohort study, patient admissions in which PAF recommendations were accepted had better clinical outcomes than matched historical controls managed in the absence of this AS service.

Pharmacist participation in antimicrobial stewardship in Australian and French hospitals: a cross-sectional nationwide survey

Background

Hospital pharmacists are an integral part of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programmes globally. Currently, little is known as to how hospital pharmacists see their role and involvement within the AMS framework.

Objectives

To assess the current level of involvement of Australian and French hospital pharmacists in AMS programmes and identify barriers limiting their involvement in AMS.

Methods

Hospital pharmacists throughout Australia and France were invited to participate in a nationwide online survey throughout March-May 2016. The survey was promoted through the national hospital pharmacists' association in Australia, while a stratified sampling method was used in France to invite pharmacists working in a variety of hospital settings.

Results

Invitations to participate in this survey were sent to 334 Australian pharmacists and 482 French pharmacists. Responses from 133 Australian and 126 French pharmacists were included for analysis. A total of 78.4% (203/259) of pharmacists reported the presence of an AMS programme. Pharmacists were most likely to be involved in AMS through assessing total antibiotic consumption and participating in AMS committee meetings. Barriers to participating in AMS included a lack of time and substantial non-clinical activities limiting involvement in AMS. Differences in responses were found between the two countries.

Conclusions

While the majority of pharmacists reported the presence of an AMS programme, multiple barriers to participation were identified by pharmacists in both countries. Further research should consider how to overcome the identified barriers to optimize the involvement of pharmacists in AMS.

Discontinuation of antibiotic therapy within 24 hours of treatment initiation for patients with no clinical evidence of bacterial infection: a 5-year safety and outcome study from Singapore General Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

BACKGROUND

Overprescribing antibiotics for patients with no bacterial infection is of growing global concern. It is important for timely Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) intervention to discontinue antibiotics for patients whose symptoms can be explained by non-infective causes, and without availability of bacterial cultures and susceptibilities reports. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and safety of early ASP review in these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the ASP database (January 2010 to December 2014) was conducted to identify patients for whom ASP recommended discontinuation of empiric antibiotics within 24 hours of prescribing. Demographics were collected. Clinical outcomes - duration of therapy, length of hospital stay (LOS), infection-related readmissions, and all-cause mortality - were compared between interventions accepted and rejected groups. Continuous data were analysed via unpaired Student's t-test. Categorical data were analysed using χ² test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate.

RESULTS

The ASP team recommended 794 interventions (overall acceptance rate of 72.9%, 579 of 794). There were no significant between-group differences in underlying demographics, and Charlson comorbidity index score. However, the interventions acceptance group had significantly shorter duration of therapy by 2.61 days (2.72 ± 3.04 vs. 5.33 ± 2.54 days; P < 0.01) and LOS by 7.41 days (7.98 ± 13.14 vs. 15.39 ± 22.62 days; P < 0.01), with estimated cost savings of SGD10 817 per patient. There were no significant between-group differences in 14-day mortality and readmission rates.

CONCLUSION

Prompt ASP interventions at Singapore General Hospital were associated with significant reductions in duration of therapy and LOS, with cost savings. It was demonstrated that it is safe to discontinue antibiotics within 24 hours of prescribing for patients with no evidence of bacterial infections.

Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection in Ambulatory Primary Care Pediatrics: Are We Using Antibiotics Appropriately?

OBJECTIVES

Antimicrobial stewardship programs target antimicrobial use within the inpatient care setting. However, most antimicrobials are prescribed at ambulatory sites. We aim to determine the appropriateness of the diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) in children within the outpatient setting at our institution, and to evaluate the cost of antibiotic treatment in our patient cohort.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted by reviewing electronic records of patients aged 2 to 18 years diagnosed with uncomplicated UTI and treated with antibiotics in the outpatient setting from January 1, 2016, to April 30, 2016. Appropriate diagnosis was defined as confirmed UTI that included: pyuria (>5 white blood cells per high-power field or positive for leukocyte esterase), a positive urine culture (≥50,000 colony units/mL of a single uropathogen for a catheterized sample or ≥100,000 colony units/mL for a clean catch urine sample), and lower urinary tract symptoms. Treatment was considered appropriate if the patient was prescribed first-line antibiotic for the susceptible isolate (trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole, amoxicillinclavulanate, nitrofurantoin, and cephalexin), and if the appropriate dose was used.

RESULTS

We included 178 patients receiving a diagnosis of uncomplicated UTI and treated with antibiotics. Of these, 70% received an inappropriate diagnosis (n = 125). 58% (n= 72) of improperly diagnosed patients had polymicrobial growth in their urine cultures. Antibiotics prescribed mostly in this group were trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (53%, n = 66) and cephalexin (22%, n = 27). Only 30% of all included patients received an appropriate diagnosis (n = 53). Of all appropriate diagnosis patients (n = 53), 26% were treated inappropriately (n = 14) with either wide-spectrum antibiotics (n = 8) or with low calculated dose (n = 6). The estimated cost of antibiotic treatment for the inappropriate diagnosis group (n = 125) was $10,755.87.

CONCLUSION

Antimicrobial stewardship programs should target the pediatric outpatient setting and antibiograms should be developed. Education of providers about the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of uncomplicated UTI in children is essential for reducing the cost of inappropriate therapy.

Improvement of gram-negative susceptibility to fluoroquinolones after implementation of a pre-authorization policy for fluoroquinolone use: A decade-long experience

OBJECTIVE

Due to concerns over increasing fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance among gram-negative organisms, our stewardship program implemented a preauthorization use policy. The goal of this study was to assess the relationship between hospital FQ use and antibiotic resistance.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Large academic medical center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of FQ susceptibility of hospital isolates for 5 common gram-negative bacteria: Acinetobacter spp., Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Primary endpoint was the change of FQ susceptibility. A Poisson regression model was used to calculate the rate of change between the preintervention period (1998-2005) and the postimplementation period (2006-2016).

RESULTS

Large rates of decline of FQ susceptibility began in 1998, particularly among P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., and E. cloacae. Our FQ restriction policy improved FQ use from 173 days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient days to <60 DOT per 1,000 patient days. Fluoroquinolone susceptibility increased for Acinetobacter spp. (rate ratio [RR], 1.038; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.005-1.072), E. cloacae (RR, 1.028; 95% CI, 1.013-1.044), and P. aeruginosa (RR, 1.013; 95% CI, 1.006-1.020). No significant change in susceptibility was detected for K. pneumoniae (RR, 1.002; 95% CI, 0.996-1.008), and the susceptibility for E. coli continued to decline, although the decline was not as steep (RR, 0.981; 95% CI, 0.975-0.987).

CONCLUSIONS

A stewardship-driven FQ restriction program stopped overall declining FQ susceptibility rates for all species except E. coli. For 3 species (ie, Acinetobacter spp, E. cloacae, and P. aeruginosa), susceptibility rates improved after implementation, and this improvement has been sustained over a 10-year period.

Physicians' utilization of microbiologic reports and determinants of their preference to order culture in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Objective

The main aim of the study was to assess physicians’ utilization of microbiologic reports and determinants of their preference in ordering microbiologic culture among patients with systemic bacterial infection at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital.

Results

Of the total 369 patients observed, 91 (24.7%) had microbiologic reports (culture and gram stain). About 12% of the patients had culture reports of which majority (77.8%) were available after 72 h of the initial antibiotic start. Antimicrobial susceptibility test was done for 83.3% of the positive cultures. Although 99.5% of the patients were initially placed on empiric therapy, adjustment was done in 114 (30.9%) of the patients. Among these patients with adjusted therapy, changes were unrelated to microbiologic reasons in 103 (90.4%) patients. None of these changes were for the reason of streamlining therapy. Prolonged hospital stay (AOR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.2–6.7), senior physician consultation (AOR = 4.1, 95% CI 1.1–17.7) and suspicion of new site of infection (AOR = 2.6, 95% CI 1.1–6.2) were positive independent predictors for physicians’ preference in ordering culture.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3782-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Clinical and Economic Benefits of Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Hemodialysis Facilities: A Decision Analytic Model

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality as well as excess costs. Antimicrobial exposure is the leading cause for these infections. Approximately 30% of antimicrobial doses administered in outpatient hemodialysis facilities are considered unnecessary. Implementing an antimicrobial stewardship program in outpatient hemodialysis facilities aimed at improving prescribing practices would have important clinical and economic benefits.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

We developed a decision analytic model of antimicrobial use on the clinical and economic consequences of implementing a nationwide antimicrobial stewardship program in outpatient dialysis facilities. The main outcomes were total antimicrobial use, infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and C. difficile, infection-related mortality, and total costs. The analysis considered all patients on outpatient hemodialysis in the United States. The value of implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs, assuming a 20% decrease in unnecessary antimicrobial doses, was calculated as the incremental differences in clinical end points and cost outcomes. Event probabilities, antimicrobial regimens, and health care costs were informed by publicly available sources.

RESULTS

On a national level, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs was predicted to result in 2182 fewer infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and C. difficile (4.8% reduction), 629 fewer infection-related deaths (4.6% reduction), and a cost savings of $106,893,517 (5.0% reduction) per year. The model was most sensitive to clinical parameters as opposed to antimicrobial costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The model suggests that implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in outpatient dialysis facilities would result in substantial reductions in infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms and C. difficile, infection-related deaths, and costs.

Evaluation of broad-spectrum beta-lactam prescriptions (except carbapenems) in a French teaching hospital

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess broad-spectrum beta-lactam prescriptions (except carbapenems) in a French teaching hospital and the impact of controlled dispensing, antimicrobial management team, and antibiotic treatment reassessment on Day 2-3.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a point-prevalence study in all hospital units and analyzed curative antibiotic broad-spectrum beta-lactam prescriptions. The assessment focused on indication, dosing, combinations, revaluation on Day 2-3, and treatment duration.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven broad-spectrum beta-lactam prescriptions were identified. The main prescriptions were amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (37%, n=25), ceftriaxone (36%, n=24), and piperacillin-tazobactam (16%, n=11). Indications, doses, combinations, and reassessment on Day 2-3 were appropriate, respectively 90% (n=60), 96% (n=64), 94% (33/35 combinations), and 88% (n=59). However, appropriate treatment durations amounted to only 63% (n=42). The benefit of controlled dispensing was observed in terms of overall antibiotic treatment duration: 86% versus 51% adequacy for uncontrolled dispensing of beta-lactams (P=0.02). The antimicrobial management team improved the antibiotic treatment duration: 73% of appropriate durations versus 44% for beta-lactams not monitored by the team, but this difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

Broad-spectrum beta-lactams were usually well prescribed but the adequacy of treatment duration could be improved, especially by reinforcing the monitoring of prescriptions.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Antimicrobial Use and Stewardship Among Prescribers at Acute-Care Hospitals

OBJECTIVE To assess antimicrobial prescriber knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding antimicrobial stewardship (AS) and associated barriers to optimal prescribing. DESIGN Cross-sectional survey. SETTING Online survey. PARTICIPANTS A convenience sample of 2,900 US antimicrobial prescribers at 5 acute-care hospitals within a hospital network. INTERVENTION The following characteristics were assessed with an anonymous, online survey in February 2015: attitudes and practices related to antimicrobial resistance, AS programs, and institutional AS resources; antimicrobial prescribing and AS knowledge; and practices and confidence related to antimicrobial prescribing. RESULTS In total, 402 respondents completed the survey. Knowledge gaps were identified through case-based questions. Some respondents sometimes selected overly broad therapy for the susceptibilities given (29%) and some "usually" or "always" preferred using the most broad-spectrum empiric antimicrobials possible (32%). Nearly all (99%) reported reviewing antimicrobial appropriateness at 48-72 hours, but only 55% reported "always" doing so. Furthermore, 45% of respondents felt that they had not received adequate training regarding antimicrobial prescribing. Some respondents lacked confidence selecting empiric therapy using antibiograms (30%), interpreting susceptibility results (24%), de-escalating therapy (18%), and determining duration of therapy (31%). Postprescription review and feedback (PPRF) was the most commonly cited AS intervention (79%) with potential to improve patient care. CONCLUSIONS Barriers to appropriate antimicrobial selection and de-escalation of antimicrobial therapy were identified among front-line prescribers in acute-care hospitals. Prescribers desired more AS-related education and identified PPRF as the most helpful AS intervention to improve patient care. Educational interventions should be preceded by and tailored to local assessment of educational needs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:316-322.

Description of a restriction program for gram-positive antimicrobial agents at an academic medical center

This report examines the effectiveness of antimicrobial restriction at 1 tertiary care health care system by analyzing the consumption of restricted versus nonrestricted gram-positive agents over time for medical versus surgical units. Significant reductions in restricted antibiotic use were detected in 57% of medical units versus none of the surgical units. There were no significant reductions in nonrestricted antibiotic use. We think looking at antibiotic consumption by service line provides opportunities for targeted antibiotic restriction program refinement.

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship programme on hospitalized patients at the intensive care unit: a prospective audit and feedback study

AIMS

Inappropriate use of antibiotics is one of the most important factors contributing to the emergence of drug resistant pathogens. The purpose of this study was to measure the clinical impact of antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) interventions on hospitalized patients at the Intensive care unit at Palestinian Medical Complex.

METHODS

A prospective audit with intervention and feedback by ASP team within 48-72 h of antibiotic administration began in September 2015. Four months of pre-ASP data were compared with 4 months of post-ASP data. Data collected included clinical and demographic data; use of antimicrobials measured by defined daily doses, duration of therapy, length of stay, readmission and all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 176 interventions were made the ASP team with an average acceptance rate of 78.4%. The most accepted interventions were dose optimization (87.0%) followed by de-escalation based on culture results with an acceptance rate of 84.4%. ASP interventions significantly reduces antimicrobial use by 24.3% (87.3 defined daily doses/100 beds vs. 66.1 defined daily doses/100 beds P < 0.001). The median (interquartile range) of length of stay was significantly reduced post ASP [11 (3-21) vs. 7 (4-19) days; P < 0.01]. Also, the median (interquartile range) of duration of therapy was significantly reduced post-ASP [8 (5-12) days vs. 5 (3-9); P = 0.01]. There was no significant difference in overall 30-day mortality or readmission between the pre-ASP and post-ASP groups (26.9% vs. 23.9%; P = 0.1) and (26.1% vs. 24.6%; P = 0.54) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective audit and feedback programme was associated with positive impact on antimicrobial use, duration of therapy and length of stay.

A Multicentric, Prospective, Observational Antibacterial Utilization Study in Indian Tertiary Referral Centers

Rationale

Antibacterials are largely prescribed to the intensive care unit (ICU) patients due to high prevalence of infections. However, appropriate use of antibacterials is imperative; since the misuse of antibacterials increases antibacterial resistance and ultimately, it has negative impact on health care and economic system. Hence, continuous antibacterials prescription assessments are very important to judge and improve prescription patterns. The present work was carried out at public and private hospitals to assess the differences in antibacterial prescribing pattern.

Methods

The present study was conducted at three public and two private hospitals over the period of 14 months. Demographic and drug use details were captured daily from patients admitted to medical ICUs to assess the World Health Organization indicators.

Results

A total of 700 patients were enrolled across the five centers (140 per center), among them 424 were male and 276 were female. Average number of drugs and antibacterials prescribed at public hospitals are significantly higher than the private hospital. However, percentage of antibacterial agents prescribed at public hospitals was significantly lower than the private hospitals (P = 0.0381). Private hospitals had significantly lower percentage of antibacterial agents prescribed by generic name (P < 0.0001). Differences in change of antibacterial agents required were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.1888); however, significant difference was observed in percentage of patients who received antibacterial treatment as per sensitivity pattern (P = 0.0385) between public and private hospitals. Significantly higher mortality was observed in public hospitals compared to private hospitals (<0.0001).

Conclusions

More generic prescriptions and more number of prescriptions as per the sensitivity pattern are required at each public and private hospital.

A Prospective Antibacterial Utilization Study in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Referral Center

Purpose:

Antibacterials are commonly prescribed to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) patients. However, inappropriate antibacterial prescriptions lead to increases in antibacterial resistance, treatment cost, duration of treatment, and poor clinical outcome. The antibacterial utilization study assesses the prescription patterns and if necessary recommends the interventions to improve antibacterial prescriptions. Hence, the present prospective groundwork was conducted.

Materials and Methods:

The study was conducted over the period of 6 months (April 18 to October 20, 2014). The demographics and drug use details were captured daily from patients admitted to PICU to assess World Health Organization indicators.

Results:

A total of 200 patients enrolled, among them 119 males and 81 females. There were 12.46 (±6.16) drugs prescribed per patient, of which 2.38 (±1.48) were antibacterials. Among the total drug prescribed, 18.49% were antibacterials and 97% patients received at least one antibacterial. Ceftriaxone (49.48%) was the most commonly prescribed antibacterial, while imipenem (2.58%) and colistin (2.06%) use was very low. A total of 80.95% antibacterials were prescribed by generic name, 94.88% were administered intravenously, and 80.76% were prescribed from hospital pharmacy. The average length of PICU stay was 6.15 days (±6.20), the average length of antibacterial treatment was 6.08 days (±6.27), and the average length of empirical antibacterial treatment was 5.50 days (±5.40). The cost of antibacterial therapy per patient was Indian rupees 824.64 (±235.35). In 27 patients, bacterial culture test was positive and of whom 21 received antibacterials as per sensitivity pattern.

Conclusions:

The use of antibacterials was not indiscriminately high but more prescriptions per sensitivity pattern are required.