Relationship of aortic excess pressure obtained using pressure-only reservoir pressure analysis to directly measured aortic flow in humans

Carotid Reservoir Pressure Decrease After Prolonged Head Down Tilt Bed Rest in Young Healthy Subjects Is Associated With Reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Time and Diastolic Length

Background

The arterial pressure waveform reflects the interaction between the heart and the arterial system and carries potentially relevant information about circulatory status. According to the commonly accepted 'wave transmission model', the net BP waveform results from the super-position of discrete forward and backward pressure waves, with the forward wave in systole determined mainly by the left ventricular (LV) ejection function and the backward by the wave reflection from the periphery, the timing and amplitude of which depend on arterial stiffness, the wave propagation speed and the extent of downstream admittance mismatching. However, this approach obscures the 'Windkessel function' of the elastic arteries. Recently, a 'reservoir-excess pressure' model has been proposed, which interprets the arterial BP waveform as a composite of a volume-related 'reservoir' pressure and a wave-related 'excess' pressure.

Methods

In this study we applied the reservoir-excess pressure approach to the analysis of carotid arterial pressure waveforms (applanation tonometry) in 10 young healthy volunteers before and after a 5-week head down tilt bed rest which induced a significant reduction in stroke volume (SV), end-diastolic LV volume and LV longitudinal function without significant changes in central blood pressure, cardiac output, total peripheral resistance and aortic stiffness. Forward and backward pressure components were also determined by wave separation analysis.

Results

Compared to the baseline state, bed rest induced a significant reduction in LV ejection time (LVET), diastolic time (DT), backward pressure amplitude (bP) and pressure reservoir integral (INTPR). INTPR correlated directly with LVET, DT, time to the peak of backward wave (bT) and stroke volume, while excess pressure integral (INTXSP) correlated directly with central pressure. Furthermore, Δ.INTPR correlated directly with Δ.LVET, and Δ.DT, and in multivariate analysis INTPR was independently related to LVET and DT and INTXSP to central systolic BP.

Conclusion

This is an hypothesis generating paper which adds support to the idea that the reservoir-wave hypothesis applied to non-invasively obtained carotid pressure waveforms is of potential clinical usefulness.

Increased Excess Pressure After Creation of an Arteriovenous Fistula in End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

Reservoir-wave analysis (RWA) separates the arterial waveform into reservoir and excess pressure (XSP) components, where XSP is analogous to flow and related to left ventricular workload. RWA provides more detailed information about the arterial tree than traditional blood pressure (BP) parameters. In end-stage renal disease (ESRD), we have previously shown that XSP is associated with increased mortality and is higher in patients with arteriovenous fistula (AVF). In this study, we examined whether XSP increases after creation of an AVF in ESRD.

METHODS

Before and after a mean of 3.9 ± 1.2 months following creation of AVF, carotid pressure waves were recorded using arterial tonometry. XSP and its integral (XSPI) were derived using RWA through pressure wave analysis alone. Aortic stiffness was assessed by carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CF-PWV).

RESURLTS

In 38 patients (63% male, age 59 ± 15 years), after AVF creation, brachial diastolic BP decreased (79 ± 10 vs. 72 ± 12 mm Hg, P = 0.002), but the reduction in systolic BP, was not statistically significant (133 ± 20 vs. 127 ± 26 mm Hg, P = 0.137). However, carotid XSP (14 [12-19] to 17 [12-22] mm Hg, P = 0.031) and XSPI increased significantly (275 [212-335] to 334 [241-439] kPa∙s, P = 0.015), despite a reduction in CF-PWV (13 ± 3.6 vs. 12 ± 3.5 m/s, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Creation of an AVF resulted in increased XSP in this population, despite improvement in diastolic BP and aortic stiffness. These findings underline the complex hemodynamic impact of AVF on the cardiovascular system.

Accuracy and applicability of non-invasive evaluation of aortic wave intensity using only pressure waveforms in humans

Background.Wave intensity (WI) analysis is a well-established method for quantifying the energy carried in arterial waves, providing valuable clinical information about cardiovascular function. The primary drawback of this method is the need for concurrent measurements of both pressure and flow waveforms.Objective. We have for the first time investigated the accuracy of a novel methodology for estimating wave intensity employing only single pressure waveform measurements; we studied both carotid- and radial-based estimations in a large heterogeneous cohort.Approach.Tonometry was performed alongside Doppler ultrasound to acquire measurements of both carotid and radial pressure waveforms as well as aortic flow waveforms in 2640 healthy and diseased participants (1439 female) in the Framingham Heart Study. Patterns consisting of two forward waves (Wf1, Wf2) and one backward wave (Wb1) along with reflection metrics were compared with those obtained from exact WI analysis.Main Results. Carotid-based estimates correlated well for forward peak amplitudes (Wf1,r = 0.85,p < 0.05; Wf2,r = 0.72,p < 0.05) and peak time (Wf1,r = 0.94,p < 0.05; Wf2,r = 0.98,p < 0.05), and radial-based estimates correlated fairly to poorly for amplitudes (Wf1,r = 0.62,p < 0.05; Wf2,r = 0.42,p < 0.05) and peak time (Wf1,r = 0.04,p = 0.10; Wf2,r = 0.75,p < 0.05). In all cases, estimated Wb1 measures were not correlated. Reflection metrics were well correlated for healthy patients (r = 0.67,p < 0.05), moderately correlated for valvular disease (r = 0.59,p < 0.05) and fairly correlated for CVD (r = 0.46,p < 0.05) and heart failure (r = 0.49,p < 0.05).Significance. These findings indicate that pressure-only WI produces accurate results only when forward contributions are of primary interest and only for carotid pressure waveforms. The pressure-only WI estimations of this work provide an important opportunity to further the goal of uncovering clinical insights through wave analysis affordably and non-invasively.

Physiological and clinical insights from reservoir-excess pressure analysis

There is a growing body of evidence indicating that reservoir-excess pressure model parameters provide physiological and clinical insights above and beyond standard blood pressure (BP) and pulse waveform analysis. This information has never been collectively examined and was the aim of this review. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with BP as the greatest cardiovascular disease risk factor. However, brachial systolic and diastolic BP provide limited information on the underlying BP waveform, missing important BP-related cardiovascular risk. A comprehensive analysis of the BP waveform is provided by parameters derived via the reservoir-excess pressure model, which include reservoir pressure, excess pressure, and systolic and diastolic rate constants and Pinfinity. These parameters, derived from the arterial BP waveform, provide information on the underlying arterial physiology and ventricular-arterial interactions otherwise missed by conventional BP and waveform indices. Application of the reservoir-excess pressure model in the clinical setting may facilitate a better understanding and earlier identification of cardiovascular dysfunction associated with disease. Indeed, reservoir-excess pressure parameters have been associated with sub-clinical markers of end-organ damage, cardiac and vascular dysfunction, and future cardiovascular events and mortality beyond conventional risk factors. In the future, greater understanding is needed on how the underlying physiology of the reservoir-excess pressure parameters informs cardiovascular disease risk prediction over conventional BP and waveform indices. Additional consideration should be given to the application of the reservoir-excess pressure model in clinical practice using new technologies embedded into conventional BP assessment methods.

Excess pressure as an analogue of blood flow velocity

INTRODUCTION

Derivation of blood flow velocity from a blood pressure waveform is a novel technique, which could have potential clinical importance. Excess pressure, calculated from the blood pressure waveform via the reservoir-excess pressure model, is purported to be an analogue of blood flow velocity but this has never been examined in detail, which was the aim of this study.

METHODS

Intra-arterial blood pressure was measured sequentially at the brachial and radial arteries via fluid-filled catheter simultaneously with blood flow velocity waveforms recorded via Doppler ultrasound on the contralateral arm (n = 98, aged 61 ± 10 years, 72% men). Excess pressure was derived from intra-arterial blood pressure waveforms using pressure-only reservoir-excess pressure analysis.

RESULTS

Brachial and radial blood flow velocity waveform morphology were closely approximated by excess pressure derived from their respective sites of measurement (median cross-correlation coefficient r = 0.96 and r = 0.95 for brachial and radial comparisons, respectively). In frequency analyses, coherence between blood flow velocity and excess pressure was similar for brachial and radial artery comparisons (brachial and radial median coherence = 0.93 and 0.92, respectively). Brachial and radial blood flow velocity pulse heights were correlated with their respective excess pressure pulse heights (r = 0.53, P < 0.001 and r = 0.43, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Excess pressure is an analogue of blood flow velocity, thus affording the opportunity to derive potentially important information related to arterial blood flow using only the blood pressure waveform.

Feasibility of Estimation of Aortic Wave Intensity Using Non-invasive Pressure Recordings in the Absence of Flow Velocity in Man

Background

Wave intensity analysis provides valuable information on ventriculo-arterial function, hemodynamics, and energy transfer in the arterial circulation. Widespread use of wave intensity analysis is limited by the need for concurrent measurement of pressure and flow waveforms. We describe a method that can estimate wave intensity patterns using only non-invasive pressure waveforms (pWIA).

Methods

Radial artery pressure and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) flow velocity waveforms were recorded in 12 participants in the Southall and Brent Revisited (SABRE) study. Pressure waveforms were analyzed using custom-written software to derive the excess pressure (P_xs) which was scaled to peak LVOT velocity and used to calculate wave intensity. These data were compared with wave intensity calculated using the measured LVOT flow velocity waveform. In a separate study, repeat measures of pWIA were performed on 34 individuals who attended two clinic visits at an interval of ≈1 month to assess reproducibility and reliability of the method.

Results

P_xs waveforms were similar in shape to aortic flow velocity waveforms and the time of peak P_xs and peak aortic velocity agreed closely. Wave intensity estimated using pWIA showed acceptable agreement with estimates using LVOT velocity tracings and estimates of wave intensity were similar to values reported previously in the literature. The method showed fair to good reproducibility for most parameters.

Conclusion

The P_xs is a surrogate of LVOT flow velocity which, when appropriately scaled, allows estimation of aortic wave intensity with acceptable reproducibility. This may enable wider application of wave intensity analysis to large studies.

The modified arterial reservoir: An update with consideration of asymptotic pressure (P∞) and zero-flow pressure (Pzf)

This article describes the modified arterial reservoir in detail. The modified arterial reservoir makes explicit the wave nature of both reservoir (P_res) and excess pressure (P_xs). The mathematical derivation and methods for estimating P_res in the absence of flow velocity data are described. There is also discussion of zero-flow pressure (P_zf), the pressure at which flow through the circulation ceases; its relationship to asymptotic pressure (P_∞) estimated by the reservoir model; and the physiological interpretation of P_zf . A systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that P_zf differs from mean circulatory filling pressure.

Acute Effects of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Central Aortic Hemodynamics in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

Severe aortic stenosis induces abnormalities in central aortic pressure, with consequent impaired organ and tissue perfusion. Relief of aortic stenosis by transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with both a short- and long-term hypertensive response. Counterintuitively, patients who are long-term normotensive post-TAVR have a worsened prognosis compared with patients with hypertension, yet the underlying mechanisms are not understood. We investigated immediate changes in invasively measured left ventricular and central aortic pressure post-TAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis using aortic reservoir pressure, wave intensity analysis, and indices of aortic function. Fifty-four patients (mean age 83.6±6.2 years, 50.0% female) undergoing TAVR were included. We performed reservoir pressure and wave intensity analysis on invasively acquired pressure waveforms from the ascending aorta and left ventricle immediately pre- and post-TAVR. Following TAVR, there were increases in systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse aortic pressures (all P<0.05). Post-TAVR reservoir pressure was unchanged (54.5±12.4 versus 56.6±14.0 mm Hg, P=0.30) whereas excess pressure increased 47% (29.0±10.9 versus 42.6±15.5 mm Hg, P<0.001). Wave intensity analysis (arbitrary units, au) demonstrated increased forward compression wave (64.9±35.5 versus 124.4±58.9, ×10³ au, P<0.001), backward compression wave (11.6±5.5 versus 14.4±6.9, ×10³ au, P=0.01) and forward expansion wave energies (43.2±27.3 versus 82.8±53.1, ×10³ au, P<0.001). Subendocardial viability ratio improved with aortic function effectively unchanged post-TAVR. Increased central aortic pressure following TAVR relates to increased transmitted power and energy to the proximal aorta with increased excess pressure but unchanged reservoir pressure. These changes provide a potential mechanism for the improved prognosis associated with relative hypertension post-TAVR.

Determinants of Increased Central Excess Pressure in Dialysis: Role of Dialysis Modality and Arteriovenous Fistula

BACKGROUND

Arterial reservoir-wave analysis (RWA)-a new model of arterial hemodynamics-separates arterial wave into reservoir pressure (RP) and excess pressure (XSP). The XSP integral (XSPI) has been associated with increased risk of clinical outcomes. The objectives of the present study were to examine the determinants of XSPI in a mixed cohort of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, to examine whether dialysis modality and the presence of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) are associated with increased XSPI.

METHOD

In a cross-sectional study, 290 subjects (232 HD and 130 with AVF) underwent carotid artery tonometry (calibrated with brachial diastolic and mean blood pressure). The XSPI was calculated through RWA using pressure-only algorithms. Logistic regression was used for determinants of XSPI above median. Through forward conditional linear regression, we examined whether treatment by HD or the presence of AVF is associated with higher XSPI.

RESULTS

Patients with XSPI above median were older, had a higher prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, had a higher body mass index, and were more likely to be on HD. After adjustment for confounders, HD was associated with a higher risk of higher XSPI (odds ratio = 2.39, 95% confidence interval: 1.16-4.98). In a forward conditional linear regression analysis, HD was associated with higher XSPI (standardized coefficient: 0.126, P = 0.012), but on incorporation of AVF into the model, AVF was associated with higher XSPI (standardized coefficient: 0.130, P = 0.008) and HD was excluded as a predictor.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that higher XSPI in HD patients is related to the presence of AVF.

Prognostic Value of Carotid and Radial Artery Reservoir-Wave Parameters in End-Stage Renal Disease

Background Reservoir-wave approach is an alternative model of arterial hemodynamics based on the assumption that measured arterial pressure is composed of volume-related (reservoir pressure) and wave-related components (excess pressure). However, the clinical utility of reservoir-wave approach remains debatable. Methods and Results In a single-center cohort of 260 dialysis patients, we examined whether carotid and radial reservoir-wave parameters were associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Central pulse pressure and augmentation index at 75 beats per minute were determined by radial arterial tonometry through generalized transfer function. Carotid and radial reservoir-wave analysis were performed to determine reservoir pressure and excess pressure integral. After a median follow-up of 32 months, 171 (66%) deaths and 88 (34%) cardiovascular deaths occurred. In Cox regression analysis, carotid excess pressure integral was associated with a hazard ratio of 1.33 (95% CI , 1.14-1.54; P<0.001 per 1 SD) for all-cause and 1.45 (95% CI : 1.18-1.75; P<0.001 per 1 SD) for cardiovascular mortality. After adjustments for age, heart rate, sex, clinical characteristics and carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, carotid excess pressure integral was consistently associated with increased risk of all-cause (hazard ratio per 1 SD, 1.30; 95% CI : 1.08-1.54; P=0.004) and cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio per 1 SD, 1.31; 95% CI : 1.04-1.63; P=0.019). Conversely, there were no significant associations between radial reservoir-wave parameters, central pulse pressure, augmentation index at 75 beats per minute, pressure forward, pressure backward and reflection magnitude, and all-cause or cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for comorbidities. Conclusions These observations support the clinical value of reservoir-wave approach parameters of large central elastic vessels in end-stage renal disease.