1
|
Greenspon CM, Valle G, Hobbs TG, Verbaarschot C, Callier T, Okorokova EV, Shelchkova ND, Sobinov AR, Jordan PM, Weiss JM, Fitzgerald EE, Prasad D, van Driesche A, Lee RC, Satzer D, Gonzalez-Martinez J, Warnke PC, Miller LE, Boninger ML, Collinger JL, Gaunt RA, Downey JE, Hatsopoulos NG, Bensmaia SJ. Biomimetic multi-channel microstimulation of somatosensory cortex conveys high resolution force feedback for bionic hands. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.02.18.528972. [PMID: 36824713 PMCID: PMC9949113 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.18.528972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/20/2023]
Abstract
Manual interactions with objects are supported by tactile signals from the hand. This tactile feedback can be restored in brain-controlled bionic hands via intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of somatosensory cortex (S1). In ICMS-based tactile feedback, contact force can be signaled by modulating the stimulation intensity based on the output of force sensors on the bionic hand, which in turn modulates the perceived magnitude of the sensation. In the present study, we gauged the dynamic range and precision of ICMS-based force feedback in three human participants implanted with arrays of microelectrodes in S1. To this end, we measured the increases in sensation magnitude resulting from increases in ICMS amplitude and participant's ability to distinguish between different intensity levels. We then assessed whether we could improve the fidelity of this feedback by implementing "biomimetic" ICMS-trains, designed to evoke patterns of neuronal activity that more closely mimic those in natural touch, and by delivering ICMS through multiple channels at once. We found that multi-channel biomimetic ICMS gives rise to stronger and more distinguishable sensations than does its single-channel counterpart. Finally, we implemented biomimetic multi-channel feedback in a bionic hand and had the participant perform a compliance discrimination task. We found that biomimetic multi-channel tactile feedback yielded improved discrimination over its single-channel linear counterpart. We conclude that multi-channel biomimetic ICMS conveys finely graded force feedback that more closely approximates the sensitivity conferred by natural touch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M. Greenspon
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Giacomo Valle
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Taylor G. Hobbs
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Ceci Verbaarschot
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Thierri Callier
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Anton R. Sobinov
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Patrick M. Jordan
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Jeffrey M. Weiss
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Emily E. Fitzgerald
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Dillan Prasad
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ashley van Driesche
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ray C. Lee
- Schwab Rehabilitation Hospital, Chicago, IL
| | - David Satzer
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Peter C. Warnke
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lee E. Miller
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael L. Boninger
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jennifer L. Collinger
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Robert A. Gaunt
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - John E. Downey
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Sliman J. Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
- Neuroscience Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ye H, Hall V, Hendee J. Improving focality and consistency in micromagnetic stimulation. Front Comput Neurosci 2023; 17:1105505. [PMID: 36817316 PMCID: PMC9932264 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2023.1105505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The novel micromagnetic stimulation (μMS) technology aims to provide high resolution on neuronal targets. However, consistency of neural activation could be compromised by a lack of surgical accuracy, biological variation, and human errors in operation. We have recently modeled the activation of an unmyelinated axon by a circular micro-coil. Although the coil could activate the axon, its performance sometimes lacked focality and consistency. The site of axonal activation could shift by several experimental factors, including the reversal of the coil current, displacement of the coil, and changes in the intensity of the stimulation. Current clinical practice with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has suggested that figure-eight coils could provide better performance in magnetic stimulation than circular coils. Here, we estimate the performance of μMS by a figure-eight micro-coil, by exploring the impact of the same experimental factors on its focality and consistency in axonal activation. We derived the analytical expression of the electric field and activating function generated by the figure-eight micro-coil, and estimated the location of axonal activation. Using NEURON modeling of an unmyelinated axon, we found two different types (A and B) of axon activation by the figure-eight micro-coil, mediated by coil currents of reversed direction. Type A activation is triggered by membrane hyperpolarization followed by depolarization; Type B activation is triggered by direct membrane depolarization. Consequently, the two types of stimulation are governed by distinct ion channel mechanisms. In comparison to the circular micro-coil, the figure-eight micro-coil requires significantly less current for axonal activation. Under figure-eight micro-coil stimulation, the site of axonal activation does not change with the reversal of the coil current, displacement of the coil, or changes in the intensity of the stimulation. Ultimately, the figure-eight micro-coil provides a more efficient and consistent site of activation than the circular micro-coil in μMS.
Collapse
|
3
|
Ye M, Zestos AG, Welle CG, Wu GK, Cui XT. Editorial: Safety and efficacy evaluation of electrical stimulation devices for neural modulation. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1143989. [PMID: 36824215 PMCID: PMC9941729 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1143989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Meijun Ye
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Alexander G Zestos
- Department of Chemistry, American University, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Cristin G Welle
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Denver, CO, United States
| | - Guangying K Wu
- Division of Biomedical Physics, Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States
| | - Xinyan Tracy Cui
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Impacts of stimulus parameters and configurations on motor cortex direct electrical stimulation using intrinsic optical imaging: a pilot study. Biomed Eng Online 2022; 21:58. [PMID: 36038875 PMCID: PMC9422127 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-022-01026-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Motor cortex stimulation applied as a clinical treatment for neuropathic disorders for decades. With stimulation electrodes placed directly on the cortical surface, this neuromodulation method provides higher spatial resolution than other non-invasive therapies. Yet, the therapeutic effects reported were not in conformity with different syndromes. One of the main issues is that the stimulation parameters are always determined by clinical experience. The lack of understanding about how the stimulation current propagates in the cortex and various stimulation parameters and configurations obstruct the development of this method. Methods In this study, we investigated the effect of different stimulation configurations on cortical responses to motor cortical stimulations using intrinsic optical imaging. Results Our results showed that the cortical activation of electrical stimulation is not only related to the current density but also related to the propagation distance. Besides, stimulation configurations also affect the propagation of the stimulation current. Conclusions All these results provide preliminary experimental evidence for parameter and electrode configuration optimizations.
Collapse
|
5
|
Pandarinath C, Bensmaia SJ. The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands. Physiol Rev 2022; 102:551-604. [PMID: 34541898 PMCID: PMC8742729 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00034.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in our understanding of brain function, along with the development of neural interfaces that allow for the monitoring and activation of neurons, have paved the way for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which harness neural signals to reanimate the limbs via electrical activation of the muscles or to control extracorporeal devices, thereby bypassing the muscles and senses altogether. BMIs consist of reading out motor intent from the neuronal responses monitored in motor regions of the brain and executing intended movements with bionic limbs, reanimated limbs, or exoskeletons. BMIs also allow for the restoration of the sense of touch by electrically activating neurons in somatosensory regions of the brain, thereby evoking vivid tactile sensations and conveying feedback about object interactions. In this review, we discuss the neural mechanisms of motor control and somatosensation in able-bodied individuals and describe approaches to use neuronal responses as control signals for movement restoration and to activate residual sensory pathways to restore touch. Although the focus of the review is on intracortical approaches, we also describe alternative signal sources for control and noninvasive strategies for sensory restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chethan Pandarinath
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
- Grossman Institute for Neuroscience, Quantitative Biology, and Human Behavior, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fifer MS, McMullen DP, Osborn LE, Thomas TM, Christie B, Nickl RW, Candrea DN, Pohlmeyer EA, Thompson MC, Anaya MA, Schellekens W, Ramsey NF, Bensmaia SJ, Anderson WS, Wester BA, Crone NE, Celnik PA, Cantarero GL, Tenore FV. Intracortical Somatosensory Stimulation to Elicit Fingertip Sensations in an Individual With Spinal Cord Injury. Neurology 2022; 98:e679-e687. [PMID: 34880087 PMCID: PMC8865889 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000013173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The restoration of touch to fingers and fingertips is critical to achieving dexterous neuroprosthetic control for individuals with sensorimotor dysfunction. However, localized fingertip sensations have not been evoked via intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). METHODS Using a novel intraoperative mapping approach, we implanted electrode arrays in the finger areas of left and right somatosensory cortex and delivered ICMS over a 2-year period in a human participant with spinal cord injury. RESULTS Stimulation evoked tactile sensations in 8 fingers, including fingertips, spanning both hands. Evoked percepts followed expected somatotopic arrangements. The subject was able to reliably identify up to 7 finger-specific sites spanning both hands in a finger discrimination task. The size of the evoked percepts was on average 33% larger than a finger pad, as assessed via manual markings of a hand image. The size of the evoked percepts increased modestly with increased stimulation intensity, growing 21% as pulse amplitude increased from 20 to 80 µA. Detection thresholds were estimated on a subset of electrodes, with estimates of 9.2 to 35 µA observed, roughly consistent with prior studies. DISCUSSION These results suggest that ICMS can enable the delivery of consistent and localized fingertip sensations during object manipulation by neuroprostheses for individuals with somatosensory deficits. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER NCT03161067.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew S Fifer
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL.
| | - David P McMullen
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Luke E Osborn
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Tessy M Thomas
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Breanne Christie
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Robert W Nickl
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Daniel N Candrea
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Eric A Pohlmeyer
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Margaret C Thompson
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Manuel A Anaya
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Wouter Schellekens
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Nick F Ramsey
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - William S Anderson
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Brock A Wester
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Nathan E Crone
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Pablo A Celnik
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Gabriela L Cantarero
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| | - Francesco V Tenore
- From the Research and Exploratory Development Department (M.S.F., L.E.O., B.P.C., E.A.P., M.C.T., F.V.T.), Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel; National Institute of Mental Health (D.P.M.), NIH, Bethesda; Department of Biomedical Engineering (T.M.T., D.N.C.), Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (R.W.N., M.A.A., P.A.C., G.L.C.), Department of Neurosurgery (W.S.A.), and Department of Neurology (B.A.W., N.E.C.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; UMC Utrecht Brain Center (W.S., N.F.R.), the Netherlands; and Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy (S.J.B.), University of Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kunigk NG, Urdaneta ME, Malone IG, Delgado F, Otto KJ. Reducing Behavioral Detection Thresholds per Electrode via Synchronous, Spatially-Dependent Intracortical Microstimulation. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:876142. [PMID: 35784835 PMCID: PMC9247280 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.876142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) has shown promise in restoring quality of life to patients suffering from paralysis, specifically when used in the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). However, these benefits can be hampered by long-term degradation of electrode performance due to the brain's foreign body response. Advances in microfabrication techniques have allowed for the development of neuroprostheses with subcellular electrodes, which are characterized by greater versatility and a less detrimental immune response during chronic use. These probes are hypothesized to enable more selective, higher-resolution stimulation of cortical tissue with long-term implants. However, microstimulation using physiologically relevant charges with these smaller-scale devices can damage electrode sites and reduce the efficacy of the overall device. Studies have shown promise in bypassing this limitation by spreading the stimulation charge between multiple channels in an implanted electrode array, but to our knowledge the usefulness of this strategy in laminar arrays with electrode sites spanning each layer of the cortex remains unexplored. To investigate the efficacy of simultaneous multi-channel ICMS in electrode arrays with stimulation sites spanning cortical depth, we implanted laminar electrode arrays in the primary somatosensory cortex of rats trained in a behavioral avoidance paradigm. By measuring detection thresholds, we were able to quantify improvements in ICMS performance using a simultaneous multi-channel stimulation paradigm. The charge required per site to elicit detection thresholds was halved when stimulating from two adjacent electrode sites, although the overall charge used by the implant was increased. This reduction in threshold charge was more pronounced when stimulating with more than two channels and lessened with greater distance between stimulating channels. Our findings suggest that these improvements are based on the synchronicity and polarity of each stimulus, leading us to conclude that these improvements in stimulation efficiency per electrode are due to charge summation as opposed to a summation of neural responses to stimulation. Additionally, the per-site charge reductions are seen regardless of the cortical depth of each utilized channel. This evocation of physiological detection thresholds with lower stimulation currents per electrode site has implications for the feasibility of stimulation regimes in future advanced neuroprosthetic devices, which could benefit from reducing the charge output per site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas G. Kunigk
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Morgan E. Urdaneta
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Ian G. Malone
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Francisco Delgado
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kevin J. Otto
- J. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
- *Correspondence: Kevin J. Otto,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moleirinho S, Whalen AJ, Fried SI, Pezaris JS. The impact of synchronous versus asynchronous electrical stimulation in artificial vision. J Neural Eng 2021; 18. [PMID: 33900206 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abecf1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Visual prosthesis devices designed to restore sight to the blind have been under development in the laboratory for several decades. Clinical translation continues to be challenging, due in part to gaps in our understanding of critical parameters such as how phosphenes, the electrically-generated pixels of artificial vision, can be combined to form images. In this review we explore the effects that synchronous and asynchronous electrical stimulation across multiple electrodes have in evoking phosphenes. Understanding how electrical patterns influence phosphene generation to control object binding and perception of visual form is fundamental to creation of a clinically successful prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Moleirinho
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.,Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Whalen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.,Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Shelley I Fried
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.,Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.,Boston VA Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - John S Pezaris
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.,Department of Neurosurgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kumaravelu K, Tomlinson T, Callier T, Sombeck J, Bensmaia SJ, Miller LE, Grill WM. A comprehensive model-based framework for optimal design of biomimetic patterns of electrical stimulation for prosthetic sensation. J Neural Eng 2020; 17:046045. [PMID: 32759488 PMCID: PMC8559728 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abacd8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Touch and proprioception are essential to motor function as shown by the movement deficits that result from the loss of these senses, e.g. due to neuropathy of sensory nerves. To achieve a high-performance brain-controlled prosthetic arm/hand thus requires the restoration of somatosensation, perhaps through intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of somatosensory cortex (S1). The challenge is to generate patterns of neuronal activation that evoke interpretable percepts. We present a framework to design optimal spatiotemporal patterns of ICMS (STIM) that evoke naturalistic patterns of neuronal activity and demonstrate performance superior to four previous approaches. APPROACH We recorded multiunit activity from S1 during a center-out reach task (from proprioceptive neurons in Brodmann's area 2) and during application of skin indentations (from cutaneous neurons in Brodmann's area 1). We implemented a computational model of a cortical hypercolumn and used a genetic algorithm to design STIM that evoked patterns of model neuron activity that mimicked their experimentally-measured counterparts. Finally, from the ICMS patterns, the evoked neuronal activity, and the stimulus parameters that gave rise to it, we trained a recurrent neural network (RNN) to learn the mapping function between the physical stimulus and the biomimetic stimulation pattern, i.e. the sensory encoder to be integrated into a neuroprosthetic device. MAIN RESULTS We identified ICMS patterns that evoked simulated responses that closely approximated the measured responses for neurons within 50 µm of the electrode tip. The RNN-based sensory encoder generalized well to untrained limb movements or skin indentations. STIM designed using the model-based optimization approach outperformed STIM designed using existing linear and nonlinear mappings. SIGNIFICANCE The proposed framework produces an encoder that converts limb state or patterns of pressure exerted onto the prosthetic hand into STIM that evoke naturalistic patterns of neuronal activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Thierri Callier
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Joseph Sombeck
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Sliman J. Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lee E. Miller
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
- Deptartment of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Warren M. Grill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Neurobiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chowdhury RH, Glaser JI, Miller LE. Area 2 of primary somatosensory cortex encodes kinematics of the whole arm. eLife 2020; 9:e48198. [PMID: 31971510 PMCID: PMC6977965 DOI: 10.7554/elife.48198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 12/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Proprioception, the sense of body position, movement, and associated forces, remains poorly understood, despite its critical role in movement. Most studies of area 2, a proprioceptive area of somatosensory cortex, have simply compared neurons' activities to the movement of the hand through space. Using motion tracking, we sought to elaborate this relationship by characterizing how area 2 activity relates to whole arm movements. We found that a whole-arm model, unlike classic models, successfully predicted how features of neural activity changed as monkeys reached to targets in two workspaces. However, when we then evaluated this whole-arm model across active and passive movements, we found that many neurons did not consistently represent the whole arm over both conditions. These results suggest that 1) neural activity in area 2 includes representation of the whole arm during reaching and 2) many of these neurons represented limb state differently during active and passive movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raeed H Chowdhury
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUnited States
- Systems Neuroscience InstituteUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUnited States
| | - Joshua I Glaser
- Interdepartmental Neuroscience ProgramNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUnited States
- Department of StatisticsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUnited States
- Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior InstituteColumbia UniversityNew YorkUnited States
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUnited States
- Department of PhysiologyNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUnited States
- Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUnited States
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLabChicagoUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sombeck JT, Miller LE. Short reaction times in response to multi-electrode intracortical microstimulation may provide a basis for rapid movement-related feedback. J Neural Eng 2019; 17:016013. [PMID: 31778982 PMCID: PMC7189902 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab5cf3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tetraplegic patients using brain-machine interfaces can make visually guided reaches with robotic arms. However, restoring proprioceptive feedback to these patients will be critical, as evidenced by the movement deficit in patients with proprioceptive loss. Proprioception is critical in large part because it provides faster feedback than vision. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a promising approach, but the ICMS-evoked reaction time (RT) is typically slower than that to natural proprioceptive and often even visual cues, implying that ICMS feedback may not be fast enough to guide movement. APPROACH For most sensory modalities, RT decreases with increased stimulus intensity. Thus, it may be that stimulation intensities beyond what has previously been used will result in faster RTs. To test this, we compared the RT to ICMS applied through multi-electrode arrays in area 2 of somatosensory cortex to that of mechanical and visual cues. MAIN RESULTS We found that the RT to single-electrode ICMS decreased with increased current, frequency, and train length. For 100 µA, 330 Hz stimulation, the highest single-electrode intensity we tested routinely, most electrodes resulted in RTs slower than the mechanical cue but slightly faster than the visual cue. While increasing the current beyond 100 µA resulted in faster RTs, sustained stimulation at this level may damage tissue. Alternatively, by stimulating through multiple electrodes (mICMS), a large amount of current can be injected while keeping that through each electrode at a safe level. We found that stimulation with at least 480 µA equally distributed over 16 electrodes could produce RTs as much as 20 ms faster than the mechanical cue, roughly the conduction delay to cortex from the periphery. SIGNIFICANCE These results suggest that mICMS may provide a means to supply rapid, movement-related feedback. Future neuroprosthetics may need spatiotemporally patterned mICMS to convey useful somatosensory information. Novelty & Significance Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a promising approach for providing artificial somatosensation to patients with spinal cord injury or limb amputation, but in prior experiments, subjects have been unable to respond as quickly to it as to natural cues. We have investigated the use of multi-electrode stimulation (mICMS) and discovered that it can produce reaction times as fast or faster even than natural mechanical cues. Although our stimulus trains were not modulated in time, this result opens the door to more complex spatiotemporal patterns of mICMS that might be used to rapidly write in complex somatosensory information to the CNS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Sombeck
- Department of Physiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dadarlat MC, Sun Y, Stryker MP. Widespread activation of awake mouse cortex by electrical stimulation. INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING : [PROCEEDINGS]. INTERNATIONAL IEEE EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING 2019; 2019:1113-1117. [PMID: 31363384 DOI: 10.1109/ner.2019.8716956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Electrical stimulation is a highly-effective, temporally-precise technique to evoke neural activity in the brain, and thus is critically important for both research and clinical applications. Here, we set out to understand the time-course and spatial spread of neural activation elicited by electrical stimulation. By imaging the cortex of awake, chronically-implanted, transgenic mice during electrical stimulation, we found that a broad range of stimulation parameters led to widespread neural activation. In general, increasing current amplitude and the number of stimulation pulses progressively produced higher maximum activity and activated larger areas of cortex. However, increasing stimulation frequency above 30 Hz primarily shifted the timing, not amplitude, of peak activity. Our results demonstrate that even weak electrical stimulation widely activates neurons within awake mouse cortex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C Dadarlat
- Physiology Department at the University of California - San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Room 436 San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Yujiao Sun
- Physiology Department at the University of California - San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Room 436 San Francisco, CA 94158
| | - Michael P Stryker
- Physiology Department at the University of California - San Francisco, 675 Nelson Rising Lane, Room 436 San Francisco, CA 94158
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
A wireless and artefact-free 128-channel neuromodulation device for closed-loop stimulation and recording in non-human primates. Nat Biomed Eng 2018; 3:15-26. [PMID: 30932068 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-018-0323-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Closed-loop neuromodulation systems aim to treat a variety of neurological conditions by delivering and adjusting therapeutic electrical stimulation in response to a patient's neural state, recorded in real time. Existing systems are limited by low channel counts, lack of algorithmic flexibility, and the distortion of recorded signals by large and persistent stimulation artefacts. Here, we describe an artefact-free wireless neuromodulation device that enables research applications requiring high-throughput data streaming, low-latency biosignal processing, and simultaneous sensing and stimulation. The device is a miniaturized neural interface capable of closed-loop recording and stimulation on 128 channels, with on-board processing to fully cancel stimulation artefacts. In addition, it can detect neural biomarkers and automatically adjust stimulation parameters in closed-loop mode. In a behaving non-human primate, the device enabled long-term recordings of local field potentials and the real-time cancellation of stimulation artefacts, as well as closed-loop stimulation to disrupt movement preparatory activity during a delayed-reach task. The neuromodulation device may help advance neuroscientific discovery and preclinical investigations of stimulation-based therapeutic interventions.
Collapse
|
14
|
Quick KM, Mischel JL, Loughlin PJ, Batista AP. The critical stability task: quantifying sensory-motor control during ongoing movement in nonhuman primates. J Neurophysiol 2018; 120:2164-2181. [PMID: 29947593 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00300.2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Everyday behaviors require that we interact with the environment, using sensory information in an ongoing manner to guide our actions. Yet, by design, many of the tasks used in primate neurophysiology laboratories can be performed with limited sensory guidance. As a consequence, our knowledge about the neural mechanisms of motor control is largely limited to the feedforward aspects of the motor command. To study the feedback aspects of volitional motor control, we adapted the critical stability task (CST) from the human performance literature (Jex H, McDonnell J, Phatak A. IEEE Trans Hum Factors Electron 7: 138-145, 1966). In the CST, our monkey subjects interact with an inherently unstable (i.e., divergent) virtual system and must generate sensory-guided actions to stabilize it about an equilibrium point. The difficulty of the CST is determined by a single parameter, which allows us to quantitatively establish the limits of performance in the task for different sensory feedback conditions. Two monkeys learned to perform the CST with visual or vibrotactile feedback. Performance was better under visual feedback, as expected, but both monkeys were able to utilize vibrotactile feedback alone to successfully perform the CST. We also observed changes in behavioral strategy as the task became more challenging. The CST will have value for basic science investigations of the neural basis of sensory-motor integration during ongoing actions, and it may also provide value for the design and testing of bidirectional brain computer interface systems. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Currently, most behavioral tasks used in motor neurophysiology studies require primates to make short-duration, stereotyped movements that do not necessitate sensory feedback. To improve our understanding of sensorimotor integration, and to engineer meaningful artificial sensory feedback systems for brain-computer interfaces, it is crucial to have a task that requires sensory feedback for good control. The critical stability task demands that sensory information be used to guide long-duration movements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin M Quick
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Jessica L Mischel
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Patrick J Loughlin
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Aaron P Batista
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Central nervous system microstimulation: Towards selective micro-neuromodulation. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
16
|
Ghafoor U, Kim S, Hong KS. Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review. Front Neurorobot 2017; 11:59. [PMID: 29163122 PMCID: PMC5671609 DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2017.00059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2017] [Accepted: 10/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
For those individuals with upper-extremity amputation, a daily normal living activity is no longer possible or it requires additional effort and time. With the aim of restoring their sensory and motor functions, theoretical and technological investigations have been carried out in the field of neuroprosthetic systems. For transmission of sensory feedback, several interfacing modalities including indirect (non-invasive), direct-to-peripheral-nerve (invasive), and cortical stimulation have been applied. Peripheral nerve interfaces demonstrate an edge over the cortical interfaces due to the sensitivity in attaining cortical brain signals. The peripheral nerve interfaces are highly dependent on interface designs and are required to be biocompatible with the nerves to achieve prolonged stability and longevity. Another criterion is the selection of nerves that allows minimal invasiveness and damages as well as high selectivity for a large number of nerve fascicles. In this paper, we review the nerve-machine interface modalities noted above with more focus on peripheral nerve interfaces, which are responsible for provision of sensory feedback. The invasive interfaces for recording and stimulation of electro-neurographic signals include intra-fascicular, regenerative-type interfaces that provide multiple contact channels to a group of axons inside the nerve and the extra-neural-cuff-type interfaces that enable interaction with many axons around the periphery of the nerve. Section Current Prosthetic Technology summarizes the advancements made to date in the field of neuroprosthetics toward the achievement of a bidirectional nerve-machine interface with more focus on sensory feedback. In the Discussion section, the authors propose a hybrid interface technique for achieving better selectivity and long-term stability using the available nerve interfacing techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usman Ghafoor
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Sohee Kim
- Department of Robotics Engineering, Daegu Gyeongbuk Institute of Science and Technology, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Keum-Shik Hong
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea.,Department of Cogno-Mechatronics Engineering, Pusan National University, Busan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Swan BD, Gasperson LB, Krucoff MO, Grill WM, Turner DA. Sensory percepts induced by microwire array and DBS microstimulation in human sensory thalamus. Brain Stimul 2017; 11:416-422. [PMID: 29126946 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2017] [Revised: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Microstimulation in human sensory thalamus (ventrocaudal, VC) results in focal sensory percepts in the hand and arm which may provide an alternative target site (to somatosensory cortex) for the input of prosthetic sensory information. Sensory feedback to facilitate motor function may require simultaneous or timed responses across separate digits to recreate perceptions of slip as well as encoding of intensity variations in pressure or touch. OBJECTIVES To determine the feasibility of evoking sensory percepts on separate digits with variable intensity through either a microwire array or deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode, recreating "natural" and scalable percepts relating to the arm and hand. METHODS We compared microstimulation within ventrocaudal sensory thalamus through either a 16-channel microwire array (∼400 kΩ per channel) or a 4-channel DBS electrode (∼1.2 kΩ per contact) for percept location, size, intensity, and quality sensation, during thalamic DBS electrode placement in patients with essential tremor. RESULTS Percepts in small hand or finger regions were evoked by microstimulation through individual microwires and in 5/6 patients sensation on different digits could be perceived from stimulation through separate microwires. Microstimulation through DBS electrode contacts evoked sensations over larger areas in 5/5 patients, and the apparent intensity of the perceived response could be modulated with stimulation amplitude. The perceived naturalness of the sensation depended both on the pattern of stimulation as well as intensity of the stimulation. CONCLUSIONS Producing consistent evoked perceptions across separate digits within sensory thalamus is a feasible concept and a compact alternative to somatosensory cortex microstimulation for prosthetic sensory feedback. This approach will require a multi-element low impedance electrode with a sufficient stimulation range to evoke variable intensities of perception and a predictable spread of contacts to engage separate digits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon D Swan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Lynne B Gasperson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Max O Krucoff
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Warren M Grill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States
| | - Dennis A Turner
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sritharan SY, Richardson AG, Weigand PK, Planell-Mendez I, Van der Spiegel J, Lucas TH. Somatosensory encoding with cuneate nucleus microstimulation: Detection of artificial stimuli. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY. ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2017; 2016:4719-4722. [PMID: 28269325 DOI: 10.1109/embc.2016.7591781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The sense of touch and proprioception are critical to movement control. After spinal cord injury, these senses may be restored with direct, electrical microstimulation of the brain as part of a complete sensorimotor neuroprosthesis. The present study was designed to test, in part, the hypothesis that the cuneate nucleus (CN) of the brainstem is a suitable site to encode somatosensory information. Two rhesus macaques were implanted with microelectrode arrays providing chronic access to the CN. The monkeys were trained on an active touch oddity task to detect vibrotactile stimuli. When the vibrotactile stimuli were replaced with electrical stimuli delivered to the CN, initial detection probabilities were near chance. Detection performance improved over time, reaching a plateau after about 10 daily sessions. At plateau performance, the monkeys exhibited detection probabilities that were 68-80% higher than the chance probability. Finally, detection probability was quantified as a function of stimulus amplitude. The resulting psychometric curve showed a detection threshold of 45 μA for 100-Hz stimulus trains. These behavioral data are the first to show that artificial CN activation is sufficient for perception. The results are consistent with our hypothesis and motivate future tests of the CN as a somatosensory encoding site.
Collapse
|
19
|
Dadarlat MC, Sabes PN. Encoding and Decoding of Multi-Channel ICMS in Macaque Somatosensory Cortex. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS 2016; 9:508-514. [PMID: 27740497 DOI: 10.1109/toh.2016.2616311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Naturalistic control of brain-machine interfaces will require artificial proprioception, potentially delivered via intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). We have previously shown that multi-channel ICMS can guide a monkey reaching to unseen targets in a planar workspace. Here, we expand on that work, asking how ICMS is decoded into target angle and distance by analyzing the performance of a monkey when ICMS feedback was degraded. From the resulting pattern of errors, we found that the animal's estimate of target direction was consistent with a weighted circular-mean strategy-close to the optimal decoding strategy given the ICMS encoding. These results support our previous finding that animals can learn to use this artificial sensory feedback in an efficient and naturalistic manner.
Collapse
|
20
|
Tomlinson T, Miller LE. Toward a Proprioceptive Neural Interface that Mimics Natural Cortical Activity. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2016; 957:367-388. [PMID: 28035576 PMCID: PMC5452683 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47313-0_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The dramatic advances in efferent neural interfaces over the past decade are remarkable, with cortical signals used to allow paralyzed patients to control the movement of a prosthetic limb or even their own hand. However, this success has thrown into relief, the relative lack of progress in our ability to restore somatosensation to these same patients. Somatosensation, including proprioception, the sense of limb position and movement, plays a crucial role in even basic motor tasks like reaching and walking. Its loss results in crippling deficits. Historical work dating back decades and even centuries has demonstrated that modality-specific sensations can be elicited by activating the central nervous system electrically. Recent work has focused on the challenge of refining these sensations by stimulating the somatosensory cortex (S1) directly. Animals are able to detect particular patterns of stimulation and even associate those patterns with particular sensory cues. Most of this work has involved areas of the somatosensory cortex that mediate the sense of touch. Very little corresponding work has been done for proprioception. Here we describe the effort to develop afferent neural interfaces through spatiotemporally precise intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). We review what is known of the cortical representation of proprioception, and describe recent work in our lab that demonstrates for the first time, that sensations like those of natural proprioception may be evoked by ICMS in S1. These preliminary findings are an important first step to the development of an afferent cortical interface to restore proprioception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tucker Tomlinson
- Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E. Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60611, USA
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 303 E. Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60611, USA.
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, 710 North Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, Illinois, 60208, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kim S, Callier T, Tabot GA, Gaunt RA, Tenore FV, Bensmaia SJ. Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112:15202-7. [PMID: 26504211 PMCID: PMC4679002 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1509265112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a powerful tool to investigate the functional role of neural circuits and may provide a means to restore sensation for patients for whom peripheral stimulation is not an option. In a series of psychophysical experiments with nonhuman primates, we investigate how stimulation parameters affect behavioral sensitivity to ICMS. Specifically, we deliver ICMS to primary somatosensory cortex through chronically implanted electrode arrays across a wide range of stimulation regimes. First, we investigate how the detectability of ICMS depends on stimulation parameters, including pulse width, frequency, amplitude, and pulse train duration. Then, we characterize the degree to which ICMS pulse trains that differ in amplitude lead to discriminable percepts across the range of perceptible and safe amplitudes. We also investigate how discriminability of pulse amplitude is modulated by other stimulation parameters-namely, frequency and duration. Perceptual judgments obtained across these various conditions will inform the design of stimulation regimes for neuroscience and neuroengineering applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungshin Kim
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
| | - Thierri Callier
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
| | - Gregg A Tabot
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637
| | - Robert A Gaunt
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
| | - Francesco V Tenore
- Research and Exploratory Development Department, Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD 20723
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
A novel turning behavior control method for rat-robot through the stimulation of ventral posteromedial thalamic nucleus. Behav Brain Res 2015; 298:150-7. [PMID: 26546880 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2015] [Revised: 10/28/2015] [Accepted: 11/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
The concept of a rat-robot was initially introduced in 2002, bringing to the field, a novel area of research using modern research into neuroscience and robotics. This paper brings to the table, a study into the method best used for navigation systems in a rat-robot. Current research is epitomized by the use of reward-based spatial navigation, combining the concept of an induced reward sensation as well as a 'virtual touch' sensation to control the movement of the rat-robot. However, such methods are plagued by limitations affecting the success rate as well as preparation procedures which may have varying effects on different rats, even under similar conditions. Hence, this paper studies the stimulation of two different portions of the brain to induce a turning motion within the rat, namely the Ventral Posteromedial (VPM) thalamic nucleus as well as the Barrel-Field (BF) cortex and demonstrates the preferential usage of VPM as the choice use of navigational control in a rat-robot.
Collapse
|
23
|
Rajan AT, Boback JL, Dammann JF, Tenore FV, Wester BA, Otto KJ, Gaunt RA, Bensmaia SJ. The effects of chronic intracortical microstimulation on neural tissue and fine motor behavior. J Neural Eng 2015; 12:066018. [PMID: 26479701 PMCID: PMC8129590 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective. One approach to conveying sensory feedback in neuroprostheses is to electrically stimulate sensory neurons in the cortex. For this approach to be viable, it is critical that intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) causes minimal damage to the brain. Here, we investigate the effects of chronic ICMS on the neuronal tissue across a variety of stimulation regimes in non-human primates. We also examine each animal’s ability to use their hand—the cortical representation of which is targeted by the ICMS—as a further assay of possible neuronal damage. Approach. We implanted electrode arrays in the primary somatosensory cortex of three Rhesus macaques and delivered ICMS four hours per day, five days per week, for six months. Multiple regimes of ICMS were delivered to investigate the effects of stimulation parameters on the tissue and behavior. Parameters included current amplitude (10–100 μA), pulse train duration (1, 5 s), and duty cycle (1/1, 1/3). We then performed a range of histopathological assays on tissue near the tips of both stimulated and unstimulated electrodes to assess the effects of chronic ICMS on the tissue and their dependence on stimulation parameters. Main results. While the implantation and residence of the arrays in the cortical tissue did cause significant damage, chronic ICMS had no detectable additional effect; furthermore, the animals exhibited no impairments in fine motor control. Significance. Chronic ICMS may be a viable means to convey sensory feedback in neuroprostheses as it does not cause significant damage to the stimulated tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander T Rajan
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Brain control and information transfer. Exp Brain Res 2015; 233:3335-47. [DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4423-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
25
|
Callier T, Schluter EW, Tabot GA, Miller LE, Tenore FV, Bensmaia SJ. Long-term stability of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of somatosensory cortex. J Neural Eng 2015; 12:056010. [DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/5/056010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
26
|
Hiremath SV, Chen W, Wang W, Foldes S, Yang Y, Tyler-Kabara EC, Collinger JL, Boninger ML. Brain computer interface learning for systems based on electrocorticography and intracortical microelectrode arrays. Front Integr Neurosci 2015; 9:40. [PMID: 26113812 PMCID: PMC4462099 DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2014] [Accepted: 05/20/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A brain-computer interface (BCI) system transforms neural activity into control signals for external devices in real time. A BCI user needs to learn to generate specific cortical activity patterns to control external devices effectively. We call this process BCI learning, and it often requires significant effort and time. Therefore, it is important to study this process and develop novel and efficient approaches to accelerate BCI learning. This article reviews major approaches that have been used for BCI learning, including computer-assisted learning, co-adaptive learning, operant conditioning, and sensory feedback. We focus on BCIs based on electrocorticography and intracortical microelectrode arrays for restoring motor function. This article also explores the possibility of brain modulation techniques in promoting BCI learning, such as electrical cortical stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and optogenetics. Furthermore, as proposed by recent BCI studies, we suggest that BCI learning is in many ways analogous to motor and cognitive skill learning, and therefore skill learning should be a useful metaphor to model BCI learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivayogi V Hiremath
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Veterans Affairs, Human Engineering Research Laboratories Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Weidong Chen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Qiushi Academy for Advanced Studies (QAAS), Zhejiang University Hangzhou, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Stephen Foldes
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Veterans Affairs, Human Engineering Research Laboratories Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ying Yang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jennifer L Collinger
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Veterans Affairs, Human Engineering Research Laboratories Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael L Boninger
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Veterans Affairs, Human Engineering Research Laboratories Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA ; Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kim S, Callier T, Tabot GA, Tenore FV, Bensmaia SJ. Sensitivity to microstimulation of somatosensory cortex distributed over multiple electrodes. Front Syst Neurosci 2015; 9:47. [PMID: 25914630 PMCID: PMC4392613 DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/07/2015] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Meaningful and repeatable tactile sensations can be evoked by electrically stimulating primary somatosensory cortex. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) may thus be a viable approach to restore the sense of touch in individuals who have lost it, for example tetraplegic patients. One of the potential limitations of this approach, however, is that high levels of current can damage the neuronal tissue if the resulting current densities are too high. The limited range of safe ICMS amplitudes thus limits the dynamic range of ICMS-evoked sensations. One way to get around this limitation would be to distribute the ICMS over multiple electrodes in the hopes of intensifying the resulting percept without increasing the current density experienced by the neuronal tissue. Here, we test whether stimulating through multiple electrodes is a viable solution to increase the dynamic range of ICMS-elicited sensations without increasing the peak current density. To this end, we compare the ability of non-human primates to detect ICMS delivered through one vs. multiple electrodes. We also compare their ability to discriminate pulse trains differing in amplitude when these are delivered through one or more electrodes. We find that increasing the number of electrodes through which ICMS is delivered only has a marginal effect on detectability or discriminability despite the fact that 2-4 times more current is delivered overall. Furthermore, the impact of multielectrode stimulation (or lack thereof) is found whether pulses are delivered synchronously or asynchronously, whether the leading phase of the pulses is cathodic or anodic, and regardless of the spatial configuration of the electrode groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungshin Kim
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Thierri Callier
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gregg A Tabot
- Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Francesco V Tenore
- Research and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory Laurel, MD, USA
| | - Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA ; Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Miranda RA, Casebeer WD, Hein AM, Judy JW, Krotkov EP, Laabs TL, Manzo JE, Pankratz KG, Pratt GA, Sanchez JC, Weber DJ, Wheeler TL, Ling GS. DARPA-funded efforts in the development of novel brain–computer interface technologies. J Neurosci Methods 2015; 244:52-67. [PMID: 25107852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2014] [Revised: 07/08/2014] [Accepted: 07/24/2014] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
29
|
Bensmaia SJ, Miller LE. Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges. Nat Rev Neurosci 2014; 15:313-25. [PMID: 24739786 DOI: 10.1038/nrn3724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 219] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The loss of a limb or paralysis resulting from spinal cord injury has devastating consequences on quality of life. One approach to restoring lost sensory and motor abilities in amputees and patients with tetraplegia is to supply them with implants that provide a direct interface with the CNS. Such brain-machine interfaces might enable a patient to exert voluntary control over a prosthetic or robotic limb or over the electrically induced contractions of paralysed muscles. A parallel interface could convey sensory information about the consequences of these movements back to the patient. Recent developments in the algorithms that decode motor intention from neuronal activity and in approaches to convey sensory feedback by electrically stimulating neurons, using biomimetic and adaptation-based approaches, have shown the promise of invasive interfaces with sensorimotor cortices, although substantial challenges remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sliman J Bensmaia
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, and Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
| | - Lee E Miller
- 1] Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Department of Physiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. [2] Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen KH, Dammann JF, Boback JL, Tenore FV, Otto KJ, Gaunt RA, Bensmaia SJ. The effect of chronic intracortical microstimulation on the electrode-tissue interface. J Neural Eng 2014; 11:026004. [PMID: 24503702 PMCID: PMC8129589 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/2/026004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Somatosensation is critical for effective object manipulation, but current upper limb prostheses do not provide such feedback to the user. For individuals who require use of prosthetic limbs, this lack of feedback transforms a mundane task into one that requires extreme concentration and effort. Although vibrotactile motors and sensory substitution devices can be used to convey gross sensations, a direct neural interface is required to provide detailed and intuitive sensory feedback. The viability of intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) as a method to deliver feedback depends in part on the long-term reliability of implanted electrodes used to deliver the stimulation. The objective of the present study is to investigate the effects of chronic ICMS on the electrode-tissue interface. APPROACH We stimulate the primary somatosensory cortex of three Rhesus macaques through chronically implanted electrodes for 4 h per day over a period of six months, with different electrodes subjected to different regimes of stimulation. We measure the impedance and voltage excursion as a function of time and of ICMS parameters. We also test the sensorimotor consequences of chronic ICMS by having animals grasp and manipulate small treats. MAIN RESULTS We show that impedance and voltage excursion both decay with time but stabilize after 10-12 weeks. The magnitude of this decay is dependent on the amplitude of the ICMS and, to a lesser degree, the duration of individual pulse trains. Furthermore, chronic ICMS does not produce any deficits in fine motor control. SIGNIFICANCE The results suggest that chronic ICMS has only a minor effect on the electrode-tissue interface and may thus be a viable means to convey sensory feedback in neuroprosthetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin H Chen
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|