Susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs of CRF01_AE, CRF02_AG, and subtype C viruses from untreated patients of Africa and Asia: comparative genotypic and phenotypic data

HIV-1 subtype B/B' and baseline drug resistance mutation are associated with virologic failure: a multicenter cohort study in China

BACKGROUND

Distribution of HIV-1 subtypes, transmitted drug resistance (TDR)/drug resistance mutation (DRM), and their impact on response to combination antiretroviral therapy remain poorly understood in China.

METHODS

We analyzed data from our multicenter cohort study with 444 antiretroviral-naive participants recruited between 2008 and 2010. HIV-1 subtype and tropism were determined by V3 sequencing, and TDR/DRM was determined by Pol sequencing. Virologic and immunologic responses were monitored over 96 weeks of follow-up. The initial combination antiretroviral therapy regimen for all patients was nevirapine + lamivudine + zidovudine or stavudine. Analysis 1 included patients who finished 96 weeks of follow-up (n = 379), and analysis 2 included all 444 patients.

RESULTS

Subtype B/B' was associated with higher prevalence of TDR/DRM to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Median time to HIV-1 suppression was 18 weeks in all 3 subtype groups. In Cox proportional models for viral suppression, neither viral tropism nor HIV-1 subtypes had any impact on viral suppression; however, subtypes CRF01_AE and C/CRF07_BC/CRF08_BC were associated with lower risk of virologic failure compared with subtype B/B', with adjusted hazard ratio of 0.11 (P = 0.032) and 0.06 (P = 0.036), respectively in analysis 1, 0.42 (P = 0.047) and 0.22 (P = 0.008), respectively in analysis 2. This association was attenuated by adding DRM profiles to multivariate regression models. Neither subtype nor HIV-1 tropism affected immunologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-1 subtype tended to be associated with virologic but not immunologic response; this effect could be ascribed to baseline DRM.

HIV-1 genetic variation and drug resistance development

Up until 10 years ago, basic and clinical HIV-1 research was mainly performed on HIV-1 subtype B that predominated in resource-rich settings. Over the past decade, HIV-1 care and therapy has been scaled up substantially in Latin America, Africa and Asia. These regions are largely dominated by non-B subtype infections, and especially the African continent is affected by the HIV pandemic. Insight on the potency of antiviral drugs and regimens as well as on the emergence of drug resistance in non-B subtypes was lacking triggering research in this field, also partly driven by the introduction and spreading of HIV-1 non-B subtypes in Europe. The scope of this article was to review and discuss the state-of-the-art on the impact of HIV-1 genetic variation on the in vitro activity of antiviral drugs and in vivo response to antiviral therapy; as well as on the in vitro and in vivo emergence of drug resistance.

The Impact of HIV Genetic Polymorphisms and Subtype Differences on the Occurrence of Resistance to Antiretroviral Drugs

The vast majority of reports on drug resistance deal with subtype B infections in developed countries, and this is largely due to historical delays in access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) on a worldwide basis. This notwithstanding the concept that naturally occurring polymorphisms among different non-B subtypes can affect HIV-1 susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) is supported by both enzymatic and virological data. These findings suggest that such polymorphisms can affect both the magnitude of resistance conferred by some major mutations as well as the propensity to acquire certain resistance mutations, even though such differences are sometimes difficult to demonstrate in phenotypic assays. It is mandatory that tools are optimized to assure accurate measurements of drug susceptibility in non-B subtypes and to recognize that each subtype may have a distinct resistance profile and that differences in resistance pathways may also impact on cross-resistance and the choice of regimens to be used in second-line therapy. Although responsiveness to first-line therapy should not theoretically be affected by considerations of viral subtype and drug resistance, well-designed long-term longitudinal studies involving patients infected by viruses of different subtypes should be carried out.

HIV gp120 H375 is unique to HIV-1 subtype CRF01_AE and confers strong resistance to the entry inhibitor BMS-599793, a candidate microbicide drug

BMS-599793 is a small molecule entry inhibitor that binds to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp120, resulting in the inhibition of CD4-dependent entry into cells. Since BMS-599793 is currently considered a candidate microbicide drug, we evaluated its efficacy against a number of primary patient HIV isolates from different subtypes and circulating recombinant forms (CRFs) and showed that activity varied between ∼3 ρM and 7 μM at 50% effective concentrations (EC(50)s). Interestingly, CRF01_AE HIV-1 isolates consistently demonstrated natural resistance against this compound. Genotypic analysis of >1,600 sequences (Los Alamos HIV sequence database) indicated that a single amino acid polymorphism in Env, H375, may account for the observed BMS-599793 resistance in CRF01_AE HIV-1. Results of site-directed mutagenesis experiments confirmed this hypothesis, and in silico drug docking simulations identified a drug resistance mechanism at the molecular level. In addition, CRF01_AE viruses were shown to be resistant to multiple broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. Thus, our results not only provide insight into how Env polymorphisms may contribute to entry inhibitor resistance but also may help to elucidate how HIV can evade some broadly neutralizing antibodies. Furthermore, the high frequency of H375 in CRF01_AE HIV-1, and its apparent nonoccurrence in other subtypes, could serve as a means for rapid identification of CRF01_AE infections.

Drug resistance pattern of HIV type 1 isolates sampled in 2007 from therapy-naive pregnant women in North-Central Nigeria

In Nigeria, the country with the second largest number of HIV-1-infected people globally, antiretroviral therapy rollout is now widespread with an increasing number of individuals and communities benefitting. However, the drug resistance profile of patients initiating or failing on antiretroviral therapy is not well characterized. Here we studied the molecular variability of the protease and reverse transcriptase region of isolates from therapy-naive pregnant women in North-Central Nigeria (one of the geopolitical zones with the highest prevalence of HIV in Nigeria) to identify baseline mutations with potential drug resistance implications. We observed the predominance of CRF02_AG and subtype G in the North-Central Nigerian epidemic and the presence of both primary and secondary drug resistance mutations. Contrary to observation from other geopolitical zones, a decreased frequency of reverse transcriptase mutations/polymorphisms was observed, thus suggesting regional differences in level of transmitted drug resistance that require more study.

Role of HIV Subtype Diversity in the Development of Resistance to Antiviral Drugs

Despite the fact that over 90% of HIV-1 infected people worldwide harbor non-subtype B variants of HIV-1, knowledge of resistance mutations in non-B HIV-1 and their clinical relevance is limited. Due to historical delays in access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) on a worldwide basis, the vast majority of reports on drug resistance deal with subtype B infections in developed countries. However, both enzymatic and virological data support the concept that naturally occurring polymorphisms among different nonB subtypes can affect HIV-1 susceptibility to antiretroviral drugs (ARVs), the magnitude of resistance conferred by major mutations, and the propensity to acquire some resistance mutations. Tools need to be optimized to assure accurate measurements of drug susceptibility of non-B subtypes. Furthermore, there is a need to recognize that each subtype may have a distinct resistance profile and that differences in resistance pathways may also impact on cross-resistance and the selection of second-line regimens. It will be essential to pay attention to newer drug combinations in well designed long-term longitudinal studies involving patients infected by viruses of different subtypes.

Comparative biochemical analysis of recombinant reverse transcriptase enzymes of HIV-1 subtype B and subtype C

Background

HIV-1 subtype C infections account for over half of global HIV infections, yet the vast focus of HIV-1 research has been on subtype B viruses which represent less than 12% of the global pandemic. Since HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) is a major target of antiviral therapy, and since differential drug resistance pathways have been observed among different HIV subtypes, it is important to study and compare the enzymatic activities of HIV-1 RT derived from each of subtypes B and C as well as to determine the susceptibilities of these enzymes to various RT inhibitors in biochemical assays.

Methods

Recombinant subtype B and C HIV-1 RTs in heterodimeric form were purified from Escherichia coli and enzyme activities were compared in cell-free assays. The efficiency of (-) ssDNA synthesis was measured using gel-based assays with HIV-1 PBS RNA template and tRNA₃^Lys as primer. Processivity was assayed under single-cycle conditions using both homopolymeric and heteropolymeric RNA templates. Intrinsic RNase H activity was compared using 5'-end labeled RNA template annealed to 3'-end recessed DNA primer in a time course study in the presence and absence of a heparin trap. A mis-incorporation assay was used to assess the fidelity of the two RT enzymes. Drug susceptibility assays were performed both in cell-free assays using recombinant enzymes and in cell culture phenotyping assays.

Results

The comparative biochemical analyses of recombinant subtype B and subtype C HIV-1 reverse transcriptase indicate that the two enzymes are very similar biochemically in efficiency of tRNA-primed (-) ssDNA synthesis, processivity, fidelity and RNase H activity, and that both enzymes show similar susceptibilities to commonly used NRTIs and NNRTIs. Cell culture phenotyping assays confirmed these results.

Conclusions

Overall enzyme activity and drug susceptibility of HIV-1 subtype C RT are comparable to those of subtype B RT. The use of RT inhibitors (RTIs) against these two HIV-1 enzymes should have comparable effects.

A few specialized issues that should be focused on anti-HIV drug evaluation in vitro

Since the introduction of antiretroviral therapy (ART), the lifespan and quality of life of patients infected with HIV have been significantly improved. But treatment efficacy was compromised eventually by the development of resistance to antiretroviral drugs, and more new anti-HIV drugs with lower toxicity and higher activity were needed. Based on the experience and lessons learned from the treatment in the developed countries, US FDA suggested that more pharmacodynamical researches should be considered ahead of the clinical trials. To facilitate the anti-HIV drug research and development, we reviewed a few specialized issues that should be focused on drug evaluations in vitro, including: 1) Mechanism of action studies, demonstrating the candidate drug's efficacy to specifically inhibit viral replication or a virus-specific function and confirm the drug target. 2) Drug resistance studies, selecting the drug-resistant variants in vitro and determining the activities inhibiting HIV isolates resistant to approved antiretroviral drugs of the same class. 3) Antiviral activity in vitro in the presence of serum proteins, ascertaining whether an investigational product is significantly bound by serum proteins. 4) Combination activity analysis, evaluating in vitro antiviral activity of an investigational product in two-drug combinations with other drugs approved.

Diversity of HIV-1 subtype C strains isolated in Romania

Two unique aspects particularities of the HIV-1 epidemics in Romania are the high prevalence of subtype F1 strains and the large pediatric population infected in the late 1980s and early 1990s. During recent years, more infections with other subtypes have been seen in newly diagnosed patients. After subtype B, subtype C was the most frequent one. This subtype is prevalent in countries from sub-Saharan Africa and India, being responsible for half of the total HIV-1 infections in the world. We have identified 37 patients infected with subtype C, sequenced the reverse transcriptase and protease regions of their pol genes, and applied phylogenetic analyses to the sequences. We have also included 20 subtype F1 strains isolated from both teenagers (children at the time of diagnosis) and adults. The phylogenetic analysis was performed by using the PhyML method, the GTR (general time reversible) model of evolution and gamma distribution of variability of rates between sites, empirically calculated from the data. The epidemiological data indicates that the main route of transmission for the adult subjects was by heterosexual contact and a relatively small number of patients were possibly infected abroad. In three cases, blood transfusion prior to 1989 or surgical procedures at early ages were suspected to be the cause of the HIV infection and three other patients were most probably parenterally infected. The phylogenetic analyses showed that the Romanian C strains are very diverse overall, clustered in several groups characterized by common transmission route (transfusion/surgical procedures) or local geographical relatedness. The HIV-1 epidemics in Romania apparently followed different patterns for subtypes F and C. While subtype F1 seems to have been monoclonally introduced and extensively spread in the 80s, the subtype C strains, although present in the late 80s, failed to spread to the same extent.

Antiretroviral drug susceptibility among drug-naive adults with recent HIV infection in Rakai, Uganda

OBJECTIVE

To analyze antiretroviral drug susceptibility in HIV from recently infected adults in Rakai, Uganda, prior to the availability of antiretroviral drug treatment.

METHODS

Samples obtained at the time of HIV seroconversion (1998-2003) were analyzed using the GeneSeq HIV and PhenoSense HIV assays (Monogram Biosciences, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA).

RESULTS

Test results were obtained for 104 samples (subtypes: 26A, 1C, 66D, 9A/D, 1C/D, 1 intersubtype recombinant). Mutations used for genotypic surveillance of transmitted antiretroviral drug resistance were identified in six samples: three had nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) surveillance mutations (two had M41L, one had K219R), and three had protease inhibitor surveillance mutations (I47V, F53L, N88D); none had nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) surveillance mutations. Other resistance-associated mutations were identified in some samples. However, none of the samples had a sufficient number of mutations to predict reduced antiretroviral drug susceptibility. Ten (9.6%) of the samples had reduced phenotypic susceptibility to at least one drug (one had partial susceptibility to didanosine, one had nevirapine resistance, and eight had resistance or partial susceptibility to at least one protease inhibitor). Fifty-three (51%) of the samples had hypersusceptibility to at least one drug (seven had zidovudine hypersusceptibility, 28 had NNRTI hypersusceptibility, 34 had protease inhibitor hypersusceptibility). Delavirdine hypersusceptibility was more frequent in subtype A than D. In subtype D, efavirenz hypersusceptibility was associated with substitutions at codon 11 in HIV-reverse transcriptase.

CONCLUSION

Phenotyping detected reduced antiretroviral drug susceptibility and hypersusceptibility in HIV from some antiretroviral-naive Ugandan adults that was not predicted by genotyping. Phenotyping may complement genotyping for analysis of antiretroviral drug susceptibility in populations with nonsubtype B HIV infection.

Appreciating HIV type 1 diversity: subtype differences in Env

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) group M is responsible for the current AIDS pandemic and exhibits exceedingly high levels of viral genetic diversity around the world, necessitating categorization of viruses into distinct lineages, or subtypes. These subtypes can differ by around 35% in the envelope (Env) glycoproteins of the virus, which are displayed on the surface of the virion and are targets for both neutralizing antibody and cell-mediated immune responses. This diversity reflects the remarkable ability of the virus to adapt to selective pressures, the bulk of which is applied by the host immune response, and represents a serious obstacle for developing an effective vaccine with broad coverage. Thus, it is important to understand the underlying biological consequences of intersubtype diversity. Recent studies have revealed that some of the HIV-1 subtypes exhibit phenotypic differences stemming from subtle changes in Env structure, particularly within the highly immunogenic V3 domain, which participates directly in viral entry. This review will therefore explore current research that describes subtype differences in Env at the genetic and phenotypic level, focusing in particular on V3, and highlighting recent discoveries about the unique features of subtype C Env, which is the most globally prevalent subtype.

Drug resistance differences among HIV types and subtypes: a growing problem

Although HIV-1 subtype B accounts for only 10% of worldwide HIV infections, almost all knowledge regarding antiretroviral (ARV) drug development and viral resistance is based on this subtype. More recently, an increasing body of evidence suggests that distinct HIV genetic variants possess different biological properties, including susceptibility and response to ARVs. In this review, we will summarize recent in vitro and in vivo studies reporting such differences. In general terms, infections with most HIV variants respond well to ARVs, but minor differences in susceptibility, in the emergence and selection of subtype-specific drug resistance mutations and in the acquisition of similar mutations over the period of ARV exposure have been reported. Such differences impact on drugresistance interpretation algorithms, which are mostly based on inference from sequence information. Despite the differences observed, clinical response to ARV therapy among subjects infected with distinct HIV variants is effective, and the dissemination of ARV access in developing countries where non-B subtypes prevail should not be delayed.

Reassessment of enfuvirtide's role in the management of HIV-1 infection

BACKGROUND

The development of new protease inhibitors, new non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and novel therapeutic drug classes has dramatically changed the approach to managing HIV-1 patients with multidrug resistant virus. This has led many clinicians to reevaluate the clinical utility of enfuvirtide.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize recent literature on enfuvirtide and to reassess enfuvirtide's role in the management of HIV-1 infection.

METHODS

MEDLINE (1990 to February Week 2 2008) and EMBASE (1990 to 2008 week 8) databases were searched using the following terms: 'enfuvirtide', 'Fuzeon', 'T20', 'HIV fusion inhibitors', and 'HIV entry inhibitor'; limits: English language. Reference lists of articles deemed relevant were hand searched for additional publications. Significant abstracts from recent international HIV conferences were also identified.

CONCLUSION

Enfuvirtide can optimize the response to new combinations of HIV-1 drug regimens in multiresistant patients. Its inclusion as an active agent is effective but use is impacted by its high cost, inconvenient route of administration and cosmetic side-effect profile.

Evidence of recombination in intrapatient populations of hepatitis C virus

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major cause of liver disease worldwide and a potential cause of substantial morbidity and mortality in the future. HCV is characterized by a high level of genetic heterogeneity. Although homologous recombination has been demonstrated in many members of the family Flaviviridae, to which HCV belongs, there are only a few studies reporting recombination on natural populations of HCV, suggesting that these events are rare in vivo. Furthermore, these few studies have focused on recombination between different HCV genotypes/subtypes but there are no reports on the extent of intra-genotype or intra-subtype recombination between viral strains infecting the same patient. Given the important implications of recombination for RNA virus evolution, our aim in this study has been to assess the existence and eventually the frequency of intragenic recombination on HCV. For this, we retrospectively have analyzed two regions of the HCV genome (NS5A and E1-E2) in samples from two different groups: (i) patients infected only with HCV (either treated with interferon plus ribavirin or treatment naïve), and (ii) HCV-HIV co-infected patients (with and without treatment against HIV). The complete data set comprised 17712 sequences from 136 serum samples derived from 111 patients. Recombination analyses were performed using 6 different methods implemented in the program RDP3. Recombination events were considered when detected by at least 3 of the 6 methods used and were identified in 10.7% of the amplified samples, distributed throughout all the groups described and the two genomic regions studied. The resulting recombination events were further verified by detailed phylogenetic analyses. The complete experimental procedure was applied to an artificial mixture of relatively closely viral populations and the ensuing analyses failed to reveal artifactual recombination. From these results we conclude that recombination should be considered as a potentially relevant mechanism generating genetic variation in HCV and with important implications for the treatment of this infection.

Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in adult HIV-1 infection: 2008 recommendations of an International AIDS Society-USA panel

Resistance to antiretroviral drugs remains an important limitation to successful human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) therapy. Resistance testing can improve treatment outcomes for infected individuals. The availability of new drugs from various classes, standardization of resistance assays, and the development of viral tropism tests necessitate new guidelines for resistance testing. The International AIDS Society-USA convened a panel of physicians and scientists with expertise in drug-resistant HIV-1, drug management, and patient care to review recently published data and presentations at scientific conferences and to provide updated recommendations. Whenever possible, resistance testing is recommended at the time of HIV infection diagnosis as part of the initial comprehensive patient assessment, as well as in all cases of virologic failure. Tropism testing is recommended whenever the use of chemokine receptor 5 antagonists is contemplated. As the roll out of antiretroviral therapy continues in developing countries, drug resistance monitoring for both subtype B and non-subtype B strains of HIV will become increasingly important.

Polymorphisms in HIV-1 subtype C proteases and the potential impact on protease inhibitors

OBJECTIVES

(i) To review data on the genetic profile of the protease (PR) gene of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-C primary isolates relative to HIV-1-B; (ii) to examine data on the susceptibility of HIV-1-C isolates harbouring polymorphisms to PR inhibitors (PI) and the development of resistance; and (iii) to identify gaps required for an improved understanding of the role of polymorphisms in resistance development of HIV-1-C to PI.

METHOD

Literature review.

RESULTS

Significant differences exist between the baseline nucleotide and amino acid sequences of PR of HIV-1-B and HIV-1-C. Some of the amino acid substitutions seen in HIV-1-B when exposed to PI occur naturally in HIV-1-C isolates. Studies used different methodologies and interpretation systems to evaluate the phenotypic significance of polymorphisms seen in subtype C viruses, with conflicting outcomes. The evolutionary path to the resistance of HIV-1-C to PI may be different from that of HIV-1-B.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection with HIV-1-C is driving the AIDS epidemic in regions of the world with the most urgent needs for the management of the disease. More and more individuals will require PR inhibitors in second-line therapies, as access to antiretrovirals progresses. It is proposed that a standardized protocol be adopted to evaluate the phenotypic significance of the highly polymorphic HIV-1-C PR to PR inhibitors with the aim of better informing the tailoring of treatment regimens for optimal clinical benefit.

Drug resistance-associated genotypic alterations in the pol gene of HIV type 1 isolates in ART-naive individuals in North India

ABSTRACT We genotyped the RT and PI regions of the pol gene of HIV-1 from treatment-naive infected individuals in North India and evaluated their possible physiological relevance and association with drug resistance. Plasma samples from 52 newly diagnosed HIV-1-infected drug-naive individuals were subjected to CD4(+) cell count and plasma viral load. For genotyping, the protease and RT regions of the pol gene were amplified from cDNA reverse transcribed from plasma viral RNA by single or nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Sequences of amplified products were analyzed for mutations using the Stanford DR and REGA database. Two out of 49 amplicons showed mutations at known "major" subtype B drug resistance positions (one each in protease and RT). In the protease region it showed a major drug resistance mutation at M46I as well as "minor" positions F53L and T74P. In the RT gene, one patient showed a mutation at major NNRTI position G190V. Forty-nine percent had mutations in the hinge (M36I, R41K, H69K) and alpha-helix (L89M) regions of the C-virus protease, which has been linked to increased catalytic activity. Our study indicates that a number of major mutations associated with resistance to PIs, NNRTIs, and NRTIs do exist, though at a low frequency, among HIV-1 isolates from treatment-naive individuals in North India. Many minor or accessory mutations related to resistance to PIs and NRTIs are also present as the variants. These results point to the greater biochemical fitness of subtype C protease and faster decrease in drug sensitivity.

Amino acid conservation in the gp41 transmembrane protein and natural polymorphisms associated with enfuvirtide resistance across HIV-1 variants

Information about gp41 variability across distinct HIV-1 subtypes is scarce, and yet such knowledge would be desirable for designing new drugs targeting this viral protein. Conserved gp41 residues in viruses derived from 79 individuals infected with distinct HIV-1 subtypes (29 A, 25 B, 8 C, 3 D, 4 F, 4 G, 2 H, 1 J, 1 U, and 2 CRF06_cpx) and naive for entry inhibitors were examined. Conservation of gp41 was also examined in 908, 56, and 3 HIV-1 group M, O, and N sequences, respectively, available at the Los Alamos HIV Sequence Database. Among the 345 residues in the full gp41 protein, 36% showed up to 90% conservation in all 987 group M sequences, as did 40% of 56 group O sequences and 49% of 3 group N sequences. The HR1 region (residues 29-82) showed a higher proportion of highly conserved residues than did the HR2 region (residues 116-161) in all groups (65 vs. 34% in group M, 57 vs. 46% in group O, and 80 vs. 52% in group N). Some secondary resistance mutations to enfuvirtide were found as natural polymorphisms (A30V and Q56K/R in group M, Q56R and S138A in group O, and S138A in group N). In fact, A30V was a signature change in clade G and CRF06_cpx, whereas Q56K/R was a signature change for clades A and J, as well as for CRF04_cpx, CRF09_cpx, CRF11_cpx, and CRF13_cpx. The relative conservation of amino acids in gp41 across HIV-1 variants indirectly highlights the critical role of this protein for HIV infectivity and makes it feasible to design new entry inhibitors with activity against diverse HIV-1 variants.

Impact of genetic variation of HIV-1 on drug resistance development

HIV is a particularly diverse virus and can be classified into different types, groups and subtypes. Most of the current knowledge is based on HIV-1 subtype B, which is responsible for the first recognized epidemic, mainly spreading in the developed world, while the other subtypes are responsible for the major part of the pandemic, primarily in the developing world. Interest in the so-called ‘non-B’ subtypes is increasing, with treatment programs expanding to include Africa and Asia. According to several recent studies, differences exist between subtypes regarding drug susceptibility, resistance development and therapy response. Currently, conclusions are often based on too few patients or samples, and the use of different resistance assays and analysis methods makes it difficult to compare results. A common mistake is to pool subtypes and recombinants together as ‘non-B subtypes’, although they differ among each other as much as they differ from subtype B. Europe, with large epidemics of subtype B and several non-B subtypes in similar patient populations, is well placed to take the lead in this research field.

Demographic, clinical, and virologic characteristics of African-born persons with HIV/AIDS in a Minnesota hospital

Minnesota is currently home to the tenth largest African population and the second largest East African population in the United States. HIV is increasingly being diagnosed in African-born persons in Minnesota. A retrospective survey was conducted on all African-born patients in our HIV clinic between January 1994 and June 2005. We identified 237 patients who were African-born and HIV-positive. They constituted 12% of patients attending the clinic within the study timeframe. There was no significant difference in the ages of the African-born and non-African patients in the HIV clinic. African-born patients were more likely to be women compared with non-African patients (p < 0.001). Forty-three percent of the African-born patients presented with AIDS as defined by CD4(+) T cell counts less than 200 cells per milliliter compared to 33% of antiretroviral naïve non-African HIV patients in the clinic (p < 0.001). Most patients were infected through heterosexual contact and only 4% were diagnosed as a result of routine testing. Seven known HIV subtypes and four unique recombinant forms were identified. The most common opportunistic infection was pulmonary tuberculosis. African immigrants with HIV appear to: (1) access care at later stages of HIV disease than other patients in our clinic; (2) are often infected with non-B subtypes; (3) do not routinely get tested for HIV. Increased awareness to this growing trend is needed for health care providers and public health officials to tailor educational programs and prevention efforts for African immigrants in the United States.

Resistance mutations in subtype C HIV type 1 isolates from Indian patients of Mumbai receiving NRTIs plus NNRTIs and experiencing a treatment failure: resistance to AR

We present here the first data available on resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in India. In these subtype C isolates, we have observed most of the mutations noted in reverse transcriptase (RT) for subtype B with some additional substitutions (at positions 98, 203, 208, and 221) that will warrant attention in the algorithms used.

Susceptibility of HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinant variants to Enfuvirtide

BACKGROUND

Data on susceptibility of HIV-1 non-B subtypes to Enfuvirtide (ENF) is rather limited.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if ENF could be active in vitro against HIV-1 non-B subtypes and how the gp41 genetic variability across variants may influence ENF susceptibility.

METHODS

Using PHENOSCRIPT Env, a recombinant envelope virus assay, ENF susceptibility was investigated in isolates from 19 drug-naive HIV-1-infected individuals harboring non-B subtypes.

RESULTS

Using phylogenetic analyses of the gp41 gene, distinct HIV-1 subtypes were recognized: A (2), C (5), D (1), F (2), G (1), J (1), CRF02_AG (6) and CRF06 (1). Susceptibility to ENF and IC(50) values in vitro could be obtained in only 13 (68.4%) specimens, most likely due to the high genetic variability in HR1 and HR2 regions in the remaining cases. A wide range of IC(50) values with a median of 0.013 microg/ml was observed (range, 0.005-0.180 microg/ml). Natural polymorphisms, but not classical ENF resistance associated mutations within HR1 (residues 36-45) were identified in most non-B viruses.

CONCLUSION

This study provides information about the baseline susceptibility to ENF in antiretroviral-naive subjects infected with different HIV-1 non-B subtypes. Susceptibility to ENF seems to be preserved despite high genetic variability in HR1 and HR2 regions.

Impact of HIV-1 pol diversity on drug resistance and its clinical implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

HIV knowledge is based on subtype B, common in resource-rich settings, whereas globally non-B subtypes predominate. Inter-subtype pol diversity encompasses multiple genotypic differences among HIV variants, the consequence of which is unknown. This review summarizes publications from the past year relevant to the impact of HIV diversity on drug resistance evolution and its potential clinical implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The benefit of antiretroviral therapy in non-B infected patients is ongoing, though subtype heterogeneity in rates of disease progression is observed. Pol inter-subtype diversity is high, and known subtype B drug resistance mutations occur in non-B subtypes. New mutations and subtype-specific mutation rates are identified, however, unexplained drug susceptibilities are seen, and additional insight is offered on structural pathogenic mechanisms of resistance in non-B subtypes. These differences may affect genotypic interpretation and our ability to apply drug resistance to patient care.

SUMMARY

Current evidence suggests good treatment response and comparable drug resistance evolution in HIV-1 B and non-B infected patients, with increasingly emerging differences. Impact of inter-subtype diversity on drug susceptibility and on evolution of drug resistance should continue to be a major research focus to increase our understanding and ability to improve global patient care.

Serendipitous identification of natural intergenotypic recombinants of hepatitis C in Ireland

Background

Recombination between hepatitis C single stranded RNA viruses is a rare event. Natural viable intragenotypic and intergenotypic recombinants between 1b-1a, 1a-1c and 2k-1b, 2i-6p, respectively, have been reported. Diagnostically recombinants represent an intriguing challenge. Hepatitis C genotype is defined by interrogation of the sequence composition of the 5' untranslated region [5'UTR]. Occasionally, ambiguous specimens require further investigation of the genome, usually by interrogation of the NS5B region. The original purpose of this study was to confirm the existence of a suspected mixed genotype infection of genotypes 2 and 4 by clonal analysis at the NS5B region of the genome in two specimens from two separate individuals. This initial identification of genotype was based on analysis of the 5'UTR of the genome by reverse line probe hybridisation [RLPH].

Results

The original diagnosis of a mixed genotype infection was not confirmed by clonal analysis of the NS5B region of the genome. The phylogenetic analysis indicated that both specimens were natural intergenotypic recombinant forms of HCV. The recombination was between genotypes 2k and 1b for both specimens. The recombination break point was identified as occurring within the NS2 region of the genome.

Conclusion

The viral recombinants identified here resemble the recombinant form originally identified in Russia. The RLPH pattern observed in this study may be a signature indicative of this particular type of intergenotype recombinant of hepatitis C meriting clonal analysis of NS2.