1
|
Thomas A, Haak T, Tombek A, Kulzer B, Ehrmann D, Kordonouri O, Kröger J, Schubert-Olesen O, Kolassa R, Siegmund T, Haller N, Heinemann L. How to Use Continuous Glucose Monitoring Efficiently in Diabetes Management: Opinions and Recommendations by German Experts on the Status and Open Questions. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024:19322968241267768. [PMID: 39129243 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241267768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Today, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is a standard diagnostic option for patients with diabetes, at least for those with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabetes on insulin therapy, according to international guidelines. The switch from spot capillary blood glucose measurement to CGM was driven by the extensive and immediate support and facilitation of diabetes management CGM offers. In patients not using insulin, the benefits of CGM are not so well studied/obvious. In such patients, factors like well-being and biofeedback are driving CGM uptake and outcome. Apps can combine CGM data with data about physical activity and meal consumption for therapy adjustments. Personalized data management and coaching is also more feasible with CGM data. The same holds true for digitalization and telemedicine intervention ("virtual diabetes clinic"). Combining CGM data with Smart Pens ("patient decision support") helps to avoid missing insulin boluses or insulin miscalculation. Continuous glucose monitoring is a major pillar of all automated insulin delivery systems, which helps substantially to avoid acute complications and achieve more time in the glycemic target range. These options were discussed by a group of German experts to identify concrete gaps in the care structure, with a view to the necessary structural adjustments of the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Haak
- Diabetes consulting, Mergentheim Diabetes Center, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Astrid Tombek
- Diabetes consulting, Mergentheim Diabetes Center, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Bernhard Kulzer
- Diabetes consulting, Mergentheim Diabetes Center, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
- FIDAM, Forschungsinstitut Diabetes-Akademie Mergentheim (Diabetes Academy Mergentheim Research Institute), Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Dominic Ehrmann
- FIDAM, Forschungsinstitut Diabetes-Akademie Mergentheim (Diabetes Academy Mergentheim Research Institute), Bad Mergentheim, Germany
| | - Olga Kordonouri
- AUF DER BULT Hospital, Diabetes Center for Children and Adolescents, Hannover, Germany
| | - Jens Kröger
- Diabetes, Hamburg City Diabetes Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Ralf Kolassa
- Diabetes, Diabetes Focus Practice Bergheim/Erft, Bergheim/Erft, Germany
| | | | - Nicola Haller
- Diabetes, Diabetes & Metabolic Center Starnberg, Starnberg, Germany
| | - Lutz Heinemann
- Science Consulting in Diabetes GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hirsch BR. Transforming diabetes care with continuous glucose monitoring: Rationale for expanded eligibility criteria. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2024; 36:385-390. [PMID: 38669198 DOI: 10.1097/jxx.0000000000000993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Randomized trials and large retrospective database studies have shown that individuals treated with noninsulin therapies experience the same glycemic benefits from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use as those treated with more intensive treatment regimens. However, many policy makers and payers are reluctant to provide CGM coverage for these patients. Although the recent American Diabetes Association guidelines have taken an important first step in recommending that CGM should be offered to all adults treated with basal insulin who are capable of using it, clinicians should consider the acute and long-term consequences of persistent hyperglycemia in all of their patients with diabetes. This article describes how the use of the FreeStyle Libre 2 CGM System (Abbott Diabetes Care, Alameda, CA) improved glycemic outcomes and facilitates personalized diabetes care in two type 2 diabetes patients treated with noninsulin therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara R Hirsch
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine, Hofstra/Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ajjan RA, Battelino T, Cos X, Del Prato S, Philips JC, Meyer L, Seufert J, Seidu S. Continuous glucose monitoring for the routine care of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2024; 20:426-440. [PMID: 38589493 DOI: 10.1038/s41574-024-00973-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
Although continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices are now considered the standard of care for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus, the uptake among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been slower and is focused on those receiving intensive insulin therapy. However, increasing evidence now supports the inclusion of CGM in the routine care of people with T2DM who are on basal insulin-only regimens or are managed with other medications. Expanding CGM to these groups could minimize hypoglycaemia while allowing efficient adaptation and escalation of therapies. Increasing evidence from randomized controlled trials and observational studies indicates that CGM is of clinical value in people with T2DM on non-intensive treatment regimens. If further studies confirm this finding, CGM could soon become a part of routine care for T2DM. In this Perspective we explore the potential benefits of widening the application of CGM in T2DM, along with the challenges that must be overcome for the evidence-based benefits of this technology to be delivered for all people with T2DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramzi A Ajjan
- The LIGHT Laboratories, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Tadej Battelino
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Xavier Cos
- DAP Cat Research Group, Foundation University Institute for Primary Health Care Research Jordi Gol i Gorina, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefano Del Prato
- Section of Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Laurent Meyer
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jochen Seufert
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Medicine II, Medical Centre, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Samuel Seidu
- Leicester Real World Evidence Unit, Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lazar D, Tao M, Matievich W, Kastanos K, Dunn TC. Accuracy and Functionality of Select Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems Are Not Impacted by Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024:19322968241260038. [PMID: 38907649 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241260038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing numbers of individuals with diabetes are adopting use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in their daily self-management. Many of these individuals have advanced heart disease. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) devices can effectively reduce arrhythmic death and all-cause mortality in individuals with advanced heart disease. However, the potential impact of ICD devices on CGM system accuracy and functionality has not been well studied. METHODS This evaluation assessed whether FreeStyle Libre (FL) CGM systems can coexist and function within the same patient in the presence of wireless interference devices, including current ICD devices. Interferer sources included Wi-Fi devices, Bluetooth devices, cellular mobile devices, implantable medical devices, Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE) devices, BLE accessory devices and BLE mobile devices, and ICD-programmer interferers. Five testing methodologies were used to evaluate the accuracy and functionality of the CGM systems when exposed to ICD functions: high-energy emergency shocking, pacing modes, anti-tachycardia pacing mode (ATP), and DC Fibber mode. RESULTS All acceptance criteria and testing requirements were met for the CGM and ICD system for wireless coexistence evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrated that coexisting ICD devices and FL CGM systems provide safe and effective wireless communications with functional and accurate transfer of data during scenarios expected in clinical use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dylan Lazar
- Cardiac Rhythm Management, Abbott, Sylmar, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wright EE, Roberts GJ, Chuang JS, Nabutovsky Y, Virdi N, Miller E. Initiating GLP-1 Therapy in Combination with FreeStyle Libre Provides Greater Benefit Compared with GLP-1 Therapy Alone. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024. [PMID: 38669474 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2024.0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Background and Aim: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) therapy provides glycemic benefits to individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the effects of GLP-1 RA therapy in combination with FreeStyle Libre systems (FSL) are unknown. This study aimed to compare changes in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) between people acquiring GLP-1 with FSL (GLP-1+FSL) versus GLP-1 without FSL (GLP-1). Methods: This real-world study used Optum's de-identified Market Clarity Data, a linked electronic health records (EHR)-claims database, and included adults with T2D and HbA1c ≥8% who acquired their first GLP-1 RA medication between 2018 and 2022. GLP-1+FSL subjects acquired their first FSL within ±30 days of their first GLP-1 acquisition. Cohorts were matched 1:5 on baseline insulin therapy, age, sex, baseline HbA1c, and GLP-1 type. Paired changes in HbA1c were compared between unmatched and matched groups at 6 months. Results: The study included 24,724 adults in the unmatched cohort (GLP-1+FSL, n = 478; GLP-1, n = 24,246). The matched cohort included 478 GLP-1+FSL users and 2,390 GLP-1 users: mean age 53.5 ± 11.8 and 53.5 ± 11.3 years, HbA1c 10.25 ± 1.68% and 10.22 ± 1.69%, respectively. HbA1c reduction was greater in the GLP-1+FSL group compared with the GLP-1 group in the unmatched cohort (-2.43% vs. -1.73%, difference 0.70%, P < 0.001, respectively) and in the matched cohort (-2.43% vs. -2.06%, difference 0.37%, P < 0.001). GLP-1+FSL vs. GLP-1 treatment was associated with greater HbA1c reduction in the intensive insulin (-2.32% vs. -1.50%), nonintensive insulin (-2.50% vs. -1.74%), and noninsulin group (-2.46% vs. -1.78%), as well as in patients using semaglutide (-2.73% vs. -1.92%) and dulaglutide (-2.45% vs. -1.71%) GLP-1 RA, all P < 0.001. Conclusions: Adults with suboptimally controlled T2D, initiating GLP-1 RA with FreeStyle Libre, had greater improvement in HbA1c compared with those treated with GLP-1 RA only. These results suggest an additional glycemic benefit of FSL when used with a GLP-1 RA in T2D treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Eden Miller
- Diabetes and Obesity Care LLC, Bend, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clark TL, Polonsky WH, Soriano EC. The Potential Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use on Diabetes-Related Attitudes and Behaviors in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Investigation of the Patient Experience. Diabetes Technol Ther 2024. [PMID: 38526557 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Background: Despite the known glycemic benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the attitudinal and behavioral changes underlying these glycemic improvements remain understudied. This study aimed to qualitatively explore these changes among a sample of adults with T2D. Methods: In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with adults with T2D who had been using CGM for 3-6 months as part of a larger community project in Ohio. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes across participants' experiences. Results: A total of 34 participants provided insights into their experiences with CGM. Six primary themes emerged: (1) Making the Invisible Visible, highlighting the newfound awareness of T2D in daily life. (2) Effective Decision-Making, emphasizing the use of real-time glucose data for immediate and long-term choices. (3) Enhanced Self-Efficacy, describing a renewed sense of control and motivation. (4) Diabetes-Related Diet Modifications. (5) Changes in Physical Activity. (6) Changes in Medication Taking. Conclusions: Participants reported a far-reaching impact of CGM on their daily lives, with many stating that CGM fostered a greater understanding of diabetes and prompted positive behavior changes. The observed attitudinal and behavioral shifts likely contributed synergistically to the significant glycemic benefits observed over the study period. This study highlights the technology's potential to bring about meaningful attitudinal and behavioral changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor L Clark
- San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - William H Polonsky
- Behavioral Diabetes Institute, San Diego, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Emily C Soriano
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, Scripps Health, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hannah KL, Nemlekar PM, Johnson ML, Cherñavvsky DR, Norman GJ. Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Reduced Diabetes-Related Hospitalizations in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and CKD. KIDNEY360 2024; 5:515-521. [PMID: 38356161 PMCID: PMC11093542 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000000000000396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
Key Points Patients with diabetes and CKD have a heightened risk of glycemic variability, which can lead to severe hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic events, potentially resulting in hospitalization. This study describes the results of a retrospective claims analysis of people with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes and stage 3–5 CKD who initiated continuous glucose monitoring. Continuous glucose monitoring could help patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD control their glucose and avoid potentially dangerous glycemic events. Background There is a heightened risk of glycemic variability in patients with diabetes and CKD. This glycemic variability could lead to hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic crises. We hypothesized that initiation of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which provides a glucose measurement every 1–5 minutes, could reduce the incidence of hospitalizations for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and CKD. Methods A retrospective analysis of US administrative claims data from the Optum Clinformatics database was conducted. People with T2D, using insulin, not receiving dialysis, and living with stage 3–5 CKD who initiated CGM between January 1, 2016, and March 31, 2022, were identified. National Drug Codes and Healthcare Common Coding Procedure System codes were used to identify CGM device use, and International Classification of Diseases 10th revision codes were used to identify CKD diagnosis and categorize health care encounters. Rates of diabetes-related hospitalizations were obtained, and multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed predictors of hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic encounters. Results A total of 8,959 insulin-using patients with T2D and CKD were identified. Most were White (72.3%), had Medicare insurance coverage (82.2%), were using intensive insulin (91.3%), and had stage 3 CKD (86.0%). After CGM initiation, rates of hospitalizations for hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia decreased by 18.2% and 17.0%, respectively (P < 0.0001 for both). The proportion hospitalized with at least one hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic event also significantly decreased after CGM initiation. Significant predictors of both hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic encounters included a previous encounter of that type, age 30–59 years and depression (for hypoglycemia), and age 30–49 years and neuropathy (for hyperglycemia). Use of CGM or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists was significantly protective against hypoglycemic encounters. Conclusions Initiation of CGM was associated with significant reductions in diabetes-related hospitalizations among insulin-using individuals with T2D and moderate-to-severe CKD. CGM could help patients with T2D and CKD control their glucose and avoid potentially dangerous glycemic events.
Collapse
|
8
|
Ibrahim M, Ba-Essa EM, Baker J, Cahn A, Ceriello A, Cosentino F, Davies MJ, Eckel RH, Van Gaal L, Gaede P, Handelsman Y, Klein S, Leslie RD, Pozzilli P, Del Prato S, Prattichizzo F, Schnell O, Seferovic PM, Standl E, Thomas A, Tuomilehto J, Valensi P, Umpierrez GE. Cardio-renal-metabolic disease in primary care setting. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2024; 40:e3755. [PMID: 38115715 PMCID: PMC11320716 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
In the primary care setting providers have more tools available than ever before to impact positively obesity, diabetes, and their complications, such as renal and cardiac diseases. It is important to recognise what is available for treatment taking into account diabetes heterogeneity. For those who develop type 2 diabetes (T2DM), effective treatments are available that for the first time have shown a benefit in reducing mortality and macrovascular complications, in addition to the well-established benefits of glucose control in reducing microvascular complications. Some of the newer medications for treating hyperglycaemia have also a positive impact in reducing heart failure (HF). Technological advances have also contributed to improving the quality of care in patients with diabetes. The use of technology, such as continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGM), has improved significantly glucose and glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values, while limiting the frequency of hypoglycaemia. Other technological support derives from the use of predictive algorithms that need to be refined to help predict those subjects who are at great risk of developing the disease and/or its complications, or who may require care by other specialists. In this review we also provide recommendations for the optimal use of the new medications; sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and Glucagon-like peptide-receptor agonists 1 (GLP1RA) in the primary care setting considering the relevance of these drugs for the management of T2DM also in its early stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Ibrahim
- EDC, Centre for Diabetes Education, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Jason Baker
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Avivit Cahn
- The Diabetes Unit & Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel
| | | | - Francesco Cosentino
- Unit of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Melanie J Davies
- Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK
| | - Robert H Eckel
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus and University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Luc Van Gaal
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Metabolism, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Peter Gaede
- Department of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark
| | | | - Samuel Klein
- Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Richard David Leslie
- Blizard Institute, Centre of Immunobiology, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
| | - Paolo Pozzilli
- Blizard Institute, Centre of Immunobiology, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
- Campus Bio-Medico University, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Del Prato
- University of Pisa and Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Oliver Schnell
- Forschergruppe Diabetes eV at the Helmholtz Centre, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Petar M Seferovic
- Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, University of Belgrade Faculty of Medicine and Belgrade University Medical Center, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Eberhard Standl
- Forschergruppe Diabetes eV at the Helmholtz Centre, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany
| | | | - Jaakko Tuomilehto
- Public Health Promotion Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Diabetes Research Unit, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Paul Valensi
- Polyclinique d'Aubervilliers, Aubervilliers and Paris Nord University, Bobigny, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Welsh JB, Psavko S, Zhang X, Gao P, Balo AK. Comparisons of Fifth-, Sixth-, and Seventh-Generation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:143-147. [PMID: 35695305 PMCID: PMC10899839 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221099879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Between-system differences for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices have important clinical consequences. PURPOSE Here we review attributes of Dexcom's fifth-, sixth-, and seventh-generation (G5, G6, and G7) CGM systems. METHODS Accuracy metrics were derived from preapproval trials of the three systems and compared after propensity score adjustments were used to balance baseline demographic characteristics. Metrics included mean absolute relative differences (MARD) between CGM and YSI values and the proportion of CGM values within 20% or 20 mg/dL of the YSI values ("%20/20"). Ease-of-use was evaluated by formal task analysis. CONCLUSIONS Adjusted MARD and %20/20 agreement rates were 9.0%/93.1% (abdomen-placed G5), 9.9%/92.3% (abdomen-placed G6), 9.1%/93.2% (abdomen-placed G7), and 8.2%/95.3% (arm-placed G7). Task analysis favored G7 over earlier systems. Favorable clinical outcomes such as hemoglobin A1c reduction and hypoglycemia avoidance seen with G5 and G6 are anticipated with G7 use.
Collapse
|
10
|
ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Bannuru RR, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Ekhlaspour L, Hilliard ME, Johnson EL, Khunti K, Lingvay I, Matfin G, McCoy RG, Perry ML, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:S126-S144. [PMID: 38078575 PMCID: PMC10725813 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-s007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
11
|
Aleppo G, Hirsch IB, Parkin CG, McGill J, Galindo R, Kruger DF, Levy CJ, Forlenza GP, Umpierrez GE, Grunberger G, Bergenstal RM. Coverage for Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Treated with Nonintensive Therapies: An Evidence-Based Approach to Policymaking. Diabetes Technol Ther 2023; 25:741-751. [PMID: 37471068 PMCID: PMC10611973 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2023.0268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
Numerous studies have demonstrated the clinical benefits of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) who are treated with intensive insulin regimens. Based on this evidence, CGM is now a standard of care for individuals within these diabetes populations and widely covered by commercial and public insurers. Moreover, recent clinical guidelines from the American Diabetes Association and American Association of Clinical Endocrinology now endorse CGM use in individuals treated with nonintensive insulin regimens. However, despite increasing evidence supporting CGM use for individuals treated with less-intensive insulin therapy or noninsulin medications, insurance coverage is limited or nonexistent. This narrative review reports key findings from recent randomized, observational, and retrospective studies investigating use of CGM in T2D individuals treated with basal insulin only and/or noninsulin therapies and presents an evidence-based rationale for expanding access to CGM within this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grazia Aleppo
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Molecular Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Janet McGill
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Lipid Research, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Rodolfo Galindo
- Lennar Medical Center, UMiami Health System, Jackson Memorial Health System, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Davida F. Kruger
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Bone & Mineral, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Carol J. Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Barbara Davis Center, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Guillermo E. Umpierrez
- Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism Emory University School of Medicine, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Richard M. Bergenstal
- International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet, HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shields S, Norman GJ, Thomas R, Ciemins EL. HbA1c Improvements After Initiation of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Primary Care Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1423-1424. [PMID: 37165659 PMCID: PMC10563531 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231171176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Shields
- American Medical Group Association (AMGA), Alexandria, VA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Klupa T, Czupryniak L, Dzida G, Fichna P, Jarosz-Chobot P, Gumprecht J, Mysliwiec M, Szadkowska A, Bomba-Opon D, Czajkowski K, Malecki MT, Zozulinska-Ziolkiewicz DA. Expanding the Role of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Modern Diabetes Care Beyond Type 1 Disease. Diabetes Ther 2023:10.1007/s13300-023-01431-3. [PMID: 37322319 PMCID: PMC10299981 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-023-01431-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Application of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has moved diabetes care from a reactive to a proactive process, in which a person with diabetes can prevent episodes of hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, rather than taking action only once low and high glucose are detected. Consequently, CGM devices are now seen as the standard of care for people with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Evidence now supports the use of CGM in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on any treatment regimen, not just for those on insulin therapy. Expanding the application of CGM to include all people with T1DM or T2DM can support effective intensification of therapies to reduce glucose exposure and lower the risk of complications and hospital admissions, which are associated with high healthcare costs. All of this can be achieved while minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia and improving quality of life for people with diabetes. Wider application of CGM can also bring considerable benefits for women with diabetes during pregnancy and their children, as well as providing support for acute care of hospital inpatients who experience the adverse effects of hyperglycemia following admission and surgical procedures, as a consequence of treatment-related insulin resistance or reduced insulin secretion. By tailoring the application of CGM for daily or intermittent use, depending on the patient profile and their needs, one can ensure the cost-effectiveness of CGM in each setting. In this article we discuss the evidence-based benefits of expanding the use of CGM technology to include all people with diabetes, along with a diverse population of people with non-diabetic glycemic dysregulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Klupa
- Department of Metabolic Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
| | - Leszek Czupryniak
- Department of Diabetology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Dzida
- Department of Internal Diseases, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Piotr Fichna
- Department of Pediatric Diabetes and Obesity, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | | | - Janusz Gumprecht
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Malgorzata Mysliwiec
- Department of Pediatrics, Diabetology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Szadkowska
- Department of Pediatrics, Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nephrology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Dorota Bomba-Opon
- 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Czajkowski
- 2nd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Maciej T Malecki
- Department of Metabolic Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reddy S, Wu CC, José A, Hsieh JL, Rautela SD. Personalized Virtual Care Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Less Intensive Therapies. Clin Diabetes 2023; 41:cd220128. [PMID: 36920750 PMCID: PMC10338274 DOI: 10.2337/cd22-0128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Aimée José
- Carbon Health Virtual Diabetes Care, Oakland CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chao C, Andrade SB, Bergford S, Calhoun P, Welsh JB, Walker TC. Assessing non-adjunctive CGM safety at home and in new markets (ANSHIN). Endocrinol Diabetes Metab 2023; 6:e414. [PMID: 36864014 PMCID: PMC10164430 DOI: 10.1002/edm2.414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can guide treatment for people with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D). The ANSHIN study assessed the impact of non-adjunctive CGM use in adults with diabetes using intensive insulin therapy (IIT). MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-arm, prospective, interventional study enrolled adults with T1D or T2D who had not used CGM in the prior 6 months. Participants wore blinded CGMs (Dexcom G6) during a 20-day run-in phase, with treatment based on fingerstick glucose values, followed by a 16-week intervention phase and then a randomized 12-week extension phase with treatment based on CGM values. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were CGM metrics. Safety endpoints were the number of severe hypoglycaemic (SH) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) events. RESULTS Of the 77 adults enrolled, 63 completed the study. Those enrolled had mean (SD) baseline HbA1c of 9.8% (1.9%), 36% had T1D, and 44% were ≥65 years old. Mean HbA1c decreased by 1.3, 1.0 and 1.0 percentage points for participants with T1D, T2D or age ≥65, respectively (p < .001 for each). CGM-based metrics including time in range also improved significantly. SH events decreased from the run-in period (67.3 per 100 person-years) to the intervention period (17.0 per 100 person-years). Three DKA events unrelated to CGM use occurred during the total intervention period. CONCLUSIONS Non-adjunctive use of the Dexcom G6 CGM system improved glycaemic control and was safe for adults using IIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Peter Calhoun
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chen L, Liu X, Lin Q, Dai H, Zhao Y, Shi Z, Wu L. Status of continuous glucose monitoring use and management in tertiary hospitals of China: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066801. [PMID: 36737090 PMCID: PMC9900061 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to reveal the use and management status of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in tertiary hospitals in China and to determine the potential factors affecting the application of CGM, based on which more effective solutions would be produced and implemented. DESIGN An online, cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to December 2021. SETTING Eighty-three tertiary hospitals in China were involved. PARTICIPANTS Eighty-three head nurses and 281 clinical nurses were obtained. OUTCOME Current condition of CGM use and management, the factors that hinder the use and management of CGM, scores of current CGM use and management, as well as their influencing factors, were collected. RESULTS Among the 83 hospitals surveyed, 57 (68.7%) hospitals used CGM for no more than 10 patients per month. Seventy-three (88.0%) hospitals had developed CGM standard operating procedures, but only 29 (34.9%) hospitals devised emergency plans to deal with adverse effects related to CGM. Comparably, maternal and children's hospitals were more likely to have a dedicated person to assign install CGM than general hospitals (52.2% vs 26.7%). As for the potential causes that hinder the use and management of CGM, head nurses' and nurses' perceptions differed. Head nurses perceived patients' limited knowledge about CGM (60.2%), the high costs of CGM and inaccessibility to medical insurance (59.0%), and imperfect CGM management systems (44.6%) as the top three factors. Different from head nurses, CGM operation nurses considered the age of CGM operators, the type of hospital nurses worked in, the number of patients using CGM per month and the number of CGM training sessions as potential factors (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS The study provides a broad view of the development status of CGM in China. Generally speaking, the use and management of CGM in China are not yet satisfactory, and more efforts are wanted for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liping Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing Medical University Affiliated Children's Hospital, Chongqing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Paediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiaoqin Liu
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Paediatrics, Chongqing, China
- Department of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University Affiliated Children's Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Qin Lin
- Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing Medical University Affiliated Children's Hospital, Chongqing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Paediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Hongmei Dai
- Department of Endocrinology, Chongqing Medical University Affiliated Children's Hospital, Chongqing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Paediatrics, Chongqing, China
| | - Yong Zhao
- School of Public Health and Management, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, Chongqing, China
| | - Zumin Shi
- Human Nutrition Department, Qatar University, Doha, Ad Dawhah, Qatar
| | - Liping Wu
- National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Paediatrics, Chongqing, China
- Department of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University Affiliated Children's Hospital, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eysenbach G, Sharma A, Green CR, Norman GJ, Thomas R, Leone K. Glycemic Outcomes and Feature Set Engagement Among Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring Users With Type 1 or Non-Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data. JMIR Diabetes 2023; 8:e43991. [PMID: 36602920 PMCID: PMC9947825 DOI: 10.2196/43991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) are well established for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the usage and effectiveness of RT-CGM in the context of non-insulin-treated T2D has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess glycemic metrics and rates of RT-CGM feature utilization in users with T1D and non-insulin-treated T2D. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data from 33,685 US-based users of an RT-CGM system (Dexcom G6; Dexcom, Inc) who self-identified as having either T1D (n=26,706) or T2D and not using insulin (n=6979). Data included glucose concentrations, alarm settings, feature usage, and event logs. RESULTS The T1D cohort had lower proportions of glucose values in the 70 mg/dl to 180 mg/dl range than the T2D cohort (52.1% vs 70.8%, respectively), with more values indicating hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia and higher glycemic variability. Discretionary alarms were enabled by a large majority in both cohorts. The data sharing feature was used by 38.7% (10,327/26,706) of those with T1D and 10.4% (727/6979) of those with T2D, and the mean number of followers was higher in the T1D cohort. Large proportions of patients with T1D or T2D enabled and customized their glucose alerts. Retrospective analysis features were used by the majority in both cohorts (T1D: 15,783/26,706, 59.1%; T2D: 3751/6979, 53.8%). CONCLUSIONS Similar to patients with T1D, patients with non-insulin-treated T2D used RT-CGM system features, suggesting beneficial, routine engagement with data by patients and others involved in their care. Motivated patients with diabetes could benefit from RT-CGM coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Courtney R Green
- Department of Medical Affairs, Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Gregory J Norman
- Department of Global Access, Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Roy Thomas
- Department of Medical Affairs, Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Keri Leone
- Department of Medical Affairs, Dexcom, Inc, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Riveline JP, Roussel R, Vicaut E, de Pouvourville G, Detournay B, Emery C, Levrat-Guillen F, Guerci B. Reduced Rate of Acute Diabetes Events with Flash Glucose Monitoring Is Sustained for 2 Years After Initiation: Extended Outcomes from the RELIEF Study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:611-618. [PMID: 35604792 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: The RELIEF study has previously shown a fall in the rate of acute diabetes events (ADEs) in people living with type 1 diabetes (PwDT1) or people living with type 2 diabetes (PwDT2) in the 12 months after initiation of flash glucose monitoring (FLASH) in France. The 2-year follow-up has provided new insights on the frequency of ADEs, including severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), during use of FLASH. Methods: The RELIEF study included 31,446 PwDT1 and 41,027 PwDT2 with a first delivery of FreeStyle Libre (FSL) between August 1 and December 31, 2017. Hospitalizations for DKA, severe hypoglycemia, diabetes-related coma, and hyperglycemia were recorded for the 12 months before and 24 months after FSL initiation. Persistence of the FSL system use was estimated through a Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Change in usual blood glucose monitoring was estimated through acquisition of blood glucose test strips. Results: In the 2 years after FSL initiation, hospitalizations for ADEs were reduced by 49% and by 48% in PwDT1 or PwDT2, respectively, driven by reductions in DKA. After 2 years, 88% of patients persisted with the system and estimated mean consumption of blood glucose test strips had fallen after 2 years by -82% and by -84% in type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus, respectively. Conclusion: Use of FSL consistently reduces the rates of hospitalization for ADEs, mainly DKA, 2 years after initiation, confirming this is not a transitory effect. Use of FSL also results in a clear and progressive drop in use of blood glucose test strips over the 2-year period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pierre Riveline
- Institut Necker Enfants Malades (INEM), INSERM U1151, CNRS UMR 8253, Université de Paris Cité, IMMEDIAB Laboratory, Paris, France
- Service of Diabetology, Endocrinology and Nutrition, Lariboisière Hospital, Féderation de Diabétologie, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Ronan Roussel
- Institut Necker Enfants Malades (INEM), INSERM U1151, CNRS UMR 8253, Université de Paris Cité, IMMEDIAB Laboratory, Paris, France
- Department of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France
- Department of Diabetology, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Eric Vicaut
- Clinical Research Unit, Fernand Vidal Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Bruno Guerci
- Department of Endocrinology, Diabetology, and Nutrition, Brabois Adult Hospital, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dabbagh Z, McKee MD, Pirraglia PA, Clements KM, Liu F, Amante DJ, Shukla P, Gerber BS. The Expanding Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:510-515. [PMID: 35231190 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zakery Dabbagh
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - M Diane McKee
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul A Pirraglia
- Division of General Medicine and Community Health, UMass Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karen M Clements
- Commonwealth Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Feifan Liu
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel J Amante
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Prateek Shukla
- Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ben S Gerber
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nguyen Q, Iyyavoo AA, Parkin CG. Use of Retrospective Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Is Underrated and Underused. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 17:843-849. [PMID: 35043701 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211070837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Access to real-time glucose data in real time allows users to make informed decisions about their insulin dosages, appropriate carbohydrate intake, exercise, and other health behaviors. Programmable alarms and alerts warn users about current and/or impending acute glycemic events. However, the value and utility of retrospective data analysis for clinical decision-making have gone mostly unrecognized. This article presents a series of patient case examples that illustrate how our use of retrospective data enables us to identify and effectively address patterns of problematic glycemia.
Collapse
|