A Novel Flexible Ureteroscope with Omnidirectional Bending Tip Using Joystick-Type Control Unit (URF-Y0016): Initial Validation Study in Bench Models

Flexible ureteroscope capable of acute-angled and balanced omnidirectional bending based on soft and flexible porous tube and crossed control wiring

Flexible ureteroscopes (fURSs) have performance limitations in accessing acute-angled calyxes and omnidirectional bending. We propose and develop a fURS based on a soft and flexible porous tube and crossed control wiring to overcome these limitations. The fURS prototype comprises a flexible solid polyamide-12 tube and a stretch-retractable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene distal tube with 40% porosity connected by a unique cylindrical wire-routing hook (CWH). The series tube includes four crossed but not contacting loop-formed control wires to provide balanced omnidirectional bending and optimized distal tube bending performance. Bending performance was assessed compared with a conventional fURS, and feasibility studies were performed using a renal phantom. The prototype achieved a 275° omnidirectional maximum bend angle by combining up-down and right-left directions. The bent shape was more compact than the conventional fURS. Thus, the prototype achieved approximately a 1.6-fold larger maximal active bending angle within the restricted environment and a 5.5-fold larger passive bending angle. The crossed control wiring design reduced CWH offset distance by about 75% compared with conventional straight wire routing. The prototype exhibited considerably improved steering performance, exemplified by its ability to access an acutely angled calyx. Our design could improve treatment outcomes and shorten operation times associated with calyceal stone removal.

How to evaluate a flexible ureterorenoscope? Systematic mapping of existing evaluation methods

Objectives

The objective of this study was to identify, map and review scope‐related and user‐related parameters used to evaluate the quality of flexible ureterorenoscopes. Thereby identifying key items and variability in grading systems.

Methods

A literature search of four databases (MEDLINE [Ovid], EMBASE [Ovid], Web of Science, Google scholar and the Cochrane Library) was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines encompassing articles published up to August 2020. A total of 2386 articles were screened.

Results

A total of 48 articles were included in this systematic scoping review. All studies had a prospective design. Five key items in the assessment of flexible ureterorenoscopy were distinguished: ‘Manoeuvrability’ (87.5%), ‘Optics’ (64.6%), ‘Irrigation’ (56.3%), ‘Handling’ (39.6%) and ‘Durability’ (35.4%). After regrouping, every key item could be divided into specific subcategories. However, the quality assessment showed a wide variation in denomination, method of measurement, circumstances of measurement, tools used during measurements, number of measurements performed, number of observers, and units of outcomes.

Conclusion

The research field regarding quality assessment of ureterorenoscopes is heterogeneous. In this systematic scoping review we identified five key parameters: Manoeuvrability, Optics, Irrigation, Handling and Durability, used to grade flexible ureterorenoscopes. However, within these categories we found a wide variety in terms of method of measurements. A standardised, uniform grading tool is required to assess and compare the quality of flexible ureterorenoscopes in the future.

Retrograde intrarenal surgery: Past, present, and future

With the recent technological advancements in endourology, retrograde intrarenal surgery has become a more popular procedure for treatment of urolithiasis. Furthermore, since the introduction of new laser systems and advanced flexible ureteroscopy with miniaturized ureteroscopes, the treatment indications for retrograde intrarenal surgery have expanded to include not only larger renal stones of >2 cm but also upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, ureteral stricture, and idiopathic renal hematuria. Clinicians must keep up with these trends and make good use of these technologies in the rapidly changing field of endourology. Simultaneously, we must consider the risk of various complications including thermal injury due to laser use, ureteral injury caused by the ureteral access sheath, and radiation exposure during retrograde intrarenal surgery with fluoroscopic guidance. This review focuses on the past, present, and future of retrograde intrarenal surgery and provides many topics and clinical options for urologists to consider.