1
|
Keskin ET, Bozkurt M, Şahin M, Özdemir H, Şevik Ç, Canat HL. Effect of preoperative single-dose methylprednisolone administration on early postoperative pain following retrograde intrarenal surgery. Int Urol Nephrol 2024; 56:1253-1258. [PMID: 37999826 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03875-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of preoperative single-dose methylprednisolone use on postoperative early pain after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). METHODS Patients who had 10-20 mm solitary kidney stones and underwent RIRS procedures were included in this prospective cohort study between February 2022 and May 2023. Patients who were administered methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg preoperatively were included in group 1 (n: 31), and the other first 90 patients who met the inclusion criteria and did not receive methylprednisolone before surgery were included in group 2 (n: 90). Demographic data, features of stone, postoperative pain at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hour, the need for analgesics, changes in serum glucose levels, and the prevalence of postoperative fever were compared. RESULTS Age, sex, stone laterality, localization, size, Hounsfield Unit, modified Satava scores, stone-free status, duration of the RIRS procedure, and duration of the ureteral access sheath were found to be similar between groups. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at postoperative 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h were found to be statistically significantly lower in group 1 (p = .001, p = .001, p = .001, p = .001, and p = .001, respectively). Similarly, postoperative analgesic requirements were found to be significantly lower in group 1 (p = .048) with a similar postoperative fever rate and changes in serum glucose levels between groups. CONCLUSION Giving a single dose of methylprednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg preoperatively for the RIRS procedure is safe and effective at preventing early pain and the need for analgesics after the RIRS procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emin Taha Keskin
- Department of Urology, Başaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Muammer Bozkurt
- Department of Urology, Başaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Şahin
- Department of Urology, Başaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Harun Özdemir
- Department of Urology, Başaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Çağrı Şevik
- Department of Urology, Başaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Halil Lutfi Canat
- Department of Urology, Başaksehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corneli A, Dombeck C, McKenna K, Harper JD, Antonelli JA, Desai AC, Lai HH, Tasian GE, Ziemba J, McCune R, Piskator B, Al-Khalidi HR, Maalouf NM, Reese PP, Wessells H, Kirkali Z, Scales CD. The Patient Voice: Stent Experiences After Ureteroscopy-Insights from In-Depth Interviews with Participants in the USDRN STENTS Nested Qualitative Cohort Study. J Endourol 2023; 37:642-653. [PMID: 37021358 PMCID: PMC10280172 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Ureteral stents are commonly used after ureteroscopy and cause significant discomfort, yet qualitative perspectives on patients' stent experiences remain unknown. We describe psychological, functional, and interpersonal effects of post-ureteroscopy stents and whether additional patient-reported assessments may be needed. Materials and Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive study design, we conducted in-depth interviews with a nested cohort of participants in the STudy to Enhance uNderstanding of sTent-associated Symptoms (STENTS). Participants shared their symptoms with a post-ureteroscopy stent and described symptom bother and impact on daily activities. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using applied thematic analysis. During analysis, participants' experiences with interference in daily activities were categorized into three groups based on their impact: minimal, moderate, and substantial. Results: All 39 participants experienced pain, although descriptions varied and differentiated between feelings of pain vs discomfort. Almost all experienced urinary symptoms. Only a few reported other physical symptoms, although several psychological aspects were identified. In the areas of sleep, mood, life enjoyment, work, exercise, activities of daily living, driving, childcare, and leisure/social activities, the stent had little impact on daily living among participants placed in the minimal group (n = 12) and far greater impact for participants in the substantial group (n = 8). For patients in the moderate group (n = 19), some daily activities were moderately or substantially affected, whereas other activities were minimally affected. Conclusions: Counseling to better prepare patients for the impact of stent-associated symptoms may help mitigate symptom burden. While existing instruments adequately cover most symptoms, additional assessments for other domains, particularly psychological factors, may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Corneli
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carrie Dombeck
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin McKenna
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan D. Harper
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jodi A. Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Alana C. Desai
- Department of Surgery (Urologic Surgery) and Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - H. Henry Lai
- Department of Surgery (Urologic Surgery) and Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Gregory E. Tasian
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin Ziemba
- Department of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rebecca McCune
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brooke Piskator
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Hussein R. Al-Khalidi
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Naim M. Maalouf
- Department of Internal Medicine and Charles and Jane Pak Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Peter P. Reese
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hunter Wessells
- Department of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ziya Kirkali
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Charles D. Scales
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Duke Surgical Center for Outcomes Research and Equity in Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Single-Session Impact of High-Power Laser with Moses Technology for Lower Pole Stones in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2022; 12:jcm12010301. [PMID: 36615101 PMCID: PMC9821691 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a high-power holmium laser with Moses technology (MT) for the treatment of lower pole stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Methods: Herein, 305 patients with lower pole stones who underwent RIRS using a high-power holmium laser with MT were retrospectively classified into the stone-free (SF) and non-SF groups. We measured the stone burden, stone volume, stone hardness, pre- or post-operative stent placement, infundibulopelvic angle (IPA), infundibular width (IW), infundibular length (IL), and calyceal pelvic height in terms of pelvicalyceal anatomy using retrograde pyelograms and evaluated the predictive factors of postoperative SF. Results: A total of 173 (56.7%) and 229 (75.1%) patients achieved a SF status on postoperative day one and at one month, respectively. Operation time in the SF group was shorter than that in the non-SF group (51.0 vs. 74.5 min). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the SF and non-SF groups. Significantly predictive risk factors in postoperative SF included total stone volume (odds ratio (OR), 1.056; 95% CI, 1.015-1.099; p = 0.007), IPA (OR, 0.970; 95% CI, 0.956-0.993; p = 0.009), and IW (OR, 0.295; 95% CI, 0.121-0.718; p = 0.007). The cut-off values of stone volume, IPA, and IW were 515.2 mm3, 46.8°, and 7.75 mm, respectively. Conclusions: A high-power holmium laser with MT in lower pole stones is a valuable option for positive outcomes and patient's safety. Larger stone volume, acute IPA, and narrow IW were negative predictors related to postoperative SF status.
Collapse
|
4
|
De Coninck V, Somani B, Sener ET, Emiliani E, Corrales M, Juliebø-Jones P, Pietropaolo A, Mykoniatis I, Zeeshan Hameed BM, Esperto F, Proietti S, Traxer O, Keller EX. Ureteral Access Sheaths and Its Use in the Future: A Comprehensive Update Based on a Literature Review. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175128. [PMID: 36079058 PMCID: PMC9456781 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Ureteral access sheaths (UASs) are part of urologist’s armamentarium when performing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Recently, the world of RIRS has changed dramatically with the development of three game-changers: thulium fiber laser (TFL), smaller size single use digital flexible ureterosopes and intraoperative intrarenal pressure (IRP) measurement devices. We aimed to clarify the impact of UASs on IRP, complications and SFRs and put its indications in perspective of these three major technological improvements. A systematic review of the literature using the Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases was performed by two authors and relevant studies were selected according to PRISMA guidelines. Recent studies showed that using a UAS lowers IRP and intrarenal temperature by increasing irrigation outflow during RIRS. Data on the impact of a UAS on SFRs, postoperative pain, risk of infectious complications, risk of ureteral strictures and risk of bladder recurrence of urothelial carcinoma after diagnostic RIRS were inconclusive. Prestenting for at least one week resulted in ureteral enlargement, while the influence of pre-operative administration of alpha-blockers was unclear. Since TFL, smaller single use digital ureteroscopes and devices with integrated pressure-measuring and aspiration technology seemed to increase SFRs and decrease pressure and temperature related complications, indications on the use of a UAS may decrease in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent De Coninck
- Department of Urology, AZ Klina, 2930 Brasschaat, Belgium
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), 75020 Paris, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-3-650-50-56
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Emre Tarik Sener
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul 34854, Turkey
| | - Esteban Emiliani
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Fundacio Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mariela Corrales
- Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), 75020 Paris, France
- Service d’Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France
- GRC n°20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Patrick Juliebø-Jones
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Amelia Pietropaolo
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Ioannis Mykoniatis
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Belthangady M. Zeeshan Hameed
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal 576104, India
| | - Francesco Esperto
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy
- Unit of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Silvia Proietti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Olivier Traxer
- Service d’Urologie, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France
- GRC n°20, Groupe de Recherche Clinique sur la Lithiase Urinaire, Hôpital Tenon, Sorbonne Université, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Etienne Xavier Keller
- Young Academic Urologists (YAU), Urolithiasis & Endourology Working Party, 6846 Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Progressive Endourological Association for Research and Leading Solutions (PEARLS), 75020 Paris, France
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Inoue T, Hamamoto S, Okada S, Yamamichi F, Fujita M, Tominaga K, Fujisawa M. Primary impact of simultaneous use of double devices through one-working channel when performing flexible ureteroscope with ureteral access sheath for single ureteral stone: In bench and retrospective clinical study. Int J Urol 2022; 29:1163-1169. [PMID: 35710688 DOI: 10.1111/iju.14957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to compare the simultaneous use of two devices versus a single device through a single working channel in flexible ureteroscopy using a ureteral access sheath for single ureteral stones. METHODS In a bench study, the time to (i) set laser fiber, (ii) exchange laser fiber and nitinol basket through working channel, and (iii) pull out the device from working channel were measured 10 times in each step. In a clinical study, 156 patients who underwent flexible ureteroscopy with a ureteral access sheath for a ureteral stone in middle and upper ureter between April 2019 and November 2021 were assessed. One device was used at a time for 79 patients (S-Group) and two were simultaneously used for 77 (D-Group). Surgical outcomes and complications were compared. RESULTS In the bench study, the mean time to change from laser fiber to basket and from basket to laser fiber through the working channel were 26.1 ± 3.7 s and 23.6 ± 2.0 s (p = 0.084), respectively, which were significantly longer than the laser setup time (p < 0.001). In the clinical study, although the stone-free rate was not significantly different between the groups (S-Group 89.8%, D-Group 93.5%; p = 0.412), the median operation time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) and the rate of postoperative stenting was significantly lower (p = 0.002) in the D-Group. There were no significant between-group differences in intra- and post-operative complications. CONCLUSION The simultaneous use of two devices through a single working channel is safe and could help save the time needed to exchange the laser fiber and nitinol basket.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Inoue
- Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Shuzo Hamamoto
- Department of Urology, Medical School, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shinsuke Okada
- Department of Urology, Gyotoku General Hospital, Ichikawa, Chiba, Japan
| | - Fukashi Yamamichi
- Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masaichiro Fujita
- Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Koki Tominaga
- Department of Urology and Stone Center, Hara Genitourinary Hospital, Kobe City, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Masato Fujisawa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Related, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|