SalmonellaSerogroup Detection in Poultry Meat Samples by Examining Multiple Colonies from Selective Plates of Two Standard Culture Methods

Selective pre-enrichment method to lessen time needed to recover Salmonella from commercial poultry processing samples

Conventional Salmonella detection is time consuming, often employing a 24-h pre-enrichment step in buffered peptone water (BPW), followed by a 24-h selective enrichment in either Rappaport Vassiliadis (RV) or tetrathionate (TT) broths before streaking onto selective indicator agar. To reduce this time, we sought to optimize pre-enrichment for Salmonella recovery by evaluating the addition of selective chemicals to BPW. Duplicate samples each representative of 500 carcasses were collected by catching processing water drip under moving carcass shackle lines immediately after feather removal in each of nine commercial processing plants. Carcass drip samples were cultured under selective pre-enrichment conditions in parallel with BPW pre-enrichment followed by RV and TT selective enrichment. Addition of bile salts (1 g/L) and novobiocin (0.015 g/L) resulted in Salmonella recovery from 89% samples when plated directly after pre-enrichment compared to 67% recovery in non-selective BPW alone. Salmonella serovar identities were determined using CRISPR-SeroSeq. Overall, serovars matched between selective pre-enrichment and traditional enrichment methods. These data suggest that increasing the selectivity of Salmonella pre-enrichment step may lessen the need for a separate selective enrichment step thereby reducing time required for Salmonella isolation by 24 h.

Evaluation of RapidChek Select for the screening of Salmonella in meat and meat products

The efficacy of the RapidChek Select, an alternative rapid method based on lateral flow technology, for the screening of Salmonella in meat and meat products, was compared with the current ISO reference culture-based method. Of the 265 routine samples examined, 61 were found to be positive for Salmonella by both methods. The percentage of agreement between the results of two methods was determined as 98%. All presumptive positive results obtained by the RapidCheck Select were confirmed to be positive by ISO method. For five samples ISO method gave positive result, while RapidChek Select gave negative result. The limit of detection (LOD(50)) of RapidChek Select and ISO methods for minced beef meat samples were 1.00 cfu/25 g and 0.63 cfu/25 g, respectively. For sausage samples, LOD(50) of both methods were 2.00 cfu/25 g. As a result, the high agreement between two methods and the comparable detection limits of two methods showed that the RapidChek Select is an efficient alternative method for the screening of Salmonella in meat and meat products.