Myositis induced by naked DNA immunization with the gene for histidyl-tRNA synthetase

Autoantibodies: Pathogenic or epiphenomenon

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are heterogeneous autoimmune diseases. There are distinct subgroups, including antisynthetase syndrome, dermatomyositis, polymyositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and sporadic inclusion body myositis. In patients with IIM, autoantibodies are present in up to 80% of the patients. These autoantibodies are often characterized as myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) or myositis-associated autoantibodies (MAA). The recognition of the importance of autoantibodies, especially MSA, is increasing in recent years. In this chapter, we provide an overview of the MSAs, including some new autoantibodies of interest as they target mainly muscle-specific autoantigen, in clinical classification, the measurement of the disease activity, and a possible role in the pathogenesis in the patients with IIM.

Serum-circulating His-tRNA synthetase inhibits organ-targeted immune responses

His-tRNA synthetase (HARS) is targeted by autoantibodies in chronic and acute inflammatory anti-Jo-1-positive antisynthetase syndrome. The extensive activation and migration of immune cells into lung and muscle are associated with interstitial lung disease, myositis, and morbidity. It is unknown whether the sequestration of HARS is an epiphenomenon or plays a causal role in the disease. Here, we show that HARS circulates in healthy individuals, but it is largely undetectable in the serum of anti-Jo-1-positive antisynthetase syndrome patients. In cultured primary human skeletal muscle myoblasts (HSkMC), HARS is released in increasing amounts during their differentiation into myotubes. We further show that HARS regulates immune cell engagement and inhibits CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell activation. In mouse and rodent models of acute inflammatory diseases, HARS administration downregulates immune activation. In contrast, neutralization of extracellular HARS by high-titer antibody responses during tissue injury increases susceptibility to immune attack, similar to what is seen in humans with anti-Jo-1-positive disease. Collectively, these data suggest that extracellular HARS is homeostatic in normal subjects, and its sequestration contributes to the morbidity of the anti-Jo-1-positive antisynthetase syndrome.

Antisynthetase syndrome pathogenesis: knowledge and uncertainties

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) is an acquired myopathy characterized by the presence of myositis-specific autoantibodies directed against tRNA-synthetases. ASyS is potentially life threatening due to lung involvement and treatment remains a challenge to date. With symptoms not limited to muscles but also involving lung, skin and joints, ASyS appears specific and has a particular pathogenesis, different from the other inflammatory myopathies. This review is intended to discuss the current understanding of ASyS pathogenesis, pointing its current knowledge and also the crucial prospects that may lead to critical improvement of ASyS care.

RECENT FINDINGS

Regarding ASyS pathogenesis, initiation of the disease seems to arise in a multifactorial context, with first lesions occurring within the lungs. This may lead to aberrant self-antigen exposure and tolerance breakdown. The consequences are abnormal activation of both innate and adaptive immunity, resulting in the patients with favourable genetic background to autoimmune-mediated organ lesions. Immune and nonimmune roles of the antigen, as well as antigen presentation leading to specific T-cell and B-cell activation and to the production of specific autoantibodies belong to the disease process.

SUMMARY

This work aims to detail ASyS pathogenesis understanding, from initiation to the disease propagation and target tissue lesions, in order to considering future treatment directions.

Role of Jo-1 in the Immunopathogenesis of the Anti-synthetase Syndrome

Histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HRS = Jo-1) represents a key autoantibody target in the anti-synthetase syndrome that is marked by myositis as well as extra-muscular organ complications including interstitial lung disease (ILD). Over the last 25 years, a wealth of clinical, epidemiological, genetic, and experimental data have collectively supported a role for Jo-1 in mediating deleterious cell-mediated, adaptive immune responses contributing to the disease phenotype of the anti-synthetase syndrome. Complementing these studies, more recent work suggests that unique, non-enzymatic functional properties of Jo-1 also endow this antigen with the capacity to activate components of the innate immune system, particularly cell surface as well as endosomal Toll-like receptors and their downstream signaling pathways. Combining these facets of Jo-1-mediated immunity now supports a more integrated model of disease pathogenesis that should lead to improved therapeutic targeting in the anti-synthetase syndrome and related subsets of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

[How can we diagnose and better understand inflammatory myopathies? The usefulness of auto-antibodies]

The inflammatory myopathies are a group of quite proteiform, systemic auto-immune diseases which include polymyositis, dermatomyositis and inclusion body myopathies. To facilitate the diagnosis, classification criteria (Bohan and Peter, 1975) have been proposed, based essentially on clinical criteria. In addition, over the past fifteen years, auto-antibodies characterizing certain forms of inflammatory myopathy have been identified. One distinguishes schematically: auto-antibodies specific for myositis and auto-antibodies sometimes associated with myositis. Concerning the myositis specific auto-antibodies (MSA), schematically there are a dozen specificities which are classed according to the cellular distribution of the auto-antigen. The most characteristic are certainly the auto-antibodies directed against cytoplasmic antigens: the anti-tRNA synthetases (anti-Jo-1 (PL-1), anti-PL-7, PL-12, EJ, OJ, JS, KS, ZO, YRS), anti-SRP (signal recognition particle), anti-Mas and anti-KJ, anti-Fer (eEF1), anti-Wa and anti-CADM p140. Other auto-antibodies are directed against nuclear auto-antigens: the anti-Mi-2, anti-PMS (PMS1, PMS2) and related antibodies (MLH1, DNA PKcs…), anti-56 kDa, anti-MJ (NXP-2), anti-SAE and anti-p155/p140 (TIF-1γ). Concerning the auto-antibodies sometimes associated with myositis (myositis associated auto-antibodies or MAA), they can also be observed in other auto-immune diseases. These auto-antibodies are directed against nuclear or nucleolar auto-antigens: the anti-PM-Scl, anti-Ku, anti-RNP (U1 RNP and U2 RNP, U4/U6 RNP and U5 RNP), anti-Ro 52 kDa and more rarely, anti-Ro 60 kDa and anti-La. The auto-antibodies related to myositis are biological tools which are of interest in two main ways. They have allowed us to sort out the nosology of these inflammatory myopathies, in particular by defining anti-tRNA synthetase syndrome. It now remains to determine how they might be employed to complement the classical clinico-biological diagnostic criteria. In this perspective, it will be indispensable first of all to diffuse and standardize the methods of detection. The latter are at the moment very heterogeneous as they use techniques and above all antigenic preparations which are extremely diverse. These antibodies are also very interesting "physiopathological" tools to try to better understand myositis. The example of anti-tRNA synthetases is a particularly original model of auto-immunization, which allows one to establish a link between an initial, probably poorly specific muscular lesion and the appearance of auto-antibodies which maintain and aggravate the muscular disease.

Polymyositis–dermatomyositis and infections

In genetically predisposed individuals, viruses, bacteria, or parasitic infectious agents are suspected to induce autoimmunity and/or to exacerbate the disease once the self-tolerance is broken. Although direct evidence for this association is still lacking, numerous data from animal models as well as from humans support the hypothesis of a direct contribution of pathogens to the induction of several autoimmune diseases. This review focused on the possible role of infectious agents as triggers of autoimmunity in polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM). Epidemiological studies, clinical and experimental findings that support the hypothesis of infection-induced PM and DM are summarized and discussed. In addition, immune response abnormalities and immunosuppressive medications may be responsible for the high percentage of infectious complications in PM and DM patients. In this review, the increased risk of developing infections in these patients is also underlined and published data are reported.

Dermatomyositis

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the skin and muscles. Although thought to be autoimmune in origin, many questions remain as to the etiopathogenesis of this disease. DM has classically been considered a humorally mediated disease. Current evidence, however, seems to increasingly support alternative (though not mutually exclusive) mechanisms of pathogenesis, including cell-mediated and innate immune system dysfunction. Pathologic findings of DM in muscle include infarcts, perifascicular atrophy, endothelial cell swelling and necrosis, vessel wall membrane attack complex deposition, and myocyte-specific MHC I upregulation. As for the skin, histopathologic findings include hyperkeratosis, epidermal basal cell vacuolar degeneration and apoptosis, increased dermal mucin deposition, and a cell-poor interface dermatitis. Autoantibodies, particularly those that bind nuclear or cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein antigens, are also commonly found in DM, although their importance in pathogenesis remains unclear. Defective cellular clearance, genetic predilection and environmental exposures, such as viral infection, may also play an important role in the pathogenesis of DM. The seminal work regarding the pathogenesis of DM is reviewed and an update on the recent basic and molecular advances in the field is provided.

Species-specific immune responses generated by histidyl-tRNA synthetase immunization are associated with muscle and lung inflammation

Evidence implicating histidyl-tRNA synthetase (Jo-1) in the pathogenesis of the anti-synthetase syndrome includes established genetic associations linking the reproducible phenotype of muscle inflammation and interstitial lung disease with autoantibodies recognizing Jo-1. To better address the role of Jo-1-directed B and T cell responses in the context of different genetic backgrounds, we employed Jo-1 protein immunization of C57BL/6 and NOD congenic mice. Detailed analysis of early antibody responses following inoculation with human or murine Jo-1 demonstrates remarkable species-specifity, with limited cross recognition of Jo-1 from the opposite species. Complementing these results, immunization with purified peptides derived from murine Jo-1 generates B and T cells targeting species-specific epitopes contained within the amino terminal 120 amino acids of murine Jo-1. The eventual spreading of B cell epitopes that uniformly occurs 8 weeks post immunization with murine Jo-1 provides additional evidence of an immune response mediated by autoreactive, Jo-1-specific T cells. Corresponding to this self-reactivity, mice immunized with murine Jo-1 develop a striking combination of muscle and lung inflammation that replicates features of the human anti-synthetase syndrome.

Contribution of autoantibodies to the diagnosis and nosology of inflammatory muscle disease

The myositides are systemic autoimmune conditions of which the most important are polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion body myositis. In addition to the classic clinical diagnostic criteria, myositis-specific autoantibodies were identified about 15 years ago. Among the dozen or so myositis-specific autoantibodies reported to date, the most characteristic are directed against cytoplasmic antigens, such as tRNA synthetase (Jo-1 or PL-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, OJ, JS, and KS), signal-recognition particle (SRP), Mas, KJ, Fer (eEF1), and Wa. Antibodies to nuclear antigens include anti-Mi-2, anti-PMS (PMS1, and PMS2), and related antibodies (MLH1, DNA protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA PKCS)...), and anti-56 kDa. Myositis-associated antibodies are not specific but may be found in patients with myositis. They are directed to nuclear or nucleolar antigens such as PM-Scl, Ku, RNP (U1-RNP and U2-RNP, U4/U6-RNP, and U5-RNP), Ro 52 kDa and, more rarely, Ro 60 kDa and La. Myositis-specific antibodies have proved useful on two fronts. They have improved the diagnosis of myositis by leading to the identification of characteristic clinical patterns, such as anti-synthetase syndrome. The place of autoantibodies alongside classic clinical and laboratory criteria remains to be determined, however. First, standardized assays will have to be developed to replace current detection methods, which use widely variable techniques and antigen preparations. Myositis-specific antibodies have also shed light on the pathogenesis of myositis. For instance, the development of antibodies to tRNA synthetases constitutes an original autoimmunity model that shows how muscle damage, probably of a nonspecific nature, can lead to the production of autoantibodies that perpetuate and aggravate the muscle lesions.

Laminin-induced autoimmune myositis in rats

The present study aimed to examine if immunization with laminin causes myositis in rats and whether the pathologic findings mirror human polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Rats were immunized with an emulsion of laminin and complete Freund's adjuvant. As a result, muscle fiber necrosis with infiltrating macrophages was frequently observed and mononuclear cells were observed in the endomysium. These mononuclear cells were composed of CD4+ cells, CD8+ T cells, and macrophages. CD4+ cells and CD8+ T cells were mainly located in the endomysium, whereas a large number of macrophages were located in the endomysium and infiltrating muscle fibers. A small number of B cells, detected by immunohistochemical staining, were mainly located in the perimysium. The nonnecrotic muscle fiber to which CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and perforin+ cells adhered was negative for antimerosin and antidystrophin antibodies. Muscle fiber necrosis in rats immunized with laminin may occur after denaturation of basement membrane proteins. In conclusion, the immunization with laminin induces moderate to severe myositis. We suggest that laminin may be an important antigen for connective tissue diseases such as polymyositis and dermatomyositis.

Anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase immune responses: insights into the pathogenesis of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

One of the most striking humoral characteristics of the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies is the specific targeting of components of the translational machinery by the immune system. The most commonly targeted of these components are the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) molecules. However, the relation between the immune responses to these molecules and the pathogenesis of the inflammatory myopathies remains obscure. This review will examine recent evidence that explores the links between the ARS molecules, inflammation, and apoptosis, with the aim of furthering our current understanding of the underlying pathogenesis of the myositis syndromes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several of the ARS molecules and their proteolytic fragments generated during inflammation and apoptosis have recently been shown to possess chemoattractant properties. The liberation of these fragments in the muscle microenvironment under certain circumstances may provide a proinflammatory context and lead to the influx of lymphocytes, macrophages, and specialized antigen-presenting cells to the site of muscle injury. The subsequent processing and presentation of these autoantigen fragments on major histocompatibility complex class I and II molecules may generate an ARS-specific autoimmune response, which may be responsible for amplification and propagation of muscle injury in these diseases.

SUMMARY

The striking association between the inflammatory myopathies and anti-ARS antibodies implies a role for the ARS molecules in the pathogenesis of these syndromes. Recent data suggest that ARS molecules and their proteolytic fragments generated during the cell death process may be responsible for priming and sustaining a specific immune response in situ in myositis. How these molecules become altered and access the immune system in the disease microenvironment is an area of ongoing investigation.

The role of jo-1 in the immunopathogenesis of polymyositis: Current hypotheses

Polymyositis represents an autoimmune disease in which T cells mediate destruction of muscle cells. Although the precise trigger(s) for this process remain unknown, distinct clinical subsets exist that are characterized by antibodies directed against specific nuclear and cytoplasmic antigens including Jo-1 (histidyl-transfer RNA synthetase). Coupled with a range of genetic and histomorphologic data, the stereotypical serologic response suggests that antigen-specific T cells directed against Jo-1 can promote T cell-mediated cytolysis of muscle cells as well as anti-Jo-1 antibody formation in selected patients with polymyositis. Beyond a previously developed animal model that has demonstrated the capacity of Jo-1 to promote humoral and cell-mediated immune responses leading to myositis, recent studies have revealed the existence of Jo-1-specific T cells in the peripheral blood of patients with Jo-1 antibody-positive polymyositis. Even more striking, investigators have discovered that Jo-1 can serve as a chemokine for immature dendritic cells and T lymphocytes. Collectively, these findings suggest a mechanism by which Jo-1 can bridge the innate and adaptive immune responses, leading to the breakdown of tolerance and autoimmune destruction of muscle.

Animal models of myositis

Current animal models of human myositis include spontaneous, induced, and transgenic models. Although it is clear that none of these models possesses all the features of the human diseases, they may provide insight into the pathophysiologic mechanisms, and possibly the therapy, of inflammatory muscle disease. Because the human IIMs are phenotypically heterogeneous, but may be divided into more homogeneous subgroups based upon clinical or serologic features, it is possible that different pathogeneses are involved in different subgroups. It is unlikely that any single model would reproduce all features of the human disease. It may be possible, however, to gain insight into some subgroups of the human disease if certain animal models faithfully reproduce one or more subtypes or aspects of the IIMs. Because immunogenetic risk factors, and exposure to certain environmental agents important in triggering myositis in genetically susceptible persons, may be necessary components for human disease induction, transgenic approaches to humanizing murine immune systems and a better understanding of environmental risk factors will be productive avenues for future research. Additional investigations into the molecular basis of the human myositis syndromes and the pathogenesis of the spontaneous, induced, and transgenic animal models should ultimately allow for better understanding and therapy of these diseases.

Possible pathogenic mechanisms in inflammatory myopathies

The limitations associated with the different approaches into the pathogenesis of the IIM have resulted in incomplete knowledge of disease mechanisms in myositis. In most research, in which muscle tissue was used to study the different aspects of disease, biopsies with inflammatory infiltrates have been selected. Although inflammatory cell infiltrates are a characteristic feature of myositis, selecting patients with inflammatory cell infiltrates for investigations naturally introduces a selection bias. Only a few studies have been published on patients without inflammatory infiltrates but with muscle weakness, and few studies have included follow-up biopsies after different therapies. The heterogeneity of the population of patients with myositis is another limitation of the studies of pathogenic mechanisms. Although most studies classify patients according to the Bohan and Peter criteria [118, 119], some studies used histopathologic criteria [6], and only a few studies included characterization with myositis-specific autoantibodies. Because myositis-specific autoantibodies are often associated with certain clinical profiles, classification according to autoantibody profiles could be important to define differences in the pathogenesis of different phenotypes [3]. From available data on pathogenic mechanisms it is evident that cellular and humoral immune responses are involved in disease mechanisms of myositis, but whether there is a muscle-specific immune response cannot be answered by current studies. It is likely that other mechanisms are important for development of muscle weakness, including metabolic disturbances, and muscle weakness could be caused by different mechanisms in different IIM subsets or in patients in different phases of the disease. There could be early changes, which reversibly affect the metabolism, and later, irreversible changes, that could be dependent on muscle fiber damage and replacement of muscle tissue by connective tissue and fat. Current findings suggest that cytokines, which are produced in muscle tissue from different cell sources including inflammatory cells, endothelial cells, and muscle fibers, could affect muscle function. Careful follow-up studies, including the effect of therapies targeting different molecules on molecular expression in muscle tissue, are likely to increase our knowledge on disease mechanisms. A better understanding of which molecules and mechanisms affect muscle function is likely to lead to improved, less toxic therapies in patients with myositis. Many possible target molecules for blocking therapies, especially the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1 and TNF-alpha, have been identified and should be studied in appropriate clinical settings given the currently poor outcomes of many patients with IIM.

Histidyl-tRNA synthetase and asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase, autoantigens in myositis, activate chemokine receptors on T lymphocytes and immature dendritic cells

Autoantibodies to histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS) or to alanyl-, asparaginyl-, glycyl-, isoleucyl-, or threonyl-tRNA synthetase occur in approximately 25% of patients with polymyositis or dermatomyositis. We tested the ability of several aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases to induce leukocyte migration. HisRS induced CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocytes, interleukin (IL)-2-activated monocytes, and immature dendritic cells (iDCs) to migrate, but not neutrophils, mature DCs, or unstimulated monocytes. An NH(2)-terminal domain, 1-48 HisRS, was chemotactic for lymphocytes and activated monocytes, whereas a deletion mutant, HisRS-M, was inactive. HisRS selectively activated CC chemokine receptor (CCR)5-transfected HEK-293 cells, inducing migration by interacting with extracellular domain three. Furthermore, monoclonal anti-CCR5 blocked HisRS-induced chemotaxis and conversely, HisRS blocked anti-CCR5 binding. Asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase induced migration of lymphocytes, activated monocytes, iDCs, and CCR3-transfected HEK-293 cells. Seryl-tRNA synthetase induced migration of CCR3-transfected cells but not iDCs. Nonautoantigenic aspartyl-tRNA and lysyl-tRNA synthetases were not chemotactic. Thus, autoantigenic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, perhaps liberated from damaged muscle cells, may perpetuate the development of myositis by recruiting mononuclear cells that induce innate and adaptive immune responses. Therefore, the selection of a self-molecule as a target for an autoantibody response may be a consequence of the proinflammatory properties of the molecule itself.

Chemokine receptors on dendritic cells promote autoimmune reactions

This paper presents a brief review of several lines of evidence suggesting that chemokine receptors on dendritic cells play an important role in breaking tolerance to self and in inducing autoimmunity. First, we have shown that an idiotypic self-antigen obtained from malignant murine lymphomas, when covalently linked to selected chemokines or defensins that interact with receptors on immature dendritic cells (iDCs), has the capacity to break tolerance to self and induce humoral or cell-mediated anti-tumor responses. Since unlinked antigens mixed with the same chemokines or defensins or antigens fused with a mutant ligand deficient in receptor-binding capacity were not immunogenic, we propose that delivery of an antigen coupled to a ligand for receptors on iDCs promotes the processing and subsequent presentation of the antigen, resulting in immunoadjuvant effects. In a second study, we observed that two of five aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) - which act as autoantigens to which some patients with myositis have autoantibodies - were chemotactic for activated monocytes, T cells, and iDCs. These aaRSs interacted with either CC chemokine receptor (CCR)5 or CCR3, as was shown by desensitization with chemokines and the response of cell lines transfected with the chemokine receptor. Presumably, these autoantigens therefore have the capacity to attract inflammatory cells, including iDCs, to infiltrate affected muscle cells. These observations suggest the hypothesis that antigens delivered to receptors on iDCs are potent immunogens capable of breaking self-tolerance to tumor antigens to induce autoimmune diseases.

Histidyl-tRNA synthetase

Histidyl-tRNA synthetase (HisRS) is responsible for the synthesis of histidyl-transfer RNA, which is essential for the incorporation of histidine into proteins. This amino acid has uniquely moderate basic properties and is an important group in many catalytic functions of enzymes. A compilation of currently known primary structures of HisRS shows that the subunits of these homo-dimeric enzymes consist of 420-550 amino acid residues. This represents a relatively short chain length among aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRS), whose peptide chain sizes range from about 300 to 1100 amino acid residues. The crystal structures of HisRS from two organisms and their complexes with histidine, histidyl-adenylate and histidinol with ATP have been solved. HisRS from Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus are very similar dimeric enzymes consisting of three domains: the N-terminal catalytic domain containing the six-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet and the three motifs characteristic of class II aaRS, a HisRS-specific helical domain inserted between motifs 2 and 3 that may contact the acceptor stem of the tRNA, and a C-terminal alpha/beta domain that may be involved in the recognition of the anticodon stem and loop of tRNA(His). The aminoacylation reaction follows the standard two-step mechanism. HisRS also belongs to the group of aaRS that can rapidly synthesize diadenosine tetraphosphate, a compound that is suspected to be involved in several regulatory mechanisms of cell metabolism. Many analogs of histidine have been tested for their properties as substrates or inhibitors of HisRS, leading to the elucidation of structure-activity relationships concerning configuration, importance of the carboxy and amino group, and the nature of the side chain. HisRS has been found to act as a particularly important antigen in autoimmune diseases such as rheumatic arthritis or myositis. Successful attempts have been made to identify epitopes responsible for the complexation with such auto-antibodies.

Antiviral Activities of Individual Murine IFN-α Subtypes In Vivo: Intramuscular Injection of IFN Expression Constructs Reduces Cytomegalovirus Replication

The IFN-α cytokines belong to a multigene family. However, the in vivo biological functions of each of the IFN-α subtypes is unknown. Recently, we developed an experimental model in which the tibialis anterior muscles of mice were transfected in situ with naked DNA plasmids encoding an IFN transgene. Here we use this model to investigate the in vivo effect of the expression of three murine IFN-α subtypes (A1, A4, and A9) on murine CMV replication in C57BL/6, BALB/c, and A/J mice. CMV was shown to replicate in the tibialis anterior muscles of mice for at least 6 days and induced an inflammatory infiltrate. However, mice expressing the IFN-α transgenes showed a marked reduction in the peak titers of virus replication, with less severe inflammation in the muscles compared with control mice that were inoculated with blank vectors. Moreover, mice expressing the IFN-α1 transgene had significantly lower CMV titers in the inoculated muscle than mice expressing either the IFN-α4 or the IFN-α9 transgenes. Furthermore, IFN-α/β receptor knockout mice had markedly higher levels of CMV replication in the tibialis anterior muscles than the wild-type parental strain (129/Sv/Ev) following IFN-α1 transgene inoculation, suggesting that the protection observed is due to host cell-mediated IFN signaling. These data provide the first evidence indicating that there are in vivo differences in the antiviral efficacy of the IFN-α subtypes.