Characteristics of radiolabelled versus unlabelled inhaler formulations

Radiolabeling Methods

In vivo measurements of the deposition of an inhaled radiolabeled pharmaceutic have provided useful information related to the inhaler efficiency for depositing drug in the lung. A number of labeling techniques have been developed and applied to pharmaceutical aerosols delivered by pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), dry powder inhalers (DPIs) and nebulizers; the choice of radiotracer depends on the type of imaging study being performed and the equipment used to image the lung. Preparation, validation and calibration of the radiolabeled pharmaceutical product is key to successful interpretation of the imaging study. When imaging a subject after inhalation of a radiolabeled formulation, it is the radioactivity that is detected and measured by the scanner; absolute amounts of deposited drug are inferred from the counts of radioactivity in the lung and other regions, based on the assumption that there is a 1:1 relationship between the two components-drug and radioactivity. This relationship holds true for direct-labeled PET products or for those formulations where a firm bond can be demonstrated between the drug and radiotracer for the time taken to acquire all the images. This chapter will discuss radiolabeling methods applied to therapeutic aerosols for the purpose of determining the deposition efficiency of these aerosols in the lung. The techniques apply to both in vivo studies in man and in animal models, and to some extent to in vitro models.

Radiolabeling Method for Lyophilizate for Dry Powder Inhalation Formulations

Human lung deposition data is non-mandatory for drug approval but very useful for the development of orally inhaled drug products. Lung deposition of inhaled drugs can be quantified by radionuclide imaging, for which one of the first considerations is the method used to radiolabel formulations. In this study, we report the development of a radiolabeling method for lyophilizate for dry powder inhalation (LDPI) formulations. TechneCoatTM is one method that can radiolabel drug particles without using solvents. In this method, particles are radiolabeled with a dispersion of 99mTc-labeled nanoparticles called TechnegasTM. Because a LDPI formulation is not comprised of particles but is a lyophilized cake aerosolized by air impact, the TechneCoat method cannot be used for the radiolabeling of LDPI formulations. We therefore modified the TechneCoat apparatus so that LDPI formulations were not aerosolized by the Technegas flow. Radiolabeling using a modified TechneCoat apparatus was validated with model LDPI formulations of interferon alpha (IFN). IFN of 99mTc-unlabeled, IFN of 99mTc-labeled, and 99mTc of 99mTc-labeled LDPI formulations showed similar behavior, and differences from IFN of 99mTc-unlabeled LDPI formulations were within ±15% in aerodynamic particle size distribution measurement. Our radiolabeling method for LDPI formulations may be useful for the quantification of drug deposition in human lungs.

Aerosol delivery of ergotamine tartrate via a breath-synchronized plume-control inhaler in humans

OBJECTIVE

To compare systemic delivery of ergotamine tartrate (ET) via a breath-synchronized, plume-control inhaler (BSPCI) (Tempo ET) with a sublingual ergot preparation and a commercial inhaler.

METHODS

Study 1 determined plasma ET concentrations in seven healthy subjects after administration of ET by a 2 mg tablet (Lingraine) and a BSPCI delivering 258 microg of ET. Study 2 determined plasma ET concentrations in 16 healthy subjects after administration via an ET metered dose inhaler (ME) (Medihaler) delivering 2052 microg of ET and a BSPCI delivering 129 microg of ET. Gamma scintigraphy with (99m)Tc validation was used to quantify lung deposition.

RESULTS

For both studies, ET C(max) was higher with the BSPCI (study 1: sublingual ET 134 pg/mL at 37 min; BSPCI 3743 pg/mL at 3 min; study 2: metered-dose inhaler 1109 pg/mL at 4 min; BSPCI 1210 pg/mL at 2.5 min). Mean dose normalized AUC was several-fold higher with the BSPCI compared with sublingual ET and ME dosing. Lung deposition of ET with the BSPCI was 33.5, 8.9, 11.4, and 13.2% for whole, central, intermediate, and peripheral lung, respectively, with a 1.5 peripheral : central ratio.

CONCLUSION

Based on these open-label studies, the BSPCI allows rapid delivery of potentially therapeutic plasma concentrations of ET at approximately 1/15th the dose of comparators.

Lung deposition of salbutamol in healthy human subjects from the MAGhaler dry powder inhaler

The MAGhaler (Mundipharma GmbH) is a multidose dry powder inhaler (DPI) containing a novel formulation of drug and lactose compacted by an isostatic pressing technique (GGU GmbH). On actuation, a precise dose is metered from a compacted ring-shaped drug tablet. In this study, the lung deposition of salbutamol from this device has been assessed. Ten healthy non-smoking subjects completed a two-way cross-over study assessing the pulmonary deposition of salbutamol (200 microg) from the MAGhaler at high (60 l/min) and low (30 l/min) peak inhaled flow rates (PIFRs), representing maximal and sub-maximal inspiratory efforts. The formulation was radiolabelled with 99mTc, and lung and oropharyngeal depositions were quantified by gamma scintigraphyThe mean (SD)% ofthe delivered dose deposited in the lungs was 26.4 (4.3)% at 60 l/min and 21.1 (5.1)% at 30 l/min (P < 0.05), corresponding to mean lung depositions of 52.8 and 42.2 microg salbutamol, respectively. The distribution of drug within different lung regions did not vary significantly with inhaled flow rate. The data provided proof of concept for the novel inhaler device and the innovative drug formulation. In comparison with previous deposition data obtained with other DPIs, the lung deposition was relatively high, relatively reproducible (coefficient of variation 16% at 60 l/min) and relatively insensitive to the change in peak inhaled flow rate.

Human lung deposition data: the bridge between in vitro and clinical evaluations for inhaled drug products?

Regulatory dossiers for new inhaled drug products generally contain in vitro data, which assess delivered dose and particle size distribution, together with clinical efficacy and safety data. Human lung deposition data may be generated using radionuclide imaging techniques or appropriate pharmacokinetic methods, and can act as a 'bridge' via which a seamless transition can be made between in vitro testing in the laboratory and efficacy/safety testing in the clinic. By enabling informed decisions to be made about the evaluation of new devices or formulations in man, lung deposition data permit a long and expensive clinical trials programme to be commenced with much greater certainty of a successful outcome. Human lung deposition data should be considered for supplementing the information required for regulatory dossiers.

Assessing lung deposition of inhaled medications. Consensus statement from a workshop of the British Association for Lung Research, held at the Institute of Biology, London, U.K. on 17 April 1998

In vitro measurements of aerosol fine particle fraction (FPF) using particle-sizing apparatus (e.g. the twin impinger, multi-stage liquid impingers, cascade impactors) have a key role to play in the development of new pharmaceutical products and in quality control. However, use of in vitro methodology to attempt to predict lung deposition in vivo is of limited value due, in part, to the inability of current apparatus to mimic upper and lower airway anatomy satisfactorily. Estimates of FPF based on cut-off points ranging from 5-7 microns generally overestimate lung deposition as measured in vivo by gamma scintigraphy. We recommend that: 1. multistage apparatus (minimum five stages) be used to characterize particle size distribution adequately, over the range 0.5-5.0 microns; 2. where possible, measurements should be made at a range of rates and profiles of flow reflecting those likely to be generated using the inhalation device in clinical practice (including use by young and elderly patients with varying degrees of airflow obstruction); 3. encouragement should be given to the further development, standardization, and validation of apparatus with a 'throat' which more closely resembles the human oropharynx and larynx. Pharmacokinetic methods can give a good estimate of total, but not regional, lung deposition, with drugs which are either not absorbed via the gastrointestinal tract, or whose absorption can be blocked by co-administration of charcoal, thus avoiding confounding by absorption of drug substance deposited in the oropharynx and subsequently swallowed. Techniques which rely on evaluation of a timed fractional output of drug substance in the urine are susceptible to the inherent variability of rate of absorption across the respiratory epithelium. We recommend that consideration should be given to the further refinement and validation of PK methods which would more clearly identify the fractional dose deposited in the lung. Lung-imaging methodology, e.g. gamma scintigraphy, employing formulations radiolabelled with gamma-ray-emitting radionuclides such as 99mTc, can measure total lung deposition and oropharyngeal deposition, provided that the radiolabelling process is appropriately validated and suitable corrections are made for attenuation of gamma rays by body tissues. An estimate of regional lung deposition can be made by drawing 'regions of interest' on the scintigraphic image; the precision of this measure is limited by the two-dimensional (2-D) nature of most images which mean that there is an overlay of structures of interest (alveoli, small and large airways), which is most marked centrally. Three-dimensional (3-D) imaging techniques (e.g. single photon emission computed tomography, SPECT, and positron emission tomography, PET) have the potential to give more detailed data on regional lung deposition, but are currently more expensive, employ higher radiation doses, and are less well validated than 2-D (planar) imaging. We consider that, of the available imaging modalities, planar gamma scintigraphy represents current best practice for the assessment of lung deposition from inhaler devices where regional differences may be important. The methodology should be optimized by the adoption of generally accepted standards for radiolabelling, imaging, attenuation correction, and interpretation. It is important that deposition in all sites (device, oropharynx, lungs, stomach) should be quantified. Consideration should be given to refining the concept of regions of interest to coincide more closely with anatomical lung structures. Statistical methods to compare the size distributions of drug and radiolabel in validation experiments should be developed. In the longer term it is envisaged that three-dimensional imaging may play a more important part in evaluating lung deposition; an optimal three-dimensional anatomical model of lung zones of interest needs to be developed.