The effects of the frequency of the initial treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab on macular volume and visual acuity

Bevacizumab dosing every 2 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration refractory to monthly dosing

PURPOSE

To evaluate intravitreal bevacizumab every 2 weeks (biweekly) in refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive nAMD patients unresponsive to monthly intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) switched to 3-4 biweekly injections.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven eyes of patients aged 82.08  ± 6.85 years were included. Prior to the 2-week interval bevacizumab injections, 74.1% (n=20) were treated with both bevacizumab and ranibizumab, 11.1% (3 eyes) also received aflibercept and 14.8% (4 eyes) had received prior treatment of monthly bevacizumab (average number of injections 21.5 ± 6.7). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) remained stable between baseline (logMAR 0.72± 0.60) and follow-up (0.76± 0.66) (p=0.41). Mean central macular thickness and macular volume did not change significantly between baseline and follow-up (p=0.35 and p=0.60, respectively). Six eyes (22.2%) showed morphologic anatomic improvements, while 19 eyes (70.4%) were stable and two eyes (7.4%) deteriorated from baseline. Subretinal fluid completely resolved in 3 of the eyes and improved in the other 3 eyes and in this group (22.2%) both central macular thickness (326.2 ± 101.4 versus 297.5 ± 97.2, p=0.002) and macular volume (8.69 ± 1.69 versus 8.22 ± 1.43, p=0.03) were significantly reduced. No adverse events were observed in any of the treated eyes.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that biweekly bevacizumab injections are effective in nearly one-quarter of nAMD non-responders with no adverse events reported. Switching earlier, rather than later, to this low cost modality may be of benefit for a portion of non-responders to conventional treatment.

Choroidal melanoma treated with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy and prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab: The Dunedin Hospital experience

INTRODUCTION

Choroidal melanoma (CM) is the most common primary ocular malignancy in adults. This study reviewed the Dunedin Hospital (DH) experience in the treatment of CM with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SRT) and the outcome of prophylactic use of intravitreal injection bevacizumab (PIB) in preventing radiation retinopathy (RR).

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of patients at DH who underwent SRT for CM with and without PIB from 1 January 2001 to 31 January 2012. In DH, some patients who had SRT following the introduction of intravitreal bevacizumab in December 2006 were also treated with PIB with the expectation that this might reduce the risk of developing RR, although the evidence of its effectiveness in this respect is not clear. The primary outcome measure was local progression as monitored with regular ultrasound. Secondary outcome measures were metastatic progression incidence, enucleation incidence, no functional vision incidence, overall survival, disease-specific mortality, incidence of RR, and radiotherapy to clinical diagnosis of RR time.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients who were followed up at DH were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (range 0.4-12.6). Fourteen patients received PIB. The local progression, metastatic progression and enucleation rate were 4%, 8% and 11%, respectively. The no functional vision (hand movements or less) rate was 62%. Overall survival was 63%, but only three (11%) deaths were due to metastatic choroidal melanoma. Incidence of RR was 57% and 54% for those that received PIB and those who did not, respectively. PIB did not reduce the rate of RR (P = 1.00).

CONCLUSION

This study reaffirmed that SRT achieves very good local control and eye retention rates. PIB did not appear to reduce the radiation retinopathy rate in this study, and more studies are required especially Phase II and III trials to determine PIB efficacy in preventing RR.