1
|
Nasher O, Hall NJ, Mehta R, El-Gohary Y, Knight M. Long-gap esophageal atresia: gastric transposition or esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis? A systematic review. Pediatr Surg Int 2024; 40:112. [PMID: 38656340 DOI: 10.1007/s00383-024-05695-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to evaluate different surgical approaches to long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) with or without tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) is unclear. METHODS A systematic literature review was done comparing gastric transposition versus esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis in infants with LGEA+/-TEF. The primary outcome was time to full oral feeds. Secondary outcomes were time to full enteric feeds, need for further surgery, growth, mortality, and postoperative adverse events. RESULTS No comparative studies were found. However, the literature was re-interrogated for non-comparative studies. Four hundred thirty-eight articles were identified and screened, and 18 met the inclusion criteria. All were case series. Forty-three infants underwent gastric transposition, and 106 had esophageal lengthening with delayed primary anastomosis. One study on gastric transposition reported time to full oral feeds, and one study in each group reported growth. Time to full enteric feeds was reported in one study in each group. 30% of infants had further surgery following gastric transposition, including hiatus hernia repair (5/43, 12%) and esophageal dilation (7/43, 16%). Following esophageal lengthening, 62/106 (58%) had anti-reflux surgery, 58/106 (55%) esophageal dilatation and 11/106 (10%) esophageal stricture resection. Anastomotic complications occurred in 13/43 (30%), gastrointestinal in 16/43 (37%), respiratory in 17/43 (40%), and nerve injury in 2/43 (5%) of the gastric transposition group. In the esophageal lengthening group, anastomotic complications occurred in 68/106 (64%), gastrointestinal in 62/106 (58%), respiratory in 6/106 (6%), and none sustained nerve injury. Each group had one death due to a cause not directly related to the surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights the morbidity associated with both surgical procedures and the variety in reporting outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Nasher
- Department of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Nigel J Hall
- Pediatric Surgery Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Rajnikant Mehta
- Research Design Service East Midlands, Queen's Medical Centre, National Institute for Health Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Yousef El-Gohary
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Leeds Children's Hospital, The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Marian Knight
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dingemann C, Eaton S, Aksnes G, Bagolan P, Cross KM, De Coppi P, Fruithof J, Gamba P, Goldschmidt I, Gottrand F, Pirr S, Rasmussen L, Sfeir R, Slater G, Suominen J, Svensson JF, Thorup JM, Tytgat SHAJ, van der Zee DC, Wessel L, Widenmann-Grolig A, Wijnen R, Zetterquist W, Ure BM. ERNICA Consensus Conference on the Management of Patients with Long-Gap Esophageal Atresia: Perioperative, Surgical, and Long-Term Management. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2021; 31:214-225. [PMID: 32668485 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence supporting best practice for long-gap esophageal atresia is limited. The European Reference Network for Rare Inherited Congenital Anomalies (ERNICA) organized a consensus conference on the management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia based on expert opinion referring to the latest literature aiming to provide clear and uniform statements in this respect. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-four ERNICA representatives from nine European countries participated. The conference was prepared by item generation, item prioritization by online survey, formulation of a final list containing items on perioperative, surgical, and long-term management, and literature review. The 2-day conference was held in Berlin in November 2019. Anonymous voting was conducted via an internet-based system using a 1 to 9 scale. Consensus was defined as ≥75% of those voting scoring 6 to 9. RESULTS Ninety-seven items were generated. Complete consensus (100%) was achieved on 56 items (58%), e.g., avoidance of a cervical esophagostomy, promotion of sham feeding, details of delayed anastomosis, thoracoscopic pouch mobilization and placement of traction sutures as novel technique, replacement techniques, and follow-up. Consensus ≥75% was achieved on 90 items (93%), e.g., definition of long gap, routine pyloroplasty in gastric transposition, and avoidance of preoperative bougienage to enable delayed anastomosis. Nineteen items (20%), e.g., methods of gap measurement were discussed controversially (range 1-9). CONCLUSION This is the first consensus conference on the perioperative, surgical, and long-term management of patients with long-gap esophageal atresia. Substantial statements regarding esophageal reconstruction or replacement and follow-up were formulated which may contribute to improve patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Dingemann
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Simon Eaton
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gunnar Aksnes
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pietro Bagolan
- Department of Medical and Surgical Neonatology, Research Institute, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Kate M Cross
- Department of Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo De Coppi
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at UCLH, Developmental Biology and Cancer Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.,Department of Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom
| | - JoAnne Fruithof
- Esophageal Atresia and Tracheo-Esophageal Fistula Support Federation and VOKS, Lichtenvoorde, The Netherlands
| | | | - Imeke Goldschmidt
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frederic Gottrand
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Reference Center for Rare Esophageal Diseases, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Sabine Pirr
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Allergology and Neonatology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lars Rasmussen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Rony Sfeir
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Reference Center for Rare Esophageal Diseases, CHU Lille, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Graham Slater
- Esophageal Atresia and Tracheo-Esophageal Fistula Support Federation and TOFS, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Janne Suominen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jan F Svensson
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Joergen M Thorup
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stefaan H A J Tytgat
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - David C van der Zee
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Lucas Wessel
- Department of Pediatirc Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anke Widenmann-Grolig
- Esophageal Atresia and Tracheo-Esophageal Fistula Support Federation and KEKS, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - René Wijnen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilhelm Zetterquist
- Department of Woman and Child Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Benno M Ure
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lieber J, Schmidt A, Kumpf M, Fideler F, Schäfer JF, Kirschner HJ, Fuchs J. Functional outcome after laparoscopic assisted gastric transposition including pyloric dilatation in long-gap esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 2020; 55:2335-2341. [PMID: 32646666 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE Among the options for esophageal replacement in long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA), gastric transposition (GT) is accessible for an endoscopic approach. Here we report a novel technique and functional results after laparoscopic-assisted gastric transposition (LAGT), including pyloric dilatation in patients with LGEA. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 14 children undergoing LAGT. Surgical steps included the release of the gastrostomy, transumbilical ante-situ section of the stomach including pyloric balloon-dilation, and laparoscopically controlled transhiatal retromediastinal blunt dissection followed by LAGT for cervical anastomosis to the proximal esophagus. RESULTS The median age at LAGT was 110 days (33-327 days), bodyweight 5.3 kg (3.1-8.3 kg). Operation time was 255 min (180-436 min); one conversion was necessary. The duration of ventilation was 4 days (1-14 days). Postpyloric feeding was started after 2 days, and oral feeding after 13 days. Complications were recurrent pleural effusion or pneumothorax and transient Horner syndrome or transient incomplete paresis of the recurrence nerve. After a median follow-up of 60 months (13-240 months), all children have a patent upper GI tract, show weight gain, and are fed without delayed gastric emptying, dumping, or reflux. Severe (n = 1) or mild (n = 2) anastomotic or pyloric (n = 5) stenosis was resolved with endoscopic dilatations. CONCLUSIONS Functional outcome after LAGT in patients with LGEA is good. The laparoscopic retromediastinal dissection preserves thoracal structures and increases patients' safety. The technique of pyloric dilatation might also prevent dumping syndrome. TYPE OF STUDY Case Series with no Comparison Group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justus Lieber
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Andreas Schmidt
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Matthias Kumpf
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Intensive Care Medicine, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Frank Fideler
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jürgen F Schäfer
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Joachim Kirschner
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jörg Fuchs
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University Children's Hospital, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dokumcu Z, Divarci E, Ozcan C, Erdener A. Single-incision laparoscopy-assisted gastric transposition combined with thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal replacement. Asian J Endosc Surg 2019; 12:366-371. [PMID: 30549226 DOI: 10.1111/ases.12633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2018] [Revised: 06/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/03/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We present a novel approach to single-incision laparoscopy-assisted gastric transposition combined with thoracoscopic esophagectomy in a child with long-segment corrosive esophageal stricture (CES). MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE A 2.5-year-old boy with a history of caustic ingestion underwent periodic esophageal dilatations at 3-week intervals, four sessions of topical mitomycin C application, and a strict antacid/H2 antagonist therapy for 8 months. The esophageal replacement was indicated because of persistent corrosive esophageal stricture. First, thoracoscopic native esophagus dissection was performed. After gastric mobilization with single-incision laparoscopy, esophagectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis were performed through the cervical incision. There was no complication, and the patient had gained weight by the end of the 12-month follow-up. DISCUSSION Single-incision laparoscopy-assisted gastric transposition combined with thoracoscopic esophagectomy is feasible, safe, and effective in patients with corrosive esophageal stricture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zafer Dokumcu
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Emre Divarci
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Coskun Ozcan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Ata Erdener
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Baird R, Lal DR, Ricca RL, Diefenbach KA, Downard CD, Shelton J, Sømme S, Grabowski J, Oyetunji TA, Williams RF, Jancelewicz T, Dasgupta R, Arthur LG, Kawaguchi AL, Guner YS, Gosain A, Gates RL, Sola JE, Kelley-Quon LI, St Peter SD, Goldin A. Management of long gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review and evidence-based guidelines from the APSA Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee. J Pediatr Surg 2019; 54:675-687. [PMID: 30853248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Revised: 11/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of the neonate with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is one of the most challenging scenarios facing pediatric surgeons today. Contributing to this challenge is the variability in case definition, multiple approaches to management, and heterogeneity of the reported outcomes. This necessitates a clear summary of existing evidence and delineation of treatment controversies. METHODS The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee drafted four consensus-based questions regarding LGEA. These questions concerned the definition and determination of LGEA, the optimal method of surgical management, expected long-term outcomes, and novel therapeutic techniques. A comprehensive search strategy was crafted and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review and report salient articles. RESULTS More than 3000 publications were reviewed, with 178 influencing final recommendations. In total, 18 recommendations are provided, primarily based on level 4-5 evidence. These recommendations provide detailed descriptions of the definition of LGEA, treatment techniques, outcomes and future directions of research. CONCLUSIONS Evidence supporting best practices for LGEA is currently low quality. This review provides best recommendations based on a critical evaluation of the available literature. Based on the lack of strong evidence, prospective and comparative research is clearly needed. TYPE OF STUDY Treatment study, prognosis study and study of diagnostic test. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level II-V.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Baird
- Department of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 4480 Oak, Vancouver V6H3V4, British Columbia.
| | - Dave R Lal
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin
| | - Robert L Ricca
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia
| | - Karen A Diefenbach
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Nationwide Children's Hospital, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Cynthia D Downard
- Hiram C. Polk Jr, MD Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
| | - Julia Shelton
- University of Iowa Stead Family Children's Hospital, Iowa City, IA
| | - Stig Sømme
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Julia Grabowski
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Tolulope A Oyetunji
- Department of Surgery, Children's Mercy Kansas City, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO
| | - Regan F Williams
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Tim Jancelewicz
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Roshni Dasgupta
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | - L Grier Arthur
- Division of General, Thoracic, and Minimally Invasive Surgery, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Akemi L Kawaguchi
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX
| | - Yigit S Guner
- Department of Surgery University of California Irvine and Division of Pediatric Surgery Children's Hospital of Orange County
| | - Ankush Gosain
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Children's Foundation Research Institute, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Robert L Gates
- Clinical University of South Carolina-Greenville, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Greenville, SC
| | - Juan E Sola
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Lorraine I Kelley-Quon
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Shawn D St Peter
- Children's Mercy Hospital, 2401 Gillham Rd, Kansas City, MO 64108
| | - Adam Goldin
- Department of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Awad K, Jaffray B. Oesophageal replacement with stomach: A personal series and review of published experience. J Paediatr Child Health 2017; 53:1159-1166. [PMID: 28799279 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Revised: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 05/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
AIM To describe the outcomes of oesophageal replacement using stomach in children. METHODS All children undergoing oesophageal replacement in a regional centre were prospectively recorded in a customised database and subjected to continual follow up. Complications within 30 days were classified as early, and all other complications were classified as late. Outcomes were related to a comprehensive analysis of published experience where studies were classified as having long-term follow up if the median duration exceeded 5 years. RESULTS Ten children underwent oesophageal replacement using the stomach between 1998 and 2016. Indications were oesophageal atresia (6), caustic ingestion (2), foreign body ingestion (1) and oesophageal hamartoma (1). Two children died at 2 and 7 months after gastric transposition. All survivors are under review, with a median follow up of 8.5 years (range 3-14 years). Complications occurred in every case. Among survivors, three had early complications and eight had late complications. Early complications included anastomotic leak (2) and lung compression by stomach (1). Late complications were anaemia (8), anastomotic stricture (7), oesophagitis (5), dumping syndrome (2), perforation of a jejunostomy (1), para-gastric hiatal hernia (1), gastric outlet obstruction (1), Barrett's oesophagus (1), prolonged inability to swallow (1) and recurrent lower respiratory tract infections (1). Among 57 publications, only three achieved complete long-term follow up. The incidence of reported complications was higher when follow up was complete. CONCLUSIONS Oesophageal replacement by gastric transposition in children leads to serious chronic morbidity. Published experience masks this because of incomplete and short follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Awad
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.,Department of Paediatric Surgery, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Bruce Jaffray
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, The Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Castle SL, Isani M, Torres MB, Anselmo DM, Nguyen NX. Tubularized Gastric Conduit is More Desirable in Pediatric Patients Treated with Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy and Gastric Pull-Up. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2017; 27:427-429. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon L. Castle
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mubina Isani
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Manuel B. Torres
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Surgery, Miller Children's Hospital, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, California
| | - Dean M. Anselmo
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Surgery, Miller Children's Hospital, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, California
| | - Nam X. Nguyen
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
- Department of Surgery, Miller Children's Hospital, Long Beach Memorial Medical Center, Long Beach, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reinberg O. Esophageal replacements in children. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016; 1381:104-112. [PMID: 27310521 DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2016] [Revised: 04/11/2016] [Accepted: 04/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Replacement of the esophagus in children can be performed in cases of malformations, injuries, or acquired conditions. The new esophagus should allow normal oral feeding, with little or no gastroesophageal reflux, and be able to work well for the lifetime of the patient. For over a century, many substitutes have been used, such as segments of colon, the entire stomach, gastric tubes, or parts of the small bowel, but none are perfect or function like a normal esophagus. Esophageal replacements are demanding challenges for pediatric surgeons. Here, I review the different techniques and the pitfalls related to these procedures on the basis of our experience of more than 300 esophageal replacements in children performed since 1989.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Reinberg
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Pully, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ng J, Loukogeorgakis SP, Pierro A, Kiely EM, De Coppi P, Cross K, Curry J. Comparison of minimally invasive and open gastric transposition in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2015; 24:742-9. [PMID: 25295636 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2014.0079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric transposition is an established method of esophageal replacement in children, and the use of minimally invasive techniques avoids the trauma of open access. The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of minimally invasive versus open gastric transposition in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS All cases of attempted laparoscopic-assisted gastric transposition at Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH), London, United Kingdom, between 2003 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. A comprehensive literature search was completed on MEDLINE for minimally invasive gastric transposition in children, and postoperative outcomes were collated. The outcomes from the retrospective review (single-center, GOSH) and the literature search (multicenter) were compared with those of the largest study on open gastric transposition consisting of 192 cases performed at GOSH. RESULTS In this retrospective review of 19 patients (mean age, 3.5 years; range, 0.4-15 years), the indications were long-gap esophageal atresia, postoperative, caustic, and idiopathic esophageal stricture, and esophageal dysmotility. Three cases were converted to laparotomy and excluded from subsequent analysis. There were one anastomotic leak, two strictures, and no deaths in this series. The literature search yielded a further 50 cases for comparison. Single-center (n=16) and multicenter (n=66) comparison of minimally invasive versus open technique (n=192) showed no difference in leak (6.3% and 16.7%, respectively, versus 12.0%; P=.701 and P=.398), stricture (12.5% and 15.2% versus 20.8%; P=.535 and P=.370), and mortality rates (0% and 1.5% versus 4.7%; P=1.000 and P=.461). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive gastric transposition is a safe and acceptable alternative to open surgery in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ng
- 1 Specialist Neonatal and Paediatric Surgery Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children , London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|