1
|
Hayward R, Smith JJ, Kontovounisios C, Qiu S, Warren OJ. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernia repair in patients with a history of previous abdominopelvic surgery. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01810-w. [PMID: 38652433 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01810-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair compared short- and long-term outcomes between individuals with or without history of previous abdominopelvic surgery, aiming to determine the feasibility of totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair within this population. All patients who underwent elective TEP inguinal hernia repair by one consultant surgeon across three London hospitals from January 2017 to May 2023 were retrospectively analysed to assess perioperative outcomes. Two hundred sixty-two patients were identified, of whom two hundred forty-three (93%) underwent laparoscopic TEP repair. The most frequent complications were haematoma (6.2%) and seroma (4.1%). Recurrence occurred in four cases (1.6% of operations, 1.1% of hernias). One hundred eighty-four patients (76%) underwent day-case surgery. There were no mesh infections or explanations, vascular or visceral injuries, port-site hernias, damage to testicle, or persisting numbness. There were no requirements for blood transfusion, returns to theatre, or readmissions within 30 days. There was one conversion to open and one death within 60 days of surgery. Eighty-three (34%) had a history of previous AP surgery. There was no significant difference in perioperative outcomes between the AP and non-AP arms. This finding carried true for subgroup analysis of 44 patients whose AP surgical history did not include previous inguinal hernia repair and for those undergoing repair of recurrent hernia. In expert hands, laparoscopic TEP repair is associated with excellent outcomes and low rates of long-term complications, and thus should be considered as standard for patients regardless of a history of AP surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacob J Smith
- Imperial College London School of Medicine, London, UK
| | - Christos Kontovounisios
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Shengyang Qiu
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Oliver J Warren
- Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Joyner J, Ayyaz FM, Cheetham M, Briggs TWR, Gray WK. Factors associated with conversion from day-case to in-patient elective inguinal hernia repair surgery across England: an observational study using administrative data. Hernia 2024; 28:555-565. [PMID: 38347244 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02949-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Elective primary inguinal hernia repair surgery is increasingly being conducted as a day-case procedure. However, some patients planned for day-case surgery have to stay in hospital for at least one night. The aim of this study was to identify the factors associated with conversion from day-case to in-patient management for elective inguinal hernia repair surgery. METHODS This was an exploratory retrospective analysis of observational data from the Hospital Episode Statistics dataset for England. All patients aged ≥ 17 years undergoing a first elective inguinal hernia repair between 1st April 2014 and 31st March 2022 that was planned as day-case surgery were identified. The exposure of interest was discharged on the day of admission (day-case) or requiring overnight stay. The primary outcome of interest was 30-day emergency readmission with an overnight stay. For reporting, providers were aggregated to an Integrated Care Board (ICB) level. RESULTS A total of 351,528 planned day-case elective primary inguinal hernia repairs were identified over the eight-year study period. Of these, 45,305 (12.9%) stayed in hospital for at least one night and were classed as day-case to in-patient stay conversions. Patients who converted to in-patient stay were older, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to have bilateral surgery and be operated on by a low-annual volume surgeon. Post-procedural complications were strongly associated with conversion. Across the 42 ICBs in England, model-adjusted conversion rates varied from 3.3% to 21.3%. CONCLUSIONS There was considerable variation in conversion to in-patient stay rates for inguinal hernia repair across ICBs in England. Our findings should help surgical teams to better identify patients suitable for day-case inguinal hernia repair and plan discharge services more effectively. This should help to reduce the variation in conversion rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Joyner
- Getting It Right First Time Programme, NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK.
- Department of General Surgery, Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, Croydon University Hospital, 530 London Road, Croydon, CR7 7YE, UK.
| | - F M Ayyaz
- Getting It Right First Time Programme, NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - M Cheetham
- Getting It Right First Time Programme, NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK
- Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - T W R Briggs
- Getting It Right First Time Programme, NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK
- Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, UK
| | - W K Gray
- Getting It Right First Time Programme, NHS England and NHS Improvement, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Christophersen C, Baker JJ, Fonnes S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Lower reoperation rates after open and laparoscopic groin hernia repair when performed by high-volume surgeons: a nationwide register-based study. Hernia 2021; 25:1189-1197. [PMID: 33835325 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-021-02400-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies have shown a correlation between surgeons with high annual volume and better outcomes after various surgical procedures. However, the preexisting literature regarding groin hernia repair and annual surgeon volume is limited. The aim was to investigate how annual surgeon volume affected the reoperation rates for recurrence after primary groin hernia repair. METHODS This nationwide cohort study was based on data from the Danish Hernia Database and the Danish Patient Safety Authority's Online Register. Patients ≥ 18 years undergoing laparoscopic or Lichtenstein primary groin hernia repair between November 2011 and January 2020 were included. Annual surgeon volume was divided into five categories: ≤ 10, 11-25, 26-50, 51-100, and > 100 cases/year. RESULTS We included 25,262 groin hernia repairs performed in 23,088 patients. The risk of reoperation for recurrence after Lichtenstein repair was significantly higher for the volume categories of ≤ 10 (HR 4.02), 11-25 (HR 3.64), 26-50 (HR 3.93), or 51-100 (HR 4.30), compared with the > 100 category. The risk of reoperation for recurrence after laparoscopic repair was significantly increased for the volume categories of ≤ 10 (HR 1.89), 11-25 (HR 2.08), 26-50 (HR 1.80), and 51-100 (HR 1.58) compared with the > 100 category. CONCLUSION The risk of reoperation for recurrence was significantly higher after Lichtenstein and laparoscopic repairs performed by surgeons with < 100 cases/year compared with > 100 cases/year. This indicates that higher surgeon volume minimizes the risk of reoperation for recurrence after groin hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Christophersen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
| | - J J Baker
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - S Fonnes
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - K Andresen
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.,The Danish Hernia Database, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - J Rosenberg
- Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.,The Danish Hernia Database, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lower recurrence rate after groin and primary ventral hernia repair performed by high-volume surgeons: a systematic review. Hernia 2021; 26:29-37. [PMID: 33404970 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02359-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hernia repair is a common procedure; however, an overview is lacking regarding the impact of annual surgeon volume and total surgical experience on the outcome of hernia repair. We aimed to explore the impact of annual surgeon volume and total surgical experience on outcomes of groin and primary ventral hernia repair. METHODS This systematic review followed the Prefered Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. A protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020176140). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. We investigated recurrence rates after groin and primary ventral hernia repair reported according to annual surgeon volume or total surgical experience with at least 6 months follow-up. Surgeons were pooled in three overlapping categories: high-volume (> 50 cases/year), medium-volume (11-50 cases/year) and low-volume (≤ 25 cases/year). RESULTS Ten records for groin hernia and one for primary ventral hernia were included. The median (range) recurrence rates after laparoscopic groin hernia repair for high, medium, and low-volume surgeons were 2.6% (2.3-3.0), 2.4% (0.7-4.6), and 4.2% (1.0-6.8), respectively. The median (range) recurrence rate after open groin hernia repair for high, medium, and low-volume surgeons were 2.1% (2.0-2.2), 1.7% (1.6-2.3), and 2.4% (2.2-5.0). The groin hernia recurrence rate seemed to increase when annual surgeon volume decreased below 25 cases/year. For primary ventral hernia, increased annual surgeon volume was associated with decreased reoperation rate. CONCLUSION High-volume surgeons seemed to have lower rates of hernia recurrence after groin as well as primary ventral hernia repair and our data supports the need for centralization of groin hernia repair on individual surgeons.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Structured laparoscopic and hysteroscopic manual skills testing distinguished novice from mid-level residents, and board-certified obstetrician–gynecologists from fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons. To establish validity evidence for the Essentials in Minimally Invasive Gynecology laparoscopic and hysteroscopic simulation systems.
Collapse
|
6
|
Raakow J, Aydin M, Kilian M, Köhler A, Werner S, Pratschke J, Fikatas P. [Elective treatment of inguinal hernia in university surgery-an economic challenge]. Chirurg 2020; 90:1011-1018. [PMID: 31359111 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-019-1008-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Elective and emergency inguinal hernia surgery is a central task for general and abdominal surgeons. As a standard procedure it is regarded as having a relatively low income in the German diagnosis-related groups (DRG) system. This can lead to an economic imbalance, especially in a cost-intensive environment of a university hospital. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the influence of clinical factors on costs and the contribution margin as well as the overall economic evaluation of elective inguinal hernia surgery at a university hospital. MATERIAL AND METHODS All patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia surgery at two locations of the Charité University Medicine Berlin in 2014 and 2015 were included in the analysis. The influence of clinical, patient and surgical factors on the economic outcome of the cases was evaluated. RESULTS A total of 419 patients were included, mostly after a Lichtenstein operation (44.9%) and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) surgery (53.9%). The greatest impact on the economic outcome was the occurrence of postoperative complications. Also, a patient clinical complexity level (PCCL) value of >1, more than 8 encoded secondary diagnoses and a duration of hospital stay of less than 2 days had a significantly negative impact on the contribution margin. Overall, elective inguinal hernia surgery led to a negative contribution margin of € 651 per case. CONCLUSION Elective inguinal hernia surgery in the environment of a university hospital has a high financial deficit; however, since a complete discontinuation of this treatment is not an alternative multifactorial approaches are required to improve the economic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Raakow
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité Campus Virchow, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.
| | - M Aydin
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité Campus Virchow, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Kilian
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité Campus Virchow, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland.,Abteilung für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Evangelische Elisabeth Klinik, Lützowstr. 26, 10785, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - A Köhler
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité Campus Virchow, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - S Werner
- Geschäftsbereich Unternehmenscontrolling, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - J Pratschke
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité Campus Virchow, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - P Fikatas
- Chirurgische Klinik, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Gliedkörperschaft der Freien Universität Berlin und der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte, Charité Campus Virchow, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maneck M, Köckerling F, Fahlenbrach C, Heidecke CD, Heller G, Meyer HJ, Rolle U, Schuler E, Waibel B, Jeschke E, Günster C. Hospital volume and outcome in inguinal hernia repair: analysis of routine data of 133,449 patients. Hernia 2019; 24:747-757. [PMID: 31786700 PMCID: PMC7395912 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-02091-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Inguinal hernias are repaired using either open or minimally invasive surgical techniques. For both types of surgery it has been demonstrated that a higher annual surgeon volume is associated with a lower risk of recurrence. This present study investigated the volume-outcome implications for recurrence operations, surgical complications, rate of chronic pain requiring treatment, and 30-day mortality based on the hospital volume. Materials and methods The data basis used was the routine data collected throughout the Federal Republic of Germany for persons insured by the Local General Sickness Fund “AOK” who had undergone inpatient inguinal hernia repair between 2013 and 2015. Complications were recorded by means of indicators. Hospitals were divided into five groups on the basis of the annual caseload volume: 1–50, 51–75, 76–100, 101–125, and ≥ 126 inguinal hernia repairs per year. The effect of the hospital volume on the indicators was assessed using multiple logistic regression. Results 133,449 inguinal hernia repairs were included. The incidence for recurrence operations was 0.95%, for surgical complications 4.22%, for chronic pain requiring treatment 2.87%, and for the 30-day mortality 0.28%. Low volume hospitals (1–50 and 51–75 inguinal hernia repairs per year) showed a significantly increased recurrence risk compared to high volume hospitals with ≥ 126 inguinal hernia repairs per year (odds ratio: 1.53 and 1.24). No significant correlations were found for the other results. Conclusions The study gives a detailed picture of hospital care for inguinal hernia repair in Germany. Furthermore, it was noted that the risk of hernia recurrence decreases in line with a rising caseload of the treating hospital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Maneck
- AOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany
| | - F Köckerling
- Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
| | | | - C D Heidecke
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - G Heller
- Department of Medicine, University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - H J Meyer
- German Society of Surgery, Berlin, Germany
| | - U Rolle
- Department of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Urology, University of Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - E Schuler
- Department of Quality Management, Helios Hospitals, Berlin, Germany
| | - B Waibel
- Medical Review Board of the Social Health Insurance Funds Baden-Württemberg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - E Jeschke
- AOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany
| | - C Günster
- AOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Köckerling F. TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men: what do we know? Hernia 2019; 23:439-459. [PMID: 31062110 PMCID: PMC6586704 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-019-01936-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Based on the new international guidelines for groin hernia management, there is no one surgical technique that is suited to all patient characteristics and diagnostic findings. Therefore, a tailored approach should be used. Here, a distinction must be made between primary unilateral inguinal hernia in men and in women, bilateral inguinal hernia, scrotal inguinal hernia, inguinal hernia following pelvic and lower abdominal procedures, patients with severe cardiopulmonary complications, recurrent inguinal hernias and incarcerated inguinal and femoral hernias. This paper now explores the relevant studies on TEP for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia in men, which constitutes the most common indication for repair. MATERIAL A systematic search of the available literature was performed in February 2019 using Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Springer Link and the Cochrane Library. Only meta-analyses, systematic reviews, RCTs and comparative registry studies were considered. 117 publications were identified as relevant. RESULTS RCTs and comparative registry analyses demonstrated the advantages of TEP with regard to postoperative complications, complication-related reoperations, and postoperative and chronic pain compared with Lichtenstein repair for elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair in men. No relevant differences were found compared with TAPP. Mesh fixation is not needed in TEP, but heavyweight meshes result in a lower recurrence rate. Extraperitoneal bupivacaine analgesia vs placebo does not demonstrate any advantages, but drainage is advantageous for seroma prophylaxis. The risk of chronic pain is negatively influenced by small defects, younger patient age, preoperative pain, higher BMI, postoperative complications, higher ASA score and risk factors. CONCLUSION For the subgroup of elective primary unilateral inguinal hernia in men, accounting for a proportion of less than 50% of the total collective, advantages were identified for TEP compared with open Lichtenstein repair but not versus TAPP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Köckerling
- Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Köckerling F, Sheen AJ, Berrevoet F, Campanelli G, Cuccurullo D, Fortelny R, Friis-Andersen H, Gillion JF, Gorjanc J, Kopelman D, Lopez-Cano M, Morales-Conde S, Österberg J, Reinpold W, Simmermacher RKJ, Smietanski M, Weyhe D, Simons MP. Accreditation and certification requirements for hernia centers and surgeons: the ACCESS project. Hernia 2019; 23:185-203. [PMID: 30671899 PMCID: PMC6456484 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-018-1873-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is a need for hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons because of the increasing complexity of hernia surgery procedures due to new techniques, more difficult cases and a tailored approach with an increasing public awareness demanding optimal treatment results. Therefore, the requirements for accredited/certified hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons should be formulated by the international and national hernia societies, while taking account of the respective health care systems. METHODS The European Hernia Society (EHS) has appointed a working group composed of 18 hernia experts from all regions of Europe (ACCESS Group-Hernia Accreditation and Certification of Centers and Surgeons-Working Group) to formulate scientifically based requirements for hernia centers and specialist hernia surgeons while taking into consideration different health care systems. A consensus was reached on the key questions by means of a meeting, a telephone conference and the exchange of contributions. The requirements formulated below were deemed implementable by all participating hernia experts in their respective countries. RESULTS The ACCESS Group suggests for an adequately equipped hernia center the following requirements: (a) to be accredited/certified by a national or international hernia society, (b) to perform a higher case volume in all types of hernia surgery compared to an average general surgery department in their country, (c) to be staffed by experienced hernia surgeons who are beyond the learning curve for all types of hernia surgery recommended in the guidelines and are responsible for education and training of hernia surgery in their department, (d) to treat hernia patients according to the current guidelines and scientific recommendations, (e) to document each case prospectively in a registry or quality assurance database (f) to perform follow-up for comparison of their own results with benchmark data for continuous improvement of their treatment results and ensuring contribution to research in hernia treatment. To become a specialist hernia surgeon, the ACCESS Group suggests a general surgeon to master the learning curve of all open and laparo-endoscopic hernia procedures recommended in the guidelines, perform a high caseload and additionally to implement and fulfill the other requirements for a hernia center. CONCLUSION Based on the above requirements formulated by the European Hernia Society for accredited/certified hernia centers and hernia specialist surgeons, the national and international hernia societies can now develop their own programs, while taking account of their specific health care systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Köckerling
- Department of Surgery, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany.
| | - A J Sheen
- Associate Clinical Head of Division (Surgery), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - F Berrevoet
- General and HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantations, Pancreas and Abdominal Wall Specialist, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - G Campanelli
- General and Day Surgery Unit, Center of Research and High Specialization for the Pathologies of Abdominal Wall and Surgical Treatment and Repair of Abdominal Hernia, Milano Hernia Center, Instituto Clinico Sant'Ambrogio, University of Insurbria, Milan, Italy
| | - D Cuccurullo
- Chief Week Surgery Departmental Unit, Department of General, Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, A.O. Dei Colli Monaldi Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - R Fortelny
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, 1160, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Friis-Andersen
- Surgical Department, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - J F Gillion
- Unité de Chirurgie Viscérale, Hôpital Privé d'Antony, 1, Rue Velpeau, 92160, Antony, France
| | - J Gorjanc
- Department of Surgery, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, Spitalgasse 26, 9300, St. Veit an der Glan, Austria
| | - D Kopelman
- Department of Surgery Emek Medical Center, Afula and the Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - M Lopez-Cano
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Morales-Conde
- Unit of Innovation in Minimally Invasive Surgery, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, Av. Manuel Siurot, s/n, 41013, Seville, Spain
| | - J Österberg
- Department of Surgery, Mora Hospital, 79285, Mora, Sweden
| | - W Reinpold
- Wilhelmsburger Krankenhaus Gross-Sand, Gross-Sand 3, 21107, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R K J Simmermacher
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelbergglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Smietanski
- Department of General Surgery and Hernia Centre, Hospital in Puck, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - D Weyhe
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Hospital for Visceral Surgery, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Medical Campus University of Oldenburg, Georgstrasse 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - M P Simons
- Department of Surgery, OLVG Hospital, Oosterpark 9, 1091 AC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hand Surgeons Performing More Open Carpal Tunnel Releases Do Not Show Better Patient Outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141:1439-1446. [PMID: 29794704 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000004369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although previous studies have shown that more experienced surgeons have better patient outcomes following a variety of procedures, in hand surgery and carpal tunnel release in particular, this relation remains unproven. The authors assessed whether there is an association between surgeon volume and patient outcomes following open carpal tunnel release. METHODS Patients who underwent carpal tunnel release between 2011 and 2015 at outpatient hand surgery clinics in The Netherlands were included. Surgeon annual volume was defined as the average number of carpal tunnel releases performed per year per participating surgeon over the study period. Primary outcome measures were the Symptom Severity Scale and Functional Status Scale of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire 6 months postoperatively. Multilevel random intercept linear regression analyses were performed to assess whether there was an association between surgeon annual volume and outcome measures, with adjustment for patient characteristics, concomitant procedures, and intake score on the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 1345 patients were included, operated on by 17 surgeons. Median annual surgeon volume was 75 (interquartile range, 50 to 149). Only 0.5 to 0.6 percent of the total variance in patient outcome on the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire could be explained by random differences between surgeons. The authors did not find an association between annual surgeon volume and outcome measures 6 months postoperatively (Symptom Severity Scale: β = 0.000; 95 percent CI, -0.001 to 0.001; and Functional Status Scale: β = 0.000; 95 percent CI, -0.001 to 0.001). CONCLUSION In the authors' sample of highly specialized hand surgeons operating in high-volume centers, they found no differences in outcome between high- and low-volume surgeons.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pavlosky KK, Vossler JD, Murayama SM, Moucharite MA, Murayama KM, Mikami DJ. Predictors of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 2018; 33:2612-2619. [PMID: 30374789 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6557-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is among the most common general surgery procedures. Multiple studies have examined costs and benefits of laparoscopic approach versus open repair. This study aimed to identify patient, surgeon, and hospital demographic predictors of laparoscopic versus open IHR. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of 342,814 IHRs (241,669 open; 101,145 laparoscopic) performed in adults (age ≥ 18) from 2010 to 2015 using the Premier Hospital Database. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratio of an IHR being laparoscopic versus open with respect to several demographic variables. RESULTS The odds of an IHR being laparoscopic increased from 2010 to 2015. A laparoscopic procedure was more likely in patients who were < age 65 (OR 1.29, CI 1.24-1.31, p < 0.0001), male (OR 1.31, CI 1.27-1.34, p < 0.0001), privately insured (OR 1.36, CI 1.33-1.40, p < 0.0001), and neither white, black, nor Hispanic (OR 1.11, CI 1.09-1.14, p < 0.0001). The likelihood of a procedure being laparoscopic decreased 13% with each one-unit increase in Charlson comorbidity index value (OR 0.88, CI 0.87-0.89, p < 0.0001). Surgeons were more likely to perform a laparoscopic procedure if they had larger annual IHR caseloads (≥ 45/year; OR 1.57, CI 1.53-1.60, p < 0.0001), and operated at large hospitals (> 500 beds; OR 1.36, CI 1.33-1.39, p < 0.0001) in New England (OR 2.38, CI 2.29-2.47, p < 0.0001). Non-predictors of a laparoscopic procedure included urban/rural hospital location (OR 1.02, CI 0.10-1.05, p = 0.06) and hospital teaching status (OR 1.01, CI 0.99-1.03, p = 0.2084). CONCLUSIONS Use of laparoscopic IHR is increasing. Patient age, gender, race, and insurance type, as well as surgeon annual volume, hospital size, and hospital region were predictors of a laparoscopic procedure. Further studies are needed to explain and remedy underlying differences impacting these predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Keano Pavlosky
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - John D Vossler
- Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1356 Lusitana St., Sixth Floor, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| | | | | | - Kenric M Murayama
- Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1356 Lusitana St., Sixth Floor, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| | - Dean J Mikami
- Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, 1356 Lusitana St., Sixth Floor, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Köckerling F. What Is the Influence of Simulation-Based Training Courses, the Learning Curve, Supervision, and Surgeon Volume on the Outcome in Hernia Repair?-A Systematic Review. Front Surg 2018; 5:57. [PMID: 30324107 PMCID: PMC6172312 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: In hernia surgery, too, the influence of the surgeon on the outcome can be demonstrated. Therefore the role of the learning curve, supervised procedures by surgeons in training, simulation-based training courses and surgeon volume on patient outcome must be identified. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of the available literature was carried out in June 2018 using Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. For the present analysis 81 publications were identified as relevant. Results: Well-structured simulation-based training courses was found to be associated with a reduced perioperative complication rate for patients operated on by trainees. Open as well as, in particular, laparo-endoscopic hernia surgery procedures have a long learning curve. Its negative impact on the patient can be virtually eliminated through consistent supervision by experienced hernia surgeons. However, this presupposes availability of an adequate trainee caseload and of well-trained hernia surgeons and calls for a certain degree of centralization in hernia surgery. Conclusion: Training courses, learning curve, supervision, and surgeon volume are important aspects in training and outcomes in hernia surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferdinand Köckerling
- Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
AlJamal Y, Buckarma E, Ruparel R, Allen S, Farley D. Cadaveric Dissection vs Homemade Model: What is the Best Way to Teach Endoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair? JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2018; 75:787-791. [PMID: 28970180 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2017] [Revised: 07/19/2017] [Accepted: 09/11/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TEP-IHR) requires practice and training to perform well. We developed a simple, low-cost, inanimate model to teach surgical residents inguinal anatomy and the technique of mesh insertion for a safe, endoscopic TEP-IHR. The objective of this study was to compare our model vs cadaveric dissection for teaching anatomy and mesh insertion. METHODS A total of 14 general surgery residents participated in an institutional review board approved, prospective, and randomized study. Participants received a timed, web-based, interactive pretest assessing relevant anatomy and operative-based techniques. They then performed endoscopic TEP-IHRs on either a cadaver or our low-cost model. Participants then received a timed, web-based interactive posttest consisting of the same questions. Participants were surveyed anonymously regarding the degree to which either the model or the cadaver was educationally effective. RESULTS Both groups of trainees (cadaver = 7, low-cost model = 7) scored higher on the posttest (p<0.05) with similar improvement (cadaver group: pretest = 78% correct, posttest = 87%; low-cost model group: 77% vs 86%). Survey results revealed the trainees preferred for both initial learning and understanding of mesh placement using low-cost models (5 out of 5, 4.8/5, respectively) over cadavers (4.0/5, 3.8/5, respectively; p<0.05). Trainees preferred the cadaver (4.7) over the low-cost model (3.9, p<0.05) in overall experience. No differences were found in the trainees' preference between the cadaver (4.5) and low-cost model (4.7) in the overall educational value. CONCLUSION While the overall educational experience of 14 learners favored a cadaver experience to learn TEP-IHR, initial anatomical learning and placing the mesh was better with an inanimate model. Given the educational value of the 2 methods was equivalent, the $1500 cost for cadavers make the inexpensive and repeatable inanimate model an attractive early resource for learning TEP-IHR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazan AlJamal
- Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - EeeLN Buckarma
- Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Raaj Ruparel
- Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Samuel Allen
- Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - David Farley
- Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Murphy BL, Ubl DS, Zhang J, Habermann EB, Farley DR, Paley K. Trends of inguinal hernia repairs performed for recurrence in the United States. Surgery 2018; 163:343-350. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2017] [Revised: 07/16/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|
15
|
Criss CN, Gish N, Gish J, Carr B, McLeod JS, Church JT, Hsieh L, Matusko N, Geiger JD, Hirschl RB, Gadepalli SK. Outcomes of Adolescent and Young Adults Receiving High Ligation and Mesh Repairs: A 16-Year Experience. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2018; 28:223-228. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2017.0511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cory N. Criss
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nathan Gish
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joshua Gish
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Benjamin Carr
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jennifer S. McLeod
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joseph T. Church
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lily Hsieh
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Niki Matusko
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - James D. Geiger
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Ronald B. Hirschl
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Samir K. Gadepalli
- Section of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of General Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
|
17
|
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Kraft B, Hukauf M, Kuthe A, Schug-Pass C. Does surgeon volume matter in the outcome of endoscopic inguinal hernia repair? Surg Endosc 2017; 31:573-585. [PMID: 27334968 PMCID: PMC5266765 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-5001-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For open and endoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, it has been demonstrated that low-volume surgeons with fewer than 25 and 30 procedures, respectively, per year are associated with significantly more recurrences than high-volume surgeons with 25 and 30 or more procedures, respectively, per year. This paper now explores the relationship between the caseload and the outcome based on the data from the Herniamed Registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS The prospective data of patients in the Herniamed Registry were analyzed using the inclusion criteria minimum age of 16 years, male patient, primary unilateral inguinal hernia, TEP or TAPP techniques and availability of data on 1-year follow-up. In total, 16,290 patients were enrolled between September 1, 2009, and February 1, 2014. Of the participating surgeons, 466 (87.6 %) had carried out fewer than 25 endoscopic/laparoscopic operations (low-volume surgeons) and 66 (12.4 %) surgeons 25 or more operations (high-volume surgeons) per year. RESULTS Univariable (1.03 vs. 0.73 %; p = 0.047) and multivariable analysis [OR 1.494 (1.065-2.115); p = 0.023] revealed that low-volume surgeons had a significantly higher recurrence rate compared with the high-volume surgeons, although that difference was small. Multivariable analysis also showed that pain on exertion was negatively affected by a lower caseload <25 [OR 1.191 (1.062-1.337); p = 0.003]. While here, too, the difference was small, the fact that in that group there was a greater proportion of patients with small hernia defect sizes may have also played a role since the risk in that group was higher. In this analysis, no evidence was found that pain at rest [OR 1.052 (0.903-1.226); p = 0.516] or chronic pain requiring treatment [OR 1.108 (0.903-1.361); p = 0.326] were influenced by the surgeon volume. As confirmed by previously published studies, the data in the Herniamed Registry also demonstrated that the endoscopic/laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery caseload impacted the outcome. However, given the overall high-quality level the differences between a "low-volume" surgeon and a "high-volume" surgeon were small. That was due to the use of a standardized technique, structured training as well as continuous supervision of trainees and surgeons with low annual caseload.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R. Bittner
- Winghofer Medicum Hernia Center, Winghofer Straße 42, 72108 Rottenburg am Neckar, Germany
| | - B. Kraft
- Diakonie Hospital, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Rosenbergstrasse 38, 70176 Stuttgart, Germany
| | - M. Hukauf
- StatConsult GmbH, Halberstädter Straße 40 a, 39112 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - A. Kuthe
- German Red Cross Hospital, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Lützerodestraße 1, 30161 Hannover, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lorenz R, Stechemesser B, Reinpold W, Fortelny R, Mayer F, Schröder W, Köckerling F. Development of a standardized curriculum concept for continuing training in hernia surgery: German Hernia School. Hernia 2016; 21:153-162. [PMID: 28032227 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-016-1566-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2016] [Accepted: 12/17/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The increasingly more complex nature of hernia surgery means that training programs for young surgeons must now meet ever more stringent requirements. There is a growing demand for improved structuring and standardization of education and training in hernia surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS In 2011, the concept of a Hernia School was developed in Germany and has been gradually implemented ever since. That concept comprises the following series of interrelated, tiered course elements: Hernie kompakt (Hernia compact), Hernie konkret (Hernia concrete), and Hernie complex (Hernia complex). All three course elements make provision for structured clinical training based on guest visits to approved hernia centers. The Hernia compact basic course imparts knowledge of anatomy working with fresh cadavers. Hernia surgery procedures can also be conducted using unfixed specimens. Knowledge of abdominal wall ultrasound diagnostics is also imparted and hernia surgery procedures simulated on pelvic trainers. In all three course elements, lectures are delivered by experts across the entire field of hernia surgery using evidence-based practices from the literature. RESULTS To date, eight Hernie kompakt (Hernia compact) courses have been conducted, in each case with up to 55 participants, and with a total of 390 participants. On evaluating the course, over 95% of participants expressed the view that the Hernia compact course content improved hernia surgery training. Following that positive feedback, the more advanced Hernie konkret (Hernia concrete) and Hernie complex (Hernia complex) course elements were introduced in 2016. CONCLUSION The experiences gained to date since the introduction of a Hernia School-a standardized curriculum concept for continuing training in hernia surgery-has been evaluated by participants as an improvement on hitherto hernia surgery training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lorenz
- 3 + Surgeons, Klosterstrasse 34/35, 13581, Berlin, Germany.
| | - B Stechemesser
- Hernia Center Cologne, PAN-Hospital, Zeppelinstrasse 1, 50667, Cologne, Germany
| | - W Reinpold
- Department of Surgery and Hernia Center, Wilhelmsburg Hospital Gross-Sand, Gross-Sand 3, 21107, Hamburg, Germany
| | - R Fortelny
- Department of General-, Visceral- and Oncologic Surgery, Wilhelminen Hospital, Montleartstrasse 37, 1160, Vienna, Austria
| | - F Mayer
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, 5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - W Schröder
- Professional Association of German Surgeons, BDC-Academy, Langenbeck-Virchow-Haus, Luisenstraße 58/59, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Köckerling
- Department of Surgery and Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité Medical School, Vivantes Hospital, Neue Bergstrasse 6, 13585, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|