Outcomes of Adolescent and Young Adults Receiving High Ligation and Mesh Repairs: A 16-Year Experience

Non-mesh inguinal hernia repair: Review

Hernioplasty stands as one of the most common abdominal surgical interventions. The "gold standard" treatment for inguinal hernias remains Lichtenstein mesh hernioplasty. Nonetheless, clinical practice continues to grapple with issues concerning complications such as recurrence, chronic postoperative pain, and infection. The myriad types of surgery lead to conflicting opinions regarding the superiority and drawbacks of inguinal canal plastic surgery methods. This article presents current data on the surgical treatment of non-mesh inguinal hernias, delineating the most prevalent techniques while exploring their respective advantages and disadvantages. Additionally, the researchers' experiences are analyzed in detail.

High ligation with posterior wall repair for inguinal hernia repair in young adults: a nationwide cohort study

Purpose

This study evaluated the difference in the recurrence of inguinal hernia in young adult patients who underwent either high ligation alone or high ligation with posterior wall repair using nationwide data.

Methods

This retrospective study included young adult patients (aged 16-30 years) who underwent surgery for inguinal hernia between June 1, 2013 and December 31, 2020. Data from the National Health Information Database from the Korea Health Insurance Service were used for this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups (high ligation alone and posterior wall repair). The primary outcome was the difference in recurrent inguinal hernia surgeries between the 2 groups.

Results

Among the 10,803 patients included in the study, 947 underwent high ligation alone, and 9,856 underwent high ligation with posterior wall repair. Recurrence was observed in 18 patients (1.9%) in the high ligation only group and 84 (0.85%) in the high ligation with posterior wall repair group. Log-rank test findings revealed that recurrence was less frequent in the high ligation with posterior wall repair group than in the high ligation only group (P = 0.003). In the multivariate analysis of factors influencing recurrence, posterior wall repair (hazard ratio, 0.241; P = 0.001) was shown to significantly lower the recurrence.

Conclusion

Posterior wall repair might be necessary for inguinal hernia repair in young adults.

The outcome of closure of inguinal hernia with laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure in young adults

BACKGROUND

Hernioplasty is one of the most commonly performed surgeries. However, the optimal procedure for young adults has not been defined yet. Our study compared the outcomes of laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (LPEC) in young adults with outcomes in children.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients aged 0-30 years who underwent LPEC. Data regarding age, sex, hernia type, surgical time, pre-intraoperative laterality, contralateral patent processus vaginalis (CPPV), and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

LPEC was performed on 2642 patients in our hospital. Of these, 51 patients were young adults (aged 15-30 years). Asymptomatic CPPV in unilateral patients was frequent in the <15-year age group (50.2%) compared to the 15-30-year age group (15.9%). The median surgical time was shorter in the <15-year age group (19 min, interquartile range [IQR]: 24-33) compared to that of the 15-30-year age group (33 min, IQR: 23.3-40.8).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report on the outcomes in young adult patients who underwent LPEC. The median surgical time was longer in the 15-30-year age group than in the <15-year age group. The median follow-up was 4.7 years with no intra-postoperative complications, such as postoperative bleeding, infection, persistent pain, and recurrence. LPEC is an effective, cosmetic, and safe surgical treatment in young adults and children.

No Reason to Use Mesh in Groin Hernia Repair in Adolescents

Groin hernias are common and hernia repair is one of the most frequent surgical procedures performed worldwide. Despite this, there is no international guideline on the management of groin hernias in adolescents. Mesh reinforcement is used for repair in adults but not in young children. Adolescents, positioned between these age groups, pose unique challenges for surgeons due to their varying growth patterns. Placing a synthetic mesh in growing patients is a concern, particularly in relation to chronic pain. Traditionally, the hernia literature has defined adults as individuals aged 18 years and above. Considering that growth can continue until age 19, this review proposes a revised definition of adolescence for patients with groin hernias encompassing ages 10 to 19. Symptomatic groin hernias in adolescents should be repaired with an open non-mesh technique because of acceptable recurrence rates and the desire to avoid introducing synthetic foreign materials into young patients with ongoing growth potential. Watchful waiting is suggested for asymptomatic groin hernias, postponing repair until the adolescent has become a fully grown adult and symptoms from the hernia develop. Most groin hernias in adolescents are lateral hernias, but before pursuing a watchful waiting strategy in females, an ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging scan is suggested to rule out the presence of a femoral hernia that may need repair.

Low incidence of recurrence and chronic pain after groin hernia repair in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The best operative management of groin hernia in adolescents is uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to assess recurrence and chronic pain after mesh versus non-mesh repair for groin hernia in adolescents.

METHODS

A systematic search was done in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL in May 2022 for studies reporting postoperative chronic pain (≥6 months) or recurrence after groin hernia repair in adolescents aged 10-17 years. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies on primary unilateral or bilateral groin hernia repair. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Meta-analysis of the incidence of recurrence was conducted. This review is reported according to PRISMA guideline.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies including 3,816 adolescents with groin hernias were included comprising two randomized controlled trials, six prospective, and 13 retrospective cohort studies. For non-mesh repairs, the weighted mean incidence proportion of recurrence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.6-2.5) after 2,167 open repairs and 1.9% (95% CI 1.1-2.8) after 1,033 laparoscopic repairs. For mesh repairs, it was 0.6% (95% CI 0.0-1.4) after 406 open repairs while there were no recurrences after 347 laparoscopic repairs (95% CI 0.0-0.6). Across all surgical techniques, the rate of chronic pain after 1,153 repairs ranged from 0 to 11%. Follow-up time varied and was reported in various ways.

CONCLUSION

The incidences of recurrence after groin hernia repair in adolescents were low for both open and laparoscopic mesh and non-mesh repairs. Rates of postoperative chronic pain were low.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42022130554.

Robotic repair of pediatric hernias: Current techniques and practices

The use of minimally invasive surgical techniques has gained popularity in pediatric surgery due to decreased length of stay, improved post-operative pain and smaller incisions. Laparoscopic assisted robotic surgical procedures are becoming more common in adults as they carry all of the benefits of traditional MIS but also allow for improved dexterity, visualization and surgeon ergonomics. In adults, hernia repairs are one of the most commonly performed robotic cases but adaption to pediatric repairs has been slower. Case reports and small case series have described a number of various types of pediatric hernia repairs including congenital diaphragmatic hernias, paraesophageal hernias and inguinal hernias. These cases have demonstrated that robotic repair of pediatric hernias is safe and feasible with minimal documented post-operative complications or recurrence. Future directions should focus on larger patient volume in order to assess outcomes between traditional laparoscopic and robotic approaches.

Adolescent inguinal hernia repair: a review of the literature and recommendations for selective management

BACKGROUND

The choice of how to repair inguinal hernias in adolescents has historically been a matter of experience and differed between pediatric surgeons who traditionally performed a high ligation of the sac and general surgeons who typically perform a repair using mesh. This up-to-date review thoroughly examines the subject and discusses the suitability of both types of repairs in this unique age group.

METHODS

A 20-year Pub Med search was performed for the following terms: adolescent hernia repair including reports of mesh hernia repair in adolescents and postoperative complications including chronic inguinal pain and recurrences.

RESULTS

The evidence in the literature suggests that while there appears to be no difference between the two types of repairs with regards to recurrence and complications, changes in the pelvic floor physiology in adolescents suggest that a selective, individualized approach can be recommended depending on the size and nature of the presenting pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

A selective approach to the inguinal hernia in adolescent patients based on the size of the defect appears justified.

Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing is a Safe and Effective Method for Inguinal Hernia Repair in Young Adolescents

Background: Percutaneous internal ring suturing (PIRS) is a laparoscopic procedure that has demonstrated its safety and efficacy as a method of hernia repair in younger children but without evidence among the adolescent population. The aim of this study was to determine the success of PIRS outcomes for hernia repair in the adolescent population. Methods: All adolescents who were operated on using the PIRS method for inguinal repair during the 5-year study period in a single center were included in a prospective cohort study. The main outcome of the study included treatment outcomes in a term of recurrence rate. The secondary outcomes include other treatment outcomes such as complications, conversion to an open procedure, and reoperation rates, as well as duration of anesthesia and surgery, duration of hospital admission, and the level of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Results: In 51 adolescents (72.5% males) with a median age of 13 years and median follow-up of 44 months, a total of 57 PIRS procedures were performed. There were 30 (58.8%) right hernia repairs, 15 (29.4%) left hernia repairs, and 6 (11.8%) bilateral hernia repairs. The median surgical time was 10 minutes for unilateral and 18 minutes for bilateral hernia repair. The median length of hospital stay was 24 hours. Only one (1.95%) intraoperative complication occurred during surgery, an inferior epigastric vein injury. No complications or recurrences were observed during the follow-up period. Conclusions: PIRS has proven to be simple, safe, and effective method for groin hernia repair in adolescent population. This method provides excellent overall and cosmetic outcomes. There is a low incidence of complications and recurrences. According to our results, PIRS could be considered to become a possible approach for groin hernia repair in adolescents.

High ligation in adolescents: Is it enough?

BACKGROUND

In adults, the gold standard for surgical repair of an inguinal hernia is a mesh repair, whereas, in children, the standard is high ligation of the hernia sac. However, adolescents represent a "gray zone" between children and adults, and there is no consensus on the most appropriate operation for inguinal hernias in these patients. We aimed to describe the outcomes in adolescents undergoing high ligation for inguinal hernia repair and determine what factors may portend an increased risk of recurrence in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed of all children that underwent open high ligation for an inguinal hernia at our tertiary children's hospital from January 2000 to January 2018, who were 12 to 18 years old at the time of surgery. We compared the patient demographic data, medical history, and repair characteristics for the cohort of hernias that developed a recurrence to the cohort that did not.

RESULTS

During our study period, 256 adolescent patients underwent repair with 11 of those patients having both sides repaired for a total of 267 hernias repaired. The median age at surgery was 14.7 years, and 83.9% of the hernias were in male patients. There was a 6.0% recurrence rate, and all patients that developed recurrence underwent a reoperation. The median time from surgery to reoperation for recurrence was 3.1 years. Patients with recurrence were more likely to have cardiac (25.0% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.02) and gastrointestinal comorbidities (25% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.01). There were no other significant differences between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

High ligation of the hernia sac in adolescents is effective and has an acceptable risk of recurrence while avoiding any additional morbidity that may come from the use of mesh. Patients with cardiac and gastrointestinal comorbidities should be counseled on the higher risk of recurrence.

Initial Experience with Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair in the Adolescent Population

Purpose: There is no one standard procedure encompassing the needs and differences of the entire pediatric population for inguinal hernia repair (IHR). Several techniques can be used, including open repair, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted laparoscopic repair. This is a report of a single pediatric hospital's experience performing robotic-assisted IHRs in an adolescent population. Methods: Robotic IHRs performed by the pediatric surgery department were prospectively captured and reviewed. The operation performed was a modified robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach with ProGrip mesh. Results: Between January 2016 and August 2020, 11 robotic-assisted IHRs occurred. All patients were male, median weight interquartile range (IQR) was 76.6 kg (67.425-90.4 kg) and median age (IQR) was 17 years (17-18.5). All together median (IQR) total operative time was 111 (97.5-126) minutes, median (IQR) total console time was 60 (55.5-75.5) minutes. There were no complications or conversions, with all patients discharged on the day of the operation. Conclusion: This study demonstrates a safe and reliable approach to repairing inguinal hernias using robotics through a small initial case series. Robotic-assisted IHR should be considered a viable technique to optimize the surgical care of adolescents.

Inguinal hernia repair with or without mesh in late adolescent males

Purpose

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common treatments worldwide, but there are few studies about the use of mesh in late adolescent patients because hernias are rare in this group. This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes of hernia repair with and without mesh in late adolescent patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 243 male patients aged between 18 and 21 years who underwent inguinal hernia repair at a single institution from January 2013 to December 2017. We distinguished 2 groups depending on the repair method; mesh (n = 121) and no-mesh (n = 122) groups. We compared the baseline characteristics, immediate postoperative outcomes, and recurrence and chronic pain rates between the 2 groups.

Results

There were no significant differences between the mesh and no-mesh groups on immediate postoperative outcomes (length of stay: 18.5 ± 8.9 days vs. 17.0 ± 6.0 days, P = 0.139; postoperative complications: 8.2% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.821) and 2-year recurrence rate (0.8% vs. 2.6%, P = 0.194). There was a significant difference in the chronic pain rate (9.0% vs. 1.7%, P = 0.023).

Conclusion

Using mesh for inguinal hernia repair in late adolescent male patients increases chronic postoperative inguinal pain.

Recurrence after laparoscopic high ligation in adolescents: A multicenter international retrospective study of ten hospitals

PURPOSE

Inguinal hernia repairs are among the most common operations performed by pediatric surgeons. Laparoscopic high ligation is a popular technique, but its recurrence rate in adolescents is unknown. We hypothesized that recurrence after laparoscopic high ligation in adolescents would be similar to open repair (1.8%-6.3%).

METHODS

We evaluated adolescent patients (12-18 years old at the time of surgery) who underwent laparoscopic high ligation across eleven hospitals. At least six months postoperatively, they were contacted by telephone for follow-up. Variables analyzed included demographics, operative details, recurrence, and other complications.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were enrolled. One hospital (n=9) had a recurrence rate of 44.4%, compared to 3.0% (4/135) for the other hospitals. By accounting for 50.0% of recurrences, it represented a statistical outlier and was excluded, leaving 135 patients for analysis. The median age was 14 years, and 63.7% were male. Recurrence with the excluded center was 5.6% (8/144). Use of absorbable suture (OR 42.67, CI 4.41-412.90, p<0.01) and braided suture (OR 12.10, CI 1.54-95.25, p=0.02) was weakly associated with recurrence. Recurrence was not significantly different from published results.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic high ligation of adolescent inguinal hernias has a recurrence rate similar to open repair when performed by experienced surgeons.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis study (retrospective study) LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.