DNA damage during the spindle-assembly checkpoint degrades CDC25A, inhibits cyclin-CDC2 complexes, and reverses cells to interphase

Aurora kinases and DNA damage response

It is well established that Aurora kinases perform critical functions during mitosis. It has become increasingly clear that the Aurora kinases also perform a myriad of non-mitotic functions including DNA damage response. The available evidence indicates that inhibition Aurora kinase A (AURKA) may contribute to the G₂ DNA damage checkpoint through AURKA's functions in PLK1 and CDC25B activation. Both AURKA and Aurora kinase B (AURKB) are also essential in mitotic DNA damage response that guard against DNA damage-induced chromosome segregation errors, including the control of abscission checkpoint and prevention of micronuclei formation. Dysregulation of Aurora kinases can trigger DNA damage in mitosis that is sensed in the subsequent G₁ by a p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint. Aurora kinases are themselves linked to the G₁ DNA damage checkpoint through p53 and p73 pathways. Finally, several lines of evidence provide a connection between Aurora kinases and DNA repair and apoptotic pathways. Although more studies are required to provide a comprehensive picture of how cells respond to DNA damage, these findings indicate that both AURKA and AURKB are inextricably linked to pathways guarding against DNA damage. They also provide a rationale to support more detailed studies on the synergism between small-molecule inhibitors against Aurora kinases and DNA-damaging agents in cancer therapies.

Premature activation of Cdk1 leads to mitotic events in S phase and embryonic lethality

Cell cycle regulation, especially faithful DNA replication and mitosis, are crucial to maintain genome stability. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)/cyclin complexes drive most processes in cellular proliferation. In response to DNA damage, cell cycle surveillance mechanisms enable normal cells to arrest and undergo repair processes. Perturbations in genomic stability can lead to tumor development and suggest that cell cycle regulators could be effective targets in anticancer therapy. However, many clinical trials ended in failure due to off-target effects of the inhibitors used. Here, we investigate in vivo the importance of WEE1- and MYT1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation of mammalian CDK1. We generated Cdk1^AF knockin mice, in which two inhibitory phosphorylation sites are replaced by the non-phosphorylatable amino acids T14A/Y15F. We uncovered that monoallelic expression of CDK1^AF is early embryonic lethal in mice and induces S phase arrest accompanied by γH2AX and DNA damage checkpoint activation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs). The chromosomal fragmentation in Cdk1^AF MEFs does not rely on CDK2 and is partly caused by premature activation of MUS81-SLX4 structure-specific endonuclease complexes, as well as untimely onset of chromosome condensation followed by nuclear lamina disassembly. We provide evidence that tumor development in liver expressing CDK1^AF is inhibited. Interestingly, the regulatory mechanisms that impede cell proliferation in CDK1^AF expressing cells differ partially from the actions of the WEE1 inhibitor, MK-1775, with p53 expression determining the sensitivity of cells to the drug response. Thus, our work highlights the importance of improved therapeutic strategies for patients with various cancer types and may explain why some patients respond better to WEE1 inhibitors.

Maintaining Genome Stability in Defiance of Mitotic DNA Damage

The implementation of decisions affecting cell viability and proliferation is based on prompt detection of the issue to be addressed, formulation and transmission of a correct set of instructions and fidelity in the execution of orders. While the first and the last are purely mechanical processes relying on the faithful functioning of single proteins or macromolecular complexes (sensors and effectors), information is the real cue, with signal amplitude, duration, and frequency ultimately determining the type of response. The cellular response to DNA damage is no exception to the rule. In this review article we focus on DNA damage responses in G2 and Mitosis. First, we set the stage describing mitosis and the machineries in charge of assembling the apparatus responsible for chromosome alignment and segregation as well as the inputs that control its function (checkpoints). Next, we examine the type of issues that a cell approaching mitosis might face, presenting the impact of post-translational modifications (PTMs) on the correct and timely functioning of pathways correcting errors or damage before chromosome segregation. We conclude this essay with a perspective on the current status of mitotic signaling pathway inhibitors and their potential use in cancer therapy.

8-60hIPP5(m)-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest involves activation of ATM/p53/p21(cip1/waf1) pathways and delayed cyclin B1 nuclear translocation

Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is a major serine/threonine phosphatase that controls gene expression and cell cycle progression. The active mutant IPP5 (8-60hIPP5(m)), the latest member of the inhibitory molecules for PP1, has been shown to inhibit the growth of human cervix carcinoma cells (HeLa). In order to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, the present study assessed overexpression of 8-60hIPP5(m) in HeLa cells. Flow cytometric and biochemical analyses showed that overexpression of 8-60hIPP5(m) induced G2/M-phase arrest, which was accompanied by the upregulation of cyclin B1 and phosphorylation of G2/M-phase proteins ATM, p53, p21(cip1/waf1) and Cdc2, suggesting that 8-60hIPP5(m) induces G2/M arrest through activation of the ATM/p53/p21(cip1/waf1)/Cdc2/ cyclin B1 pathways. We further showed that overexpression of 8-60hIPP5(m) led to delayed nuclear translocation of cyclin B1. 8-60hIPP5(m) also could translocate to the nucleus in G2/M phase and interact with pp1α and Cdc2 as demonstrated by co-precipitation assay. Taken together, our data demonstrate a novel role for 8-60hIPP5(m) in regulation of cell cycle in HeLa cells, possibly contributing to the development of new therapeutic strategies for cervix carcinoma.

Identification of biomarkers for diagnosis of gastric cancer by bioinformatics

BACKGROUND

We aimed to discover potential gene biomarkers for gastric cancer (GC) diagnosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Genechips of 10 GC tissues and 10 gastric mucosa (GM, para-carcinoma tissue, normal control) tissues were generated using an exon array of Affymetrix containing 30,000 genes. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between GC tissues and normal control were identified by the Limma package and analyzed by hierarchical clustering analysis. Gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analyses were performed for investigating the functions of DEGs. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to measure the effects of biomarker candidates for diagnosis of GC.

RESULTS

Totals of 896 up-regulated and 60 down-regulated DEGs were identified to be differentially expressed between GC samples and normal control. Hierarchical clustering analysis showed that DEGs were highly differentially expressed and most DEGs were up-regulated. The most significantly enriched GO-BP term was revealed to be mitotic cell cycle and the most significantly enriched pathway was cell cycle. The intersection analysis showed that most significant DEGs were cyclin B1 (CCNB1) and cyclin B2 (CCNB2). The sensitivities and specificities of CCNB1 and CCNB2 were both high (p<0.0001). Areas under the ROC curve for CCNB1 and CCNB2 were both greater than 0.9 (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

CCNB1 and CCNB2, which were involved in cell cycle, played significant roles in the progression and development of GC and these genes may be potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of GC.

Role of RUNX2 in Breast Carcinogenesis

RUNX2 is a transcription factor playing the major role in osteogenesis, but it can be involved in DNA damage response, which is crucial for cancer transformation. RUNX2 can interact with cell cycle regulators: cyclin-dependent kinases, pRB and p21Cip1 proteins, as well as the master regulator of the cell cycle, the p53 tumor suppressor. RUNX2 is involved in many signaling pathways, including those important for estrogen signaling, which, in turn, are significant for breast carcinogenesis. RUNX2 can promote breast cancer development through Wnt and Tgfβ signaling pathways, especially in estrogen receptor (ER)-negative cases. ERα interacts directly with RUNX2 and regulates its activity. Moreover, the ERα gene has a RUNX2 binding site within its promoter. RUNX2 stimulates the expression of aromatase, an estrogen producing enzyme, increasing the level of estrogens, which in turn stimulate cell proliferation and replication errors, which can be turned into carcinogenic mutations. Exploring the role of RUNX2 in the pathogenesis of breast cancer can lead to revealing new therapeutic targets.

Co-inhibition of polo-like kinase 1 and Aurora kinases promotes mitotic catastrophe

Mitosis is choreographed by a number of protein kinases including polo-like kinases and Aurora kinases. As these kinases are frequently dysregulated in cancers, small-molecule inhibitors have been developed for targeted anticancer therapies. Given that PLK1 and Aurora kinases possess both unique functions as well as co-regulate multiple mitotic events, whether pharmacological inhibition of these kinases together can enhance mitotic catastrophe remains an outstanding issue to be determined. Using concentrations of inhibitors that did not induce severe mitotic defects on their own, we found that both the metaphase arrest and mitotic slippage induced by inhibitors targeting Aurora A and Aurora B (MK-5108 and Barasertib respectively) were enhanced by a PLK1 inhibitor (BI 2536). We found that PLK1 is overexpressed in cells from nasopharyngeal carcinoma, a highly invasive cancer with poor prognosis, in comparison to normal nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells were more sensitive to BI 2536 as a single agent and co-inhibition with Aurora kinases than normal cells. These observations underscore the mechanism and potential benefits of targeting PLK1 and Aurora kinases to induce mitotic catastrophe in cancer cells.

DNA damage to a single chromosome end delays anaphase onset

Chromosome ends contain nucleoprotein structures known as telomeres. Damage to chromosome ends during interphase elicits a DNA damage response (DDR) resulting in cell cycle arrest. However, little is known regarding the signaling from damaged chromosome ends (designated here as "TIPs") during mitosis. In the present study, we investigated the consequences of DNA damage induced at a single TIP in mitosis. We used laser microirradiation to damage mitotic TIPs or chromosome arms (non-TIPs) in PtK2 kidney epithelial cells. We found that damage to a single TIP, but not a non-TIP, delays anaphase onset. This TIP-specific checkpoint response is accompanied by differential recruitment of DDR proteins. Although phosphorylation of H2AX and the recruitment of several repair factors, such as Ku70-Ku80, occur in a comparable manner at both TIP and non-TIP damage sites, DDR factors such as ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), MDC1, WRN, and FANCD2 are specifically recruited to TIPs but not to non-TIPs. In addition, Nbs1, BRCA1, and ubiquitin accumulate at damaged TIPs more rapidly than at damaged non-TIPs. ATR and 53BP1 are not detected at either TIPs or non-TIPs in mitosis. The observed delay in anaphase onset is dependent on the activity of DDR kinases ATM and Chk1, and the spindle assembly checkpoint kinase Mps1. Cells damaged at a single TIP or non-TIP eventually exit mitosis with unrepaired lesions. Damaged TIPs are segregated into micronuclei at a significantly higher frequency than damaged non-TIPs. Together, these findings reveal a mitosis-specific DDR uniquely associated with chromosome ends.

Role of genomic instability in arsenic-induced carcinogenicity. A review

Exposure to chronic arsenic toxicity is associated with cancer. Although unstable genome is a characteristic feature of cancer cells, the mechanisms leading to genomic instability in arsenic-induced carcinogenesis are poorly understood. While there are excellent reviews relating to genomic instability in general, there is no comprehensive review presenting the mechanisms involved in arsenic-induced genomic instability. This review was undertaken to present the current state of research in this area and to highlight the major mechanisms that may involved in arsenic-induced genomic instability leading to cancer. Genomic instability is broadly classified into chromosomal instability (CIN), primarily associated with mitotic errors; and microsatellite instability (MIN), associated with DNA level instability. Arsenic-induced genomic instability is essentially multi-factorial in nature and involves molecular cross-talk across several cellular pathways, and is modulated by a number of endogenous and exogenous factors. Arsenic and its metabolites generate oxidative stress, which in turn induces genomic instability through DNA damage, irreversible DNA repair, telomere dysfunction, mitotic arrest and apoptosis. In addition to genetic alteration; epigenetic regulation through promoter methylation and miRNA expression alters gene expression profiling leading to genome more vulnerable and unstable towards cancer risk. Moreover, mutations or silencing of pro-apoptotic genes can lead to genomic instability by allowing survival of damaged cells that would otherwise die. Although a large body of information is now generated regarding arsenic-induced carcinogenesis; further studies exploring genome-wide association, role of environment and diet are needed for a better understanding of the arsenic-induced genomic instability.

CHK1 inhibitors in combination chemotherapy: thinking beyond the cell cycle

Cellular sensing of DNA damage, along with concomitant cell cycle arrest, is mediated by a great many proteins and enzymes. One focus of pharmaceutical development has been the inhibition of DNA damage signaling, and checkpoint kinases (Chks) in particular, as a means to sensitize proliferating tumor cells to chemotherapies that damage DNA. 7-Hydroxystaurosporine, or UCN-01, is a clinically relevant and well-studied kinase activity inhibitor that exerts chemosensitizing effects by inhibition of Chk1, and a multitude of Chk1 inhibitors have entered development. Clinical development of UCN-01 has overcome many initial obstacles, but the drug has nevertheless failed to show a high level of clinical activity when combined with chemotherapeutic agents. One very likely reason for the lack of clinical efficacy of Chk1 inhibitors may be that the inhibition of Chk1 causes the compensatory activation of ATM and ERK1/2 pathways. Indeed, inhibition of many enzyme activities, not necessarily components of cell cycle regulation, may block Chk1 inhibitor-induced ERK1/2 activation and enhance the toxicity of Chk1 inhibitors. This review examines the rationally hypothesized actions of Chk1 inhibitors as cell cycle modulatory drugs as well as the impact of Chk1 inhibition upon other cell survival signaling pathways. An understanding of Chk1 inhibition in multiple signaling contexts will be essential to the therapeutic development of Chk1 inhibitors.

Beyond ATM: the protein kinase landscape of the DNA damage response

The DNA of all organisms is constantly subjected to damaging agents, both exogenous and endogenous. One extremely harmful lesion is the double-strand break (DSB), which activates a massive signaling network - the DNA damage response (DDR). The chief activator of the DSB response is the ATM protein kinase, which phosphorylates numerous key players in its various branches. Recent phosphoproteomic screens have extended the scope of damage-induced phosphorylations beyond the direct ATM substrates. We review the evidence for the involvement of numerous other protein kinases in the DDR, obtained from documentation of specific pathways as well as high-throughput screens. The emerging picture of the protein phosphorylation landscape in the DDR broadens the current view on the role of this protein modification in the maintenance of genomic stability. Extensive cross-talk between many of these protein kinases forms an interlaced signaling network that spans numerous cellular processes. Versatile protein kinases in this network affect pathways that are different from those they have been identified with to date. The DDR appears to be one of the most extensive signaling responses to cellular stimuli.

In vitro gene regulatory networks predict in vivo function of liver

BACKGROUND

Evolution of toxicity testing is predicated upon using in vitro cell based systems to rapidly screen and predict how a chemical might cause toxicity to an organ in vivo. However, the degree to which we can extend in vitro results to in vivo activity and possible mechanisms of action remains to be fully addressed.

RESULTS

Here we use the nitroaromatic 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) as a model chemical to compare and determine how we might extrapolate from in vitro data to in vivo effects. We found 341 transcripts differentially expressed in common among in vitro and in vivo assays in response to TNT. The major functional term corresponding to these transcripts was cell cycle. Similarly modulated common pathways were identified between in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we uncovered the conserved common transcriptional gene regulatory networks between in vitro and in vivo cellular liver systems that responded to TNT exposure, which mainly contain 2 subnetwork modules: PTTG1 and PIR centered networks. Interestingly, all 7 genes in the PTTG1 module were involved in cell cycle and downregulated by TNT both in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our investigation of TNT effects on gene expression in liver suggest that gene regulatory networks obtained from an in vitro system can predict in vivo function and mechanisms. Inhibiting PTTG1 and its targeted cell cycle related genes could be key mechanism for TNT induced liver toxicity.

Avian reovirus nonstructural protein p17-induced G(2)/M cell cycle arrest and host cellular protein translation shutoff involve activation of p53-dependent pathways

The effects of avian reovirus (ARV) p17 protein on cell cycle progression and host cellular protein translation were studied. ARV infection and ARV p17 transfection resulted in the accumulation of infected and/or transfected cells in the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle. The accumulation of cells in the G(2)/M phase was accompanied by upregulation and phosphorylation of the G(2)/M-phase proteins ATM, p53, p21(cip1/waf1), Cdc2, cyclin B1, Chk1, Chk2, and Cdc25C, suggesting that p17 induces a G(2)/M cell cycle arrest through activation of the ATM/p53/p21(cip1/waf1)/Cdc2/cyclin B1 and ATM/Chk1/Chk2/Cdc25C pathways. The G(2)/M cell cycle arrest resulted in increased virus replication. In the present study, we also provide evidence demonstrating that p17 protein is responsible for ARV-induced host cellular protein translation shutoff. Increased phosphorylation levels of the eukaryotic translation elongation factor 2 (eEF2) and initiation factor eIF2alpha and reduced phosphorylation levels of the eukaryotic translation initiation factors eIF4E, eIF4B, and eIF4G, as well as 4E-BP1 and Mnk-1 in p17-transfected cells, demonstrated that ARV p17 suppresses translation initiation factors and translation elongation factors to induce host cellular protein translation shutoff. Inhibition of mTOR by rapamycin resulted in a decrease in the levels of phosphorylated 4E-BP1, eIF4B, and eIF4G and an increase in the levels eEF2 but did not affect ARV replication, suggesting that ARV replication was not hindered by inhibition of cap-dependent translation. Taken together, our data indicate that ARV p17-induced G(2)/M arrest and host cellular translation shutoff resulted in increased ARV replication.

Depression of MAD2 inhibits apoptosis and increases proliferation and multidrug resistance in gastric cancer cells by regulating the activation of phosphorylated survivin

Mitotic arrest-deficient 2 (MAD2) is one of the essential mitotic spindle checkpoint regulators, and it can protect cells from aberrant chromosome segregation. The Mad2 gene is very rarely mutated in many kinds of human cancer, but aberrantly reduced expression of MAD2 has been correlated with defective mitotic checkpoints in several human cancers. We have previously found that the MAD2 expression level is also shown to be associated with the multidrug resistance of tumour cells. In this study, we constructed a small interfering RNA (siRNA) eukaryotic expression vector of MAD2 and downregulated MAD2 expression in the gastric cancer cell line SGC7901 by transfection of MAD2-siRNA. SGC7901 cells stably transfected with the MAD2-siRNA exhibited significantly increased expression of phosphorylated survivin protein and enhanced drug resistance. Furthermore, MAD2-siRNA suppressed the proliferation of SGC7901 cells and inhibited tumour formation in athymic nude mice. This study clearly reveals that downregulation of MAD2 could regulate the cell cycle, increase proliferation, and improve the drug resistance of gastric cancer cells by regulating the activation of phosphorylated survivin. It also suggests both that MAD2 might play an important role in the development of human gastric cancer and that silencing the MAD2 gene may help to deal with the multidrug resistance of gastric cancer cells.

Generation of an indestructible cyclin B1 by caspase-6-dependent cleavage during mitotic catastrophe

Overriding the G(2) DNA damage checkpoint permits precocious entry into mitosis that ultimately leads to mitotic catastrophe. Mitotic catastrophe is manifested by an unscheduled activation of CDK1, caspase activation and apoptotic cell death. We found that although cyclin B1 was required for mitotic catastrophe, it was cleaved into a approximately 35 kDa protein by a caspase-dependent mechanism during the process. Cyclin B1 cleavage occurred after Asp123 in the motif ILVD(123) downward arrow, and mutation of this motif attenuated the cleavage. Cleavage was abolished by a pan-caspase inhibitor as well as by specific inhibitors for the effector caspase-6 and the initiator caspase-8. Cleavage created a truncated cyclin B1 lacking part of the NH(2)-terminal regulatory domain that included the destruction box sequence. Although cleavage of cyclin B1 itself was not absolutely required for mitotic catastrophe, expression of the truncated product enhanced cell death. In support of this, ectopic expression of this truncated cyclin B1 was not only sufficient to induce mitotic block and apoptosis but also enhanced mitotic catastrophe induced by ionizing radiation and caffeine. These data underscore a possible linkage between mitotic and apoptotic functions by caspase-dependent processing of mitotic activators.

RPA phosphorylation facilitates mitotic exit in response to mitotic DNA damage

Human replication protein A (RPA) becomes phosphorylated on the RPA2 subunit by cyclin B-Cdc2 during mitosis, although the functional role of this modification is unclear. We find that this modification stimulates RPA2 to become hyperphosphorylated in response to mitotic DNA damage caused by bleomycin treatment. Cells in which endogenous RPA2 was replaced by a mutant subunit lacking both Cdc2 sites had a significant defect in mitotic release into a 2N G(1) phase after exposure to bleomycin. An increased percentage of these mutant cells also was positive initially for cyclin B expression and BubR1 chromatin staining, indicative of an extended spindle assembly checkpoint. The mutant cells that experienced mitotic DNA damage also underwent apoptosis at higher levels than cells expressing the WT subunit. Even so, we did not find the mutation had any dramatic effects on the level of DNA repair in mitosis. Cells lacking ATM (a checkpoint factor and RPA2 kinase) also were severely defective in mitotic exit and were unable to support RPA hyperphosphorylation after mitotic DNA damage. Although checkpoint 1 effector kinase (Chk1) had a more complex role, inhibition of Chk1 activity with UCN-01 also reduced mitotic exit. Chk1 activation and mitotic RPA hyperphosphorylation were found to be independent events. Our results demonstrate that mitotic RPA hyperphosphorylation facilitates release of cells from a damaged mitosis into a 2N G(1) phase, thereby increasing cell viability.

Specialized roles of the two mitotic cyclins in somatic cells: cyclin A as an activator of M phase-promoting factor

The role of cyclin B-CDC2 as M phase-promoting factor (MPF) is well established, but the precise functions of cyclin A remain a crucial outstanding issue. Here we show that down-regulation of cyclin A induces a G2 phase arrest through a checkpoint-independent inactivation of cyclin B-CDC2 by inhibitory phosphorylation. The phenotype is rescued by expressing cyclin A resistant to the RNA interference. In contrast, down-regulation of cyclin B disrupts mitosis without inactivating cyclin A-CDK, indicating that cyclin A-CDK acts upstream of cyclin B-CDC2. Even when ectopically expressed, cyclin A cannot replace cyclin B in driving mitosis, indicating the specific role of cyclin B as a component of MPF. Deregulation of WEE1, but not the PLK1-CDC25 axis, can override the arrest caused by cyclin A knockdown, suggesting that cyclin A-CDK may tip the balance of the cyclin B-CDC2 bistable system by initiating the inactivation of WEE1. These observations show that cyclin A cannot form MPF independent of cyclin B and underscore a critical role of cyclin A as a trigger for MPF activation.

Inhibiting transient protein-protein interactions: lessons from the Cdc25 protein tyrosine phosphatases

Transient protein-protein interactions have key regulatory functions in many of the cellular processes that are implicated in cancerous growth, particularly the cell cycle. Targeting these transient interactions as therapeutic targets for anticancer drug development seems like a good idea, but it is not a trivial task. This Review discusses the issues and difficulties that are encountered when considering these transient interactions as drug targets, using the example of the cell division cycle 25 (Cdc25) phosphatases and their cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)-cyclin protein substrates.

Regulation of Polo-like kinase 1 by DNA damage in mitosis. Inhibition of mitotic PLK-1 by protein phosphatase 2A

DNA damage triggers multiple checkpoint pathways to arrest cell cycle progression. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is an important regulator of several events during mitosis. In addition to Plk1 functions in cell cycle, Plk1 is involved in DNA damage check-point in G2 phase. Normally, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase (ATM) is a key enzyme involved in G2 phase cell cycle arrest following DNA damage, and inhibition of Plk1 by DNA damage during G2 occurs in a ATM/ATR-dependent manner. However, it is still unclear how Plk1 is regulated in response to DNA damage in mitosis in which Plk1 is already activated. Here, we show that treatment of mitotic cells with doxorubicin and gamma-irradiation inhibits Plk1 activity through dephosphorylation of Plk1, and cells were arrested in G2 phase. Treatments of the phosphatase inhibitors and siRNA experiments suggested that PP2A pathway might be involved in regulating mitotic Plk1 activity in mitotic DNA damage. Finally, we propose a novel pathway, which is connected between ATM/ATR/Chk and protein phosphatase-Plk1 in DNA damage response in mitosis.

Polyploidization increases the sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in mammalian cells

Polyploidization occurs during normal development as well as during tumorigenesis. In this study, we investigated if the responses to genotoxic stress in cancer cells are influenced by the ploidy. Prolonged treatment of Hep3B cells with the spindle inhibitor nocodazole resulted in mitotic slippage, followed by re-replication of the DNA to produce polyploids. Reintroduction of p53 restored the checkpoints and suppressed polyploidization. Remarkably, a stable tetraploidy cell line could be generated from Hep3B by a transient nocodazole treatment followed by a period of recovery. Using this novel tetraploid system, we found that tetraploidization increased the cell volume without significantly affecting the cell cycle. Although tetraploidization was accompanied by an increase in centrosome number, the majority of mitoses in the tetraploid cells remained bipolar. Polyploidization sensitized cells to genotoxic stress inflicted by ionizing radiation and topoisomerase inhibitors without affecting the sensitivity to spindle inhibitors. Accordingly, more gamma-H2AX foci were induced by radiation in tetraploids than in normal Hep3B cells. Likewise, primary tetraploid human fibroblasts displayed higher gamma-H2AX foci formation than diploid human fibroblasts. An implication for chemotherapy is that some cancer cells can be sensitized to genotoxic agents by a preceding step that induces polyploidization.

Downregulation of Fer induces PP1 activation and cell-cycle arrest in malignant cells

Fer is a nuclear and cytoplasmic intracellular tyrosine kinase. Herein we show that Fer is required for cell-cycle progression in malignant cells. Decreasing the level of Fer using the RNA interference (RNAi) approach impeded the proliferation of prostate and breast carcinoma cells and led to their arrest at the G0/G1 phase. At the molecular level, knockdown of Fer resulted in the activation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB), and this was reflected by profound hypo-phosphorylation of pRB on both cyclin-dependent kinase CDK4 and CDK2 phosphorylation sites. Dephosphorylation of pRB was not seen upon the direct targeting of either CDK4 or CDK2 expression, and was only partially achieved by the simultaneous depletion of these two kinases. Amino-acid sequence analysis revealed two protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) binding motifs in the kinase domain of Fer and the association of Fer with the pRB phosphatase PP1alpha was verified using co-immunoprecipitation analysis. Downregulation of Fer potentiated the activation of PP1alpha and overexpression of Fer decreased the enzymatic activity of that phosphatase. Our findings portray Fer as a regulator of cell-cycle progression in malignant cells and as a potential target for cancer intervention.

Cdc25: mechanisms of checkpoint inhibition and recovery

Members of the eukaryotic Cdc25 phosphatase family are key targets of the Chk1 and Chk2 checkpoint kinases, which inactivate Cdc25 to halt cell cycle progression when DNA is damaged or incompletely replicated. Now, new kinases that phosphorylate and inactivate Cdc25 are being discovered, including MAPKAP kinase-2, a component of the p38 stress-activated MAP kinase pathway. The roles of other kinases, such as cyclin-dependent kinase, Polo and Aurora A kinase, in controlling the localization or the activation of Cdc25, are controversial. Here, we discuss new data that suggests that different Cdc25 isoforms and regulators of Cdc25 are differentially required for normal cell cycle progression and recovery from checkpoint arrest.

Cross-talk between DNA damage and cell survival checkpoints during G2and mitosis: pharmacologic implications

In this study, we wanted to clarify the role of survivin-mediated survival signaling during G2 and M in tumor cells treated with DNA-damaging agents. As a cellular model, we selected MOLT-4 human T-cell lymphoblastic leukemia cells that overexpress survivin and nonfunctional p53. Treatment with melphalan, a classic DNA-damaging agent, led to the induction of the DNA damage checkpoint and growth arrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle. Checkpoint abrogation by caffeine was accompanied by mitotic entry and rapid apoptotic cell death, whereas cells remaining in G2 remained viable during the same time interval. Unexpectedly, when the spindle checkpoint was activated following G2 abrogation, two different effects could be observed. If the microtubules of the melphalan-treated cells were destabilized by nocodazole, cells became arrested in prometaphase with low survivin levels and entered apoptosis. In contrast, if the microtubules of the melphalan-treated cells were stabilized by taxol, cells were still arrested in prometaphase, but apoptotic execution was inhibited. This effect is, most likely, directly mediated by survivin itself given its well-established antiapoptotic functions. In conclusion, depending on the way the spindle checkpoint was activated in cells with damaged DNA, cells could be either protected by survivin or die during mitosis. We suggest that the efficacy of DNA damage checkpoint abrogators used in combination with DNA-damaging agents may critically depend on whether DNA damage is able to invoke spindle checkpoint response and to activate survivin-associated survival signaling during mitosis.

Selective and irreversible cell cycle inhibition by diphenyleneiodonium

Because cell proliferation is subject to checkpoint-mediated regulation of the cell cycle, pharmacophores that target cell cycle checkpoints have been used clinically to treat human hyperproliferative disorders. It is shown here that the flavoprotein inhibitor diphenyleneiodionium can block cell proliferation by targeting of cell cycle checkpoints. Brief exposure of mitotically arrested cells to diphenyleneiodonium induces a loss of the mitotic cell morphology, and this corresponds with a decrease in the levels of the mitotic markers MPM2 and phospho-histone H3, as well as a loss of centrosome maturation, spindle disassembly, and redistribution of the chromatin remodeling helicase ATRX. Surprisingly, this mitotic exit resulted in a tetraploidization that persisted long after drug release. Analogously, brief exposure to diphenyleneiodonium also caused prolonged arrest in G(1) phase. By contrast, diphenyleneiodonium exposure did not abrogate S phase, although it did result in a subsequent block of G(2) cell cycle progression. This indicates that diphenyleneiodonium selectively targets components of the cell cycle, thereby either causing cell cycle arrest, or checkpoint override followed by cell cycle arrest. These irreversible effects of diphenyleneiodonium on the cell cycle may underlie its potent antiproliferative activity.

The Drosophila Grp/Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint controls entry into anaphase

It is well established that DNA damage induces checkpoint-mediated interphase arrest in higher eukaryotes, but recent studies demonstrate that DNA damage delays entry into anaphase as well. Damaged DNA in syncytial and gastrulating Drosophila embryos delays the metaphase/anaphase transition . In human cultured cells, DNA damage also induces a delay in mitosis . However, the mechanism by which DNA damage delays the anaphase onset is controversial. Some studies implicate a DNA damage checkpoint , whereas other studies invoke a spindle checkpoint . To resolve this issue, we compared the effects of random DNA breaks induced by X-irradiation to site-specific I-CreI endonuclease-induced chromosome breaks on cell-cycle progression in wild-type and checkpoint-defective Drosophila neuroblasts. We found that both the BubR1 spindle checkpoint pathway and the Grp/Chk1 DNA damage checkpoint pathway are involved in delaying the metaphase/anaphase transition after extensive X-irradiation-induced DNA damage, whereas Grp/Chk1, but not BubR1, is required to delay anaphase onset in the presence of I-CreI-induced double-strand breaks. On the basis of these results, we propose that DNA damage in nonkinetochore regions produces a Grp/Chk1 DNA-damage-checkpoint-mediated delay in the metaphase/anaphase transition.

Targeting senescence pathways to reverse drug resistance in cancer

Irreversible proliferation arrest (also called senescence) has emerged recently as a drug-responsive program able to influence the outcome of cancer chemotherapy. Since the drug amounts required for induction of proliferation arrest are much lower than those necessitated for induction of cell death, forcing cancer cells to undergo senescence may represent a less aggressive approach to control tumor progression. However, to achieve a long-standing control of proliferation, the ability of cancer cells to escape senescence and become drug resistant must be inhibited. Therefore, a clear understanding of the mechanisms that govern drug-induced senescence is critical and can lead to discovery of novel approaches to suppress drug resistance. The present review discusses the relevance of senescence in response to chemotherapy and the onset of drug resistance development. Particular emphasis is directed toward the utilization of findings from the field of research on aging, that can be applied to induction of senescence in cancer cells and reversal of their drug resistance phenotype. Proof of principle for this relationship is represented by the identification of inhibitors of aging associated proteases such as the proteasome and cathepsin L as novel and potent cancer drug resistance reversing agents.

Mitotic Arrest Deficient 2 Expression Induces Chemosensitization to a DNA-Damaging Agent, Cisplatin, in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells

Recently, mitotic arrest deficient 2 (MAD2)-mediated spindle checkpoint is shown to induce mitotic arrest in response to DNA damage, indicating overlapping roles of the spindle checkpoint and DNA damage checkpoint. In this study, we investigated if MAD2 played a part in cellular sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, especially cisplatin, and whether it was regulated through mitotic checkpoint. Using nine nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell lines, we found that decreased MAD2 expression was correlated with cellular resistance to cisplatin compared with the cell lines with high levels of MAD2. Exogenous MAD2 expression in NPC cells also conferred sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents especially cisplatin but not other anticancer drugs with different mechanisms of action. The increased cisplatin sensitivity in MAD2 transfectants was associated with mitotic arrest and activation of apoptosis pathway evidenced by the increased mitotic index and apoptosis rate as well as decreased Bcl-2 and Bax ratio and expression of cleaved poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and caspase 3. Our results indicate that the MAD2-induced chemosensitization to cisplatin in NPC cells is mediated through the induction of mitotic arrest, which in turn activates the apoptosis pathway. Our evidence further confirms the previous hypothesis that spindle checkpoint plays an important part in DNA damage-induced cell cycle arrest and suggests a novel role of MAD2 in cellular sensitivity to cisplatin.

Chromosome damage and progression into and through mitosis in vertebrates

How cells behave as they divide in the presence of chromosome (DNA) damage is only just beginning to be explored. It appears to depend on the cell type and organism, the stage of development, how extensive the damage is and when it occurs. The existing data support the conclusion that vertebrate somatic cells lack a conventional DNA damage checkpoint during mitosis, and that when damaged DNA does prolong mitosis it is mediated by the spindle assembly checkpoint. As a rule, in the presence of DNA damage cells ultimately undergo an aberrant mitosis and enter the ensuing G1. They then either die, via apoptosis or mitotic catastrophe, or survive with an altered genome. To avoid these outcomes, cells with DNA damage are normally prevented from entering mitosis by a number of G2 checkpoint control pathways.

A Major Role for Mitotic cdc2 Kinase Inactivation in the Establishment of the Mitotic DNA Damage Checkpoint

Cdc2 kinase is inactivated when DNA damage occurs during the spindle assembly checkpoint. Here, we show that the level of mitotic Bloom syndrome protein phosphorylation reflects the level of cdc2 activity. A complete inactivation of cdc2 by either introduction of DNA double-strand breaks or roscovitine treatment prevents exit from mitosis. Thus, mitotic cdc2 inactivation plays a major role in the establishment of the mitotic DNA damage checkpoint. In response to mitotic cdc2 inactivation, the M/G(1) transition is delayed after releasing the drug block in nonmalignant cells, whereas tumor cells exit mitosis without dividing and rereplicate their DNA, which results in mitotic catastrophe. This opens the way for new chemotherapeutic strategies.

Polo-Like Kinase 1 Inactivation Following Mitotic DNA Damaging Treatments Is Independent of Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Kinase

Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is an important regulator of several events during mitosis. Recent reports show that Plk1 is involved in both G2 and mitotic DNA damage checkpoints. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM) is an important enzyme involved in G2 phase cell cycle arrest following interphase DNA damage, and inhibition of Plk1 by DNA damage during G2 occurs in an ATM-/ATM-Rad3–related kinase (ATR)–dependent fashion. However, it is unclear how Plk1 is regulated in response to M phase DNA damage. We found that treatment of mitotic cells with DNA damaging agents inhibits Plk1 activity primarily through dephosphorylation of Plk1, which occurred in both p53 wild-type and mutant cells. Inhibition of Plk1 is not prevented by caffeine pretreatment that inhibits ATM activity and also occurs in ATM mutant cell lines. Furthermore, ATM mutant cell lines, unlike wild-type cells, fail to arrest after mitotic DNA damaging treatments. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, LY294002, reduces Plk1 dephosphorylation following mitotic DNA damaging treatments, suggesting that the PI3K pathway may be involved in regulating Plk1 activity. Earlier studies showed that inhibition of Plk1 by G2 DNA damage occurs in an ATM-dependent fashion. Our results extend the previous studies by showing that ATM is not required for dephosphorylation and inhibition of Plk1 activity following mitotic DNA damage, and also suggest that Plk1 is not a principal regulator or mediator of the mitotic DNA damage response.

Binding of 14-3-3beta but not 14-3-3sigma controls the cytoplasmic localization of CDC25B: binding site preferences of 14-3-3 subtypes and the subcellular localization of CDC25B

The dual specificity phosphatase CDC25B positively controls the G2-M transition by activating CDK1/cyclin B. The binding of 14-3-3 to CDC25B has been shown to regulate the subcellular redistribution of CDC25B from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and may be correlated with the G2 checkpoint. We used a FLAG-tagged version of CDC25B to study the differences among the binding sites for the 14-3-3 subtypes, 14-3-3beta, 14-3-3epsilon and 14-3-3sigma, and the relationship between subtype binding and the subcellular localization of CDC25B. All three subtypes were found to bind to CDC25B. Site-directed mutagenesis studies revealed that 14-3-3beta bound exclusively near serine-309 of CDC25B1, which is within a potential consensus motif for 14-3-3 binding. By contrast, 14-3-3sigma bound preferentially to a site around serine-216, and the presence of serine-137 and -309 enhanced the binding. In addition to these binding-site differences, we found that the binding of 14-3-3beta drove CDC25B to the cytoplasm and that mutation of serine-309 to alanine completely abolished the cytoplasmic localization of CDC25B. However, co-expression of 14-3-3sigma and CDC25B did not affect the subcellular localization of CDC25B. Furthermore, serine-309 of CDC25B was sufficient to produce its cytoplasmic distribution with co-expression of 14-3-3beta, even when other putative 14-3-3 binding sites were mutated. 14-3-3epsilon resembled 14-3-3beta with regard to its binding to CDC25B and the control of CDC25B subcellular localization. The results of the present study indicate that two 14-3-3 subtypes can control the subcellular localization of CDC25B by binding to a specific site and that 14-3-3sigma has effects on CDC25B other than the control of its subcellular localization.

How many mutant p53 molecules are needed to inactivate a tetramer?

The tumor suppressor p53 is transcription factor composed of four identical subunits. The majority of the mutations in p53 are missense mutations that impair DNA binding. On the other hand, the p53-related p63 and p73 genes are rarely mutated, but many cell types express natural variants lacking the N-terminal transactivation domain (NDelta). Compelling evidence indicates that both the DNA binding-defective and NDelta mutants can impair the function of wild-type p53 in a dominant-negative manner. Interestingly, it is uncertain how many mutant subunit(s) a p53 tetramer can tolerate. In this study, we first made theoretical predictions based on the number of mutant p53 monomers needed to inactivate a tetramer and then tested how well the experimental data fit the predicted values. Surprisingly, these experiments reveal that DNA binding-defective p53 mutants (R249S and R273H) are very ineffective in impairing the transcriptional activity of p53: at least three mutants are required to inactivate a tetramer. In marked contrast, p53NDelta is a very potent inhibitor of p53: one NDelta subunit per tetramer is sufficient to abolish the transcriptional activity. DNA binding is not necessary for the NDelta proteins to inactivate p53. Similarly, NDelta variants of p63 and p73 are also powerful inhibitors of members of the p53 family. These results have important implications for our thinking about the mechanism of tumorigenesis involving missense p53 mutants or the N-terminally truncated isoforms.

Topoisomerase poisons differentially activate DNA damage checkpoints through ataxia-telangiectasia mutated–dependent and –independent mechanisms

Camptothecin and Adriamycin are clinically important inhibitors for topoisomerase (Topo) I and Topo II, respectively. The ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) product is essential for ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage responses, but the role of ATM in Topo poisons-induced checkpoints remains unresolved. We found that distinct mechanisms are involved in the activation of different cell cycle checkpoints at different concentrations of Adriamycin and camptothecin. Adriamycin promotes the G1 checkpoint through activation of the p53-p21CIP1/WAF1 pathway and decrease of pRb phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of p53(Ser20) after Adriamycin treatment is ATM dependent, but is not required for the full activation of p53. The G1 checkpoint is dependent on ATM at low doses but not at high doses of Adriamycin. In contrast, the Adriamycin-induced G2 checkpoint is independent on ATM but sensitive to caffeine. Adriamycin inhibits histone H3(Ser10) phosphorylation through inhibitory phosphorylation of CDC2 at low doses and down-regulation of cyclin B1 at high doses. The camptothecin-induced intra-S checkpoint is partially dependent on ATM, and is associated with inhibitory phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 and reduction of BrdUrd incorporation after mid-S phase. Finally, apoptosis associated with high doses of Adriamycin or camptothecin is not influenced by the absence of ATM. These data indicate that the involvement of ATM following treatment with Topo poisons differs extensively with dosage and for different cell cycle checkpoints.

Differential mode of regulation of the checkpoint kinases CHK1 and CHK2 by their regulatory domains

CHK1 and CHK2 are key mediators that link the machineries that monitor DNA integrity to components of the cell cycle engine. Despite the similarity and potential redundancy in their functions, CHK1 and CHK2 are unrelated protein kinases, each having a distinctive regulatory domain. Here we compare how the regulatory domains of human CHK1 and CHK2 modulate the respective kinase activities. Recombinant CHK1 has only low basal activity when expressed in cultured cells. Surprisingly, disruption of the C-terminal regulatory domain activates CHK1 even in the absence of stress. Unlike the full-length protein, C-terminally truncated CHK1 displays autophosphorylation, phosphorylates CDC25C on Ser(216), and delays cell cycle progression. Intriguingly, enzymatic activity decreases when the entire regulatory domain is removed, suggesting that the regulatory domain contains both inhibitory and stimulatory elements. Conversely, the kinase domain suppresses Ser(345) phosphorylation, a major ATM/ATR phosphorylation site in the regulatory domain. In marked contrast, CHK2 expressed in either mammalian cells or in bacteria is already active as a kinase against itself and CDC25C and can delay cell cycle progression. Unlike CHK1, disruption of the regulatory domain of CHK2 abolishes its kinase activity. Moreover, the regulatory domain of CHK2, but not that of CHK1, can oligomerize. Finally, CHK1 but not CHK2 is phosphorylated during the spindle assembly checkpoint, which correlates with the inhibition of the kinase. The mitotic phosphorylation of CHK1 requires the regulatory domain, does not involve Ser(345), and is independent on ATM. Collectively, these data reveal the very different mode of regulation between CHK1 and CHK2.