Tracking cellular and immune therapies in cancer

The field of tumor immunology has seen an explosion of renewed interest over the last decade. With the FDA approval of new immunotherapies for prostate cancer and melanoma, as well as several exciting new drugs in clinical trials, tumor immunology is becoming an increasingly important topic in preclinical studies and patient care. However, the current methods for assessing the immune status of a patient and tumor are limited, which has led to the development of novel molecular imaging methods for assessing tumor immunology. From cell tracking for cellular therapeutics to assessing the tumor immune microenvironment, these imaging methods have the potential to further preclinical understanding of immunotherapies and potentially translate into clinically useful tests to predict and assess therapeutic response of these exciting new agents. In this review, we first discuss the recent advances in cancer immunotherapy, followed by a detailed review of the current state of molecular imaging for tumor immunology. Finally, we discuss opportunities for further development and innovation in this rapidly growing field.

Radiolabeled peptides in diagnosis and therapy

During the past few years, there has been exponential growth in the development of radiolabeled peptides for diagnosis and therapy. This is because the peptides can be synthesized easily and inexpensively, they have fast clearance and rapid tissue penetration, and they are less likely to be immunogenic. More importantly, most peptides have a high affinity for characteristic receptor molecules that are overexpressed on malignant mammalian cells. Peptides can be labeled with a variety of radionuclides intended for specific applications, diagnostic or therapeutic, by using both conventional and novel chelating moieties, many of which can be incorporated during the solid state synthesis of a chosen peptide. High specific-activity peptides can be prepared and used to minimize unwanted physiologic effects, and known sequences of amino acids can be modified to slow their in vivo catabolic rate. These characteristics have paved the way for the preparation of a large number of radiolabeled peptides for a variety of clinical and experimental applications. This article briefly discusses the peptide chemistry; it also summarizes the preparation of radiolabeled peptides and outlines their applications in imaging vascular thrombosis, detecting infection and inflammation, and localizing tumors. Their therapeutic applications in oncology are also presented and the future directions outlined. Peptides that have been approved for human use, such as AcuTect (Diatide, Londonderry, NH) or OctreoScan (Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO), or those that have made it to clinical trials, are emphasized. Also discussed are selected promising agents that are still in preclinical investigation.

Radio-labeled receptor-binding peptides: a new class of radiopharmaceuticals

Radio-labeled receptor-binding peptides have emerged as an important class of radiopharmaceuticals. In vertebrates, these peptides transmit their biological function by binding to their specific receptor on the target cell surface. This specific receptor-binding property is exploited when the radio-labeled peptide is used as a radiopharmaceutical. The high-binding affinity for its receptor facilitates retention of the peptide in receptor-expressing tissues, whereas its relatively small size facilitates rapid clearance from the blood and other nontarget tissues. Receptor-binding peptides labeled with gamma-emitters can be used to visualize receptor-positive cells in vivo. In addition, when labeled with beta- or alpha-emitters, these peptides can be used for peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy. Various receptors are overexpressed on particular tumor types, and peptides binding to these receptors can be used to visualize tumor lesions scintigraphically. Furthermore, peptides binding receptors on granulocytes can be used to image infectious and inflammatory foci, whereas peptides binding receptors on activated thrombocytes can be used for thrombus imaging. Here, the peptide analogs that are under development for these applications are reviewed.

Value of peptide receptor scintigraphy using (123)I-vasoactive intestinal peptide and (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe1-octreotide in 194 carcinoid patients: Vienna University Experience, 1993 to 1998

PURPOSE

To report our experience with both (123)I-vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-octreotide for imaging to identify primary and metastatic tumor sites in carcinoid patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred ninety-four patients with a verified or clinically suspected diagnosis of a carcinoid tumor were injected with (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-OCT for imaging purposes, while 133 patients underwent scanning with both (123)I-VIP and (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-OCT in random order. Imaging results were compared with computed tomography scans, results of conventional ultrasound, endosonography, and endoscopy, and results of surgical exploration in case of inconclusive conventional imaging.

RESULTS

Primary or recurrent carcinoid tumors could be visualized with (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-OCT in 95 (91%) of 104 patients; metastatic sites were identified in 110 (95%) of 116 patients. In 11 (51%) of 21 patients with suggestive symptoms but without identified lesions by conventional imaging, focal tracer uptake located the carcinoid tumor. In addition, metastatic disease was demonstrated in three patients after resection. In a direct comparison in the 133 patients who underwent both imaging modalities, (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-OCT was found to be superior to (123)I-VIP, with 35 (93%) of 38 versus 32 (82%) of 38 scans being positive in primary or recurrent tumors, 58 (90%) of 65 versus 53 (82%) of 65 being positive in patients with metastatic sites, and seven (44%) of 16 versus four (25%) of 16 being positive in patients with symptoms but otherwise negative work-ups. Overall, additional lesions not seen on conventional imaging were imaged in 43 (41%) of 158 versus 25 (25%) of 103 scans with (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-OCT and (123)I-VIP, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both peptide tracers have a high sensitivity for localizing tumor sites in patients with ascertained or suspected carcinoid tumors, with (111)In-DTPA-D-Phe(1)-OCT scintigraphy being more sensitive than (123)I-VIP receptor scanning. Both, however, had a higher diagnostic yield than conventional imaging, as verified by surgical intervention or long-term follow-up. The combination of both peptide receptor scans does not seem to further enhance diagnostic information.