Improved survival with dose-escalated radiotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of the National Cancer Database

Long-term outcome of definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world single-center study in the pre-durvalumab era

BACKGROUND

There was limited research data on large-scale locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) radical radiotherapy (RT) reported in China. This study examined overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), treatment effectiveness, and toxicity in patients with LA-NSCLC treated with definitive RT in the pre-durvalumab era.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of demographic information, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of 789 patients with LA-NSCLC who underwent radical RT at our center between January 2005 and December 2015 was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for survival comparisons, and Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There were 328 patients with stage IIIA disease and 461 with stage IIIB disease. By the last follow-up, there were 365 overall deaths and 576 cases of recurrence, metastasis, or death. The median survival time was 31 months. The OS rates at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were 83.7%, 59.5%, 28.8%, and 18.9%, respectively. PFS rates at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were 48%, 24.5%, 11.9%, and 5.5%, respectively. Rates of ≥grade 3 acute radiation pneumonitis or esophagitis were 7.6% and 1.9%, respectively. Rates of ≥grade 3 chronic radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis were 11% and 0.4%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, smoking status, and combined chemotherapy were prognostic factors for OS (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that combined chemotherapy and radiation dose were prognostic factors for PFS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our center's data showed that the survival prognosis of locally advanced patients receiving RT and chemotherapy in China was consistent with international levels during the same period. Patients with a KPS score of 80 or higher, who had never smoked or received combined RT, had a more favorable prognosis than those with a KPS of less than 80, who had smoked, or only received RT. The combination of RT and chemotherapy, with a reasonable radiation dose, was the key to improving the therapeutic effect.

Pulmonary magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy of locally advanced: the PUMA trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with locally-advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) are often ineligible for surgery, so that definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) represents the treatment of choice. Nevertheless, long-term tumor control is often not achieved. Intensification of radiotherapy (RT) to improve locoregional tumor control is limited by the detrimental effect of higher radiation exposure of thoracic organs-at-risk (OAR). This narrow therapeutic ratio may be expanded by exploiting the advantages of magnetic resonance (MR) linear accelerators, mainly the online adaptation of the treatment plan to the current anatomy based on daily acquired MR images. However, MR-guidance is both labor-intensive and increases treatment times, which raises the question of its clinical feasibility to treat LA-NSCLC. Therefore, the PUMA trial was designed as a prospective, multicenter phase I trial to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of MR-guided online adaptive RT in LA-NSCLC.

METHODS

Thirty patients with LA-NSCLC in stage III A-C will be accrued at three German university hospitals to receive MR-guided online adaptive RT at two different MR-linac systems (MRIdian Linac®, View Ray Inc. and Elekta Unity®, Elekta AB) with concurrent chemotherapy. Conventionally fractioned RT with isotoxic dose escalation up to 70 Gy is applied. Online plan adaptation is performed once weekly or in case of major anatomical changes. Patients are followed-up by thoracic CT- and MR-imaging for 24 months after treatment. The primary endpoint is twofold: (1) successfully completed online adapted fractions, (2) on-table time. Main secondary endpoints include adaptation frequency, toxicity, local tumor control, progression-free and overall survival.

DISCUSSION

PUMA aims to demonstrate the clinical feasibility of MR-guided online adaptive RT of LA-NSCLC. If successful, PUMA will be followed by a clinical phase II trial that further investigates the clinical benefits of this approach. Moreover, PUMA is part of a large multidisciplinary project to develop MR-guidance techniques.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05237453 .

Predicting personalised and progressive adaptive dose escalation to gross tumour volume using knowledge-based planning models for inoperable advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy

OBJECTIVES

Increased radiation doses could improve local control and overall survival of lung cancer patients, however, this could be challenging without exceeding organs at risk (OAR) dose constraints especially for patients with advanced-stage disease. Increasing OAR doses could reduce the therapeutic ratio and quality of life. It is therefore important to investigate methods to increase the dose to target volume without exceeding OAR dose constraints.

METHODS

Gross tumour volume (GTV) was contoured on synthetic computerised tomography (sCT) datasets produced using the Velocity adaptive radiotherapy software for eleven patients. The fractions where GTV volume decreased compared to that prior to radiotherapy (reference plan) were considered for personalised progressive dose escalation. The dose to the adapted GTV (GTVAdaptive) was increased until OAR doses were affected (as compared to the original clinical plan). Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was maintained for all plans. Doses were also escalated to the reference plan (GTVClinical) using the same method. Adapted, dose-escalated, plans were combined to estimate accumulated dose, D99 (dose to 99%) of GTVAdapted, PTV D99 and OAR doses and compared with those in the original clinical plans. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) model was developed to predict D99 of the adapted GTV with OAR doses and PTV coverage kept similar to the original clinical plans; prediction accuracy and model verification were performed using further data sets.

RESULTS

Compared to the original clinical plan, dose to GTV was significantly increased without exceeding OAR doses. Adaptive dose-escalation increased the average D99 to GTVAdaptive by 15.1Gy and 8.7Gy compared to the clinical plans. The KBP models were verified and demonstrated prediction accuracy of 0.4% and 0.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Progressive adaptive dose escalation can significantly increase the dose to GTV without increasing OAR doses or compromising dose to microscopic disease. This may increase overall survival without increasing toxicities.

Dose-escalation by hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost IMRT in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

To explore the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and evaluate the safety of dose escalation using hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) concurrent with chemotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Four escalating radiation dose levels were used. This study included 25 patients with previously untreated NSCLC who received six concurrent weekly chemotherapy cycles comprising cisplatin and docetaxel. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any acute toxicity that interrupted radiotherapy for more than 1 week. MTD was defined as the highest dose level that didn’t induce DLT or grade 5 toxicity in two patients.

Results

All 25 patients received the prescribed escalating radiation dose from the start dose up to LEVEL 4. Two patients experienced DLT at dose LEVEL 4. One patient died because of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 6 months after radiotherapy, whereas another patient among the additional five patients died because of grade 5 radiation pneumonitis within 2 months after radiotherapy. Dose LEVEL 3 was defined as MTD. The 1- and 2-year local controls were 82.8 and 67.8%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 15.4 months, whereas the median overall survival was 27.3 months.

Conclusions

Dose escalation was safely achieved up to LEVEL 3 [the planning gross target volume (PTVG) 60.5 Gy/22 Fx, 2.75 Gy/Fx; the planning clinical target volume (PTVC) 49.5 Gy/22 Fx] using SIB-IMRT concurrently with chemotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC, and the acute toxicities were generally well tolerated. Further prospective studies on long-term outcomes and late toxicities are warranted.

Trial registration

Retrospective registration, ChiCTR1900027290(08/11/2019).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09099-3.

Hypofractionated Volumetric-Modulated Arc Radiotherapy for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Not Suitable for Surgery or Conventional Chemoradiotherapy or SBRT

Background

Hypofractionated radiotherapy (HypoRT) has been used to pursue an alternative treatment regimen for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not eligible for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), surgery or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and has shown good local control and safety. We analyzed the feasibility of using volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique to achieve high local control with few treatment-related toxicities.

Patients and Methods

A total of 55 patients with stage I-IV NSCLC who were not candidates for SABR, surgery or CCRT were included in the present study. All patients received a prescribed dose of 60 to 66 Gy in 15 fractions. Local progression-free survival (LPFS), PFS, overall survival (OS), and toxicities were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Thirty-three patients (60.0%) had stage IV or recurrent disease in this study. The median follow-up time was 8 months (interquartile range: 5.0-16.3 months). The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 84.3% and 69.9%, and the 1-year and 2-year LPFS rates were 91.0% and 63.0%. The median OS (mOS) and median LPFS (mLPFS) were not reached, and median PFS (mPFS) was 15 months. Twenty-eight (51.9%) patients had disease progression at the time of analysis. Of these, 7 (13.0%), 7 (13.0%) and 21 (38.9%) had local recurrence, locoregional failure and distant metastasis, respectively. All cases of local recurrence were found within the SIB region. Four patients had grade 2-3 pneumonitis, and 8 patients had grade 2-3 esophagitis. Patients with grade 2-3 esophagitis had significantly higher maximum dose and dose to 5 cm³ volume to esophagus than those with grade 0-1 esophagitis. No grade 4 or higher toxicity was observed.

Conclusion

The 60 to 66 Gy in 15 fractions RT regimen provides favorable local control and survival with well-tolerated toxicities. Hypofractionated VMAT+SIB is an alternative treatment option for patients with NSCLC who cannot tolerate standard definitive therapy.

Rationale for concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer

When treating patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), those with a good performance status and disease measured within a radical treatment volume should be considered for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). This guidance is based on key scientific rationale from two large Phase 3 randomised studies and meta-analyses demonstrating the superiority of cCRT over sequential (sCRT). However, the efficacy of cCRT comes at the cost of increased acute toxicity versus sequential treatment. Currently, there are several documented approaches that are addressing this drawback, which this paper outlines. At the point of diagnosis, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach can enable accurate assessment of patients, to determine the optimal treatment strategy to minimise risks. In addition, reviewing the Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice (ACROP) guidelines can provide clinical oncologists with additional recommendations for outlining target volume and organ-at-risk delineation for standard clinical scenarios in definitive cCRT (and adjuvant radiotherapy). Furthermore, modern advances in radiotherapy treatment planning software and treatment delivery mean that radiation oncologists can safely treat substantially larger lung tumours with higher radiotherapy doses, with greater accuracy, whilst minimising the radiotherapy dose to the surrounding healthy tissues. The combination of these advances in cCRT may assist in creating comprehensive strategies to allow patients to receive potentially curative benefits from treatments such as immunotherapy, as well as minimising treatment-related risks.

Sparing Organs at Risk with Simultaneous Integrated Boost Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An Automatic Treatment Planning Study

Background

The technique of simultaneous integrated boost volumetric modulated arc therapy (SIB-VMAT) has been widely used in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer; however, its dosimetric advantages are seldom reported. This study aimed to quantify dosimetric advantages of SIB-VMAT.

Methods

Forty patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer in our hospital were retrospectively included. SIB-VMAT and conventional VMAT (C-VMAT) plans were generated for every patient using the automatic treatment planning system. A reduced dose was delivered to PTV in SIB-VAMT plans compared to C-VMAT plans (50.4Gy vs 60Gy). The prescribed dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to PTV and 59.92 Gy in 28 fractions to PGTV in SIB-VMAT plans, while 60 Gy in 30 fractions to PTV in C-VMAT plans. Dose-volume metrics of PTV, total lung, heart, esophagus and spinal cord were recorded. The quality score was used to evaluate organs at risk (OAR) protection for two type prescription plans.

Results

Conformal coverage of the targets (PGTV/PTV) by 95% of the prescription dose was well achieved in radiation plans. SIB-VMAT plans achieved significantly higher quality score than C-VMAT plans (Mean: 68.15±13.32 vs 49.15±13.35, P<0.001). More plans scored above sixty in SIB-VMAT group compared to C-VMAT group (72.5% vs 20%, P<0.001). Notable reductions in mean dose, V₃₀, V₄₀ and V₅₀ of total lung were observed in SIB-VMAT plans compared to C-VMAT plans, with median decreased proportions of 6.5%, 8.7%, 19.6% and 32.1%, respectively. Statistically significant decrease in heart V₃₀ and V₄₀ was also achieved in SIB-VMAT plans, with median decreased proportions of 26.1% and 38.8%. SIB-VMAT plans achieved significant reductions in the maximum doses to both esophagus and spinal cord. Patients with CTV/(GTV+GTVnd) ≥8.6 showed more notable decrease in total lung V₅₀ (median, 33.6% vs 28.8%, P=0.001) in SIB-VMAT plans compared to those with the ratio being less than 8.6.

Conclusion

SIB-VMAT technique could lead to a substantial sparing of normal organs, including lung, heart, esophagus and cord, mainly through reducing high and inter-median dose exposure. Patients with CTV/(GTV+GTVnd) ≥8.6 might benefit more from SIB-VMAT.

Predictive model of the first failure pattern in patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC)

Purpose

To analyze patterns of failure in patients with LA-NSCLC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and to build a nomogram for predicting the failure patterns in this population of patients.

Materials and methods

Clinicopathological data of patients with LA-NSCLC who received definitive chemoradiotherapy and follow-up between 2013 and 2016 in our hospital were collected. The endpoint was the first failure after definitive chemoradiotherapy. With using elastic net regression and 5-fold nested cross-validation, the optimal model with better generalization ability was selected. Based on the selected model and corresponding features, a nomogram prediction model was built. This model was also validated by ROC curves, calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

With a median follow-up of 28 months, 100 patients experienced failure. There were 46 and 54 patients who experience local failure and distant failure, respectively. Predictive model including 9 factors (smoking, pathology, location, EGFR mutation, age, tumor diameter, clinical N stage, consolidation chemotherapy and radiation dose) was finally built with the best performance. The average area under the ROC curve (AUC) with 5-fold nested cross-validation was 0.719, which was better than any factors alone. The calibration curve revealed a satisfactory consistency between the predicted distant failure rates and the actual observations. DCA showed most of the threshold probabilities in this model were with good net benefits.

Conclusion

Clinicopathological factors could collaboratively predict failure patterns in patients with LA-NSCLC who are receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy. A nomogram was built and validated based on these factors, showing a potential predictive value in clinical practice.

High dose radiation therapy based on normal tissue constraints with concurrent chemotherapy achieves promising survival of patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We aimed to investigate the potential of individual isotoxic dose escalation based on normal tissue constraints (NTC), hypothesizing that high dose radiation therapy would be superior to standard-dose in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Individually prescribed radiation doses were calculated based on NTC. Patients with total tumour radiation doses ≥66 Gy were assigned to the high dose (HD, ≥66 Gy) group, and all other patients were assigned to the standard-dose (SD, <66 Gy) group. Each patient was retrospectively assigned an Eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer disease stage based on the imaging data of initial diagnosis to avoid over- and under-staging. Intensity modulated radiation therapy plans were optimized to minimize the volumes of organs at risk exposed to radiation. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

From March 2006 to September 2012, 140 patients were enrolled and assigned to two groups: 71 patients into the HD group and 69 patients into the SD group. The median survival time (MST) was significantly higher in the HD group (33.5 months) than in the SD group (21 months), (p < 0.0001). Overall 5-year survival rates were significantly higher in the HD group than in the SD group (37.8% vs 16.7%). Median progression-free survival was 19 months in the HD group and 11 months in the SD group (p < 0.0001). No difference in severe (grade 3-5) toxic effects was noted between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant positive association observed between prescribed dose and survival suggests that individualized isotoxic dose-escalated radiation based on NTC might improve survival in this cohort of stage III NSCLC Chinese patients.

Strengths and limitations of large databases in lung cancer radiation oncology research

There has been a substantial rise in the utilization of large databases in radiation oncology research. The advantages of these datasets include a large sample size and inclusion of a diverse population of patients in a real-world setting. Such observational studies hold promise in enhancing our understanding of questions for which evidence is conflicting or absent in lung cancer radiotherapy. However, it is critical that investigators understand the strengths and limitations of large databases in order to avoid the common pitfalls that beset observational analyses. This review begins by outlining the data variables available in major registries that are used most often in observational analyses. This is followed by a discussion of the type of radiotherapy-related questions that can be addressed using such datasets, accompanied by examples from the lung cancer literature. Finally, we describe some limitations of observational research and techniques to mitigate bias and confounding. We hope that clinicians and researchers find this review helpful for designing new research studies and interpreting published analyses in the literature.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective study

Background

Consistent results are lacking as regards the comparative effectiveness of simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) versus conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). Therefore, we conducted a retrospective analysis to demonstrate the role of SIB-IMRT for patients.

Methods

Patients who had histologically confirmed NSCLC, stage III disease and received thoracic IMRT between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The survival, toxicities and dose to organs at risk (OAR) were compared among patients irradiated with different techniques. The SIB-IMRT plans were designed to deliver 45–59.4Gy (median: 50.4Gy) to PTV while simultaneously delivering 50-70Gy (median: 59.92Gy) to PGTV. As for conventional IMRT plans, a total dose of 50-70Gy (median: 60Gy) was delivered to PTV.

Results

426 patients with stage III NSCLC were eligible for analysis, including 128 with SIB-IMRT and 298 with conventional IMRT. The SIB-IMRT group had more stage IIIB disease (69.5% vs. 53%, P = 0.002), larger planning treatment volumes (median: 504 ml vs. 402 ml, P<0.001), and a larger planning treatment volume/volume of lung ratio (median, 0.18 vs. 0.12, P<0.001). The median OS of the SIB-IMRT and conventional IMRT groups were 34.5 and 31.7 months, with the 2-year rate of 60.4 and 59%, respectively (P = 0.797). No difference in PFS, LRFS or DMFS was observed between the two techniques. Patients treated with SIB-IMRT got similar lung and esophageal toxicities versus those with conventional IMRT.

Conclusions

SIB-IMRT may be an effective and safe option for patients with locally advanced NSCLC, especially for those with large mass or wide lymph node metastasis.

A current review of dose-escalated radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Background The mainstay therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Loco-regional recurrence constitutes the predominant failure patterns. Previous studies confirmed the relationship between increased biological equivalent doses and improved overall survival. However, the large randomized phase III study, RTOG 0617, failed to demonstrate the benefit of dose-escalation to 74 Gy compared with 60 Gy by simply increasing fraction numbers. Conclusions Though effective dose-escalation methods have been explored, including altered fractionation, adapting individualized increments for different patients, and adopting new technologies and new equipment such as new radiation therapy, no consensus has been achieved yet.

Dose escalation to 84 Gy with concurrent chemotherapy in stage III NSCLC appears excessively toxic: Results from a prematurely terminated randomized phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the mainstay treatment for NSCLC stage III disease. To investigate whether radiation dose escalation based on individual normal tissue constraints can improve outcome, the Swedish lung cancer study group launched this randomized phase II trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

NSCLC patients with stage III disease, good performance status (0-1) and adequate lung function (FEV1 > 1.0 L and CO diffusion capacity > 40%) received three cycles of cisplatin (75 mg/m² day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m² day 1 and 8) every third week. Radiotherapy started concurrently with the second cycle, with either 2 Gy daily, 5 days a week, to 68 Gy (A) or escalated therapy (B) based on constraints to the spinal cord, esophagus and lungs up to 84 Gy by adding an extra fraction of 2 Gy per week.

RESULTS

A pre-planned safety analysis revealed excessive toxicity and decreased survival in the escalated arm, and the study was stopped. Thirty-six patients were included during 2011-2013 (56% male, 78% with adenocarcinoma, 64% with PS 0 and 53% with stage IIIB). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11 and 17 months in arm B compared to the encouraging results of 28 and 45 months in the standard arm. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 56% and 33% (B) and 72% and 56% (A), respectively. There were seven toxicity-related deaths due to esophageal perforations and pneumonitis: five in the escalated group and two with standard treatment.

CONCLUSION

Dose-escalated concurrent chemoradiotherapy to 84 Gy to primary tumor and nodal disease is hazardous, with a high risk of excessive toxicity, whereas modern standard dose chemoradiotherapy with proper staging given in the control arm shows a promising outcome with a median survival of 45 months and a 3-year survival of 56% (NCT01664663).

Radiotherapy Dosing for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: "MTD" or "ALARA"?

Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is typically treated with thoracic radiotherapy, often in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Despite tremendous advances in the evaluation, treatment techniques, and supportive care measures provided to LA-NSCLC patients, local disease progression and distant metastases frequently develop following definitive therapy. A recent landmark randomized trial demonstrated that radiotherapy dose escalation may reduce survival rates, highlighting our poor understanding of the effects of thoracic radiotherapy for LA-NSCLC. Here, we present rationale for further studies of radiotherapy dose escalation as well as arguments for exploring relatively low radiotherapy doses for LA-NSCLC.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and a dosimetric factor for predicting symptomatic radiation pneumonitis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To identify the factors that predict the progression of radiological radiation pneumonitis (RP) to symptomatic RP, and to evaluate the usefulness of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a marker of RP severity and prognosis in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 61 patients treated between January 2010 and December 2015. Patients' demographic characteristics, clinical data, laboratory findings and treatment parameters were analyzed to determine the predictive factors associated with progression from radiological RP to symptomatic RP.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (77%) exhibited radiological RP at a median of 78 days after radiation therapy (RT) completion, and 15 (32%) of these patients developed symptomatic RP. The interval between RT completion and radiological RP presentation was shorter in patients who progressed to symptomatic RP (P = .001); progression was highly probable if this latency period was ≤2 months (P = .002). Stage and RT technique correlated with symptomatic RP development (P = .046 and P = .046, respectively). Among dosimetric factors, a V₂₀ (defined as the lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy) of >30% was the most significant predictor of symptomatic RP (P = .001). The NLR and C-reactive protein level at radiological RP were higher in patients who developed symptomatic RP (P = .067 and P = .012, respectively). On multivariate analysis, a V₂₀ >30% and an NLR at radiological RP >6 were associated with symptomatic RP development.

CONCLUSION

The NLR at radiological RP is a useful biomarker for predicting symptomatic RP development after CCRT in stage III NSCLC patients.

Ultrasmall Silica-Based Bismuth Gadolinium Nanoparticles for Dual Magnetic Resonance-Computed Tomography Image Guided Radiation Therapy

Selective killing of cancer cells while minimizing damage to healthy tissues is the goal of clinical radiation therapy. This therapeutic ratio can be improved by image-guided radiation delivery and selective radiosensitization of cancer cells. Here, we have designed and tested a novel trimodal theranostic nanoparticle made of bismuth and gadolinium for on-site radiosensitization and image contrast enhancement to improve the efficacy and accuracy of radiation therapy. We demonstrate in vivo magnetic resonance (MR), computed tomography (CT) contrast enhancement, and tumor suppression with prolonged survival in a non-small cell lung carcinoma model during clinical radiation therapy. Histological studies show minimal off-target toxicities due to the nanoparticles or radiation. By mimicking existing clinical workflows, we show that the bismuth-gadolinium nanoparticles are highly compatible with current CT-guided radiation therapy and emerging MR-guided approaches. This study reports the first in vivo proof-of-principle for image-guided radiation therapy with a new class of theranostic nanoparticles.

Did dose escalated radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer improve overall survival?

Radiotherapy has been applied in the treatment for lung cancer patients for many years, especially those with advanced stage disease who cannot be treated with surgery. However, if these advanced stage patients should be treated with standard dosage therapy (60 Gy) or high dosage therapy (>60 Gy) remains a hot debated point. Literature related to this topic would be reviewed here. We believe standard dosage therapy should be strongly recommended, and high dosage therapy might benefit patients with high risk factors patients.