Comparative total and unbound pharmacokinetics of cefazolin administered by bolus versus continuous infusion in patients undergoing major surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Population pharmacokinetics of unbound cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent high-flux haemodialysis: can a three-times-weekly post-dialysis dosing regimen provide optimal treatment?

OBJECTIVES

To describe the population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in infected hospitalized patients requiring intermittent haemodialysis (IHD).

METHODS

This prospective population pharmacokinetic study was conducted in IHD patients prescribed cefazolin 2 g three times weekly. Plasma samples were collected at prespecified timepoints and assayed for total and unbound concentrations using validated LC. Pharmacokinetic modelling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics®. PTA in plasma suitable for MSSA (unbound trough concentrations of ≥2 mg/L for the final 24 h of a 72 h interval) were simulated for different dosing regimens. A PTA of ≥95% was deemed acceptable.

RESULTS

A total of 260 cefazolin concentrations (130 total, 130 unbound) were collected from 16 patients (14 female) with a median age of 51 years. The median (IQR) pre-dialysis unbound cefazolin concentration for a 3 day dose interval trough was 17.7 (13.5-31.4) mg/L. The median (IQR) unbound fraction was 0.38 (0.32-0.46). The lowest pre-dialysis unbound concentration was 9.1 mg/L. A two-compartment model with a complex protein-binding component adequately described the data. The mean unbound cefazolin CL during IHD was 16.4 ± 4.26 L/h, compared with 0.40 ± 0.19 L/h when dialysis was off. Duration of time on haemodialysis (TOH) was the only covariate supported in the final model. The 2 g three-times-weekly regimen was associated with a PTA of 99.7% on dosing simulations to maintain unbound concentrations of ≥2 mg/L with TOH of 6 months. The 1 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis was associated with a PTA of 95.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

A 2 g three-times-weekly post-dialysis cefazolin regimen is supported for MSSA infections.

Dosing Cefazolin for Surgical Site Infection Prophylaxis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: Intermittent Bolus or Continuous Infusion?-A Pilot Study

Background: Cefazolin may minimize the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Cefazolin dosing recommendations vary and there is limited evidence for achieved tissue concentrations. Methods: We performed a randomized, controlled, prospective pharmacokinetic pilot study of 12 patients given cefazolin by either intermittent bolus (30 mg/kg every 3 h) or continuous infusion (30 mg/kg bolus followed by 10/mg/kg per hour) during PSF for AIS. Results: Patients were well matched for demographic and perioperative variables. While total drug exposure, measured as area-under-the-curve (AUC), was similar in plasma for bolus and infusion dosing, infusion dosing achieved greater cefazolin exposure in subcutaneous and muscle tissue. Using the pharmacodynamic metric of time spent above minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), both bolus and infusion dosing performed well. However, when targeting a bactericidal concentration of 32 µg/mL, patients in the bolus group spent a median of 1/5 and 1/3 of the typical 6 h operative time below target in subcutaneous and muscle tissue, respectively. Conclusions: We conclude that intraoperative determination of cefazolin tissue concentrations is feasible and both bolus and infusion dosing of cefazolin achieve concentrations in excess of typical MICs. Infusion dosing appears to more consistently achieve bactericidal concentrations in subcutaneous and muscle tissues.

External validation of a pharmacokinetic model for target-controlled infusion of cefazolin as a prophylactic antibiotic

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of previously constructed cefazolin pharmacokinetic models and determine whether cefazolin administration via the target-controlled infusion (TCI) method may be possible in clinical practice.

METHODS

Twenty-five gastrectomy patients receiving cefazolin as a prophylactic antibiotic were enrolled. Two grams of cefazolin was dissolved in 50 mL of normal saline to give a concentration of 40 mg mL-1 . Before skin incision, cefazolin was administered using a TCI syringe pump, and its administration continued until the end of surgery. The target total plasma concentration was set to 100 μg mL-1 . Total and unbound plasma concentrations of cefazolin were measured in three arterial blood samples collected at 30, 60 and 120 min after the start of cefazolin administration. The predictive performance of the TCI system was evaluated using four measures: inaccuracy, divergence, bias and wobble.

RESULTS

Total (n = 75) and unbound (n = 75) plasma concentration measurements from 25 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled median (95% confidence interval) biases and inaccuracies were 6.3 (4.0-8.5) and 10.5 (8.6-12.4) for the total concentration model and -10.3 (-16.8 to -3.7) and 22.4 (18.2-26.7) for the unbound concentration model, respectively. All unbound concentrations were above 10 μg mL-1 .

CONCLUSION

Administration of cefazolin by the TCI method showed a clinically acceptable performance. Applying the TCI method by setting the total concentration as the target concentration rather than the unbound concentration is effective in maintaining a constant target concentration of cefazolin.

Population pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the older population: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

Older individuals face an elevated risk of developing bacterial infections. The optimal use of antibacterial agents in this population is challenging because of age-related physiological alterations, changes in pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD), and the presence of multiple underlying diseases. Therefore, population pharmacokinetics (PPK) studies are of great importance for optimizing individual treatments and prompt identification of potential risk factors.

AREA COVERED

Our search involved keywords such as 'elderly,' 'old people,' and 'geriatric,' combined with 'population pharmacokinetics' and 'antibacterial agents.' This comprehensive search yielded 11 categories encompassing 28 antibacterial drugs, including vancomycin, ceftriaxone, meropenem, and linezolid. Out of 127 studies identified, 26 (20.5%) were associated with vancomycin, 14 (11%) with meropenem, and 14 (11%) with piperacillin. Other antibacterial agents were administered less frequently.

EXPERT OPINION

PPK studies are invaluable for elucidating the characteristics and relevant factors affecting the PK of antibacterial agents in the older population. Further research is warranted to develop and validate PPK models for antibacterial agents in this vulnerable population.

Effective Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery: The Relevance and Role of Pharmacokinetics-Pharmacodynamics

Appropriate surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is an important measure in preventing surgical site infections (SSIs). Although antimicrobial pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PKPD) is integral to optimizing antibiotic dosing for the treatment of infections, there is less research on preventing infections postsurgery. Whereas clinical studies of SAP dose, preincision timing, and redosing are informative, it is difficult to isolate their effect on SSI outcomes. Antimicrobial PKPD aims to explain the complex relationship between antibiotic exposure during surgery and the subsequent development of SSI. It accounts for the many factors that influence the PKs and antibiotic concentrations in patients and considers the susceptibilities of bacteria most likely to contaminate the surgical site. This narrative review examines the relevance and role of PKPD in providing effective SAP. The dose-response relationship i.e., association between lower dose and SSI in cefazolin prophylaxis is discussed. A comprehensive review of the evidence for an antibiotic concentration-response (SSI) relationship in SAP is also presented. Finally, PKPD considerations for improving SAP are explored with a focus on cefazolin prophylaxis in adults and outstanding questions regarding its dose, preincision timing, and redosing during surgery.

Peri-operative pharmacokinetics of cefazolin prophylaxis during valve replacement surgery

OBJECTIVE

There is little prospective data to guide effective dosing for antibiotic prophylaxis during surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). We aim to describe the effects of CPB on the population pharmacokinetics (PK) of total and unbound concentrations of cefazolin and to recommend optimised dosing regimens.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CPB for elective cardiac valve replacement were included using convenience sampling. Intravenous cefazolin (2g) was administered pre-incision and re-dosed at 4 hours. Serial blood and urine samples were collected and analysed using validated chromatography. Population PK modelling and Monte-Carlo simulations were performed using Pmetrics® to determine the fractional target attainment (FTA) of achieving unbound concentrations exceeding pre-defined exposures against organisms known to cause surgical site infections for 100% of surgery (100% fT>MIC).

RESULTS

From the 16 included patients, 195 total and 64 unbound concentrations of cefazolin were obtained. A three-compartment linear population PK model best described the data. We observed that cefazolin 2g 4-hourly was insufficient to achieve the FTA of 100% fT>MIC for Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli at serum creatinine concentrations ≤ 50 μmol/L and for Staphylococcus epidermidis at any of our simulated doses and serum creatinine concentrations. A dose of cefazolin 3g 4-hourly demonstrated >93% FTA for S. aureus and E. coli.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that cefazolin 2g 4-hourly was not able to maintain concentrations above the MIC for relevant pathogens in patients with low serum creatinine concentrations undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. The simulations showed that optimised dosing is more likely with an increased dose and/or dosing frequency.

ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS FOR ABDOMINAL SURGERY: WHEN TO RECOMMEND? BRAZILIAN COLLEGE OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY POSITION PAPER

BACKGROUND

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is an essential component of perioperative care. The use of prophylactic regimens of antibiotics is a well-established practice that is encouraged to be implemented in preoperative/perioperative protocols in order to prevent surgical site infections.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to emphasize the crucial aspects of antibiotic prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

Antibiotic prophylaxis is defined as the administration of antibiotics before contamination occurs, given with the intention of preventing infection by achieving tissue levels of antibiotics above the minimum inhibitory concentration at the time of surgical incision. It is indicated for clean operations with prosthetic materials or in cases where severe consequences may arise in the event of an infection. It is also suitable for all clean-contaminated and contaminated operations. The spectrum of action is determined by the pathogens present at the surgical site. Ideally, a single intravenous bolus dose should be administered within 60 min before the surgical incision. An additional dose should be given in case of hemorrhage or prolonged surgery, according to the half-life of the drug. Factors such as the patient's weight, history of allergies, and the likelihood of colonization by resistant bacteria should be considered. Compliance with institutional protocols enhances the effectiveness of antibiotic use.

CONCLUSION

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with reduced rates of surgical site infection, hospital stay, and morbimortality.

Prophylactic antibiotics for massive endoprostheses in orthopaedic oncology

The recently published Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens In Tumor Surgery (PARITY) trial found no benefit in extending antibiotic prophylaxis from 24 hours to five days after endoprosthetic reconstruction for lower limb bone tumours. PARITY is the first randomized controlled trial in orthopaedic oncology and is a huge step forward in understanding antibiotic prophylaxis. However, significant gaps remain, including questions around antibiotic choice, particularly in the UK, where cephalosporins are avoided due to concerns of Clostridioides difficile infection. We present a review of the evidence for antibiotic choice, dosing, and timing, and a brief description of PARITY, its implication for practice, and the remaining gaps in our understanding.

Optimizing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Pregnant Women: A Critical Literature Review

BACKGROUND

More than 90% of pregnant women take at least one drug during pregnancy. Drug dose adjustments during pregnancy are sometimes necessary due to various pregnancy-induced physiological alterations frequently associated with lower plasma concentrations. However, the clinical relevance or benefits of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in pregnant women have not been specifically studied. Clinical pharmacokinetic studies in pregnant women are incredibly challenging for many reasons. Despite this, regulatory agencies have made efforts to encourage the inclusion of this population in clinical trials to achieve more information on the pharmacotherapy of pregnant women. This review aims to provide support for TDM recommendations and dose adjustments in pregnant women.

METHODS

The search was conducted after a predetermined strategy on PubMed and Scopus databases using the MeSH term "pregnancy" alongside other terms such as "Pregnancy and dose adjustment," "Pregnancy and therapeutic drug monitoring," "Pregnancy and PBPK," "Pregnancy and pharmacokinetics," and "Pregnancy and physiological changes."

RESULTS

The main information on TDM in pregnant women is available for antiepileptics, antipsychotics, antidepressants, antibiotics, antimalarials, and oncologic and immunosuppressive drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

More data are needed to support informed benefit-risk decision making for the administration of drugs to pregnant women. TDM and/or pharmacokinetic studies could ensure that pregnant women receive an adequate dosage of an active drug. Mechanistic modeling approaches potentially could increase our knowledge about the pharmacotherapy of this special population, and they could be used to better design dosage regimens.

Population Pharmacokinetics of Prophylactic Cefazolin in Cardiac Surgery with Standard and Minimally Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation

The objectives of this study were to develop a population pharmacokinetic model of prophylactically administered cefazolin in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with and without the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass of both existing types-standard (ECC) and minimallyu invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC)-and to propose cefazoline dosing optimization based on this model. A total of 65 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery were recruited to this clinical trial. A prophylactic cefazolin dose of 2 g was intravenously administered before surgery. Blood samples were collected using a rich sampling design and cefazolin serum concentrations were measured using the HPLC/UV method. The pharmacokinetic population model was calculated using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach, and the Monte Carlo simulation was used to evaluate the PK/PD target attainment. The population cefazolin central volume of distribution (Vd) of 4.91 L increased by 0.51 L with each 1 m2 of BSA, peripheral Vd of 22.07 L was reduced by 0.77 L or 0.79 L when using ECC or MiECC support, respectively, while clearance started at 0.045 L/h and increased by 0.49 L/h with each 1 mL/min/1.73 m2 of eGFR. ECC/MiECC was shown to be covariate of cefazolin Vd, but without relevance to clinical practice, while eGFR was most influential for the PK/PD target attainment. The standard dose of 2 g was sufficient for PK/PD target attainment throughout surgery in patients with normal renal status or with renal impairment. In patients with augmented renal clearance, an additive cefazolin dose should be administered 215, 245, 288 and 318 min after the first dose at MIC of 4, 3, 2 and 1.5 mg/L, respectively.

An Overview of the Protein Binding of Cephalosporins in Human Body Fluids: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Protein binding can diminish the pharmacological effect of beta-lactam antibiotics. Only the free fraction has an antibacterial effect. The aim of this systematic literature review was to give an overview of the current knowledge of protein binding of cephalosporins in human body fluids as well as to describe patient characteristics influencing the level of protein binding. Method: A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core Collection and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with the following search terms: "protein binding," "beta-lactam antibiotic," and "body fluid." Only studies were included where protein binding was measured in humans in vivo. Results: The majority of studies reporting protein binding were performed in serum or plasma. Other fluids included pericardial fluid, blister fluid, bronchial secretion, pleural exudate, wound exudate, cerebrospinal fluid, dialysate, and peritoneal fluid. Protein binding differs between diverse cephalosporins and between different patient categories. For cefazolin, ceftriaxone, cefpiramide, and cefonicid a non-linear pattern in protein binding in serum or plasma was described. Several patient characteristics were associated with low serum albumin concentrations and were found to have lower protein binding compared to healthy volunteers. This was for critically ill patients, dialysis patients, and patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass during surgery. While mean/median percentages of protein binding are lower in these patient groups, individual values may vary considerably. Age is not likely to influence protein binding by itself, however limited data suggest that lower protein binding in newborns. Obesity was not correlated with altered protein binding. Discussion/Conclusion: Conclusions on protein binding in other body fluids than blood cannot be drawn due to the scarcity of data. In serum and plasma, there is a large variability in protein binding per cephalosporin and between different categories of patients. Several characteristics were identified which lead to a lower protein binding. The finding that some of the cephalosporins display a non-linear pattern of protein binding makes it even more difficult to predict the unbound concentrations in individual patients. Taken all these factors, it is recommended to measure unbound concentrations to optimize antibiotic exposure in individual patients. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42021252776).

Predictive performance of pharmacokinetic models for target concentration-controlled infusion of cefoxitin as a prophylactic antibiotic in patients with colorectal surgery

We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of previously constructed free (C_free) and total (C_total) cefoxitin pharmacokinetic models and the possibility of administering cefoxitin via the target‐controlled infusion (TCI) method in clinical practice. Two external validation studies (N = 31 for C_free model, N = 30 for C_total model) were conducted sequentially. Cefoxitin (2 g) was dissolved in 50 mL of normal saline to give a concentration of 40 mg mL⁻¹. Before skin incision, cefoxitin was infused with a TCI syringe pump. Target concentrations of free concentration and total concentration were set to 25 and 80 μg mL⁻¹, respectively, which were administered throughout the surgery. Three arterial blood samples were collected to measure the total and free plasma concentrations of cefoxitin at 30, 60 and 120 min, after the start of cefoxitin administration. The predictive performance was evaluated using four parameters: inaccuracy, divergence, bias and wobble. The pooled median (95% confidence interval) biases and inaccuracies were − 45.9 (−47.3 to −44.5) and 45.9 (44.5 to 47.3) for C_free model (Choi_F model), and − 16.6 (−18.4 to −14.8) and 18.5 (16.7 to 20.2) for C_total model (Choi_T_old model), respectively. The predictive performance of the newly constructed model (Choi_T_new model), developed by adding the total concentration data measured in the external validation, was better than that of the Choi_T_old model. Models constructed with total concentration data were suitable for clinical use. Administering cefoxitin using the TCI method in patients maintained the free concentration above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints of the major pathogens causing surgical site infection throughout the operation period.

Association of serum and fat tissue antibiotic concentrations with surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND

During surgery, the effectiveness of perioperative prophylactic antibiotic administration against surgical site infections is inferred from serum concentrations and not from tissues where local infections occur. This study aimed to measure the serum and tissue concentrations of cefmetazole in colorectal surgery cases to clarify whether there is an association between the incidence of surgical site infections and antibiotic concentrations.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study was performed at a single tertiary care center. The data of 105 patients who underwent colorectal surgery between October 2017 and September 2019 were evaluated. The primary outcome was the incidence of surgical site infections. Univariate analysis was performed to investigate the association between surgical site infections, perioperative factors, and the serum and tissue concentrations of cefmetazole.

RESULTS

The incidence of surgical site infections was 13/105 (12.4%). Cefmetazole concentrations were measured at initial incision (serum; 101 vs 93.1 mg/L, P = .75, subcutaneous fat tissue; 2.8 vs 3.7 mg/g, P = .15), intestinal resection (serum; 35.1 vs 36.7 mg/L, P = .63, mesenteric adipose tissue; 1.3 vs 1.7 mg/g, P = .55), and at skin closure (serum; 34.5 vs 44.8 mg/L, P = .18, subcutaneous fat tissue; 1.0 vs 2.2 mg/g, P = .09). In univariate analysis with P ≤ .10, cefmetazole concentration in subcutaneous fat tissue at skin closure was found to be a significant risk factor for surgical site infections. Age, additional intraoperative administration of cefmetazole, and creatinine clearance were also significant risk factors for the occurrence of surgical site infections.

CONCLUSION

Low subcutaneous fat cefmetazole concentrations at skin closure during gastrointestinal operations may also be involved in the occurrence of surgical site infections.

Perioperative cefazolin prophylaxis in paediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study's objective was to determine the effect of age, prolonged bypass, and hypothermia on serum cefazolin concentrations in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, single-centre, observational study was conducted. Children undergoing cardiac surgery were examined. Participants received cefazolin intravenously approximately 1 hour before skin incision, 3 hourly intraoperatively and 8 hourly postoperatively. Blood samples were collected at 6-8 timepoints intraoperatively and 6-time points in the first 24 hours postoperatively. Target unbound serum cefazolin concentrations were of 2 mg/L.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in the study, and 64 included in the analysis. All maintained concentrations ≥ 2 mg/L throughout the operation. Nineteen patients (30%) did not maintain concentrations ≥ 2 mg/L in the first 24 hours following surgery. Older, larger children (p < 0.0001) were significantly less likely to achieve target unbound serum cefazolin concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative cefazolin concentrations reached the target concentration in all paediatric cardiac surgical cases. Postoperative cefazolin dosing appears insufficient to achieve minimum inhibitory concentrations in many patients.

Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in an Era of Antibiotic Resistance: Common Resistant Bacteria and Wider Considerations for Practice

The increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a global crisis to healthcare, with longstanding antimicrobial agents becoming less effective at treating and preventing infection. In the surgical setting, antibiotic prophylaxis has long been established as routine standard of care to prevent surgical site infection (SSI), which remains one of the most common hospital-acquired infections. The growing incidence of AMR increases the risk of SSI complicated with resistant bacteria, resulting in poorer surgical outcomes (prolonged hospitalisation, extended durations of antibiotic therapy, higher rates of surgical revision and mortality). Despite these increasing challenges, more data are required on approaches at the institutional and patient level to optimise surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in the era of antibiotic resistance (AR). This review provides an overview of the common resistant bacteria encountered in the surgical setting and covers wider considerations for practice to optimise surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in the perioperative setting.

Development of a new pharmacokinetic model for target-concentration controlled infusion of cefoxitin as a prophylactic antibiotic in colorectal surgical patients

AIMS

There are several limitations to the existing method of administering cefoxitin as a prophylactic antibiotic, and the limitations may be overcome by applying the target-concentration controlled infusion (TCI) method. Population pharmacokinetic parameters are required to administer cefoxitin by the TCI method. The aim of this study was to construct a new pharmacokinetic model of cefoxitin for the TCI method in colorectal surgical patients.

METHODS

In patients undergoing colorectal surgery, 2 g of cefoxitin was dissolved in 50 mL of saline and administered for 10 minutes prior to skin incision. Arterial blood samples were obtained at preset intervals to measure the total and free plasma concentrations of cefoxitin. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM software (ICON Development Solutions, Dublin, Ireland). Additionally, stochastic simulation was used to indirectly evaluate the effectiveness of the two administration methods (standard method vs TCI).

RESULTS

In total, 297 plasma concentration measurements from 31 patients were used to characterize the pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin. A three-compartment mammillary model described the pharmacokinetics of cefoxitin. Body weight and creatinine clearance were significant covariates for clearance. The stochastic simulation showed that when compared with the standard method, the TCI method has a significantly higher fraction of time that the free concentration of cefoxitin is maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

TCI has the potential to become a new infusion method for patient-tailored dosing in surgical patients. To administer cefoxitin via TCI in clinical practice, the newly constructed pharmacokinetic model should undergo proper external validation.

Ultra-short antibiotic prophylaxis guided by preoperative microbiological nasal swabs in endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery

PURPOSE

Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) is a clean-contaminated procedure. Guidelines regarding the antibiotic prophylaxis in EESBS have not been developed yet, and today, there are no universally accepted protocols. In this article, we investigated the efficacy of our new ultra-short antibiotic prophylaxis protocol for EESBS guided by the cultural results of preoperative microbiological nasal swabs.

METHODS

We defined as "nasal swab-related antibiotic protocol" the administration of a first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin 2 g) in patients whose nasal swabs revealed the presence of normal nasal flora or methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), and the administration of vancomycin 1 g intravenously in patients whose nasal swabs revealed the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) or with reported cephalosporin/penicillin allergy. This case-control study included 120 patients who underwent EESBS. The case group included 60 cases who received the "nasal swab-related antibiotic protocol," while the control group included 60 cases who received the "standard hospital antibiotic protocol" used in neurosurgery (cefazolin 2 g plus metronidazole 500 mg at induction, and 2 g of cefazolin repeated after 180 min).

RESULTS

The preoperative microbiological nasal swabs showed normal nasal flora in 42 patients (70%), MSSA in 17 patients (28.3%), and MRSA in 1 patient (1.6%). During the study period, no cases of meningitis or sinusitis occurred in the case group ("nasal swab-related antibiotic protocol"), while two infections (3.3%, 1 sinusitis and 1 meningitis) were reported in the control group ("standard hospital antibiotic protocol"). Mean length of hospitalization was 6.5 days for the case group and 8.5 days in the control group. "Standard hospital antibiotic protocol" is less expensive (range, 2.88-5.42 euros) compared with our new "nasal swab-related antibiotic protocol" (range, 10.02-32.56 euros), but in line with other antibiotic prophylaxis protocols reported in literature.

DISCUSSION

The low complication rates of our case series (0%) is comparable to complication rates reported in literature (1.6% for meningitis and 8% for sinusitis). Compared with other perioperative antibiotic regimens reported in literature, the "nasal swab-related antibiotic protocol" is cheap and at least equally effective. We discuss the rationale on which we based the choice of chemoprophylaxis, the timing, and the length of our regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed the safety and efficacy of our easily applicable and low-cost antibiotic prophylaxis protocol.

WHAT'S NEW IN INFECTION ON SURGICAL SITE AND ANTIBIOTICOPROPHYLAXIS IN SURGERY?

INTRODUCTION

Infection of the surgical site is the common complication, with significant rates of morbidity and mortality, representing a considerable economic problem for the health system.

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a narrative review of the literature on surgical site infection and the principles of antibiotic prophylaxis to update the knowledge of its use in surgery.

METHOD

Medline, Ovid, Google Scholar, National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Cochrane and SciELO were used for the research. The keywords used were "anti-bacterial agents"; "antibioticoprophylaxis" AND "surgical wound infection". The inclusion criteria were articles of recent publication, with full texts available and performed in humans.

RESULT

A total of 29 articles were evaluated and selected according to the eligibility criteria.

CONCLUSION

Infection of the surgical site is the most common postoperative complication. The key point of its prevention is the combination of several interventions that aim to reduce risk factors, such as: compliance with the new guidelines of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention; the principles of the use of prophylactic antibiotics; factors and risk index of the surgical site; administration time; duration and dosage of antibiotics. These data are available in this article.

Population pharmacokinetics of cefazolin before, during and after cardiopulmonary bypass in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery

PURPOSE

The aims of the present study were to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of cefazolin for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and to assess the probability of target attainment (PTA) for the prophylaxis of surgical site infection (SSI) using cefazolin.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery with CPB were enrolled in the prospective study. Blood samples for plasma cefazolin assay were collected, and total and unbound drug concentrations were measured and analysed using the nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NONMEM) software considering saturable plasma protein binding. Using the PPK model, plasma unbound cefazolin concentration-time courses with current prophylaxis protocols were simulated, and the PTA for common SSI pathogens was estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 199 blood samples were obtained from 27 patients. A one-compartment model with first-order elimination plus an on/off CPB compartment best described the data. The population mean for systemic drug clearance (CL) was reduced and that for the volume of distribution (V) was increased during CPB compared with the pre-CPB values. CPB-induced hypoalbuminemia was associated with reduced maximum protein binding (B_max). The simulation studies suggested that the current dosing protocols are insufficient for attaining PTA > 0.9 throughout surgery against pathogens with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) >8 mg/L. A new dosing protocol that achieves a PTA > 0.9 for pathogens with a MIC of 16 mg/L was proposed.

CONCLUSION

PPK modelling with simulation may be valuable for devising a cefazolin prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB.

A Critical Update of the Assessment and Acute Management of Patients with Severe Burns

Significance: Burns are debilitating, life threatening, and difficult to assess and manage. Recent advances in assessment and management have occurred since a comprehensive review of the care of patients with severe burns was last published, which may influence research and clinical practice. Recent Advances: Recent advances have occurred in the understanding of burn pathophysiology, which has led to the identification of potential biomarkers of burn severity, such as protein C. There is new evidence about the potential superiority of natural colloids over crystalloids during fluid resuscitation, and new evidence about components of initial and perioperative management, including an improved understanding of pain following burns. Critical Issues: The limitations of the clinical examination highlight the need for imaging and biomarkers to assist in estimations of burn severity. Fluid resuscitation reduces mortality, although there is conjecture over the ideal method. The subsequent perioperative period is associated with significant morbidity and the evidence for preventing and treating pain, infection, and fluid overload while maximizing wound healing potential is described. Future Directions: Promising developments are ongoing in imaging technology, histopathology, biomarkers, and wound healing adjuncts such as hyperbaric oxygen therapy, topical negative pressure therapy, stem cell treatments, and skin substitutes. The greatest benefit from further research on management of patients with burns would most likely be derived from the elucidation of optimal fluid resuscitation protocols, pain management protocols, and surgical techniques from randomized controlled trials.

Pharmacokinetics of Total and Unbound Cefazolin during Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Case Report

Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy could affect effective drug concentrations via adsorption onto the oxygenator or associated circuit. We describe a case of a 25-year-old female who required a veno-arterial ECMO therapy for refractory cardiac arrest due to massive pulmonary embolism. She had mild renal dysfunction as a result of the cardiac arrest. A total of 2 g of intravenous cefazolin 8-hourly was administered. Pre- and post-oxygenator blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 4, and 8 h post antibiotic administration. Samples were analyzed for total and unbound cefazolin concentrations. Protein binding was ∼60%. Clearance was reduced due to impaired renal function. The pharmacokinetics of cefazolin appear to not be affected by ECMO therapy and dosing adjustment may not be required.

Population Pharmacokinetic Study of Cefazolin Dosage Adaptation in Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis Based on a Nomogram

Optimal dosing of continuous-infusion cefazolin can be challenging in patients being treated for bacteremia or infective endocarditis. The aim of this work is to describe and analyze the pharmacokinetics of cefazolin in those patients using a population pharmacokinetics modeling approach and to establish a nomogram to determine the optimal daily dose. Population pharmacokinetics were modeled using the Pmetrics package for R. Plasma concentrations were collected retrospectively from patients treated with continuous-infusion cefazolin for bacteremia or infective endocarditis. The influence of multiple parameters, including renal function, total body weight, body mass index, body surface area (BSA), ideal weight, lean body weight, height, and age, was tested. The probabilities of target attainment for selected target concentrations (40, 60, and 80 mg/liter) were calculated. A dosing nomogram was then developed, using the absolute value of the glomerular filtration rate (aGFR), to determine the optimal daily dose required to achieve the target concentrations in at least 90% of patients. In total, 346 cefazolin plasma concentrations from 162 patients were collected. A one-compartment model best described the data set. The only covariate was aGFR, calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula and the patient's body surface area, for the rate of elimination. Using the nomogram, achieving a cefazolin concentration target of 40 mg/liter with a success rate of at least 90% and with an aGFR of 30, 60, 90, and 120 ml/min requires a daily dose of 2.6, 4.3, 6.1, and 8.0 g/day, respectively. These results confirm the interest of posology adaptation of cefazolin according to aGFR.

Reassessing the dosing of cefoxitin prophylaxis during major abdominal surgery: insights from microdialysis and population pharmacokinetic modelling

Objectives

Cefoxitin is frequently used for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). Using microdialysis, we evaluated whether the currently recommended dosing regimen is appropriate to maintain cefoxitin subcutaneous tissue concentrations above the MIC for pathogens involved in abdominal surgical site infection.

Methods

Data from eight patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were analysed using population pharmacokinetic modelling, and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to determine the PTA for aerobic and anaerobic pathogens. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02703857.

Results

Only 2.3% and 47.4% of the simulated patients maintained cefoxitin subcutaneous concentrations above the MIC breakpoint for anaerobic (MIC = 16 mg/L) and aerobic (MIC = 8 mg/L) pathogens, respectively. New simulations with administration of a loading dose followed by a constant infusion of cefoxitin were conducted and demonstrate that, notwithstanding using the same total dose per unit of time, continuous infusion of cefoxitin can cover aerobes in 96.6% of the simulated patients, but remains insufficient for anaerobic bacteria.

Conclusions

The recommended dosing regimen of cefoxitin is insufficient for covering the usual bacteria during abdominal surgery. Administration of a loading dose followed by a constant infusion should be considered for aerobic bacteria and cefoxitin should be avoided as SAP for anaerobic bacteria.

Compliance with perioperative prophylaxis guidelines and the use of novel outcome measures

Postoperative wound infections represent an important source of morbidity and mortality in children. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis has been shown to decrease the risk of developing infections and hospital guidelines surrounding antibiotic use exist to standardize patient care. Despite supporting evidence, rates of compliance with guidelines vary. Quality improvement initiatives have been introduced to improve compliance with intraoperative antibiotic guidelines. Thorough infection surveillance, including antibiotic provision in presurgical checklists, computerized voice antibiotic administration prompts, and national feedback systems are now increasingly common. Few studies have been conducted investigating the effectiveness of prophylactic antibiotics in children. Outcome measures such as morbidity and mortality and return to the operating room can be used to examine the relationship between antibiotic use and patient outcome but these measures are limited in that they occur infrequently or are subjective and difficult to measure. Metrics such as days alive out of hospital and length of hospital stay may be useful alternatives for ongoing monitoring of infections and identifying improvements in patient outcomes. Guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis have facilitated an increase in the correct provision of perioperative antibiotics and a reduction in the incidence of postoperative infection. Measures of patient outcome such as days alive out of hospital and length of hospital stay are easy to collect and calculate but further work is needed to confirm the utility of these measures for monitoring infection rates.

Cefazolin tissue concentrations with a prophylactic dose administered before sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients: a single centre study in 116 patients

BACKGROUND

In obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy, the blood and fatty-tissue concentrations of cefazolin required for adequate antibiotic prophylaxis are uncertain.

METHODS

This was a single centre prospective study in obese (Group A: 40≤ BMI ≤50 kg m^-2) and severely obese (Group B: 50< BMI ≤65 kg m^-2) patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Blood and fatty-tissue samples were collected after a cefazolin 4 g i.v. injection. The primary aim was to compare cefazolin concentrations in subcutaneous fatty tissue with a targeted tissue concentration of 4 μg g^-1 according to Staphylococcus aureus resistance breakpoint.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixteen patients were included: 79 in Group A and 37 in Group B. At the beginning of the surgery, cefazolin concentration in subcutaneous fatty tissue was 12.2 (5.4) μg g^-1 in Group A and 12 (6.1) μg g^-1 in Group B (P=0.7). At the end, cefazolin concentrations in subcutaneous fatty tissue were 9.0 (4.9) and 7.8 (4.2) μg g^-1 in Groups A and B, respectively (P=0.2). The plasma concentration of free cefazolin during surgery was higher in Group A than in Group B (P<0.0001). Fatty-tissue concentrations of 95% and 83% patients in Groups A and B, respectively, were above S. aureus resistance breakpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

After a 4 g dose, the concentrations of cefazolin in fatty tissue were above the 4 μg g^-1 tissue concentration target, providing adequate antibiotic tissue concentrations during bariatric surgery. As cefazolin concentration in fatty tissue is a surrogate endpoint, the results should be considered in conjunction with the results on free cefazolin concentrations in subcutaneous tissue.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01537380.