Sporadic non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: multicentre analysis

[Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms-Surgery in a multimodal concept]

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN) are mainly found in the small intestine and pancreas. The course of the disease in patients is highly variable and depends on the degree of differentiation (G1-G3) of the neoplasm. The potential for metastasis formation of GEP-NEN is high even with good differentiation (G1). Lymph node metastases and, in many cases, liver metastases are also often found. Less common are bone metastases or peritoneal carcinomas. The treatment of these GEP-NENs is surgical, whenever possible. If an R0 resection with removal of all lymph node and liver metastases is successful, the prognosis of the patients is excellent. Patients with diffuse liver or bone metastases can no longer be cured by surgery alone. The long-term survival of these patients is nowadays possible due to the availability of drugs (e.g., somatostatin analogues, tyrosine kinase inhibitors), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and liver-directed procedures, with a good quality of life.

Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Surgical Strategies and Controversies

OBJECTIVE

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are uncommon tumors which are increasing in incidence. The management of these tumors continues to evolve. This review examines the current role of surgery in the treatment of these tumors.

METHODS

Studies published over the past 10 years were identified using several databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and Science Direct. Search terms included PNETs, treatment, and surgery. Clinical practice guidelines and updates from several major groups were reviewed.

RESULTS

Surgery continues to have a major role in the treatment of sporadic functional and nonfunctional PNETs. Pancreas-sparing approaches are increasingly accepted as alternatives to formal pancreatic resection in selected patients. Options such as watch and wait or endoscopic ablation may be reasonable alternatives to surgery for non-functional PNETs < 2 cm in size. Surgical decision-making in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patients remains complex and in some situations such as gastrinoma quite controversial. The role of surgery has significantly diminished in patients with advanced disease due to the advent of more effective systemic and liver-directed therapies. However, the optimal treatments and sequencing in advanced disease remain poorly defined, and it has been suggested that surgery is underutilized in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery remains a major treatment modality for PNETs. Given the plethora of available treatments, ongoing controversies and the changing landscape, management has become increasingly complex. An experienced multidisciplinary team which includes surgery is essential to manage these patients.

Factors Affecting Nonfunctioning Small Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Proposed New Treatment Strategies

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Despite previously reported treatment strategies for nonfunctioning small (≤20 mm) pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs), uncertainties persist. We aimed to evaluate the surgically resected cases of nonfunctioning small pNENs (NF-spNENs) in a large Japanese cohort to elucidate an optimal treatment strategy for NF-spNENs.

METHODS

In this Japanese multicenter study, data were retrospectively collected from patients who underwent pancreatectomy between January 1996 and December 2019, were pathologically diagnosed with pNEN, and were treated according to the World Health Organization 2019 classification. Overall, 1490 patients met the eligibility criteria, and 1014 were included in the analysis cohort.

RESULTS

In the analysis cohort, 606 patients (59.8%) had NF-spNENs, with 82% classified as grade 1 (NET-G1) and 18% as grade 2 (NET-G2) or higher. The incidence of lymph node metastasis (N1) by grade was significantly higher in NET-G2 (G1: 3.1% vs G2: 15.0%). Independent factors contributing to N1 were NET-G2 or higher and tumor diameter ≥15 mm. The predictive ability of tumor size for N1 was high. Independent factors contributing to recurrence included multiple lesions, NET-G2 or higher, tumor diameter ≥15 mm, and N1. However, the independent factor contributing to survival was tumor grade (NET-G2 or higher). The appropriate timing for surgical resection of NET-G1 and NET-G2 or higher was when tumors were >20 and >10 mm, respectively. For neoplasms with unknown preoperative grades, tumor size >15 mm was considered appropriate.

CONCLUSIONS

NF-spNENs are heterogeneous with varying levels of malignancy. Therefore, treatment strategies based on tumor size alone can be unreliable; personalized treatment strategies that consider tumor grading are preferable.

European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) 2023 guidance paper for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

This ENETS guidance paper for well-differentiated nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-Pan-NET) has been developed by a multidisciplinary working group, and provides up-to-date and practical advice on the management of these tumours. Using the extensive experience of centres treating patients with NF-Pan-NEN, the authors of this guidance paper discuss 10 troublesome questions in everyday clinical practice. Our many years of experience in this field are still being verified in the light of the results of new clinical, which set new ways of proceeding in NEN. The treatment of NF-Pan-NEN still requires a decision of a multidisciplinary team of specialists in the field of neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Optimal Lymphadenectomy in Patients with Well-Differentiated Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

This study aimed to evaluate the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological data of patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms who underwent surgical resection. We investigated the frequency of metastases at each lymph node station according to tumor location and analyzed the factors contributing to poor overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Overall, data of 84 patients were analyzed. Among patients with pancreatic head tumors, metastases at stations 8, 13, and 17 were found in one (3.1%), four (12.5%), and three (9.3%) patients, respectively. However, none of the other stations showed metastases. For pancreatic body and tail tumors, metastases only at station 11 were found in two (5.1%) patients. Additionally, multivariate DFS and OS analyses showed that lymph node metastasis was the only independent prognostic factor. In conclusion, lymph node metastasis near the primary tumor was the only independent factor of poor prognosis in patients with nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms after undergoing curative surgery. Peri-pancreatic lymphadenectomy might be recommended for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Optimal surgical approach for digestive neuroendocrine neoplasia primaries: Oncological benefits versus short and long-term complications

The rising incidence and the accumulating prevalence of neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) in the population makes this a common, prevalent and a clinically relevant disease group. Surgical resection represents the only potentially curative treatment for digestive NENs. Thus, resection should in principle be considered for all patients with NEN, although taking the patients age, relevant comorbidity, and performance status into account for operability. Patients with insulinomas, NEN of the appendix and rectal NENs are usually cured by surgery alone. However, less than a third of patients are amendable to curative surgery alone at time of diagnosis. Furthermore, recurrence is common and may occur years after primary surgery, hence the long follow-up time recommended in most NENs (>10 years). As many patients with NENs present with locoregional or metastatic disease, there is considerable debate regarding the role of debulking surgery in these settings. However, good long-term survival can be achieved in a considerable proportion of patients, with 50-70% alive up to 10 years after surgery. Location and grade are the main determinants of long-term survival. Here we present considerations to surgery for primary neuroendocrine tumors in the digestive tract.

Reappraisal of Malignant Risk Assessment for Small (≤20 mm) Non-functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Optimal management of non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) ≤20 mm is controversial. The biological heterogeneity of these tumors poses challenges when deciding between resection and observation.

METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, we analyzed all patients (n = 78) who underwent resection of non-functioning PanNETs ≤20 mm at three tertiary medical centers from 2004 to 2020 to assess the utility of preoperatively available radiological features and serological biomarkers of non-functioning PanNETs in choosing an optimal surgical indication. The radiological features included non-hyper-attenuation pattern on enhancement computed tomography (CT; hetero/hypo-attenuation) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) involvement, and serological biomarkers included elevation of serum elastase 1 and plasma chromogranin A (CgA) levels.

RESULTS

Of all small non-functioning PanNETs, 5/78 (6%) had lymph node metastasis, 11/76 (14%) were WHO grade II, and 9/66 (14%) had microvascular invasion; 20/78 (26%) had at least one of these high-risk pathological factors. In the preoperative assessment, hetero/hypo-attenuation and MPD involvement were observed in 25/69 (36%) and 8/76 (11%), respectively. Elevated serum elastase 1 and plasma CgA levels were observed in 1/33 (3%) and 0/11 (0%) patients, respectively. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, hetero/hypo-attenuation (odds ratio [OR] 6.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7-22.2) and MPD involvement (OR 16.8, 95% CI 1.6-174.3) were significantly associated with the high-risk pathological factors. The combination of the two radiological worrisome features correctly predicted non-functioning PanNETs with high-risk pathological factors, with about 75% sensitivity, 79% specificity, and 78% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination of radiological worrisome features can accurately predict non-functioning PanNETs that may require resection.

Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

Introduction: The development of dedicated endoscopes and the technical evolution of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have allowed a direct approach to pancreatic neoplastic lesions both for diagnosis and treatment. Among the more promising targets are pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NETs). Aim: to describe the evolution of endoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) with particular attention to the treatment of PanNETs, focusing on safety and clinical efficacy of the technique. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies reporting about EUS-RFA for the treatment of PanNETs. Studies with outcomes of interest were selected and results were reported to describe clinical success, complications, fol-low-ups, and electrodes used. Clinical success was defined as the disappearance of clinical symp-toms for functional (F-) PanNETs and as complete ablation per nonfunctional (NF)-PanNETs. The pooled data were analyzed by a random-effects model. Results: Nineteen studies were selected, including 183 patients (82 males, 44.8%) with 196 lesions (101 F-PanNETs and 95 NF-PanNETs). Pooled estimates for the overall AE rates for the clinical efficacy were 17.8% (95% CI 9.1-26.4%) and 95.1% (95% CI 91.2-98.9%) for F-PanNETs and 24.6% (95% CI 7.4-41.8%) and 93.4% (95% CI 88.4-98.4%) for NF-PanNETs. Conclusions: EUS-RFA appears to be a mini-invasive technique with a good safety and efficacy profile for the treatment of F- and NF-PanNETs. EUS-RFA could be of-fered as possible alternative to surgery for the treatment of low-grade NF- or F-PanNETs, especially for those patients that are not eligible or are at high-risk for surgery.

Prognostic Significance and Predictors of Nodal Recurrence After Surgery for Non-Functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of nodal recurrence after surgery for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs) and its predictors have been poorly investigated. This study aimed to compare clinicopathologic features and survival between patients with nodal relapse and those with distant relapse and to identify predictors of nodal relapse after surgery for NF-PanNETs.

METHODS

All patients (n = 321) submitted to surgery for NF-PanNETs were included. Nodal recurrence was defined as the presence of one or more enlarged LNs at high-quality radiologic examinations and always confirmed by ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-PET or biopsy.

RESULTS

Altogether, 21 patients (6 %) experienced nodal (± distant) relapse, and 35 patients (11 %) had distant recurrence alone. Isolated nodal recurrence occurred for 23 % of patients with recurrence. Overall, 11 patients died of disease, one of whom (pT3N1G3) had an isolated nodal relapse. The rate of LN metastases (81 % vs 54 %; p = 0.044) and median number of positive LNs (PLN) (3 vs 0; p = 0.019) both were significantly higher for the patients with nodal (± distant) relapse than for those with distant relapse alone. Microvascular invasion (p = 0.046), T stage (p = 0.004), N stage (N1 [p = 0.049]; N2 [p = 0.001]), M stage (p < 0.001), and necrosis (p = 0.011) independently predicted nodal relapse. After distal pancreatectomy (n = 182), 13 patients experienced nodal recurrence, 9 of whom had left paraortic LNs involvement.

DISCUSSION

Lymph nodes are not rare sites of recurrence after surgery for NF-PanNETs. Lymph node involvement is a powerful determinant of nodal relapse. Nodal relapse frequently involves LNs that are not removed during standard lymphadenectomy.

Small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: Time for a step-up treatment approach?

Surgery has been regarded as the only curative treatment for patients with small nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NF-PNENs) less than 2 cm. Due to the significant adverse event rates of surgery, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society issued guidelines favoring surveillance for those patients lacking criteria suggestive of an aggressive disease. Despite the above recommendations, a significant proportion of small NF-PNEN patients still undergo surgery. Recently, several studies have reported the safety and effectiveness of EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small NF-PNENs. The experience with EUS-RFA is, however, limited, but published results indicate a potential role as a minimally invasive alternative treatment for these patients, in particular in those in whom further progression is more probable, before they reach the absolute need for surgery. A step-up approach with EUS-RFA followed by surgery for the failure cases can become a valid option to be validated in clinical studies.

[Controversy: asymptomatic small pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms : Current standards in diagnostics and treatment]

BACKGROUND

For the increasingly diagnosed entity of small asymptomatic, sporadic, nonfunctional, pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN), a negligible or at least unclear prognostic relevance of the disease for patient survival has often been observed.

OBJECTIVE

Safety and acceptance of a watch-and-wait strategy versus surgical resection for small, asymptomatic nonfunctional (NF) pNEN.

METHODS

Presentation and evaluation of the relevant literature as well as the corresponding national and European guidelines.

RESULTS

Surgery of small NF-pNEN shows complication rates of 15-32% (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) and a mortality of 3.6%. Even for pNEN < 2 cm the presence of lymph node metastases has been observed in 11% of cases, while their prognostic relevance in G1-pNEN compared with active surveillance remains unclear. On average 14% of patients under active surveillance for small NF-pNEN, underwent a resection. Relevant tumor growth during surveillance was found in < 20% of cases. In all well-selected surveillance cohorts no metachronous lymphatic or distant metastases occurred during active surveillance and especially no cases of a metachronous no longer curable disease.

CONCLUSION

Even small asymptomatic NF-pNEN have a certain metastatic potential but the clinical relevance has prospectively not yet been clearly determined. Controlled surveillance of these tumors is at least an alternative to immediate tumor resection. Especially patients above 70 years old do not seem to benefit from resection. The pros and cons of a resection should therefore be individually evaluated with the patient.

Survival after active surveillance versus upfront surgery for incidental small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

The safety of observing small non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NF-Pan-NETs) remains under debate.

METHODS

This was a multicentre retrospective study of patients with small incidental NF-Pan-NETs. Survival of patients who underwent upfront surgery versus active surveillance was compared. The risk of death was matched with that in the healthy population. The excess hazard rate and probability of a normal lifespan (NLP) were calculated. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1 : 1 ratio was used to minimize the risk of selection bias.

RESULTS

Some 222 patients (43.7 per cent) underwent upfront surgery and 285 (56.3 per cent) were observed. The excess hazard rate for the entire cohort was quantifiable as 0.04 (95 per cent c.i. 0 to 0.08) deaths per 1000 persons per year, and the NLP was 99.7 per cent. Patients in the active surveillance group were older (median age 65 versus 58 years; P < 0.001), and more often had co-morbidity (45.3 versus 24.8 per cent; P = 0.001), and smaller tumours (median 12 versus 13 mm; P < 0.001), less frequently located in the pancreatic body-tail (59.5 versus 69.6 per cent; P = 0.008, 59.3 versus 73.9 per cent; P = 0.001). Median follow-up was longer for patients who underwent upfront surgery (5.6 versus 2.7 years; P < 0.001). After PSM, 118 patients per group were included. The excess hazard rates were 0.2 and 0.9 deaths per 1000 persons per year (P = 0.020) for patients in the active surveillance and upfront surgery groups respectively. Corresponding NLPs were 99.9 and 99.5 per cent respectively (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Active surveillance of small incidental NF-Pan-NETs is a reasonable alternative to resection.

Simultaneous Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Safety and Oncological Efficacy

Simple Summary

Up to half of all newly diagnosed pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) present with liver metastases (LM). The surgical resection of PNETs and LMs can provide complete tumor clearance and improve long-term survival. However, the combination of liver and pancreatic resection simultaneously can theoretically cumulate the morbidity and mortality of two separate operations. In the current study, we analyzed the outcomes of the synchronous surgical resection of PNETs and LMs in 51 patients. There were no differences in the postoperative outcomes in terms of mortality and morbidity according to the type of pancreatic resection. The tumor grade was identified as the sole prognostic factor for survival. The resection of well-differentiated PNETs with LMs was characterized by the longest survival rates (median overall survival 128 months, 5-year overall survival 83%). The optimal sequential surgical strategies for PNETs with LM and the use of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy in this category of patients remain to be further investigated.

Abstract

Whether the simultaneous resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) with synchronous liver metastases (LM) is safe and oncologically efficacious remains to be debated. We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from patients who underwent the simultaneous resection of PNETs with LMs over the last 25 years. Fifty-one consecutive patients with a median age of 54 years (range 27–80 years) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) (n = 16), distal pancreatosplenectomy (DSP) (n = 32) or total pancreatectomy (n = 3) with synchronous LM resection. There were no differences in the postoperative outcomes in term of mortality (p = 0.33) and morbidity (p = 0.76) between PD and DSP. The median overall survival (OS) was 64.78 months (95% CI: 49.7–119.8), and the overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 97.9%, 86.2% and 61%, respectively. The OS varied according to the tumor grade (G): G1 (OS 128 months, 5-year OS 83%) vs. G2 (OS 60.5 months, 5-year OS 58%) vs. G3 (OS 49.7 months, 5-year OS 0%) (p = 0.03). Multivariate Cox analysis identified G as the only prognostic factor (HR: 5.56; 95% CI: 0.91–9.60; p = 0.01). Simultaneous PNETS with LMs can be performed safely with acceptable morbidity and mortality at tertiary centers. Well-differentiated PNETs had longer survival and might benefit the most from these extended surgeries.

Updated Principles of Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours (pNETs): What Every Surgeon Needs to Know

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (pNETs) represent 1 to 2% of all pancreatic neoplasm with an increasing incidence. They have a varied clinical, biological and radiological presentation, depending on whether they are sporadic or genetic in origin, whether they are functional or non-functional, and whether there is a single or multiple lesions. These pNETs are often diagnosed at an advanced stage with locoregional lymph nodes invasion or distant metastases. In most cases, the gold standard curative treatment is surgical resection of the pancreatic tumour, but the postoperative complications and functional consequences are not negligible. Thus, these patients should be managed in specialised high-volume centres with multidisciplinary discussion involving surgeons, oncologists, radiologists and pathologists. Innovative managements such as "watch and wait" strategies, parenchymal sparing surgery and minimally invasive approach are emerging. The correct use of all these therapeutic options requires a good selection of patients but also a constant update of knowledge. The aim of this work is to update the surgical management of pNETs and to highlight key elements in view of the recent literature.