Glutathione S-transferase mu1 null genotype is associated with K-ras gene mutation in lung adenocarcinoma among smokers

Research Advances on Anti-Cancer Natural Products

Malignant tumors seriously threaten people's health and life worldwide. Natural products, with definite pharmacological effects and known chemical structures, present dual advantages of Chinese herbs and chemotherapeutic drug. Some of them exhibit favorable anti-cancer activity. Natural products were categorized into eight classes according to their chemical structures, including alkaloids, terpenoids and volatile oils, inorganic salts, phenylpropanoids, flavonoids and isoflavones, quinone, saponins and polysaccharides. The review focused on the latest advances in anti-cancer activity of representative natural products for every class. Additionally, anti-cancer molecular mechanism and derivatization of natural products were summarized in detail, which would provide new core structures and new insights for anti-cancer new drug development.

Association between GSTM1 and CYP1A1 polymorphisms and survival in oral cancer patients

AIMS

Cancer patient's inherited genotype may influence his or her survival, but evidence for the role of these genetic differences in oral cancer survival has not yet been explored.

METHODS

The authors evaluated polymorphisms in the GSTM1 and CYP1A1 genes for associations with overall survival in 100 oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treated patients and 100 controls who were followed up for survival within 2 years of the date of completion of their treatment. Overall survival was evaluated in Kaplan-Meier survival functions and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

After adjustment for stage and histology, GSTM1null genotype was associated with shorter survival among OSCC patients, compared with GSTM1 present genotype. There was no association between CYP1A1 C genotype and survival in the overall study population.

CONCLUSION

The study indicated a potential role for GSTM1 polymorphism in predicting the clinical outcomes of treated oral carcinoma patients.

Effect of CYP1A1 MSPI polymorphism on the relationship between TP53 mutation and CDKN2A hypermethylation in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The molecular mechanisms of lung cancer susceptibility have not been fully understood. Although it has been described that germline polymorphisms are associated with either mutation or methylation of genes, the link between gene polymorphisms and gene-gene interactions has not been investigated. Therefore, we conducted this study to determine whether CYP1A1/GSTM1 polymorphisms can affect the relationship between TP53 mutation and CDKN2A hypermethylation in lung cancer.

METHODS

This study included 196 primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. CYP1A1 MSPI and GSTM1 polymorphisms were characterized through PCR-RFLP on DNA isolated from peripheral lymphocytes. TP53 mutations of exons 5 through 9 and CDKN2A promoter hypermethylation in both cancer tissues and corresponding normal tissues were analyzed by direct sequencing and methylation-specific PCR (MSP) respectively.

RESULTS

TP53 mutation in the tumor was associated with squamous cell histology and CDKN2A methylation was associated with older age (≥60 years), heavy smoking (>30 pack-years), squamous cell histology and advanced stage (stage II-IV). After adjusting for age, sex, smoking degree, histology type and TNM stage, the correlation between TP53 mutation and CDKN2A methylation was significant in patients with CYP1A1 risk genotype (p = 0.038), but not in those with CYP1A1 homogeneity wild genotype (p = 0.151).

CONCLUSIONS

This may suggest that TP53 mutation and CDKN2A methylation specifically interact to promote lung tumorigenesis in subjects with CYP1A1 risk genotype but not in those with CYP1A1 wild-type homozygotes, implying different pathways for the development of lung carcinoma with respect to CYP1A1 polymorphism.

Glutathione-S-transferase genotypes influence prognosis in follicular non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Polymorphisms in detoxification enzymes of the glutathione S-transferase (GST) family have been associated with risk and prognosis of several cancer types. We studied deletions of GSTM1 and GSTT1, and the GSTP1 Ile(105)Val polymorphism in 89 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). Patients with a GSTM1 or GSTT1 deletion had a significantly worse event-free survival, when compared with patients with undeleted genotype (p = 0.03 and p = 0.03, respectively). Outcome was even worse in patients with a double negative genotype, in comparison with patients with only one GST deletion or normal genotype (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the GSTM1/GSTT1 genotype tended to have a prognostic significance independent from the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score. In particular, GSTM1/T1 deletions identified patients with negative prognosis in the low (<3) FLIPI score group (p = 0.01). Larger prospective studies including homogeneously treated patients will be needed to confirm these results.

Glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) polymorphisms and lung cancer: a literature-based systematic HuGE review and meta-analysis

Multiple genes have been studied for potential associations with lung cancer. The gene most frequently associated with increased risk has been glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1). The glutathione S-transferase enzyme family is known to catalyze detoxification of electrophilic compounds, including carcinogens, therapeutic drugs, environmental toxins, and products of oxidative stress. In this review, the authors summarize the available evidence associating lung cancer with the GSTM1 gene. They describe results from an updated meta-analysis of 98 published genetic association studies investigating the relation between the GSTM1 null variant and lung cancer risk including 19,638 lung cancer cases and 25,266 controls (counting cases and controls in each study only once). All studies considered, the GSTM1 null variant was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14, 1.30), but no increase in risk was seen (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.91, 1.12) when only the five largest studies (>500 cases each) were considered. Furthermore, while GSTM1 null status conferred a significantly increased risk of lung cancer to East Asians (OR = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.24, 1.55), such a genotype did not confer increased risk to Caucasians. More data regarding the predictive value of GSTM1 genetic testing are needed before population-based testing may be reasonably considered.

Genotoxicity of tobacco smoke and tobacco smoke condensate: a review

This report reviews the literature on the genotoxicity of mainstream tobacco smoke and cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) published since 1985. CSC is genotoxic in nearly all systems in which it has been tested, with the base/neutral fractions being the most mutagenic. In rodents, cigarette smoke induces sister chromatid exchanges (SCEs) and micronuclei in bone marrow and lung cells. In humans, newborns of smoking mothers have elevated frequencies of HPRT mutants, translocations, and DNA strand breaks. Sperm of smokers have elevated frequencies of aneuploidy, DNA adducts, strand breaks, and oxidative damage. Smoking also produces mutagenic cervical mucus, micronuclei in cervical epithelial cells, and genotoxic amniotic fluid. These data suggest that tobacco smoke may be a human germ-cell mutagen. Tobacco smoke produces mutagenic urine, and it is a human somatic-cell mutagen, producing HPRT mutations, SCEs, microsatellite instability, and DNA damage in a variety of tissues. Of the 11 organ sites at which smoking causes cancer in humans, smoking-associated genotoxic effects have been found in all eight that have been examined thus far: oral/nasal, esophagus, pharynx/larynx, lung, pancreas, myeoloid organs, bladder/ureter, uterine cervix. Lung tumors of smokers contain a high frequency and unique spectrum of TP53 and KRAS mutations, reflective of the PAH (and possibly other) compounds in the smoke. Further studies are needed to clarify the modulation of the genotoxicity of tobacco smoke by various genetic polymorphisms. These data support a model of tobacco smoke carcinogenesis in which the components of tobacco smoke induce mutations that accumulate in a field of tissue that, through selection, drive the carcinogenic process. Most of the data reviewed here are from studies of human smokers. Thus, their relevance to humans cannot be denied, and their explanatory powers not easily dismissed. Tobacco smoke is now the most extreme example of a systemic human mutagen.