The EEG multiverse of schizophrenia

Resting-State EEG Microstates and Power Spectrum in Borderline Personality Disorder: A High-Density EEG Study

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a debilitating psychiatric condition characterized by emotional dysregulation, unstable sense of self, and impulsive, potentially self-harming behavior. In order to provide new neurophysiological insights on BPD, we complemented resting-state EEG frequency spectrum analysis with EEG microstates (MS) analysis to capture the spatiotemporal dynamics of large-scale neural networks. High-density EEG was recorded at rest in 16 BPD patients and 16 age-matched neurotypical controls. The relative power spectrum and broadband MS spatiotemporal parameters were compared between groups and their inter-correlations were examined. Compared to controls, BPD patients showed similar global spectral power, but exploratory univariate analyses on single channels indicated reduced relative alpha power and enhanced relative delta power at parietal electrodes. In terms of EEG MS, BPD patients displayed similar MS topographies as controls, indicating comparable neural generators. However, the MS temporal dynamics were significantly altered in BPD patients, who demonstrated opposite prevalence of MS C (lower than controls) and MS E (higher than controls). Interestingly, MS C prevalence correlated positively with global alpha power and negatively with global delta power, while MS E did not correlate with any measures of spectral power. Taken together, these observations suggest that BPD patients exhibit a state of cortical hyperactivation, represented by decreased posterior alpha power, together with an elevated presence of MS E, consistent with symptoms of elevated arousal and/or vigilance. This is the first study to investigate resting-state MS patterns in BPD, with findings of elevated MS E and the suggestion of reduced posterior alpha power indicating a disorder-specific neurophysiological signature previously unreported in a psychiatric population.

Proteomic profiling in the progression of psychosis: Analysis of clinical high-risk, first episode psychosis, and healthy controls

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Recent evidence has highlighted the benefits of early detection and treatment for better clinical outcomes in patients with psychosis. Biological markers of the disease have become a focal point of research. This study aimed to identify protein markers detectable in the early stages of psychosis and indicators of progression by comparing them with those of healthy controls (HC) and first episode psychosis (FEP).

STUDY DESIGN

The participants comprised 28 patients in the clinical high-risk (CHR) group, 49 patients with FEP, and 61 HCs aged 15-35 years. Blood samples were collected and analyzed using multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry to measure the expression of 158 peptide targets. Data were adjusted for age, sex, and use of psychotropic drugs.

STUDY RESULTS

A total of 18 peptides (17 proteins) differed significantly among the groups. The protein PRDX2 was higher in the FEP group than in the CHR and HC groups and showed increased expression according to disease progression. The levels of six proteins were significantly higher in the FEP group than in the CHR group. Nine proteins differed significantly in the CHR group compared to the other groups. Sixteen proteins were significantly correlated with symptom severity. These proteins are primarily related to the coagulation cascade, inflammatory response, brain structure, and synaptic plasticity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that peripheral protein markers reflect disease progression in patients with psychosis. Further longitudinal research is needed to confirm these findings and to identify the specific roles of these markers in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia.

Do we really measure what we think we are measuring?

Tests used in the empirical sciences are often (implicitly) assumed to be representative of a given research question in the sense that similar tests should lead to similar results. Here, we show that this assumption is not always valid. We illustrate our argument with the example of resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG). We used multiple analysis methods, contrary to typical EEG studies where one analysis method is used. We found, first, that many EEG features correlated significantly with cognitive tasks. However, these EEG features correlated weakly with each other. Similarly, in a second analysis, we found that many EEG features were significantly different in older compared to younger participants. When we compared these EEG features pairwise, we did not find strong correlations. In addition, EEG features predicted cognitive tasks poorly as shown by cross-validated regression analysis. We discuss several explanations of these results.