Aplastic anemia during malarial prophylaxis with mefloquine

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Oral Administration of Mefloquine to Clinically Normal Cats: A Preliminary In-Vivo Study of a Potential Treatment for Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP)

Simple Summary

In searching for antiviral agents against feline coronaviruses and feline caliciviruses, mefloquine, a human anti-malarial drug, has been demonstrated to reduce viral load of feline coronaviruses and feline calicivirus in infected cells. In this study, mefloquine was administered orally to seven clinically healthy cats twice weekly for four doses and mefloquine concentrations in blood were measured to investigate the pharmacokinetic profile—the movement of drug in the body. The maximum blood concentration of mefloquine was 2.71 ug/mL and was reached 15 h after a single oral dose was administered. Mefloquine side effects included vomiting following administration without food in some cats, and mild increases in symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), an early kidney biomarker. This study provides valuable information on mefloquine’s profile in cats as an introductory step towards investigating it as a potential treatment for feline coronavirus and feline calicivirus infection in cats.

Abstract

The pharmacokinetic profile of mefloquine was investigated as a preliminary study towards a potential treatment for feline coronavirus infections (such as feline infectious peritonitis) or feline calicivirus infections. Mefloquine was administered at 62.5 mg orally to seven clinically healthy cats twice weekly for four doses and mefloquine plasma concentrations over 336 h were measured using high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) after a single oral dose of mefloquine was 2.71 ug/mL and time to reach Cmax (Tmax) was 15 h. The elimination half-life was 224 h. The plasma concentration reached a higher level at 4.06 ug/mL when mefloquine was administered with food. Adverse effects of dosing included vomiting following administration without food in some cats. Mild increases in serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), but not creatinine, concentrations were observed. Mefloquine may provide a safe effective treatment for feline coronavirus and feline calicivirus infections in cats.

In vitro hepatic metabolism of mefloquine using microsomes from cats, dogs and the common brush-tailed possum (Trichosurus vulpecula)

Feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) is a systemic, fatal, viral-induced, immune-mediated disease of cats caused by feline infectious peritonitis virus (FIPV). Mefloquine, a human anti-malarial agent, has been shown to inhibit FIPV in vitro. As a first step to evaluate its efficacy and safety profile as a potential FIP treatment for cats, mefloquine underwent incubation in feline, canine and common brush-tailed possum microsomes and phase I metabolism cofactors to determine its rate of phase I depletion. Tramadol was used as a phase I positive control as it undergoes this reaction in both dogs and cats. Using the substrate depletion method, the in vitro intrinsic clearance (mean ± S.D.) of mefloquine by pooled feline and common brush-tailed possum microsomes was 4.5 ± 0.35 and 18.25 ± 3.18 μL/min/mg protein, respectively. However, phase I intrinsic clearance was too slow to determine with canine microsomes. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) identified carboxymefloquine in samples generated by feline microsomes as well as negative controls, suggesting some mefloquine instability. Mefloquine also underwent incubation with feline, canine and common brush-tailed possum microsomes and phase II glucuronidative metabolism cofactors. O-desmethyltramadol (ODMT or M1) was used as a positive control as it undergoes a phase II glucuronidation reaction in these species. The rates of phase II mefloquine depletion by microsomes by all three species were too slow to estimate. Therefore mefloquine likely undergoes phase I hepatic metabolism catalysed by feline and common brush-tailed possum microsomes but not phase II glucuronidative metabolism in all three species and mefloquine is not likely to have delayed elimination in cats with clinically normal, hepatic function.

Mefloquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis 1992-1998: a review

Mefloquine is an orally administered blood schizontocide for the chemoprophylaxis of malaria in nonimmune travelers. New pharmacokinetic data has shown that food increases the bioavailability of mefloquine. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of weekly prophylaxis in long term travelers have shown that toxic accumulation does not occur and that weekly dosing is associated with protective levels of the drug. The pharmacokinetics of mefloquine are highly stereospecific and all pharmacokinetic parameters, except tmax are significantly different for the (+) and (-) enantiomers. Mefloquine and its metabolite are not appreciably removed by hemodialysis. Steady-state levels of mefloquine can be attained in a reduced time frame of 4 days compared to 7-9 weeks using a loading dose strategy of 250 mg mefloquine daily for 3 days followed thereafter by weekly mefloquine dosage. This strategy, is however, associated with a higher incidence of an adverse event (AE). Cumulative evidence suggests a high protective efficacy of mefloquine (>91%) in nonimmune travelers to areas of chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum (CRPF) except for clearly defined regions of multi-drug resistance. Reports from sub-Saharan Africa indicate a low but increasing level of resistance to this drug. Mefloquine resistance is associated with halofantrine and quinine resistance but not with chloroquine resistance. Penfluridol has been shown to reverse P. falciparum mefloquine resistance in vitro. There is some controversy regarding the tolerabilty of mefloquine for malaria chemoprophylaxis. A review of the studies conducted during 1992-1998 shows that in the reporting of any AE the incidence lies in the range (12-90%) and where there is a comparator, is equivalent to the incidence reported for almost all alternative regimens. When some measure of subjective severity is applied to the rating of AE, it appears that 11-17% of travelers are, to some extent, incapacitated by AE. Major studies and worldwide monitoring have shown that serious events are rare. A recent meta-analysis showed that rates of withdrawal and overall incidence of AE with mefloquine were not significantly higher than those observed with comparator regimens except that mefloquine was more likely to cause insomnia and fatigue. Withdrawals in mefloquine arms were higher than in placebo arms. No performance deficit or functional impairment was observed in five clinical toxicity studies of mefloquine prophylaxis, including a study of driving performance. There is limited data regarding use of mefloquine in pregnancy. Early animal studies have documented teratogenic and embryotoxic effects associated with the use of high dose mefloquine. Two studies have shown a relatively high incidence of spontaneous abortions in mefloquine users. Cumulative evidence, however, is reassuring and has led the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to sanction the use of mefloquine in pregnant women during the second and third trimesters. In conclusion, mefloquine prophylaxis is recommended for travelers to high risk areas of chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum. The risk of malarial infection and the proven efficacy of mefloquine to prevent malaria should be weighed against the risk of drug associated adverse events.