Failure of pindolol and metoprolol to reduce the size of non-reperfused infarcts in dogs using area at risk techniques

The role of β-adrenergic receptors in the regulation of cardiac tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion. Why do β-adrenergic receptor agonists and antagonists protect the heart?

BACKGROUND

Catecholamines and β-adrenergic receptors (β-ARs) play an important role in the regulation of cardiac tolerance to the impact of ischemia and reperfusion. This systematic review analyzed the molecular mechanisms of the cardioprotective activity of β-AR ligands.

METHODS

We performed an electronic search of topical articles using PubMed databases from 1966 to 2023. We cited original in vitro and in vivo studies and review articles that documented the cardioprotective properties of β-AR agonists and antagonists.

RESULTS

The infarct-reducing effect of β-AR antagonists did not depend on a decrease in the heart rate. The target for β-blockers is not only cardiomyocytes but also neutrophils. β1-blockers (metoprolol, propranolol, timolol) and the selective β2-AR agonist arformoterol have an infarct-reducing effect in coronary artery occlusion (CAO) in animals. Antagonists of β1- and β2-АR (metoprolol, propranolol, nadolol, carvedilol, bisoprolol, esmolol) are able to prevent reperfusion cardiac injury. All β-AR ligands that reduced infarct size are the selective or nonselective β1-blockers. It was hypothesized that β1-AR blocking promotes an increase in cardiac tolerance to I/R. The activation of β1-AR, β2-AR, and β3-AR can increase cardiac tolerance to I/R. The cardioprotective effect of β-AR agonists is mediated via the activation of kinases and reactive oxygen species production.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear why β-blockers with the similar receptor selectivity have the infarct-sparing effect while other β-blockers with the same selectivity do not affect infarct size. What is the molecular mechanism of the infarct-reducing effect of β-blockers in reperfusion? Why did in early studies β-blockers decrease the mortality rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and without reperfusion and in more recent studies β-blockers had no effect on the mortality rate in patients with AMI and reperfusion? The creation of more effective β-AR ligands depends on the answers to these questions.

Impact of Bisoprolol on Ventricular Arrhythmias in Experimental Myocardial Infarction

Following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), early use of beta-blockers (BBs) reduced the incidences of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and death in the pre reperfusion era. However, some studies have reported a worsening of clinical outcomes and therefore, this study used a porcine model of AMI to evaluate the efficacy of bisoprolol on VAs and mortality. Twenty pigs were divided into two groups with one group using oral bisoprolol which was given for 3 hours before the experiment and then maintained for 7 days. A loop recorder was implanted, AMI was induced by balloon occlusion for 60 min, and then, reperfusion. One week later, the echocardiography and loop recorder data were analyzed in the surviving animals. Bisoprolol did not increase the heart rate (62.9±14.5 vs 79.0±20.3; p=0.048), lower the rate of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) (0.8±0.8 vs 11.0±12.8; p=0.021) or tend to lower recurrent VA (0.6±0.5 vs 1.1±1.1; p=0.131) during coronary artery occlusion. After reperfusion, bisoprolol did reduce VA in the early AMI period (0.1±0.3 vs 4.2±4.6; p=0.001) and it was not associated with the extent of myocardial recovery. In this porcine model, early oral bisoprolol might help reduce the incidences of PVC and recurrent VA and determine whether effects are more pronounced during the early AMI period. Our results suggest that bisoprolol might help reduce lethal VA and cardiac death following AMI in this reperfusion era.

Comparison of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone and/or Metoprolol on Myocardial Infarct Size and Mitochondrial Damage in a Rat Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury

The cardioprotective effectiveness of low-dose pyrroloquinoline quinone (PQQ, 3 mg/kg) was compared with metoprolol, a β1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist. Rats underwent 30 minutes of left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and 2 hours of reperfusion. Metoprolol and/or PQQ were given at the onset of reperfusion to mimic clinical treatment. Metoprolol and/or PQQ reduced infarct size and protected against ischemia-induced left ventricular dysfunction after 2 hours of reper-fusion. Combined therapy augmented left ventricular developed pressure at the end of reperfusion. Metoprolol or PQQ alone enhanced mitochondrial respiratory ratios in ischemic and nonischemic myocardium. Although the PQQ/metoprolol combination therapy increased respiratory ratio values, the effects were small when compared with PQQ alone. Only PQQ decreased lipid peroxidation. Metoprolol and/or PQQ given at the onset of reperfusion reduce infarct size and improve cardiac function. Combination therapy further reduces infarct size. PQQ is superior to metoprolol in protecting mitochondria from ischemia/reperfusion oxidative damage

Rationale and design of a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of early administration of intravenous β-blockers in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction before primary percutaneous coronary intervention: EARLY β-blocker administration before primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial

BACKGROUND

β-Blockers have a class 1a recommendation in the treatment of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs), as they are associated with a reduced mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, life-threatening arrhythmias, and with prevention of unfavorable left ventricular remodeling. Whether early administration before primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of intravenous β-blockers reduces the infarct size in the current era is unknown.

HYPOTHESIS

We postulate that the early administration of β-blockers will reduce the myocardial infarcted area as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 30 days.

DESIGN

In a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, patients with symptoms and signs of STEMI and transferred to a hospital for primary PCI will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to intravenous metoprolol (5 mg twice daily) administration or placebo. Before admission, study treatment will be started as soon as possible after the diagnosis of STEMI. After admission, primary PCI will be performed as per standard of care. After primary PCI, medical treatment will occur as per current guidelines in all patients, including the use of oral β-blockers. The primary end point is the myocardial infarct size as assessed by MRI at 30 days. Based on a superiority design and assuming an 18% relative infarct size reduction (from 28% to 23.5%), 408 patients are required to be enrolled, accounting for 20% drop-out (α = .05 and power = 80%).

SUMMARY

The EARLY-BAMI trial is a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial that will investigate the impact of intravenous metoprolol administration before primary PCI for STEMI on myocardial infarct size as measured with MRI at 30 days.

Intracoronary followed by intravenous administration of the short-acting β-blocker landiolol prevents myocardial injury in the face of elective percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Myocardial injury during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with higher subsequent cardiac events and mortality. β-Blockers have been used to reduce myocardial injury during ischemia and reperfusion. We investigated whether intracoronary followed by intravenous administration of the short-acting β-blocker landiolol prevents myocardial injury in the face of elective PCI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing elective PCI (n=70) were randomly assigned to the landiolol (n=35) or control (n=35) group. Landiolol or saline was administered into target vessels through a balloon catheter for 1min before and after first balloon inflation followed by continuous intravenous administration for 6h after PCI. The incidence of myocardial injury defined by cardiac troponin-I (cTnI) >/=0.05 ng/ml was 79% of the patients in the control group compared to 56% in the landiolol group (p=0.04). The cTnI level at 24h after PCI tended to be lower in the landiolol group (0.57 ± 1.14 versus 1.27 ± 2.48 ng/ml; p=0.07), while the CK-MB level was not significantly different between the landiolol and control groups. The incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction defined by cTnI >/=0.12 ng/ml was significantly (p=0.02) lower in the landiolol group (41%) compared to the control group (70%). There was no incidence of coronary spasm, hypotension, bradycardia or heart failure during and after PCI in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Brief intracoronary followed by continuous intravenous administration of landiolol is safe and effective for myocardial protection in the face of elective PCI.

Early metoprolol administration before coronary reperfusion results in increased myocardial salvage: analysis of ischemic myocardium at risk using cardiac magnetic resonance

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers improve clinical outcome when administered early after acute myocardial infarction. However, whether beta-blockers actually reduce the myocardial infarction size is still in dispute. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can accurately depict the left ventricular (LV) ischemic myocardium at risk (T2-weighted hyperintense region) early after myocardial infarction, as well as the extent of necrosis (delayed gadolinium enhancement). The aim of this study was to determine whether early administration of metoprolol could increase myocardial salvage, measured as the difference between the extent of myocardium at risk and myocardial necrosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twelve Yorkshire pigs underwent a 90-minute left anterior descending coronary occlusion, followed by reperfusion. They were randomized to metoprolol (7.5 mg during myocardial infarction) or placebo. Global and regional LV function, extent of myocardium at risk, and myocardial necrosis were quantified by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies performed 4 and 22 days after reperfusion in 10 survivors. Despite similar extent of myocardium at risk in metoprolol- and placebo-treated pigs (30.9% of LV versus 30.6%; P=NS), metoprolol resulted in 5-fold-larger salvaged myocardium (32.4% versus 6.2% of myocardium at risk; P=0.015). The LV ejection fraction significantly improved in metoprolol-treated pigs between days 4 and 22 (37.2% versus 43.0%; P=0.037), whereas it remained unchanged in pigs treated with placebo (35.1% versus 35.0%; P=NS). The extent of myocardial salvage was related directly to LV ejection fraction improvement (P=0.031) and regional LV wall motion recovery (P=0.039) at day 22.

CONCLUSIONS

Early metoprolol administration during acute coronary occlusion increases myocardial salvage. The extent of myocardial salvage, measured as the difference between myocardium at risk and myocardial necrosis, was associated with regional and global LV motion improvement.

Cardiac protection during acute myocardial infarction: Where do we stand in 2004?

Despite better outcomes with early coronary artery reperfusion for the treatment of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), morbidity and mortality from acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain significant, the incidence of congestive heart failure continues to increase, and there is a need to provide better cardioprotection (therapy that reduces the amount of necrosis that may be coupled with better clinical outcome) in the setting of AMI. Since the introduction of the concept of cardiac protection over a quarter of a century ago, various interventions have been investigated to reduce myocardial infarct size. Intravenous beta-blockers administered in the early hours of infarction were clearly shown to be of benefit. Intravenous adenosine appeared promising for anterior wall AMIs, as did cariporide in some studies. Glucose-insulin-potassium infusion was beneficial in certain subgroups of patients, particularly diabetics. A variety of other medications were studied with negative or marginal results. The best strategy to limit infarct size is early reperfusion with percutaneous coronary stenting or thrombolytic therapy. Stenting is superior and should be adopted whenever there is a qualified laboratory available. Available resources should focus on decreasing time from onset of symptoms to start of reperfusion and maintaining vessel patency. Future studies powered to better assess clinical outcome are needed for adjunctive therapy with adenosine, K(ATP) channel openers, Na(+)/H(+) exchange inhibitors, and hypothermia.

Early intravenous administration of metoprolol enhances myocardial salvage by thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator after thrombotic coronary artery occlusion in the dog by improvement of the collateral blood flow to the area at risk

OBJECTIVES

We studied the effects of beta 1-adrenergic blockade preceding thrombolysis on hemodynamic variables, myocardial blood flow and infarct size in a canine model of thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

BACKGROUND

Previous work suggested a reduction in infarct size and improvement in left ventricular function by intravenous beta-blockade preceding thrombolysis.

METHODS

Experiments were conducted in 34 anesthetized dogs; 17 received 0.975 mg/kg body weight of metoprolol intravenously starting 15 min after occlusion, and thrombolysis was initiated 60 min after occlusion. Seventeen dogs received saline solution followed by thrombolysis. Coronary blood flow was measured by radioactive microspheres, infarct size by a dye method, hemodynamic variables by catheter-tipped pressure transducers and cardiac output by the thermodilution method.

RESULTS

Infarct size in metoprolol- and placebo-treated dogs was 23.62 +/- 18.04% and 41.50 +/- 16.03% of area at risk, respectively (p < 0.01). Before occlusion, myocardial blood flow and hemodynamic variables were similar. Sixty minutes after occlusion, cardiac output (1.94 +/- 0.41 vs. 2.32 +/- 0.68 liters/min, p < 0.01) was lower in the metoprolol-treated dogs. Collateral flow to the area at risk (17.27 +/- 7.44 vs. 10.25 +/- 5.33) and to its epicardial (21.68 +/- 8.04 vs. 11.5 +/- 6.10), midmyocardial (14.30 +/- 8.63 vs. 7.35 +/- 4.94) and endocardial (13.18 +/- 8.21 vs. 6.26 +/- 5.34 cm3/min per 100 g) layers was higher (p < or = 0.05) in the metoprolol-treated dogs. The ratio of epicardial flow area at risk/circumflex territory was inversely correlated to infarct size (r = -0.69, p < 0.01). After 5 min of occlusion, collateral flow was comparable in the five dogs of each group; over the next 55 min it remained constant in the metoprolol group but decreased in the placebo dogs.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous metoprolol, administered before thrombolysis, enhances infarct size limitation, partly by improvement of collateral flow to area at risk.

Effects of metoprolol on early infarct expansion after acute myocardial infarction

The effects of metoprolol on early infarct expansion after acute myocardial infarction were studied in rats (n = 54) that underwent either left coronary artery ligation (MI) or sham operation. Immediately after surgery, the rats received either metoprolol (M) by mouth, which had been dissolved in drinking water, for 72 hours supplemented with three intraperitoneal doses over the first 24 hours or no treatment (H2O). Three days after the initial surgery, hemodynamic measurements were made before and after volume loading. The rats were killed, the hearts were removed, and passive pressure-volume curves were obtained. The hearts were then fixed at a constant pressure and analyzed morphometrically. Infarct size was nonsignificantly lower in the metoprolol-treated group compared with the untreated group (38% +/- 5% MI-M vs 48% +/- 3% MI-H2O, p = 0.10) Compared with infarcted untreated rats, infarcted metoprolol-treated rats had a lower heart rate (322 +/- 13 beats/min MI-M vs 452 +/- 19 beats/min MI-H2O, p < 0.001), lower left ventricular systolic pressure (63 +/- 4 mm Hg MI-M vs 90 +/- 6 mm Hg MI-H2O, p = 0.004), and lower +dp/dt (1340 +/- 169 mm Hg/sec MI-M vs 2872 +/- 273 mm Hg/sec MI-H2O, p < 0.001), but left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and cardiac index did not differ between the two groups. Left ventricular weight corrected for body weight was higher in infarcted rats treated with metoprolol compared with infarcted untreated rats (2.76 +/- 0.07 gm/kg MI-M vs 2.41 +/- 0.09 gm/kg MI-H2O, p < 0.05). The initial slope of the pressure-volume relationship Ki, an index of operative volume stiffness, was lower in infarcted rats treated with metoprolol compared with infarcted untreated rats (p = 0.03). There were, however, no significant differences in the expansion index, thinning ratio, or left ventricular volume between the two infarcted groups. Thus metoprolol therapy begun in the immediate postinfarction period promotes an increase in left ventricular weight and reduces operative volume stiffness but has no significant effect on indexes of early infarct expansion.

Infarct size in rabbits: a modified method illustrated by the effects of propranolol and trimetazidine

Following a 45-min period of coronary occlusion the myocardial infarct that developed after 24 h of blood reperfusion in the rabbit heart was studied in three groups of animals: controls (n = 7), and those pretreated with 3 mg.kg-1 of the piperazine derivative, trimetazidine (n = 7) or propranolol at 0.3 mg.kg-1 (n = 6). Twenty-four hours after coronary artery ligation for 45 min infarct size was measured in myocardial slices using trinitrophenyl-tetrazolium staining, and the "area at risk" was determined by injection of zinc/cadmium particles and delineated by imaging under fluorescent light the areas of tissue that did not fluoresce. The range of "area at risk" was similar in all of the groups. There was a significant reduction in the size of infarct that developed in the trimetazidine treated group when compared with the controls. In the propranolol treated group there was a slight reduction in infarct size when compared to control, but this was less than in the trimetazidine treated group and did not reach statistical significance. It is concluded that pretreatment with trimetazidine in the blood perfused rabbit heart is effective in reducing myocardial infarct size.

Dietary fish oil supplementation reduces myocardial infarct size in a canine model of ischemia and reperfusion

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to determine whether the long-term administration of fish oil attenuates myocardial necrosis in an occlusion-reperfusion model of myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND

Omega-3 fatty acids found in fish oil have various biologic properties that may modify myocardial injury caused by severe ischemia and reperfusion.

METHODS

Of 21 dogs fed an identical diet, 10 were given supplemental fish oil containing 0.06 g/kg per day of eicosapentaenoic acid for 6 weeks. Under anesthesia and open chest conditions, the left circumflex coronary artery was occluded for 90 min, followed by 6 h of reperfusion. Regional myocardial blood flow was measured with 15-microns spheres before and during occlusion and during reperfusion. The area at risk and infarct size were measured using standard staining techniques.

RESULTS

In the dogs receiving supplemental fish oil, the platelet cell membrane content of eicosapentaenoic acid increased from 0.9 +/- 0.56% to 7.1 +/- 4.0% (p < 0.001). Infarct size was 29 +/- 7% in the control group and 13 +/- 3% in the fish oil group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the myocardial area at risk or rate-pressure product between the control and fish oil groups. There was no difference in regional myocardial blood flow between the groups at baseline study or during coronary occlusion and reperfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Dietary fish oil supplementation significantly reduced myocardial infarct size in this model. The difference in infarct size did not appear to be related to dissimilarities in regional myocardial blood flow or determinants of oxygen consumption. Further investigation is needed to determine the nature of the protective mechanisms of omega-3 fatty acids on myocardial infarct size.

Is esmolol cardioprotective? Tolerance of pacing tachycardia, acute afterloading and hemodilution in dogs with coronary stenosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine whether esmolol, an ultrashort-acting beta-adrenergic antagonist, possesses cardioprotective properties unrelated to a concomitant decrease in heart rate.

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of beta-adrenergic blocking agents with unchanged heart rates.

METHODS

The effect of esmolol (100 micrograms/kg per min) on the response of global cardiovascular and regional myocardial contractile function (sonomicrometry) to pacing-induced tachycardia and acute left ventricular afterloading was assessed in dogs with a critical stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). These responses were observed at the baseline hemoglobin level (12.5 +/- 0.3 g/100 ml) as well as after hemodilution-induced mild regional contractile dysfunction (7.4 +/- 0.4 g/100 ml) in the area supplied by this artery (LAD area). Data were analyzed by using a repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance with complete block design treating pacing rate and afterloading, respectively, as the repeated measure.

RESULTS

Esmolol decreased the maximal first derivative of left ventricular pressure (dP/dtmax); global cardiovascular and regional myocardial contractile function were otherwise unchanged. Esmolol did not alter the response of global cardiovascular or regional myocardial function to pacing-induced tachycardia or to acute left ventricular afterloading, both at the baseline hemoglobin level as well as during mild hemodilution-induced LAD area contractile dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

At an infusion rate of 100 micrograms/kg per min we were unable to demonstrate cardioprotective esmolol effects in a canine model of critical coronary stenosis with controlled heart rate and identical loading conditions.

Cardioprotective effect of pindolol in ischemic-reperfused isolated rat hearts

The effects of pindolol and timolol on ischemia reperfusion damage were studied in isolated working rat hearts. Ischemia (15 min) decreased the mechanical function and the energy state, and increased the tissue levels of free fatty acids (FFA). During reperfusion (20 min), the mechanical function did not recover, but the energy state recovered incompletely, whereas FFA increased further. Pindolol (50 microM) accelerated recovery of the mechanical function and the energy state that had been decreased by ischemia during reperfusion, and inhibited the accumulation of FFA during ischemia and reperfusion, especially when it was applied during the whole period of reperfusion. Timolol (50 microM), however, did not accelerate recovery of the mechanical function and the energy state during reperfusion, although it attenuated FFA accumulation during reperfusion. The pindolol-induced recovery of the mechanical function during reperfusion was reduced by timolol. The results suggest that the intrinsic sympathomimetic activity of pindolol may play an important role, at least in part, in producing the cardioprotective effect, especially during reperfusion.

Intravenous pretreatment with A1-selective adenosine analogues protects the heart against infarction

BACKGROUND

Recent data from this laboratory indicate that pretreatment with adenosine can protect the heart against infarction via A1-receptors, but because of systemic hypotension, adenosine had to be given into the coronary circulation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this study, we tested whether the protection could be achieved by intravenous administration of the A1-selective adenosine agonists N6-(phenyl-2R-isopropyl)-adenosine (PIA) and 2-chloro-N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA). Nine groups of open-chest anesthetized rabbits were subjected to 30 minutes of regional coronary ischemia and 3 hours of reperfusion. Infarct size was determined by tetrazolium staining. Control hearts receiving no treatment had 38 +/- 4% of the risk zone infarcted. Preconditioning with 5 minutes of ischemia and 10 minutes of reperfusion before ischemia limited the infarct to 8 +/- 4%. Intravenous PIA 15 minutes before 30-minute ischemia also limited infarct size to 6 +/- 2% at the highest dose. CCPA offered similar protection. When the PIA was given at reperfusion, infarct size was 46 +/- 6%, indicating that receptor activation must precede ischemia to protect. Pretreatment with CGS 21680, a selective A2-receptor agonist, caused identical hypotension but failed to limit infarct size (43 +/- 3%), indicating again that the A1-receptor is involved. When rabbits pretreated with PIA were paced at 220 beats per minutes, PIA still limited infarct size (16 +/- 4%), indicating that protection was not the result of bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that stimulation of adenosine A1-receptors causes the heart to become resistant to ischemia and that this protection can be achieved with intravenous administration of A1-selective agents.

Effect of atenolol on myocardial infarct expansion in a nonreperfused rat model

Acute myocardial infarct expansion is associated with a poor prognosis. This study was performed to assess potential beneficial effects of beta-blockers on inhibiting expansion. A pilot study showed that atenolol (10 mg/kg) achieved sustained beta-blockade in rats. In the main study, following left coronary ligation, 36 rats received atenolol and 18 rats received placebo daily for 7 days. Infarct size was similar in treated and control rats (25 +/- 13% versus 28 +/- 11%). Expansion grades and a quantitative index of expansion were similar for both groups. Infarct size and expansion index were significantly related, but linear regression lines were similar for treated and control rats. We conclude that atenolol has no significant effect on infarct expansion in this nonreperfused rat model.

Effects of selective cardiac denervation on collateral blood flow after coronary artery occlusion in conscious dogs

The extent to which cardiac nerves regulate responses to myocardial ischemia remains controversial. Our data in conscious dogs indicate that neither selective posterior left ventricular (LV) wall denervation nor selective ventricular denervation, leaving the atria intact, modifies the effects of coronary artery occlusion (for 24 h) on regional myocardial function and infarct size as compared to normally innervated dogs. Since hemodynamic changes were similar among the three groups after coronary artery occlusion, it is possible to speculate that responses of collateral blood flow to the ischemic zone were also not modified by chronic selective cardiac denervation. To address this, individual samples were selected and included in either the infarcted (TTC negative) or salvaged (TTC positive) group. The infarcted and salvaged samples were paired according to blood flow levels of 0.1-0.2, 0.2-0.3, or 0.3-0.4 ml/min/g at either 5 min, 1 h, 3 h, or 6 h after coronary artery occlusion. The results demonstrated similar patterns of myocardial blood flow in tissue samples within the area at risk after coronary artery occlusion in the animals, regardless of whether the ischemic zone was innervated or denervated. While blood flow rose in ischemic tissue that ultimately was salvaged, and tended not to rise over the 24 h monitoring period in tissue samples that became necrotic, no differences could be discerned on the basis of intact or absent innervation of the ischemic zone. Thus, chronic absence of cardiac nerves does not affect regulation of ischemic zone blood flow following coronary artery occlusion in conscious dogs.

Determinants of infarct size in non-human primates

To achieve a better understanding of the major factors that determine infarct size in non-human primates, a mathematical model was constructed using stepwise regression analysis. The model was developed on the basis of infarct size measurements, including the anatomical area at risk, regional myocardial blood flow measurements and hemodynamic determinants obtained in 23 control baboons undergoing up to 2 h of coronary artery thrombosis followed by thrombolysis. In this model, the size of the perfusion bed of the occluded coronary artery and the duration of coronary artery occlusion were found to be the only important predictors of infarct size (expressed as a percentage of left ventricular mass). R2 (square or the multiple correlation coefficient) was 70% in this model. Collateral blood flow and rate-pressure product were not identified as important predictors of infarct size. In a second group of eight baboons, atenolol (0.1 mg.kg-1) was administered intravenously 15 min after the onset of coronary artery thrombosis. Predicted infarct size (based on the mathematical model obtained in the control group) was larger than the observed infarct size in seven out of eight cases. In four instances observed infarct size was smaller than the 95% lower limit of the predicted value. It is concluded that the determinants of infarct size in non-human primates differ from those in canine models with respect to collateral flow and estimates of myocardial oxygen consumption (rate pressure product). The developed mathematical model of infarct size prediction allows the detection of cardioprotective drug effects with an acceptable efficacy.

Left ventricular unloading during reperfusion does not limit myocardial infarct size

To determine whether venting the left ventricle during coronary reperfusion limits myocardial infarct size, we studied paced (200 beats/min) Langendorff rabbit hearts, perfused with blood from a support rabbit. A left coronary artery was occluded for 60 minutes, followed by 2 hours of reperfusion. Four experimental conditions, as follows, were used: In group 1 (control), the hearts contracted isovolumetrically on a fluid-filled balloon in the left ventricle during both occlusion and reperfusion. In group 2, the balloon was present only during occlusion, and the heart was vented during reperfusion. Hearts in group 3 were vented during occlusion and developed pressure during reperfusion. In group 4, the left ventricle was vented during occlusion and reperfusion. Perfusion pressure (91.2 +/- 0.9 mm Hg) and coronary flow (0.88 +/- 0.03 ml/min/g) were not different between groups. Left ventricular pressures (mean of all groups) were 87.3 +/- 1.5 mm Hg systolic and 6.5 +/- 0.6 mm Hg diastolic. Infarcted myocardium was assessed by triphenyl tetrazolium staining and expressed as a percentage of the area at risk, as measured by fluorescent particles. Venting during both ischemia and reperfusion (n = 10) did result in significantly smaller infarcts than in the unvented controls (n = 10), that is, 13 +/- 5% vs. 41 +/- 6%, respectively. Venting only during reperfusion (n = 10) or occlusion (n = 11) did not significantly limit infarct size (57 +/- 6% and 32 +/- 5%, respectively), as compared with controls. Thus, the clinically feasible intervention of left ventricular venting during reperfusion was not cardioprotective.

Coronary reperfusion by thrombolysis and early beta-adrenergic blockade in acute experimental myocardial infarction

The effects of beta-adrenergic blockade, thrombolysis and their combination on infarct size and left ventricular function were investigated in a canine model of thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Metoprolol was administered intravenously (0.5 mg/kg) over 10 min, starting 15 min after occlusion. Recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) was given intravenously 1 h after occlusion for clot lysis. Anatomic infarct size was measured as a percent of perfusion area and ventricular mass. Left ventricular function was assessed by ejection fraction and the centerline method. Groups 1, 3, 5 and 7 were evaluated after 24 h and received, respectively, metoprolol plus rt-PA, rt-PA, metoprolol and no treatment; groups 2, 4, 6 and 8 were studied after 1 week and treated, respectively, as groups 1, 3, 5 and 7. Metoprolol did not influence infarct size and global or regional ventricular function after 24 h and 1 week. Thrombolysis reduced infarct size from 69.5 +/- 3.4% (24 h) and 76.6 +/- 1.8% (1 week) in the control group to, respectively, 44.1 +/- 11.6% and 39.5 +/- 10.5% (p greater than 0.05), did not influence left ventricular function after 24 h and was accompanied after 1 week by a definite recovery of global and regional left ventricular function when compared with findings in control dogs. Metoprolol plus rt-PA further reduced infarct size (percent perfusion area) to 20.4 +/- 3.7% and 19.9 +/- 8.1% after 24 h and 1 week, respectively (p = NS versus rt-PA).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Myocardial salvage after regional beta-adrenergic blockade

The aim of the study was to determine whether regional beta-adrenergic blockade via the coronary sinus limited myocardial damage after coronary artery occlusion in the canine model. Accordingly, open-chest anesthetized dogs were randomly allocated to one of three groups: a control group and groups treated with propranolol (in doses of 0.02, 0.2, and 2.0 mg/kg) given either intravenously or via the coronary sinus. The hypoperfused zone (i.e., risk area) and the extent of myocardial damage were assessed by autoradiography and triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining, respectively. Myocardial damage expressed as a percent of the hypoperfused zone was 84 +/- 5% in the control group (n = 9) and 78 +/- 7% (0.02 mg/kg, n = 7, NS), 63 +/- 6% (0.2 mg/kg, n = 7, p less than 0.05), and 62 +/- 7% (2.0 mg/kg, n = 9, p less than 0.02) in the groups receiving intravenous propranolol and 73 +/- 6% (0.02 mg/kg, n = 7, NS), 58 +/- 7% (0.2 mg/kg, n = 7, p less than 0.01), and 44 +/- 9% (2.0 mg/kg, n = 9, p less than 0.001) in groups receiving propranolol via the cardiac veins. There was a significant enhancement of myocardial salvage with increasing doses of propranolol delivered via the cardiac veins (linear regression trend, p less than 0.05). In contrast, myocardial damage expressed as a percent of the hypoperfused zone remained comparable with propranolol doses of 0.2 and 2.0 mg/kg administered intravenously (linear regression trend, NS).

IN CONCLUSION

(1) regional beta-adrenergic blockade via the cardiac veins afforded significant myocardial salvage and (2) the regional administration of propranolol resulted in significant reduction of myocardial damage in a dose-dependent fashion.

Comparison of the effects of acute and chronic beta-blockade on infarct size in the dog after circumflex occlusion

In order to compare the effects of acute and chronic beta-blockade on infact size, the left circumflex coronary artery was occluded for 6 hours in 33 anesthetized dogs. The dogs (18 to 22 kg) were divided into three groups; group 1 (N = 10) served as controls, group 2 received intravenous nadolol (average dose 1.25 mg/kg) just prior to coronary occlusion, and group 3 received oral nadolol (80 mg) twice daily for 16 days prior to coronary occlusion. To ensure equivalent degrees of beta-blockade at the time of occlusion, group 2 and 3 dogs were given incremental doses of intravenous nadolol to abolish the chronotropic response to isoproterenol (2 mu/kg IV). Left ventricular pressure, its first derivative (dP/dt), and heart rate were monitored. The anatomic risk region was determined antemortem by Evan's blue staining while the infarct zone was delineated postmortem by tetrazolium staining. Compared to Group 1, heart rate was 22% lower in group 2 and 15% lower in group 3 dogs 6 hours after occlusion (p less than 0.05). There were no differences among groups in peak left ventricular systolic pressure or mean arterial pressure. Infarct size as a function of the area at risk was 68 +/- 3% in group 1, 52 +/- 7% in group 2, and 44 +/- 8% in group 3. A significant difference was found only between groups 3 and 1. The data suggest that chronic beta-blockade provides greater protection against ischemic-induced necrosis than does acute beta-blockade. The greater protective effect of chronic beta-blockade may be due to chronic adaptive changes in either blood flow or metabolism.

Reduction in infarct size and enhanced recovery of systolic function after coronary thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator combined with beta-adrenergic blockade with metoprolol

The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on the salvage and functional recovery of reperfused myocardium was investigated in anesthetized dogs. Immediately after thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery, the cardioselective beta-blocking agent metoprolol was given intravenously at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg infused over 10 min. One hour after the onset of occlusion, recanalization was initiated by intravenous infusion of recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA, 10 micrograms/kg/min for 30 min). Anatomic infarct size expressed as percent of the left ventricular mass (I/LV), global ejection fraction, and mean systolic shortening of the segmental radii (SS) of the infarcted area were measured either after 24 hr or 1 week in six groups of six dogs each: group I (rt-PA + metoprolol, evaluated at 24 hr), group II (rt-PA + metoprolol, evaluated at 1 week, group III (rt-PA alone, evaluated at 24 hr), group IV (rt-PA alone, evaluated at 1 week), group V (persistent occlusion, evaluated at 24 hr), and group VI (persistent occlusion, evaluated at 1 week). The smallest infarcts were found in reperfused dogs given metoprolol, but the differences from dogs receiving rt-PA alone were not statistically significant (I/LV, expressed as mean +/- SEM: 5.5 +/- 0.9% in group I, 6.7 +/- 1.9% in group II, 15.4 +/- 5.0% in group III, 11.4 +/- 3.5% in group IV, 23.6 +/- 2.5% in group V, and 26.9 +/- 2.3% in group VI).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Metoprolol. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy, in hypertension, ischaemic heart disease and related cardiovascular disorders

During the intervening years since metoprolol was first reviewed in the Journal (1977), it has become widely used in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension and angina pectoris. Although much data have accumulated, its precise mechanisms of action in these diseases remain largely uncertain. Optimum treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris with metoprolol is achieved through dose titration within the therapeutic range. It has been clearly demonstrated that metoprolol is at least as effective as other beta-blockers, diuretics and certain calcium antagonists in the majority of patients. Although a twice daily dosage regimen is normally used, satisfactory control can be maintained in many patients with single daily doses of conventional or, more frequently, slow release formulations. Addition of a diuretic may improve the overall response rate in hypertension. Several controlled trials have studied the effects of metoprolol administered during the acute phase and after myocardial infarction. In early intervention trials a reduction in total mortality was achieved in one moderately large trial of prolonged treatment, but in another, which excluded patients already being treated with beta-blockers or certain calcium antagonists and where treatment was only short term, mortality was significantly reduced only in 'high risk' patients. Overall results with metoprolol have not demonstrated that early intervention treatment in all patients produces clinically important improvement in short term mortality. Thus, the use of metoprolol during the early stages of myocardial infarction is controversial, largely because of the requirement to treat all patients to save a small number at 'high risk'. This blanket coverage approach to treatment may be more justified during the post-infarction follow-up phase since it has been shown that metoprolol slightly, but significantly, reduces the mortality rate for periods of up to 3 years. Metoprolol is generally well tolerated and its beta 1-selectivity may facilitate its administration to certain patients (e.g. asthmatics and diabetics) in whom non-selective beta-blockers are contraindicated. Temporary fatigue, dizziness and headache are among the most frequently reported side effects. After a decade of use, metoprolol is well established as a first choice drug in mild to moderate hypertension and stable angina, and is beneficial in post-infarction patients. Further study is needed in less well established areas of treatment such as cardiac arrhythmias, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertensive cardiomegaly.

Experimental and clinical observations on the efficacy of esmolol in myocardial ischemia

Beta blockers reduce myocardial oxygen demand and are therefore useful in ischemic states. They reduce angina pectoris and reduce the risk of death when administered long-term after acute myocardial infarction. Some studies suggest that when administered early after coronary occlusion they can reduce myocardial infarct size. Relative contraindications to beta blockers, such as a history of congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive lung disease, atrioventricular conduction defects and low blood pressure, limit their use. Conventional beta blockers have a relatively long duration of action and are either contraindicated or must be used with particular caution in patients with these contraindications. Esmolol is an ultrashort-acting beta blocker with a biologic half-life of 9 minutes. Therefore, such an agent may be useful in patients with ischemic heart disease in whom reducing heart rate would be beneficial but in whom there is concern that beta blockers might not be tolerated. Esmolol reduced myocardial infarct size in 2 experimental studies of coronary occlusion followed by reperfusion, and improved the recovery of the stunned myocardium when administered during experimental myocardial ischemia. Esmolol's brief duration of action may make it safer than conventional beta blockers for the management of patients with unstable angina or myocardial infarction.

Adverse effects of chronic cardiac denervation in conscious dogs with myocardial ischemia

The extent to which total chronic cardiac denervation protects the ischemic myocardium was investigated in conscious dogs. The major hemodynamic difference after coronary artery occlusion was that left ventricular end-diastolic pressure rose significantly more, P less than 0.01, in the denervated group (12 +/- 1.5 mm Hg) than in the normal group (4.4 +/- 1.4 mm Hg). Blood flow (radioactive microspheres) in the ischemic endo- and epicardium fell to similar levels at 3-5 minutes after coronary occlusion, but was significantly less (P less than 0.01) in denervated dogs at 3 hours after occlusion in the endo- (0.05 +/- 0.01) and epicardium (0.30 +/- 0.02 ml/min per g), than in the endo- (0.13 +/- 0.03) and epicardium (0.42 +/- 0.05 ml/min per g) in the normal group. A subgroup of normal dogs was also studied, with left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased by volume loading to levels similar to those observed in the denervated group after coronary occlusion; in these dogs, blood flow was similar to that in the other two groups 3-5 minutes after coronary artery occlusion, but, at 3 hours, was significantly more depressed (P less than 0.01) than that observed in normal dogs without volume loading in both endo- (0.03 +/- 0.01) and epicardial (0.25 +/- 0.03 ml/min per g) layers. Infarct size, as a fraction of the area at risk, was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) in the denervated group (60 +/- 4.3%) and in the subgroup of normal dogs with elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (73 +/- 5.8%), compared with the normal group without volume loading (37 +/- 8.1%). Thus, in conscious dogs, total chronic cardiac denervation exerts an adverse effect on infarct size which may be related to the sustained elevation in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and consequent impairment of collateral perfusion.

Enhancement of salvage of reperfused myocardium by early beta-adrenergic blockade (timolol)

Although reperfusion of severely ischemic myocardium with thrombolytic agents or surgery has shown reduction in infarct size, the time after coronary occlusion during which reperfusion can salvage ischemic myocardium is limited. To determine whether beta-adrenergic blockade could enhance the salvage of ischemic myocardium by reperfusion, the left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded in 18 anesthetized dogs. An in vivo area at risk was determined by injecting technetium-99m-labeled albumin microspheres into the left atrium 5 minutes after occlusion and carrying out radioautography to define the poorly perfused tissue. Fifteen minutes after coronary occlusion, the dogs were randomized either to a control (saline-treated) group (n = 8) or to a timolol-treated group (n = 10). Timolol was administered until a decrease of 20% in heart rate or blood pressure occurred (mean total dose = 0.85 +/- 0.22 mg/kg +/- standard error of the mean). Coronary occlusion was maintained for 3 hours and was followed by 3 hours of reperfusion in both groups. At the end of 6 hours, infarct size was defined by triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining and masses of infarct and risk were calculated. Percent left ventricular mass at risk was similar for both groups (control = 20.9 +/- 2.4%, timolol-treated = 23.7 +/- 2.1%, p = not significant). Mass of necrosis/mass at risk was significantly smaller in the timolol-treated reperfusion group (27.3 +/- 2.7%) versus saline reperfusion alone (46.5 +/- 5.6%) (p less than 0.005). Thus, beta-adrenergic blockade administered early after coronary occlusion results in substantial enhancement of the salvage achieved by reperfusion alone.