1
|
Solanki AJ, Kamrava M, Posadas EM, Freedland SJ, Ballas L, Sandler HM, Bairey Merz CN, Atkins KM, Nikolova AP. A practical guide for assessing and managing cardiovascular risk during androgen-deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer 2024; 130:1916-1929. [PMID: 38529566 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men worldwide, and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay of treatment. There are observational data demonstrating an increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients who receive ADT, particularly those who have an elevated baseline cardiovascular risk. Because, for most patients with prostate cancer, death is predominantly from noncancer-related causes, cardiovascular disease and its risk factors should be optimized during cancer treatment. This review provides an overview of the landscape of ADT treatment and serves as a guide for appropriate cardiovascular screening and risk-mitigation strategies. The authors emphasize the importance of shared communication between the multidisciplinary cancer team and primary care to improve baseline cardiovascular screening and treatment of modifiable risk factors within this higher risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aum J Solanki
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Edwin M Posadas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Leslie Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Howard M Sandler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - C Noel Bairey Merz
- Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Katelyn M Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Andriana P Nikolova
- Department of Cardiology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Lin PH, Freedland SJ, Chi JT. Metabolic Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1991. [PMID: 38893112 PMCID: PMC11171316 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) stands as the most frequently diagnosed non-skin cancer and ranks as the second highest cause of cancer-related deaths among men in the United States. For those facing non-metastatic PC necessitating intervention, solely local treatments may not suffice, leading to a possible transition toward systemic therapies, including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), chemotherapy, and therapies targeting androgen. Yet, these systemic treatments often bring about considerable adverse effects. Additionally, it is observed that overweight men are at a higher risk of developing aggressive forms of PC, advancing to metastatic stages, and succumbing to the disease. Consequently, there is a pressing demand for new treatment options that carry fewer side effects and enhance the current standard treatments, particularly for the majority of American men who are overweight or obese. In this article, we will review the metabolic response to ADT and how lifestyle modulation can mitigate these ADT-associated metabolic responses with a particular focus on the two clinical trials, Carbohydrate and Prostate Study 1 (CAPS1) and Carbohydrate and Prostate Study 2 (CAPS2), which tested the effects of low-carbohydrate diets on the metabolic side effects of ADT and PC progression, respectively. Furthermore, we will summarize the findings of serum metabolomic studies to elucidate the potential mechanisms by which ADT and low-carbohydrate diets can affect the metabolic response to mitigate the metabolic side effects while maximizing therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yubin Chen
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA;
- Center of Applied Genomic Technologies, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Pao-Hwa Lin
- Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA;
| | - Stephen J. Freedland
- Center for Integrated Research in Cancer and Lifestyle, Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA;
- Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Jen-Tsan Chi
- Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA;
- Center of Applied Genomic Technologies, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Merseburger AS, Bakshi G, Chen DY, Chiong E, Jabbour M, Joung JY, Lai AYH, Lawrentschuk N, Le TA, Ng CF, Ng CT, Ong TA, Pang JST, Rabah DM, Ragavan N, Sase K, Suzuki H, Teo MMH, Uemura H, Woo HH. Cardiovascular disease risk assessment and multidisciplinary care in prostate cancer treatment with ADT: recommendations from the APMA PCCV expert network. World J Urol 2024; 42:156. [PMID: 38483562 PMCID: PMC10940372 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04852-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the mainstay approach for prostate cancer (PCa) management. However, the most commonly used ADT modality, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, has been associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS The PCa Cardiovascular (PCCV) Expert Network, consisting of multinational urologists, cardiologists and oncologists with expertise in managing PCa, convened to discuss challenges to routine cardiovascular risk assessment in PCa management, as well as how to mitigate such risks in the current treatment landscape. RESULTS The experts identified several barriers, including lack of awareness, time constraints, challenges in implementing risk assessment tools and difficulties in establishing multidisciplinary teams that include cardiologists. The experts subsequently provided practical recommendations to improve cardio-oncology care for patients with PCa receiving ADT, such as simplifying cardiovascular risk assessment, individualising treatment based on CVD risk categories, establishing multidisciplinary teams and referral networks and fostering active patient engagement. A streamlined cardiovascular risk-stratification tool and a referral/management guide were developed for seamless integration into urologists' practices and presented herein. The PCCV Expert Network agreed that currently available evidence indicates that GnRH antagonists are associated with a lower risk of CVD than that of GnRH agonists and that GnRH antagonists are preferred for patients with PCa and a high CVD risk. CONCLUSION In summary, this article provides insights and guidance to improve management for patients with PCa undergoing ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel S Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - Ganesh Bakshi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Center, Mumbai, India
| | - Dong-Yi Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Edmund Chiong
- Department of Urology, National University Hospital, and Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Michel Jabbour
- Division of Urology, Saint Georges Hospital, Balamand University, Achrafieh, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Jae Young Joung
- Center for Urological Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Allen Yu-Hung Lai
- Global Health Program, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Department of Urology and Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | - Chi Fai Ng
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, Hong Kong
| | - Choon Ta Ng
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Teng Aik Ong
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Jacob See-Tong Pang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Danny M Rabah
- The Cancer Research Chair and Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Narasimhan Ragavan
- Department of Urology, The Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Medical University, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India
| | - Kazuhiro Sase
- Clinical Pharmacology and Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyoshi Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Hiroji Uemura
- Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Henry H Woo
- Department of Urology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Uro-Oncology, Chris O.Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duivenvoorden WC, Margel D, Subramony Gayathri V, Duceppe E, Yousef S, Naeim M, Khajehei M, Hopmans S, Popovic S, Ber Y, Heels-Ansdell D, Devereaux PJ, Pinthus JH. Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Exacerbates Cardiovascular Disease in the Presence of Low or Castrate Testosterone Levels. JACC Basic Transl Sci 2024; 9:364-379. [PMID: 38559622 PMCID: PMC10978407 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Low testosterone (T), common in aging men, associates with cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), which is affected by T, modulates the cardiovascular effects associated with low T or castration. FSHβ-/-:low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-/- mice, untreated or castrated (orchiectomy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist), demonstrated significantly less atherogenesis compared with similarly treated LDLR-/- mice, but not following FSH delivery. Smaller plaque burden in LDLR-/- mice receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists vs agonists were nullified in FSHβ-/-:LDLR-/- mice. Atherosclerotic and necrotic plaque size and macrophage infiltration correlated with serum FSH/T. In patients with prostate cancer, FSH/T following androgen-deprivation therapy initiation predicted cardiovascular events. FSH facilitates cardiovascular disease when T is low or eliminated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilhelmina C.M. Duivenvoorden
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Research Institute of St. Joe’s Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Margel
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Emmanuelle Duceppe
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sadiya Yousef
- Research Institute of St. Joe’s Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Magda Naeim
- Research Institute of St. Joe’s Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mohammad Khajehei
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Hopmans
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Snezana Popovic
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yaara Ber
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Diane Heels-Ansdell
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philip J. Devereaux
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jehonathan H. Pinthus
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Research Institute of St. Joe’s Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poon DMC, Tan GM, Chan K, Chan MTY, Chan TW, Kan RWM, Lam MHC, Leung CLH, Wong KCW, Kam KKH, Ng CF, Chiu PKF. Addressing the risk and management of cardiometabolic complications in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy: consensus statements from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1345322. [PMID: 38357197 PMCID: PMC10864500 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1345322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the foundational treatment for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Androgen receptor (AR) axis-targeted therapies are a new standard of care for advanced PCa. Although these agents have significantly improved patient survival, the suppression of testosterone is associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic syndrome. This highlights the urgency of multidisciplinary efforts to address the cardiometabolic risk of anticancer treatment in men with PCa. Methods Two professional organizations invited five urologists, five clinical oncologists, and two cardiologists to form a consensus panel. They reviewed the relevant literature obtained by searching PubMed for the publication period from April 2013 to April 2023, to address three discussion areas: (i) baseline assessment and screening for risk factors in PCa patients before the initiation of ADT and AR axis-targeted therapies; (ii) follow-up and management of cardiometabolic complications; and (iii) selection of ADT agents among high-risk patients. The panel convened four meetings to discuss and draft consensus statements using a modified Delphi method. Each drafted statement was anonymously voted on by every panelist. Results The panel reached a consensus on 18 statements based on recent evidence and expert insights. Conclusion These consensus statements serve as a practical recommendation for clinicians in Hong Kong, and possibly the Asia-Pacific region, in the management of cardiometabolic toxicities of ADT or AR axis-targeted therapies in men with PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darren M. C. Poon
- Department of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Translational Oncology, Sir YK Pao Centre for Cancer, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Guang-Ming Tan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kuen Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Marco T. Y. Chan
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tim-Wai Chan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Martin H. C. Lam
- Hong Kong Integrated Oncology Centre, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Kenneth C. W. Wong
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Kevin K. H. Kam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Chi-Fai Ng
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Peter K. F. Chiu
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nelson AJ, Lopes RD, Hong H, Hua K, Slovin S, Tan S, Nilsson J, Bhatt DL, Goodman SG, Evans CP, Clarke NW, Shore ND, Margel D, Klotz LH, Tombal B, Leong DP, Alexander JH, Higano CS. Cardiovascular Effects of GnRH Antagonists Compared With Agonists in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. JACC CardioOncol 2023; 5:613-624. [PMID: 37969642 PMCID: PMC10635880 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Androgen deprivation therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with advanced prostate cancer. Meta-analysis of small, oncology-focused trials suggest gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists may be associated with fewer adverse cardiovascular outcomes compared with GnRH agonists. Objectives This study sought to determine whether GnRH antagonists were associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events compared with GnRH agonists. Methods Electronic databases were searched for all prospective, randomized trials comparing GnRH antagonists with agonists. The primary outcome was a major adverse cardiovascular event as defined by the following standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms: "myocardial infarction," "central nervous system hemorrhages and cerebrovascular conditions," and all-cause mortality. Bayesian meta-analysis models with random effects were fitted. Results A total of 11 eligible studies of a maximum duration of 3 to 36 months (median = 12 months) enrolling 4,248 participants were included. Only 1 trial used a blinded, adjudicated event process, whereas potential bias persisted in all trials given their open-label design. A total of 152 patients with primary outcome events were observed, 76 of 2,655 (2.9%) in GnRH antagonist-treated participants and 76 of 1,593 (4.8%) in agonist-treated individuals. Compared with GnRH agonists, the pooled OR of GnRH antagonists for the primary endpoint was 0.57 (95% credible interval: 0.37-0.86) and 0.58 (95% credible interval: 0.32-1.08) for all-cause death. Conclusions Despite the addition of the largest, dedicated cardiovascular outcome trial, the volume and quality of available data to definitively answer this question remain suboptimal. Notwithstanding these limitations, the available data suggest that GnRH antagonists are associated with fewer cardiovascular events, and possibly mortality, compared with GnRH agonists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam J. Nelson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Monash Heart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria
| | - Renato D. Lopes
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hwanhee Hong
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kaiyuan Hua
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susan Slovin
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sean Tan
- Monash Heart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria
| | - Jan Nilsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Deepak L. Bhatt
- Mount Sinai Heart, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shaun G. Goodman
- Division of Cardiology, St. Michael’s Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christopher P. Evans
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Noel W. Clarke
- Department of Urology, The Christie and Salford Royal Hospitals, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Neal D. Shore
- Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, USA
| | - David Margel
- Division of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel
| | - Laurence H. Klotz
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bertrand Tombal
- Institut de Recherche Cliniques, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Darryl P. Leong
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Celestia S. Higano
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
MacLean CM, Ulys A, Jankevičius F, Saladžinskas Ž, van Os S, Larsen F. Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluation of Teverelix for the Treatment of Hormone-Sensitive Advanced Prostate Cancer: Phase 2 Loading-Dose-Finding Studies. Medicina (B Aires) 2023; 59:medicina59040681. [PMID: 37109639 PMCID: PMC10146264 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59040681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives: Teverelix drug product (DP) is a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in development for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer in whom androgen deprivation therapy is indicated. The aim of this paper is to present the results of five Phase 2 studies that assessed the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety of different loading dose regimens of teverelix DP. Methods: Five single-arm, uncontrolled clinical trials were conducted in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The five different loading dose regimens of teverelix DP tested were (a) a single 90 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2); (b) a single 90 mg intramuscular (IM) injection of teverelix DP given 7 days apart (Days 0 and 7); (c) a single 120 mg SC injection of teverelix DP given on 2 consecutive days (Days 0 and 1); (d) 2 × 60 mg SC injections of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2), and (e) 2 × 90 mg SC injections of teverelix DP given on 3 consecutive days (Days 0, 1 and 2). The primary efficacy parameter was the duration of action of an initial loading dose regimen in terms of suppression of testosterone to below the castration level (0.5 ng/mL). Results: Eighty-two patients were treated with teverelix DP. Two regimens (90 mg and 180 mg SC on 3 consecutive days) had a mean duration of castration of 55.32 days and 68.95 days with >90% of patients having testosterone levels < 0.5 ng/mL at Day 28. The mean onset of castration for the SC regimens ranged from 1.10 to 1.77 days, while it was slower (2.4 days) with IM administration. The most common adverse event (AE) was injection site reaction. No AEs of severe intensity were reported. Conclusions: Teverelix DP is safe and well tolerated. Castrate levels of testosterone can be rapidly achieved following the subcutaneous injection of teverelix DP on 3 consecutive days. Streamlining of the administration of the loading dose and identifying a suitable maintenance dose will be investigated in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Feliksas Jankevičius
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Ciurlionio 21, LT-03101 Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Žilvinas Saladžinskas
- Department of Surgery, Medical Academy, Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50103 Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Klimis H, Pinthus JH, Aghel N, Duceppe E, Fradet V, Brown I, Siemens DR, Shayegan B, Klotz L, Luke PP, Niazi T, Lavallee LT, Mousavi N, Hamilton RJ, Chin JL, Gopaul D, Violette PD, Davis MK, Hanna N, Sabbagh R, Ben Zadok OI, Hajjar LA, Kann AG, Mian R, Rangarajan S, Huei Ng KK, Iakobishvili Z, Selvanayagam JB, Avezum A, Leong DP. The Burden of Uncontrolled Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Men With Prostate Cancer: A RADICAL-PC Analysis. JACC CardioOncol 2023; 5:70-81. [PMID: 36875906 PMCID: PMC9982287 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence is higher in men with prostate cancer (PC) than without. Objectives We describe the rate and correlates of poor cardiovascular risk factor control among men with PC. Methods We prospectively characterized 2,811 consecutive men (mean age 68 ± 8 years) with PC from 24 sites in Canada, Israel, Brazil, and Australia. We defined poor overall risk factor control as ≥3 of the following: suboptimal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (>2 mmol/L if Framingham Risk Score [FRS] ≥15 and ≥3.5 mmol/L if FRS <15), current smoker, physical inactivity (<600 MET min/wk), suboptimal blood pressure (BP) (≥140/90 mm Hg if no other risk factors, systolic BP ≥120 mm Hg if known CVD or FRS ≥15, and ≥130/80 mm Hg if diabetic), and waist:hip ratio >0.9. Results Among participants (9% with metastatic PC and 23% with pre-existing CVD), 99% had ≥1 uncontrolled cardiovascular risk factor, and 51% had poor overall risk factor control. Not taking a statin (odds ratio [OR]: 2.55; 95% CI: 2.00-3.26), physical frailty (OR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.51-3.71), need for BP drugs (OR: 2.36; 95% CI: 1.84-3.03), and age (OR per 10-year increase: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.14-1.59) were associated with poor overall risk factor control after adjustment for education, PC characteristics, androgen deprivation therapy, depression, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group functional status. Conclusions Poor control of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors is common in men with PC, highlighting the large gap in care and the need for improved interventions to optimize cardiovascular risk management in this population.
Collapse
Key Words
- ADT, androgen deprivation therapy
- BP, blood pressure
- CVD, cardiovascular disease
- ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
- GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone
- HDL, high-density lipoprotein
- HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin
- LDL, low-density lipoprotein
- PC, prostate cancer
- PHQ-9, Patient Health Questionnaire-9
- PSA, prostate-specific antigen
- androgen deprivation therapy
- cardiovascular disease prevention
- cardiovascular risk
- prospective
- prostate cancer
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Klimis
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Nazanin Aghel
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emmanuelle Duceppe
- Department of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vincent Fradet
- Department of Surgery, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.,Research Center of CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Oncology Axis, Quebec, Canada.,CHU de Québec, Site L'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ian Brown
- Division of Urology, Niagara Health System, Saint Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - D Robert Siemens
- Queen's Cancer Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bobby Shayegan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, St Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Laurence Klotz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick P Luke
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Luke T Lavallee
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Negareh Mousavi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joseph L Chin
- Department of Urology, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darin Gopaul
- Department of Medicine, Division of Radiation Oncology, Grand River Regional Cancer Centre, Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philippe D Violette
- Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.,Woodstock Hospital, Woodstock, Ontario, Canada
| | - Margot K Davis
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Nawar Hanna
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, CIUSSS de l'Est-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Installation Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Robert Sabbagh
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar
- Department of Cardiology, Instituto do Coração, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Rajibul Mian
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sumathy Rangarajan
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelvin Kuan Huei Ng
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Zaza Iakobishvili
- Department of Community Cardiology, Tel Aviv Jaffa District, Clalit Health Fund and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Joseph B Selvanayagam
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.,Department of Heart Health, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Darryl P Leong
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Relugolix (Orgovyx®), an orally active nonpeptide gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist that provides rapid testosterone suppression, is indicated in the USA for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer and in the EU for advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. In the pivotal phase III HERO trial in men with advanced prostate cancer, once-daily oral relugolix (with a loading dose on day 1) led to a sustained castration rate over 48 weeks of treatment of > 90%, a rate that was non-inferior to that provided by intramuscular leuprolide depot every 3 months (with an exploratory analysis further indicating the superiority of relugolix over leuprolide). Relugolix was generally well tolerated, having an adverse event profile that is consistent with testosterone suppression. Furthermore, there is evidence that relugolix may be associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiac events compared with leuprolide. With the ability to provide the rapid testosterone suppression (with no initial surge in testosterone upon treatment initiation) combined with the benefits of oral administration and potentially improved cardiac safety, relugolix presents a valuable treatment option for men with advanced prostate cancer where androgen deprivation therapy is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matt Shirley
- Springer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Swaby J, Aggarwal A, Batra A, Jain A, Seth L, Stabellini N, Bittencourt MS, Leong D, Klaassen Z, Barata P, Sayegh N, Agarwal N, Terris M, Guha A. Association of Androgen Deprivation Therapy with Metabolic Disease in Prostate Cancer Patients: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 21:e182-e189. [PMID: 36621463 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), a backbone treatment for advanced prostate cancer (PC), is known to have a variety of metabolic side effects. We conducted an updated meta-analysis to quantify the metabolic risks of ADT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in May of 2022 for studies investigating the risk of metabolic syndrome (MetS), diabetes, and hypertension from ADT in PC patients using keywords. Only full-length studies with a control group of PC patients not on ADT were included. All results compatible with each outcome domain in each included study were sought. For included studies, relative risk (RR) was pooled using a random effects model and a trim-fill approach was used to adjust for publication bias. RESULTS 1,846 records were screened, of which 19 were found suitable for data extraction. Five studies, including 891 patients, were evaluated for MetS as an outcome, with the random effects model showing a pooled RR of 1.60 ([95% Confidence Interval (CI), 1.06-2.42]; P=0.03) for patients on ADT while twelve studies, including 336,330 patients, examined diabetes as an outcome, and the random effects model showed a RR of 1.43 ([95% CI, 1.28-1.59]; P< 0.01). After adjustment for publication bias, ADT was associated with a 25% increased risk for diabetes but was not associated with MetS. 4 studies, including 7,051 patients, examined hypertension as an outcome, and the random effects model showed a RR of 1.30 ([95% CI, 1.08-1.55]; P=0.18) in ADT patients. CONCLUSION In patients with PC, ADT was not associated with MetS and the association with diabetes was not as strong as previously reported. Our novel meta-analysis of hypertension showed that ADT increased the risk of hypertension by 30%. These results should be understood in the context of collaborating care between a patient's oncologist and primary care provider to optimize care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Swaby
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | | | - Akshee Batra
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Anubhav Jain
- Department of Cardiology, Ascension Genesys Hospital, Garden city, MI
| | - Lakshya Seth
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Nickolas Stabellini
- Department of Hematology- Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH
| | | | - Darryl Leong
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Pedro Barata
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA
| | | | | | - Martha Terris
- Division of Surgery: Urology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Avirup Guha
- Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Augusta University, Augusta, GA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tisseverasinghe S, Tolba M, Saad F, Gravis G, Bahoric B, Niazi T. Should Prostate Cancer Patients With History of Cardiovascular Events Be Preferentially Treated With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Antagonists? J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:4173-4177. [PMID: 35862876 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marwan Tolba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Fred Saad
- Center Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Gwenaëlle Gravis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille University, CRCM, Marseille, France
| | - Boris Bahoric
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
HbA1c Variability and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Prostate Cancer Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2022; 47:3-11. [PMID: 36601042 PMCID: PMC9806701 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) worsens glycaemic control and cardiovascular outcomes. The prognostic value of visit-to-visit HbA1c variability (VVHV) has been unexplored in prostate cancer (PCa) patients receiving ADT. Objective To explore the effect of ADT on VVHV and the cardiovascular prognostic value of VVHV. Design setting and participants PCa patients receiving ADT in Hong Kong between January 1, 1993 and March 31, 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Those with fewer than three HbA1c results available within 3 yr after ADT initiation, <6 mo of ADT, missing baseline HbA1c, prior diagnosis of any component of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and MACEs occurring within 3 yr were excluded. Patients were followed up until September 31, 2021. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The outcome was MACEs (composite of heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality). VVHV was calculated from HbA1c levels within 3 yr after and, separately where available, before ADT initiation using coefficient of variation (CV; standard deviation [SD] divided by mean) and average real variability (ARV; average difference between consecutive measurements). Results and limitations Altogether, 1065 patients were analysed (median age 74.4 yr old [interquartile range 68.3-79.5 yr]). In 709 patients with VVHV available before and after ADT initiation, VVHV increased after ADT initiation (p < 0.001), with 473 (66.2%) and 474 (66.9%) having increased CV and ARV, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 4.3 yr (2.8-6.7 yr), higher VVHV was associated with a higher risk of MACEs (adjusted hazard ratio [per SD] for CV 1.21 [95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.43], p = 0.029; ARV 1.25 [1.06, 1.48], p = 0.008). Limitations included residual confounding and selection bias. Conclusions In PCa patients receiving ADT, VVHV increased after ADT initiation. Higher VVHV was associated with an increased risk of MACEs. Patient summary In prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), glycaemic control is less stable after initiating ADT, which was associated with an increased cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
|
13
|
S. Merseburger A, Krabbe LM, Joachim Krause B, Böhmer D, Perner S, von Amsberg G. The Treatment of Metastatic, Hormone-Sensitive Prostatic Carcinoma. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2022; 119:622-632. [PMID: 35912436 PMCID: PMC9756320 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For many years, the standard treatment of metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostatic carcinoma (mHSPC) was androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. By lowering the testosterone level into the castration range, ADT deprives the tumor of a key growth factor. METHODS For this article, we evaluated the treatment recommendations contained in national and international guidelines (German S3 guidelines and those of the European Society for Medical Oncology [ESMO], European Association of Urology [EAU], and National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]), as well as pertinent publications revealed by a PubMed search and the congress abstracts of the ESMO and of the American Society of Clinical Oncology [ASCO]. RESULTS The past few years have witnessed fundamental changes in the treatment of mHSPC. Treatment intensification with docetaxel or with the new drugs directed against the androgen receptor signal pathway (abiraterone, apalutamide and enzalutamide) has been found to lower mortality by 19-40% and is now an integral component of first-line therapy. Relevant new findings have also been obtained with threefold combinations of ADT, docetaxel, and abiraterone or darolutamide. For patients with a light tumor burden, local radiotherapy of the primary tumor improves the probability of survival at 3 years by 8% (45.4 versus 49.1 months, difference 3.6 months; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 6.2 months). CONCLUSION The treatment of mHSPC is constantly changing. Phase III trials that are now in the recruitment stage, as well as our continually improving understanding of the underlying molecular-pathological mechanisms, will be altering the treatment landscape still further in the years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel S. Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany,*Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernd Joachim Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Dirk Böhmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Charité Universitätsmedizin – Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sven Perner
- University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck and Research Center Borstel, Leibniz Lung Center, Borstel, Germany,University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Institute of Pathology, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Gunhild von Amsberg
- Department of Uro-Oncology of the Oncology Center and the Martini Clinic, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
DE Nunzio C, Fiori C, Fusco F, Gregori A, Pagliarulo V, Alongi F. Androgen deprivation therapy and cardiovascular risk in prostate cancer. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:508-517. [PMID: 35470648 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04847-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), with or without palliative local treatments, is the standard of care for many patients with locally-advanced and/or metastatic prostate cancer. However, the possible cardiovascular (CV) risks associated with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and agonists continue to be the subject of concern, especially in a patient population that may already be at increased CV risk. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The present review provides a narrative summary of the evidence regarding the CV risks associated with GnRH antagonists and agonists from randomized clinical trials (RCTs), real-world evidence, and meta-analyses. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS From RCTs, it appears clear that there is a direct class effect for CV risk in patients with prostate cancer being administered GnRH agonists and antagonists, with the latter being associated with reduced CV risk. Real-world data and the available meta-analyses largely indicate that CV risk is lower with GnRH antagonists than with GnRH agonists. CONCLUSIONS A review of the pathophysiological mechanisms of gives further support to the possibility that GnRH antagonists are associated with lower CV risk than agonists. It can be highlighted that when treating patients with advanced or metastatic prostate cancer it is important to screen for underlying comorbidities prior to choosing the most appropriate therapy; moreover, patients should be closely monitored for factors associated with CV risk in order to optimize outcomes. Further studies are needed to define the most appropriate treatment according to the individual patient characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Fusco
- Urology Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy.,University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fragkoulis C, Glykas I, Dellis A, Mitsogiannis I, Papatsoris A. Relugolix: A new kid on the block among gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists. Arab J Urol 2021; 19:460-463. [PMID: 34881062 PMCID: PMC8648026 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2021.1994231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is the cornerstone of metastatic prostate cancer treatment. ADT can be achieved through surgical castration, or it may be induced either by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists or GnRH antagonists. GnRH antagonists provide a more rapid castration alongside with a safer profile regarding adverse events. Degarelix is the sole GnRH antagonist used in clinical practice. Injection site reactions are the commonest adverse events related to the use of degarelix. Relugolix, a novel molecule, represents the first orally administered United States Food and Drug Administration approved GnRH antagonist, with clinical efficacy equal to that of the established ADT regimens. The main advantages of relugolix are the avoidance of the injection site reactions of GnRH antagonists such as degarelix alongside its patient-friendly oral administration. The aim of the present review article is to present novel data regarding the role of relugolix as ADT for the treatment of prostate cancer. Abbreviations: ADT: androgen-deprivation therapy; FDA: United States Food and Drug Administration
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charalampos Fragkoulis
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Athens 'G. Gennimatas', Mesogeion Avenue 154, Athens, P.C, 115 27, Greece
| | - Ioannis Glykas
- Department of Urology, General Hospital of Athens 'G. Gennimatas', Mesogeion Avenue 154, Athens, P.C, 115 27, Greece
| | - Athanasios Dellis
- Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion Hospital,School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Iraklis Mitsogiannis
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Athanasios Papatsoris
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanoglio Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
von Amsberg G, Thiele H, Merseburger A. [Cardiovascular side effects in patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: superiority of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists? An update]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1450-1457. [PMID: 34213627 PMCID: PMC8568757 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01583-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plays a crucial role in treatment of advanced prostate cancer (PCa). The additional application of new drugs results in prolonged overall survival, both in the hormone sensitive and castration resistant state. Consequently, the long-term use of ADT moves potential side effects into the focus of interest. In this context special consideration must be given to cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVES Review of current evidence on potential differences regarding the cardiovascular risk profile of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists compared to GnRH antagonists. METHODS Narrative review based on an expert consensus supported by a literature search in PubMed (MEDLINE) and the abstract databases of ASCO and ESMO was conducted for publications published between January 2015 and January 2021. Significant meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world data (RWD) revealing relevant results for clinical practice were taken into account. Selection of studies was performed based on the clinical relevance for everyday practice. RESULTS The search yielded three relevant meta-analyses, two prospective RCTs as well as three RWD publications that are of importance for clinical practice. Overall, a decreased incidence of cardiovascular events was reported for GnRH antagonists compared to GnRH agonists. Only one RWD publication described comparable rates of complications for both drug classes. CONCLUSION GnRH antagonists have a lower risk of treatment related cardiovascular events compared to GnRH agonists. Risks should be minimized by taking known cardiovascular risk factors into account before initiating therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gunhild von Amsberg
- II. medizinische Klinik, Onkologisches Zentrum und Martini-Klinik, Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
| | - Holger Thiele
- Herzzentrum Leipzig, Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Axel Merseburger
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Chierigo F, Tian Z, Shariat SF, Terrone C, Saad F, Tilki D, Graefen M, Mandel P, Kluth LA, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Non-cancer mortality in elderly prostate cancer patients treated with combination of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy. Prostate 2021; 81:728-735. [PMID: 34010465 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To test for rates of other cause mortality (OCM) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in elderly prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with the combination of radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) versus RP alone, since elderly PCa patients may be over-treated. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2004-2016), cumulative incidence plots, after propensity score matching for cT-stage, cN-stage, prostate specific antigen, age and biopsy Gleason score, and multivariable competing risks regression models (socioeconomic status, pathological Gleason score) addressed OCM and CSM in patients (70-79, 70-74, and 75-79 years) treated with RP and EBRT versus RP alone. RESULTS Of 18,126 eligible patients aged 70-79 years, 2520 (13.9%) underwent RP and EBRT versus 15,606 (86.1%) RP alone. After propensity score matching, 10-year OCM rates were respectively 27.9 versus 20.3% for RP and EBRT versus RP alone (p < .001), which resulted in a multivariable HR of 1.4 (p < .001). Moreover, 10-year CSM rates were respectively 13.4 versus 5.5% for RP and EBRT versus RP alone. In subgroup analyses separately addressing 70-74 year old and 75-79 years old PCa patients, 10-year OCM rates were 22.8 versus 16.2% and 39.5 versus 24.0% for respectively RP and EBRT versus RP alone patients (all p < .001). CONCLUSION Elderly patients treated with RP and EBRT exhibited worrisome rates of OCM. These higher than expected OCM rates question the need for combination therapy (RP and EBRT) in elderly PCa patients and indicate the need for better patient selection, when combination therapy is contemplated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Chierigo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic
- Department of Urology, Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Derya Tilki
- Department of Urology, Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Department of Urology, Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Luis A Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Chierigo F, Mori K, Tian Z, Terrone C, Shariat SF, Saad F, Tilki D, Graefen M, Mandel P, Roos FC, Chun FKH, Karakiewicz PI. Pattern of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group 5 (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5) Predicts Survival After Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiation Therapy. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:710-717. [PMID: 33933420 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2021] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous cancer-specific mortality (CSM) analyses for different Gleason patterns in Gleason grade group (GGG) 5 cancer were limited by sample size. OBJECTIVE To test for differences in CSM according to biopsy GG 5 patterns (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5) among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database treated with RP and EBRT (2004-2016) were identified and stratified according to Gleason 4 + 5 versus 5 + 4 versus 5 + 5. INTERVENTION RP or EBRT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models predicting CSM were constructed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of 17 263 eligible patients with GG 5 cancer at biopsy (RP: n = 7208; EBRT: n = 10 055), 12 705 had Gleason 4 + 5, 3302 had Gleason 5 + 4, and 1256 had Gleason 5 + 5 disease. Median age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at diagnosis, and advanced cT and cN stages significantly differed by Gleason pattern (Gleason 4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5; all p < 0.001). The 10-yr CSM rate was 18.2% for Gleason 4 + 5, 28.0% for Gleason 5 + 4, and 39.1% for Gleason 5 + 5 (p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses for the entire cohort adjusted for PSA, age at diagnosis, and cT and cN stage, Gleason 5 + 4 and Gleason 5 + 5 were associated with 1.6- and 2.2-fold higher CSM, respectively, relative to Gleason 4 + 5. In addition, Gleason 5 + 4 and Gleason 5 + 5 were associated with 1.6- and 2.5-fold, and 1.5- and 2.1-fold higher CSM rates in the RP and EBRT subgroups, respectively, relative to Gleason 4 + 5 (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS For patients with biopsy GG 5 prostate cancer treated with RP or EBRT, there are important CSM differences by Gleason pattern (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5). Ideally, the individual Gleason pattern should be considered in pretreatment risk stratification. PATIENT SUMMARY For patients with grade 5 prostate cancer, we found differences in cancer-specific death rates according to the pattern of abnormal cells in the prostate, called the Gleason score. The highest death rate was found for a Gleason pattern score of 5 + 5, followed by Gleason 5 + 4 and then Gleason 4 + 5. These differences were observed for both patients who were treated with prostate removal and patients who underwent radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada.
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Chierigo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada; Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Urology, Policlinico San Martino Hospital, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Frederik C Roos
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sciarra A, Busetto GM, Salciccia S, Del Giudice F, Maggi M, Crocetto F, Ferro M, De Berardinis E, Scarpa RM, Porpiglia F, Carmignani L, Damiano R, Artibani W, Carrieri G. Does Exist a Differential Impact of Degarelix Versus LHRH Agonists on Cardiovascular Safety? Evidences From Randomized and Real-World Studies. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:695170. [PMID: 34194398 PMCID: PMC8237856 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.695170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The main systemic therapy for the management of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (PC) is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), with the use of long-acting luteinizing hormone releasing-hormone (LHRH) agonists considered the main form of ADT used in clinical practice to obtain castration in PC. The concomitant administration of antiandrogens for the first weeks could reduce the incidence of clinical effects related to the testosterone flare-up in the first injection of LHRH. On the contrary, Gonadotropin Rh (GnRH) antagonists produce a rapid decrease of testosterone levels without the initial flare-up, with degarelix commonly used in clinical practice to induce castration in PC patients. Even if no long-term data are reported in terms of survival to define a superiority of GnRH or LHRH, for oncological efficacy and PC control, data from randomized clinical trials and from real-life experiences, suggest a difference in cardiovascular risk of patients starting ADT. The age-related decline in testosterone levels may represent a factor connected to the increase of cardiovascular disease risk, however, the role of ADT in increasing CV events remains controversial. For these reasons, the aim of the paper is to synthesize the difference in cardiovascular risk between LHRH and degarelix in patients undergoing ADT. A difference in cardiovascular risk could be indeed an important parameter in the evaluation of these two forms of castration therapy. The Randomized trials analyzed in this paper sustain a possible protective role for degarelix versus LHRH agonists in reducing the rate of new CV events and interventions in the short-term period. On the contrary, real-word data are contradictory in different national experiences and are strongly conditioned by huge differences between the LHRH agonists group and the degarelix group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Maria Busetto
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy
| | - Stefano Salciccia
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Martina Maggi
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Human Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
- *Correspondence: Felice Crocetto,
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, IRCCS European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
| | - Ettore De Berardinis
- Department of Urology, Sapienza Rome University Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, San Donato Policlinic Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Rocco Damiano
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Abano Terme Policlinic, Abano Terme, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti, Foggia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|