Lymph node dissection along the recurrent laryngeal nerves in patients with oesophageal cancer who had undergone chemoradiotherapy: is it safe?

Characteristics of lymph node metastasis and short-term outcome of esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy: a prospective cross-sectional study (with video)

Introduction

Surgery for esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (ESCC) presents many potential challenges owing to malignant lymph node metastasis, complex procedures and severe postoperative complications. The appropriate lymphadenectomy for ESCC remains controversial. This study aims to evaluate the characteristics of lymph node metastasis and postoperative complications in patients with ESCC undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy and extended two-field lymph node dissection.

Patients and methods

This prospective, single-center, cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2022 to May 2024. All patients with ESCC who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy and extended two-field lymph node dissection were selected for this study. Postoperative lymph nodes were divided into upper thoracic, middle thoracic, lower thoracic and abdominal lymph node groups.

Results

Seventy-four patients with ESCC, including 49 patients who underwent upfront surgery and 25 patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy, were selected. The rate of lymph node metastasis in all patients was 39.2%, with 13.6% of patients having upper thoracic metastasis. The factors affecting the rate of lymph node metastasis included preoperative chemoradiotherapy, tumor stage, poor differentiation, lymphovascular/perineural invasion, and tumor size greater than 2 cm, all of which were significantly different (P<0.05). Common postoperative complications included pneumonia (25.7%), recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy (10.8%) and anastomotic leak (4.1%). There were no cases required conversion to open surgery, nor any deaths within 90 days postoperatively.

Conclusion

Lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma has a high incidence, occurs in the early stages, and is widely distributed in all regions of the mediastinum and abdomen. Minimally invasive esophagectomy and extended two-field lymph node dissection are feasible and safe, with low complication rates.

Multicentre randomized clinical trial on robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (REVATE trial)

BACKGROUND

Surgery for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma involves dissecting lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve. This is technically challenging and injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve may lead to vocal cord palsy, which increases the risk of pulmonary complications. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted oesophagectomy (RAO) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy (VAO) for dissection of lymph nodes along the left RLN.

METHODS

Patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were scheduled for minimally invasive McKeown oesophagectomy were allocated randomly to RAO or VAO, stratified by centre. The primary endpoint was the success rate of left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection. Success was defined as the removal of at least one lymph node without causing nerve damage lasting longer than 6 months. Secondary endpoints were perioperative and oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

From June 2018 to March 2022, 212 patients from 3 centres in Asia were randomized, and 203 were included in the analysis (RAO group 103; VAO group 100). Successful left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection was achieved in 88.3% of the RAO group and 69% of the VAO group (P < 0.001). The rate of removal of at least one lymph node according to pathology was 94.2% for the RAO and 86% for the VAO group (P = 0.051). At 1 week after surgery, the RAO group had a lower incidence of left recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy than the VAO group (20.4 versus 34%; P = 0.029); permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rates at 6 months were 5.8 and 20% respectively (P = 0.003). More mediastinal lymph nodes were dissected in the RAO group (median 16 (i.q.r. 12-22) versus 14 (10-20); P = 0.035). Postoperative complication rates were comparable between the two groups and there were no in-hospital deaths.

CONCLUSION

In patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, RAO leads to more successful left recurrent laryngeal nerve lymph node dissection than VAO, including a lower rate of short- and long-term recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. Registration number: NCT03713749 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Preoperative Clinical Characteristics Predict Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Lymph Node Metastasis and Overall Survival in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study With External Validation

Background

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node metastasis (LNM) is not rare in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We aimed to develop and externally validate a preoperative nomogram using clinical characteristics to predict RLN LNM in patients with ESCC and evaluate its prognostic value.

Methods

A total of 430 patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy with lymphadenectomy of RLN LNs at two centers between May 2015 and June 2019 were reviewed and divided into training (center 1, n = 283) and external validation cohorts (center 2, n = 147). Independent risk factors for RLN LNM were determined by multivariate logistic regression, and a nomogram was developed. The performance of the nomogram was assessed in terms of discrimination, calibration, clinical usefulness, and prognostic value. The nomogram was internally validated by the bootstrap method and externally validated by the external validation cohort.

Results

Multivariate analysis indicated that clinical T stage (P <0.001), endoscopic tumor length (P = 0.003), bioptic tumor differentiation (P = 0.004), and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with RLN LNM. The nomogram had good discrimination with the area under the curve of 0.770 and 0.832 after internal and external validations. The calibration curves and decision curve analysis confirmed the good calibration and clinical usefulness of this model. High-risk of RLN LNM predicted by the nomogram was associated with worse overall survival in the external validation cohort (P <0.001).

Conclusion

A nomogram developed by preoperative clinical characteristics demonstrated a good performance to predict RLN LNM and prognosis for patients with ESCC.

The Value of Paratracheal Lymphadenectomy in Esophagectomy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus or Gastroesophageal Junction: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

The role of upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy for distal esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas remains a matter of debate. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of evidence on the incidence of nodal metastases in the upper mediastinum following transthoracic esophagectomy for distal esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma.

Methods

A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases up to November 2020 to include studies on patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy with upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy for distal esophageal and/or GEJ adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was the incidence of metastatic nodes in the upper mediastinum based on pathological examination. Secondary endpoints were the definition of upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy rate and survival.

Results

A total of 17 studies were included and the sample sizes ranged from 10-634 patients. Overall, the median incidence of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases was 10.0% (IQR 4.7-16.7). The incidences of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases were 8.3% in the 7 studies that included patients undergoing primary resection (IQR 2.0-16.6), 4,4% in the 1 study that provided neoadjuvant therapy to the full cohort, and 10.6% in the 9 studies that included patients undergoing esophagectomy either with or without neoadjuvant therapy (IQR 8.9-15.8%). Data on survival and RLN palsy rates were scarce and inconclusive.

Conclusions

The incidence of upper mediastinal lymph node metastases in distal esophageal adenocarcinoma is up to 10%. Morbidity should be weighed against potential impact on survival.

Laparoscopic versus laparotomic gastric pull-up following thoracoscopic esophagectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Because of its capacity to reduce surgical trauma to the chest wall, thoracoscopic esophagectomy is considered paramount for decreasing the risk of pulmonary complications in the context of minimally invasive esophagectomy. Whether laparoscopy (LS) following thoracoscopic esophagectomy can further improve outcomes compared with open laparotomy (OL) is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and imaging records of 428 patients who received McKeown esophagectomy with a thoracoscopic approach for cancer. Using propensity score matching based on eight parameters (age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, tumor location, type of preoperative therapy, reconstruction route, and occurrence/severity of postoperative vocal cord palsy), 60 pairs were identified and compared with regard to perioperative complications and overall survival (OS).

RESULT

Compared with OL, LS resulted in lower blood loss (mean: 171.21 versus 107.58 mL, respectively, p = 0.023) and a reduced incidence of pneumonia (13.3% versus 3.3%, respectively, p = 0.048), albeit at the expense of a longer operating time (mean: 399.37 versus 443.93 min, respectively, p = 0.003). Notably, lymph node yields and OS of patients who were treated with LS were similar to those observed in those who underwent OL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who receive LS after thoracoscopic esophagectomy experience lower blood loss and have a reduced risk of pneumonia than those treated with OL.

Risk factors for lymph node metastasis of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The factors for left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node (LN) metastasis have important guiding significance for whether the left RLN LNs should be dissected in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but few studies are currently available. To analyze the risk factors of LN metastasis of the left RLN area and to assess which LNs should be dissected in ESCC.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) (no neoadjuvant therapy) at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital (from January 2016 to December 2019). The detection of left RLN LNs using enhanced computed tomography (CT) was compared with the pathological examination.

Results

Of the total 94 participants, 43 had LN metastasis. The metastatic LNs were mainly located next to left (18.1%) and right (14.9%) RLN, and the left gastric artery (13.8%). Tumor size, LN size, tumor invasion (T stage), N stage, and tumor node metastasis (TNM) stage were associated with left RLN LNs metastasis, while LN size was the only independently associated factor [odds ratio (OR) =1.569, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.259–1.956, P=0.0012]. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) reached 0.877, with 64% sensitivity and 75% specificity using a cutoff of 5.5 mm LN size.

Conclusions

The size of left RLN LN is independently associated with metastasis. Left RLN LNs >5.5 mm at CT examination are more likely to be positive and should probably be dissected.

Transition from video-assisted thoracoscopic to robotic esophagectomy: a single surgeon's experience

Lymph node dissection (LND) along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is a technically challenging part of esophageal cancer surgery, especially after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Robotic surgery holds promise to increase its safety and feasibility. The aim of this study was to describe a single thoracoscopic surgeon's experience related to the transition from video-assisted esophagectomy (VATE) to robotic esophagectomy (RE)-with a special focus on the safety of left RLN LND. Patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy and RLN dissection following CRT were dichotomized according to the use of robotic surgery (robotic esophagectomy [RE] versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy [VATE]). The following parameters were determined: (1) number of dissected nodes, (2) rates of RLN palsy, (3) rates of perioperative complications, and (4) learning curve. Learning curve analysis was performed using the 10-patient moving average (MA) for operation times and with the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method for left RLN LND (target failure rate: 15%). The RE and VATE groups consisted of 39 and 67 patients, respectively. The intraoperative identification of the left RLN was more common in the RE group (97.4%) than in the VATE group (68.7%; P < 0.001). Postoperative left RLN palsy was significantly more frequent in the VATE group (26.9%) than in the RE group (10.3%; P = 0.042), with a higher rate of pneumonia in the former (16.4% versus 2.6%; P = 0.03). The MA chart revealed a downward trend followed by a flattening of the RE operation time at operation number 17 and 29, respectively. CUSUM analysis showed that the left RLN palsy rate decreased to the target rate after 12 operations. We conclude that at least 12 cases are required for a surgeon with prior experience in VATE to safely accomplish left RLN LND through a robotic approach.

Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Radical lymph node dissection (LND) along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is surgically demanding and can be associated with substantial postoperative morbidity. The question of whether robot-assisted esophagectomy (RE) might be superior to video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (VATE) for performing LND along the RLN in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains open.

METHODS/DESIGN

We will conduct a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (Robotic-assisted Esophagectomy vs Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy (REVATE)) enrolling patients with ESCC scheduled to undergo LND along the RLN. Patients will be randomly assigned to either RE or VATE. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of unsuccessful LND along the left RLN, which will be defined as: failure to remove lymph nodes along the left RLN (i.e., no identifiable nodes on pathology reports); or occurrence of permanent (duration > 6 months) left RLN palsy following LND. Secondary outcomes will include the number of successfully removed RLN nodes, postoperative recovery, length of hospital stay, 30-day and 90-day mortality, quality of life, and oncological outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The REVATE study provides an opportunity to explore whether RE could facilitate LND along the left RLN-a complex surgical procedure that, as of now and with the use of VATE, remains difficult to perform and associated with a significant burden of morbidity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03713749 . Registered on 22 October 2018.

The management of mid & proximal oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Despite the rise in incidence of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus remains the commonest cell type worldwide and is predominant in the East. Except for very early tumours where endoscopic therapy can be performed with curative intent, in more advanced but potentially curative cancers, treatment for mid and upper third tumours is primarily surgery with extended lymphadenectomy, together with multimodal therapies such as preoperative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Definitive chemoradiotherapy is utilized in those who decline surgery or in those who are unfit for major procedures. For cervical oesophageal cancer, the anatomical proximity to the larynx influences the choice of treatment and surgical options. Definitive chemoradiation with the aim of laryngeal preservation has become the treatment of choice; long-term prognosis is believed to be comparable to radical pharyngo-laryngo-oesophagectomy. Selected patients with residual disease or disease recurrence can consider salvage surgery. The decision to operate is a major undertaking as salvage surgery carries high morbidity and even mortality risks. Careful patient selection, choice of treatment, meticulous operative technique and postoperative care are the cornerstones of success.