What are the PROSPECTs and clinical implications of vulnerable plaque?

Predictors for Vulnerable Plaque in Functionally Significant Lesions

BACKGROUND

Vulnerable plaque presents prognostic implications in addition to functional significance.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to identify relevant features of vulnerable plaque in functionally significant lesions.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective study conducted across 5 countries, including patients who had invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80, a total of 95 patients with available pullback pressure gradient (PPG) and plaque analysis on coronary computed tomographic angiography and optical coherence tomography were analyzed. Vulnerable plaque was defined as the presence of plaque rupture or thin-cap fibroatheroma on optical coherence tomography. Among the 25 clinical characteristics, invasive angiographic findings, physiological indexes, and coronary computed tomographic angiographic findings, significant predictors of vulnerable plaque were identified.

RESULTS

Mean percentage diameter stenosis, FFR, and PPG were 77.8% ± 14.6%, 0.66 ± 0.13, and 0.65 ± 0.13, respectively. Vulnerable plaque was present in 53 lesions (55.8%). PPG and FFR were identified as significant predictors of vulnerable plaque (P < 0.05 for all). PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70 were significantly related to a higher probability of vulnerable plaque after adjustment for each other (OR: 6.75 [95% CI: 2.39-19.1]; P < 0.001] for PPG >0.65; OR: 4.61 [95% CI: 1.66-12.8]; P = 0.003 for FFR ≤0.70). When categorizing lesions according to combined PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70, the prevalence of vulnerable plaque was 20.0%, 57.1%, 66.7%, and 88.2% in the order of PPG ≤0.65 and FFR >0.70, PPG ≤0.65 and FFR ≤0.70, PPG >0.65 and FFR >0.70, and PPG >0.65 and FFR ≤0.70 (P for trend < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among low-FFR lesions, the presence of vulnerable plaque can be predicted by PPG combined with FFR without additional anatomical or plaque characteristics. (Precise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Plan [P3] Study; NCT03782688).

Cardiovascular Imaging for Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

In patients with diabetes mellitus, accelerated progression of atherosclerosis can lead to worse clinical outcomes. Determining the best diagnostic strategy to identify patients with increased cardiovascular risk is challenging. Current guidelines recommend using both functional imaging and CT angiography to detect myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease based on pre-test probability. Functional imaging is suggested for patients with a higher clinical likelihood due to its higher rule-in diagnostic capacity. On the other hand, CT angiography is preferred for patients with lower pre-test probability because of its excellent negative predictive value. The optimal management strategy for asymptomatic diabetic patients remains unclear. In asymptomatic diabetic patients, previous randomized trials have not shown benefits from diagnostic testing over standard care. However, these trials were methodologically inconsistent and lacked clear stratification of cardiovascular risk. In terms of invasive evaluation, a combined invasive functional and anatomic imaging approach for angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis appears to be the best, most effective decision pathway for managing diabetic patients.

Deferred revascularization in diabetic patient according to combined invasive functional and intravascular imaging data: A case report

BACKGROUND

Invasive functional evaluation by fractional flow reserve (FFR) is considered as a gold standard for the evaluation of intermediate coronary stenosis. However, in patients with diabetes due to accelerated progression of atherosclerosis the outcome may be worse even in the presence of negative functional testing.

CASE SUMMARY

We present a case of 55-year-old male diabetic patient who was admitted for chest pain. Diagnostic coronary angiography disclosed 2 intermediate stenoses of the obtuse marginal branch with no evidence of restenosis on previously implanted stent. Patient undergone invasive functional testing of intermediate lesion with preserved FFR (0.88), low coronary flow reserve (1.2) and very high index of microvascular resistance (84). Due to discrepancy in invasive functional parameters, intravascular imaging with optical coherence tomography showed fibrotic stenoses without signs of thin-sup fibroatheroma. Because of the preserved FFR and no signs of vulnerable plaque, the interventional procedure was deferred and the patient continued with optimal medications.

CONCLUSION

Combined functional and anatomic imaging of intermediate coronary stenosis in diabetic patients represent comprehensive contemporary decision pathway in the management of the patients.

Proteomics associated with coronary high-risk plaques by optical coherence tomography

Biomarkers are widely used for the diagnosis and monitoring of cardiovascular disease. However, markers for coronary high-risk plaques have not been identified. The aim of this study was to identify proteins specific to coronary high-risk plaques. Fifty-one patients (71.2 ± 11.1 years, male: 66.7%) who underwent intracoronary optical coherence tomography imaging and provided blood specimens for proteomic analysis were prospectively enrolled. A total of 1470 plasma proteins were analyzed per patient using the Olink® Explore 1536 Reagent Kit. In patients with thin-cap fibroatheroma, the protein expression of Calretinin (CALB2), Corticoliberin (CRH) and Alkaline phosphatase, placental type (ALPP) were significantly increased, while the expression of Neuroplastin (NPTN), Folate receptor gamma (FOLR3) and Serpin A12 (SERPINA12) were significantly decreased. In patients with macrophage infiltration, the protein expressions of Fatty acid-binding protein, intestinal (FABP2), and Fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) were significantly decreased. In patients with lipid-rich plaques, the protein expression of Interleukin-17 C (IL17C) was significantly increased, while the expression of Fc receptor-like protein 3 (FCRL3) was significantly decreased. These proteins might be useful markers in identifying patients with coronary high-risk plaques. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ , UMIN000041692.

Coronary Artery Lesion Lipid Content and Plaque Burden in Diabetic and Nondiabetic Patients: PROSPECT II

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes have increased rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). We hypothesized that this is explained by diabetes-associated differences in coronary plaque morphology and lipid content.

METHODS

In PROSPECT II (Providing Regional Observations to Study Predictors of Events in the Coronary Tree), 898 patients with acute myocardial infarction with or without ST-segment elevation underwent 3-vessel quantitative coronary angiography and coregistered near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound imaging after successful percutaneous coronary intervention. Subsequent MACEs were adjudicated to either treated culprit lesions or untreated nonculprit lesions. This substudy stratified patients by diabetes status and assessed baseline culprit and nonculprit prevalence of high-risk plaque characteristics defined as maximum plaque burden ≥70% and maximum lipid core burden index ≥324.7. Separate covariate-adjusted multivariable models were performed to identify whether diabetes was associated with nonculprit lesion-related MACEs and high-risk plaque characteristics.

RESULTS

Diabetes was present in 109 of 898 patients (12.1%). During a median 3.7-year follow-up, MACEs occurred more frequently in patients with versus without diabetes (20.1% versus 13.5% [odds ratio (OR), 1.94 (95% CI, 1.14-3.30)]), primarily attributable to increased risk of myocardial infarction related to culprit lesion restenosis (4.3% versus 1.1% [OR, 3.78 (95% CI, 1.12-12.77)]) and nonculprit lesion-related spontaneous myocardial infarction (9.3% versus 3.8% [OR, 2.74 (95% CI, 1.25-6.04)]). However, baseline prevalence of high-risk plaque characteristics was similar for patients with versus without diabetes concerning culprit (maximum plaque burden ≥70%: 90% versus 93%, P=0.34; maximum lipid core burden index ≥324.7: 66% versus 70%, P=0.49) and nonculprit lesions (maximum plaque burden ≥70%: 23% versus 22%, P=0.37; maximum lipid core burden index ≥324.7: 26% versus 24%, P=0.47). In multivariable models, diabetes was associated with MACEs in nonculprit lesions (adjusted OR, 2.47 [95% CI, 1.21-5.04]) but not with prevalence of high-risk plaque characteristics (adjusted OR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.86-1.69]).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with recent myocardial infarction, both treated and untreated lesions contributed to the diabetes-associated ≈2-fold increased MACE rate during the 3.7-year follow-up. Diabetes-related plaque characteristics that might underlie this increased risk were not identified by multimodality imaging.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02171065.