What Do We Know So Far About Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death Prediction in the Mitral Valve Prolapse Population? Could Biomarkers Help Us Predict Their Occurrence?

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

To summarize currently available data on the topic of mitral valve prolapse (MVP) and its correlation to the occurrence of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. To assess the prognostic value of several diagnostic methods such as transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, electrocardiography, and electrophysiology concerning arrhythmic episodes. To explore intra and extracellular biochemistry of the cardiovascular system and its biomarkers as diagnostic tools to predict rhythm disturbances in the MVP population.

RECENT FINDINGS

MVP is a common and mainly benign valvular disorder. It affects 2-3% of the general population. MVP is a heterogeneous and highly variable phenomenon with three structural phenotypes: myxomatous degeneration, fibroelastic deficiency, and forme fruste. Exercise intolerance, supraventricular tachycardia, and chest discomfort are the symptoms that are often paired with psychosomatic components. Though MVP is thought to be benign, the association between isolated MVP without mitral regurgitation (MR) or left ventricle dysfunction, with ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) has been observed. The incidence of SCD in the MVP population is around 0.6% per year, which is 6 times higher than the occurrence of SCD in the general population. Often asymptomatic MVP population poses a challenge to screen for VA and prevent SCD. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully assess the risk of VA and SCD in patients with MVP with the use of various tools such as diagnostic imaging and biochemical and genetic screening.

Predictive role of C-reactive protein in sudden death: a meta-analysis of prospective studies

Objective

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a powerful predictor of and risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between CRP and sudden death (SD) is controversial. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between CRP and SD.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, CNKI, China Biology Medicine disc, and Weipu. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the data quality. The overall effect size was meta-analyzed using Stata software version 12.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Twelve prospective studies involving 36,646 patients were included in the present meta-analysis. The data revealed that patients with higher CRP concentrations had a greater risk of SD (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.09–1.29). When the hazard ratio of SD was calculated by multivariate analysis of nine studies, CRP was confirmed to be an independent predictive factor for SD (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.07).

Conclusions

This meta-analysis confirmed that CRP is an independent predictor of SD. These results support the recommendation of recording the CRP concentration for risk assessment of SD in clinical practice.

N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in Risk Stratification of Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Background

The prognostic value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in heart failure (HF) is well-established. However, whether it could facilitate the risk stratification of HF patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is still unclear.

Objective

To determine the associations between baseline NT-proBNP and outcomes of all-cause mortality and first appropriate shock due to sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) in ICD recipients.

Methods and results

N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was measured before ICD implant in 500 patients (mean age 60.2 ± 12.0 years; 415 (83.0%) men; 231 (46.2%) Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM); 136 (27.2%) primary prevention). The median NT-proBNP was 854.3 pg/ml (interquartile range [IQR]: 402.0 to 1,817.8 pg/ml). We categorized NT-proBNP levels into quartiles and used a restricted cubic spline to evaluate its nonlinear association with outcomes. The incidence rates of mortality and first appropriate shock were 5.6 and 9.1%, respectively. After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariable Cox regression showed a rise in NT-proBNP was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Compared with the lowest quartile, the hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CI across increasing quartiles were 1.77 (0.71, 4.43), 3.98 (1.71, 9.25), and 5.90 (2.43, 14.30) for NT-proBNP (p for trend < 0.001). A restricted cubic spline demonstrated a similar pattern with an inflection point found at 3,231.4 pg/ml, beyond which the increase in NT-proBNP was not associated with increased mortality (p for nonlinearity < 0.001). Fine-Gray regression was used to evaluate the association between NT-proBNP and first appropriate shock accounting for the competing risk of death. In the unadjusted, partial, and fully adjusted analysis, however, no significant association could be found regardless of NT-proBNP as a categorical variable or log-transformed continuous variable (all p > 0.05). No nonlinearity was found, either (p = 0.666). Interactions between NT-proBNP and predefined factors were not found (all p > 0.1).

Conclusion

In HF patients with ICD, the rise in NT-proBNP is independently associated with increased mortality until it reaches the inflection point. However, its association with the first appropriate shock was not found. Patients with higher NT-proBNP levels might derive less benefit from ICD implant.

[Possibilities of modern biomarkers for assessing the risk of developing ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients with chronic heart failure]

Current biomarkers allow diagnosing a wide array of pathological processes and evaluating effects of therapies and prognosis for cardiological patients. This review focuses on a possibility of using N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), soluble suppressor of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), galectin-3, and other biomarkers in patients with chronic heart failure for evaluating the risk of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.

Classic and Novel Biomarkers as Potential Predictors of Ventricular Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death

Sudden cardiac death (SCD), most often induced by ventricular arrhythmias, is one of the main reasons for cardiovascular-related mortality. While coronary artery disease remains the leading cause of SCD, other pathologies like cardiomyopathies and, especially in the younger population, genetic disorders, are linked to arrhythmia-related mortality. Despite many efforts to enhance the efficiency of risk-stratification strategies, effective tools for risk assessment are still missing. Biomarkers have a major impact on clinical practice in various cardiac pathologies. While classic biomarkers like brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and troponins are integrated into daily clinical practice, inflammatory biomarkers may also be helpful for risk assessment. Indeed, several trials investigated their application for the prediction of arrhythmic events indicating promising results. Furthermore, in recent years, active research efforts have brought forward an increasingly large number of “novel and alternative” candidate markers of various pathophysiological origins. Investigations of these promising biological compounds have revealed encouraging results when evaluating the prediction of arrhythmic events. To elucidate this issue, we review current literature dealing with this topic. We highlight the potential of “classic” but also “novel” biomarkers as promising tools for arrhythmia prediction, which in the future might be integrated into clinical practice.

Biomarkers in electrophysiology: role in arrhythmias and resynchronization therapy

Circulating biomarkers related to inflammation, neurohormones, myocardial stress, and necrosis have been associated with commonly encountered arrhythmic disorders such as atrial fibrillation (AF) and more malignant processes including ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Both direct and indirect biomarkers implicated in the heart failure cascade have potential prognostic value in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This review will focus on the role of biomarkers in AF, history of SCD, and CRT with an emphasis to improve clinical risk assessment for arrhythmias and patient selection for device therapy. Notably, information obtained from biomarkers may supplement traditional diagnostic and imaging techniques, thus providing an additional benefit in the management of patients.

Inflammatory markers in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction

After acute myocardial infarction, ventricular remodeling is characterized by changes at the molecular, structural, geometrical and functional level that determine progression to heart failure. Inflammation plays a key role in wound healing and scar formation, affecting ventricular remodeling. Several, rather different, components of the inflammatory response were studied as biomarkers in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. Widely available and inexpensive tests, such as leukocyte count at admission, as well as more sophisticated immunoassays provide powerful predictors of adverse outcome in patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. We review the value of inflammatory markers in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and their association with ventricular remodeling, heart failure and sudden death. In conclusion, the use of these biomarkers may identify subjects at greater risk of adverse events and perhaps provide an insight into the mechanisms of disease progression.

Protein biomarkers identify patients unlikely to benefit from primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators: findings from the Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (PROSE-ICD)

BACKGROUND

Primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce all-cause mortality, but the benefits are heterogeneous. Current risk stratification based on left ventricular ejection fraction has limited discrimination power. We hypothesize that biomarkers for inflammation, neurohumoral activation, and cardiac injury can predict appropriate shocks and all-cause mortality in patients with primary prevention ICDs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Prospective Observational Study of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (PROSe-ICD) enrolled 1189 patients with systolic heart failure who underwent ICD implantation for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death. The primary end point was an ICD shock for adjudicated ventricular tachyarrhythmia. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality. After a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 137 subjects experienced an appropriate ICD shock and 343 participants died (incidence rates of 3.2 and 5.8 per 100 person-years, respectively). In multivariable-adjusted models, higher interleukin-6 levels increased the risk of appropriate ICD shocks. In contrast, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α receptor II, pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), and cardiac troponin T showed significant linear trends for increased risk of all-cause mortality across quartiles. A score combining these 5 biomarkers identified patients who were much more likely to die than to receive an appropriate shock from the ICD.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in serum biomarkers of inflammation, neurohumoral activation, and myocardial injury increased the risk for death but poorly predicted the likelihood of an ICD shock. These findings highlight the potential importance of serum-based biomarkers in identifying patients who are unlikely to benefit from primary prevention ICDs.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL

clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00733590.

Risk assessment of post-infarction heart failure. Systematic review on the role of emerging biomarkers

The prognostic significance of cardiospecific troponins and natriuretic peptides in patients with myocardial ischemia is well established, and their measurement is now endorsed by the most important guidelines and recommendations for diagnosis and management of heart failure (HF). Additional biomarkers have also been investigated to support clinical judgment and diagnostic imaging in the stratification of risk of cardiac dysfunction in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). We have performed a systematic analysis of the current scientific literature regarding the most important biomarkers of HF, selecting all prospective studies with adequate sample size (i.e. >100 patients) that have assessed, during the early phase of myocardial ischemia, the prognostic value of emergent biomarkers for new-onset HF or deterioration of cardiac function in patients with MI. This analysis has provided some good evidence suggesting that, in most cases, the use of diagnostic biomarkers of cardiac dysfunction does not translate into efficient risk prediction of HF. However, some notable exceptions were found, including biomarkers of cardiac fibrosis (especially galectin-3), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), osteoprotegerin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and red blood cell distribution width (RDW). Nevertheless, future studies with well-defined characteristics including the use of larger sample sizes, standardized end points, and replication populations, along with benchmark analyses against other consolidated biomarkers (i.e. cardiospecific troponins and natriuretic peptides), should be planned. Such evaluations will help to establish whether an integrated approach including biomarkers of different pathogenetic pathways - for example, apoptosis, stress of cardiomyocytes, cardiac fibrosis, inflammation, and extra-cardiac involvement - may be cost effective for identifying patients at increased risk of developing HF, and who, therefore, may benefit from a tailored therapeutic strategy.

Blocking interleukin-1 as a novel therapeutic strategy for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events

The inflammatory hypothesis of atherosclerosis postulates that inflammation within the plaque promotes plaque progression and complications. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a key pro-inflammatory cytokine responsible for the amplification of the inflammatory response following injury. Animal studies show that IL-1 blockade is effective in limiting atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis and improving outcomes in acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Preliminary data in patients with acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and heart failure are promising. A large secondary prevention trial with canakinumab in patients with prior acute myocardial infarction is currently ongoing. Many unanswered questions remain regarding the optimal use of IL-1 blockade and the preferred agent.